/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.15135236]

Currently, VIDT is an ERC-20 token with a total supply of 62,787,519, but with 25mn VIDT of that set aside for the validation pool that will never be circulated. Thus, maximum circulating supply is 38,044,522 VIDT.

https://info.binance.com/en/rate/detail/2879

[Anonymous No.15135260]

never been comfier in my life, this is gonna make up for my vet losses

[Anonymous No.15135269]

20k lurking

[Anonymous No.15135330]

23k vid here.

Will I make it?

[Anonymous No.15135375]

>>15135330
Vidt is driven by profits, everything else is driven by dumping their tokens (chainlink)

I think we will be good.

[Anonymous No.15135387]

sold at 50 cents.....not rebuying either looking more at the new CB digital assets like ONE

[Anonymous No.15135398]

>>15135387
Larp

[Anonymous No.15135474]

>>15135387
See you in a few weeks when you get dumped on anon

[Anonymous No.15135486]

>>15135236
Trash that will never go back to 50 cents.
Get in on ONE, at least we're going on coinbase.

[Anonymous No.15135556]

>>15135236
Enough of this scam-coin shilling, my friend. UND is the new nation-state dollar.

[Anonymous No.15136580]

>lit fudder disappeared
I wonder what happened?

[Anonymous No.15136653]

>>15135236
All verifications are free on all subscription plans. While one hundred validations are free for clients on the $55 option. One validation is worth less than 55 cents, once you factor in profit margin and everything else the subscription offers to clients. Keep in mind, one validation costs at least 5 tokens. When you do the math, it's around 11 cents.

Tokens are divisible, except no reason why it would be necessary. There's is a huge supply and it's a Chuck E Cheese token. V-ID could print eight trillion tokens out of thin air. It has no utility outside of the V-ID API. V-ID doesn't give a shit about the price, as they're paid in FIAT. V-ID makes majority of its revenue from subscription plans, servicing, and on-site training.

Token not needed. There is no staking and there is no reason to hold VIDT. Token is useless without a subscription plan.

The token has no utility. Why would hold 10,000 VIDT? Holding it in case V-ID comes on IDEX and buys it off of you? What reason is there to even do a buyback other than to pacify bagholders? It's also a security token in the eyes of SEC.

[Anonymous No.15136666]

>>15136653

[Anonymous No.15136700]

>>15136666
I didn't give you permission to post a photo of me. Take it down now or I'll contact a mod.

[Anonymous No.15136827]

>>15136666
spooky digits

[Anonymous No.15137185]

Sold my Unibright and bought some VIDT. Comfy?

[Anonymous No.15137361]

>>15137185
Yea. Unibright is shit. They wont even sell their own tokens to clients. They have a shit attitude. MITx is better than Unibright but VIDT is comfy as fuck aswell.

[Anonymous No.15137616]

How long will we have to wait /biz/

[Anonymous No.15138104]

>>15137616
Roughly three months. Then it's getting delisted from IDEX.

[Anonymous No.15138145]

>>15138104
VIDT = Utility Token
VIDS = Security
Brainlet.

[Anonymous No.15138152]

>>15137616
Will be listed on binance this quarter

[Anonymous No.15138178]

>>15138145
>VIDT = Security Token
>VIDS = Security Token
Fixed it for you. Free of charge.

[Anonymous No.15138295]

>>15138152
Can anyone counter this shill image

[Anonymous No.15138312]

>>15138295
Verify it for yourself. Of course if you had VIDT you wouldnt have to

[Anonymous No.15138356]

>>15138312
I thought we agreed that was vidt trying to bribe Binance and actually fucking themselves

[Anonymous No.15139508]

>>15138356
That was just FOTM fud while we were mooning

[Anonymous No.15139659]

This is going to end up being 2019s version of dent. Real use, real product, real partnerships with telcos. Hits one ath then bleeds forever. Very similar. Only hope is T1 exchange which will probably be late and a disappointment.

[Anonymous No.15139747]

>>15139659
It's so funny reading subreddits of failed coins

[Anonymous No.15139765]

>>15139508
>That was just FOTM fud while we were mooning
False and nice counter to the shill image, bagholder.

>>15139659
>This is going to end up being 2019s version of dentacoin.
Agreed.

[Anonymous No.15139856]

>>15139659
Dentacoin hit a 2bil marketcap. VIDT hit just under 15mil. If it's 2019's version of DENT, holders are going to lose their shit rolling in profits.
>>15138356
Which is why they successfully listed on Binance DEX after only a few days, the fastest listing of anything outside maybe FTM after proposal. Not like I think Binance DEX matters, but the idea Binance would list them on their DEX if they screwed themselves out of the CEX is literal retard status FUD.

[Anonymous No.15139907]

>>15139856
Side note, DENT's clients are hilariously small when compared to VIDT's. But hey, gotta FUD somehow.
>>15136653
This guy is legit obsessed with VIDT, I don't get it. So much misinformation. VIDT can't print tokens like you say, and if you looked at the validation wallet you'd already be able to counter most of the garbage you said. It's not a security in the eyes of the SEC either, it really doesn't take any time to check this for yourself. I'm cool with the FUD though, lower price is nice since I still haven't bought back in.

