/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.15146074]

>not being all in the best decentralized AWS
YOU ARE ALL RETARDS

[Anonymous No.15146082]

i wish Gilles invited me to his private parties

[Anonymous No.15146254]

>>15146074
>doracles
lmfao

[Anonymous No.15146289]

Can this be stored in MEW?

[Anonymous No.15146497]

>>15146289
YES
>>15146254
LMFAO
>>15146082
IM INVITED EVERY WEEKEND SHITS LIT

[Anonymous No.15146789]

>>15146074
Post hand with timestamp

[Anonymous No.15146816]

>>15146074
imagine not holding the next best cryptocurrency
these idiot will only ever hold stupid thing like chainlink and ethereum
i making laughing at them all of the times

[Anonymous No.15146820]

>>15146789
MY PHONE IS DEAD
I AM EXTREMELY WHITE, DESCENDED FROM VIKINGS. I AM ALMOST TRANSPARENT BECAUSE I NEVER GO OUTSIDE. FUCK YOU IF YOU DONT BELIEVE ME

[Anonymous No.15147651]

>>15146074

[Anonymous No.15147670]

>>15146074
YOU ARE A BAGHOLDER

[Anonymous No.15147756]

Now I can go all in on crypto and still afford to play vidya, thanks /biz/

[Anonymous No.15147831]

>>15146074
fucking 130k volume? Stfu u fucking pleblet with ur -98% bag

[Anonymous No.15147846]

>>15146074
>decentralized AWS
>calls people retards

[Anonymous No.15147894]

>>15146074
>no major exchange listing
>good coin

[Anonymous No.15148003]

>>15146074
Cool poster

[Anonymous No.15148160]

>>15146074
Fuck off you indonesian and algerian organized scammers, we aren't falling for your lies to get us into your french REQ-tier failing shitcoin again.

[Anonymous No.15148526]

>>15148160
>Fuck off you indonesian and algerian organized scammers
Fuck off with this weak shit. If you have a valid point to make, then make it. Otherwise STFU and stop wasting everybody's time. You look like a paid fudder, and you are probably Indonesian yourself because you won't shut up about it. At least you didn't post the same shitty picture today that you usually do.
Have you ever actually investigated RLC for yourself? I don't mean repeating what you have seen other people say, I mean have you ever sat down with the documentation and tried deploying something on RLC? If you haven't, you should - you might be surprised.
And until you have, your opinion is worthless because you don't really know what you are talking about and we all know it.
People who haven't tried RLC for themselves think it is shit.
People who have tried RLC for themselves think it is superior to all competing technology.
I wonder which group knows more about the subject?

[Anonymous No.15148562]

>>15148526
I have deployed something, and I was actually surprised - surprised how badly it is documented, how buggy the whole system is and how limited the capabilities are compared to what faggots here always scream around. Any decent cloud has 1000x the options, is magnitudes cheaper and so much more easier to use, and on top of all I don't need to buy a shitty ERC-20 "runs-on-lots-of-computers" coin to use it.

[Anonymous No.15148829]

>>15148562
>I have deployed something, and I was actually surprised - surprised how badly it is documented, how buggy the whole system is
Sounds like you are lying, or you suck at deploying things. Try again and ask for support if you get stuck. The community is very helpful.
>and how limited the capabilities are compared to what faggots here always scream around
With iExec you can deploy Docker contains to SGX enclaves... therefore the only limit is your imagination of what you can program.
When you deployed something to iExec, what did your program do specifically? Be as detailed as possible.
I deployed two examples. The first was just a simple "hello world" app in a Docker container which executed perfectly (and in an SGX enclave so I could verify the results myself). My second example was based on their "rentable AI model" use case, where I wrote a program to query a private dataset.
This one is very interesting to me as one of my clients owns a *lot* of private financial data which could be used to train some very interesting models. However, exposing our trained model would violate privacy laws so obviously we can't do that. With iExec we could rent out access to our trained model while remaining compliant with laws like GDPR. Difficult to grasp how big this is, so a lot of people don't get it.
Perhaps you meant capabilities like S3, RDS, etc. Then you have a misunderstanding (as do the people who claim iExec is a decentralized AWS: they are wrong). iExec is not competing with every service offered by cloud providers. They are offering off-chain trusted computing, which is a limited subset of the compute resources offered by AWS/GCP/Azure.
If you went into it existing a like-for-like alternative to AWS you were mistaken.
You should be comparing it to e.g. LINK, in that it is a platform for bridging smart contracts with off-chain computing. From this perspective it is vastly more advanced than LINK, who have not even finished their SGX implementation.

[Anonymous No.15148877]

Kek

[Anonymous No.15148929]

>>15148877
Yeah, stupid people shill projects. Does not detract from the quality of the project for those capable of understanding it.

[Anonymous No.15149799]

Hmm

[Anonymous No.15149971]

>>15148829
>LINK, who have not even finished their SGX implementation.
I wouldn't worry too much about Link and SGX.
Pic related.

Yapping about Link is the last semblance of relevance iexec has. Sad.

[Anonymous No.15150777]

5/15
NEVER BAGUETTE