/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.15125488]

Can someone please debunk "iExec is better than link in every way" fud?

[Anonymous No.15125508]

>>15125488
Lmfao
No one wants the suite of iexec

Chainlink is whitelabel

[Anonymous No.15125557]

>>15125508
This says nothing about the tech. It's known by every developer that iExec is better than LINK.

[Anonymous No.15125575]

>>15125557
>everyone knows that
go back to sales school boomer

[Anonymous No.15125596]

>>15125557
>It's known by every developer
Developer here. Link is better than iexec
Checkmate

[Anonymous No.15125622]

>>15125488
I will bet 1 eth that rlc will announce they are using chainlink to 'help' their oracles by eoy. Any takers?

[Anonymous No.15125643]

>>15125488
>dev video
>you guys requested decentralized oracles, so we coded them in!
it was literally added as a side project. iexec wont succed for no reason other than they try to do to much and dont do anything well. a decentralized oracle network is not something you implement because some users wanted it, its literally solving a multi-trillion dollar issue which is removing trust from contracts

[Anonymous No.15125908]

>>15125488
Just because someone is pro-RLC is does not mean they are anti-LINK. This is not a zero sum game or a football match where you have to support one side.
No-one will debunk the claims because smart linkies know that RLC is actually ahead on technology, so they will not enter the discussion. The really smart linkies hold RLC too.
>>15125643
>its literally solving a multi-trillion dollar issue which is removing trust from contracts
And iExec did it as a "side project"? That's impressive.

[Anonymous No.15125929]

>>15125908
>some smart people that are with our main competitors secretly like our product
you too, back to sales school

[Anonymous No.15125972]

>>15125929
What are you trying to say here? Do you have any technical contribution to make about why you think LINK is ahead?

[Anonymous No.15126104]

>>15125908
>And iExec did it as a "side project"? That's impressive.
i dont think you understand. link is developing technology in the decentralized oracle field. iexec is adding whats publically available to their chain. they did the equivalent of adding a flashlight to a pen. sure its cool to play with for five minutes, but no one actually uses it when they have a real flashlight. iExec is a meme coin trying to ride apples little i capital next letter garbage.

[Anonymous No.15126151]

>>15126104
Very good analogy with the pen and flashlight

[Anonymous No.15126216]

>>15125972
>open up google
>type: Google, Microsoft, Oracle, SWIFT
> + Chainlink
>read
My technical contribution.

[Anonymous No.15126219]

>>15126104
They've been working on oracles for 2 years.
Fun fact: decentralized oracles are a requirement for a technology like iExec. The devs realized this early on, and made them.

[Anonymous No.15126240]

>>15125488

OP, iExec. Look at the name. It’s literally named after a failed 90’s tech company.

[Anonymous No.15126497]

>>15126219
>https://youtu.be/xfIThShzefQ
>6:50 - 7:45
>decentralized oracles have been requested many times in the past, so we made it happen
doesnt sound like it was a foundational requirement for the product to work. nor has there been any previous mention of needing them.

the coin has barely been out from its ICO from 2 years ago, they havnt been working on decentralized oracles for that long.

but hey i cant understand what anyone in that video says other than the one guy talking about oracles so maybe they are making the best product ever.

[Anonymous No.15126561]

>>15126497
I forget where I saw it but someone from the team stated they had been working on decentralized oracles for 2 years and they are very important to the tech because it enables fiat onramps much more easily among other benefits of oracles + supercomputing