[Anonymous No.15139944]

>>15139856
Dent not dentacoin. Only reason it hit market cap that high was 2017 bullrun. I'm saying it was hailed for having real world adoption and turned out to be a dud top up app no one really needed. Was supposed to disrupt telco industry... Similar pattern emerging. Vid had its pump now dead cat bounce to bottom.

[Anonymous No.15140006]

>>15139907
>This guy is legit obsessed with VIDT, I don't get it. So much misinformation. It's not a security in the eyes of the SEC either, it really doesn't take any time to check this for yourself.
I could argue with you, but you haven't backed up anything with facts, so it's a waste of time.

Proof that VIDT is a security token and will not be available on Coinbase, Binance, and soon IDEX:

>Framework for “Investment Contract” Analysis of Digital Assets
https://www.sec.gov/corpfin/framework-investment-contract-analysis-digital-assets
>The inquiry into whether a purchaser is relying on the efforts of others focuses on two key issues:
>Does the purchaser reasonably expect to rely on the efforts of an AP?
In this case, AP means "Active Participant" or V-ID.

>An AP creates or supports a market for,[17] or the price of, the digital asset. This can include, for example, an AP that: (1) controls the creation and issuance of the digital asset; or (2) takes other actions to support a market price of the digital asset, such as by limiting supply or ensuring scarcity, through, for example, buybacks, "burning," or other activities.
Buybacks and burning.

>The term "security" includes an "investment contract," as well as other instruments such as stocks, bonds, and transferable shares. A digital asset should be analyzed to determine whether it has the characteristics of any product that meets the definition of "security" under the federal securities laws.

[Anonymous No.15140026]

>>15139944
>Vidt had its pump now dead cat bounce to bottom.
Quoting this in case bagholders have missed this vital factual post.

[Anonymous No.15140429]

Guys this coin is dipping again...

[Anonymous No.15140532]

>>15140429
Good I’m trying to buy back in once it goes below 90k
Preferably back to 60-70k

[Anonymous No.15140583]

>>15140532
>Preferably back to 60-70k
That would be the fair value of VIDT. I'd buy it at that price. Easy 30%-80% gains at that range, then simply pass them onto delusional bagholders.

[Anonymous No.15140585]

>>15140006
This copypasta is tiresome. It's posted by someone in every thread. No one gives a shit if it's a security, burgers included. If it gets taken off idex, you can still just use hotbit or whatever other exchanges this gets on if you need to buy/sell.

[Anonymous No.15140594]

Every holder in this thread will make it. Believe in the power of validations.

[Anonymous No.15140632]

>>15140583
Salty LIT holder detected

[Anonymous No.15140646]

>>15139944

[Anonymous No.15140647]

>>15140585
>hotbit the washtraded bot infested piece of shit no one uses
>americans don't care it's illegal to buy vidt and will never get on coinbase or binance
>americans don't care it might get delisted on idex and the price will dump at least 50% 24 hours after the fact
>the whole initial pump revolved around the v-id team essentially "bribing" binance by sending them vidt without prior approval
Sure, bagholder. Sure.

[Anonymous No.15140722]

Altcoin season won’t begin till we start getting that 16k BTC it’s going to be a bit. Prepare for the dips, hold a comfy amount that you don’t need on your day to day. We will be waiting minimally for 3 months.

[Anonymous No.15140739]

Don’t get caught with your pants down on a random big jump up. Saying to your self “I wish I bought at X”

[Anonymous No.15140909]

>>15138104
Its not getting delisted you fucking moron

[Anonymous No.15140974]

>>15140909
>Its not getting delisted you fucking moron
Yes it will. Writing is on the wall.

[Anonymous No.15141262]

>>15140974
The SEC hadn't won the fraction of an of court cases to even begin to try to get their way. And there is a lot of resistance in Congress. I highly doubt Trump gets elected next year. We'll have a new SEC head soon.

[Anonymous No.15141345]

>>15141262
So you admit that current SEC would consider it a security token. And the only cope hope is that Trump won't get elected and we'll get a new SEC head.

[Anonymous No.15141379]

can anyone give me the link to the amount of tokens burned each month? I swear I'm not retarded but I can't find it

[Anonymous No.15141472]

>>15141345
To some extent yes. The SEC considers most tokens securities and has for years. It considered ETH a security for awhile.

[Anonymous No.15141507]

>>15141379
https://about.v-id.org/vidt-usage-dashboard/

[Anonymous No.15141726]

>>15141472
>The SEC considers most tokens securities and has for years.
SEC consider most ICOs a security, which usually they are, not cryptocurrency on its own. It's the buybacks and burns that make it a security.

[Anonymous No.15141746]

>>15141726
It's way worse than that. Simply depending on the managerial effort of others in any way classifies it as a security. That's almost every token.

[Anonymous No.15142087]

>>15141746
>Simply depending on the managerial effort of others in any way classifies it as a security. That's almost every token.
Every shitcoin, maybe. Not the ones that you would want to hold for over a year though.

[Anonymous No.15142294]

>>15142087
You could be right, Raj. You could be right.