Tonight

[Anonymous No.14980808]

https://www.eventbrite.com/e/bytom-blockchain-meetup-san-francisco-tickets-65614351291?aff=eand

[Anonymous No.14980815]

https://twitter.com/multipliednancy/status/1153504070046371840?s=19

[Anonymous No.14980827]

Who is dis chink

[Anonymous No.14980843]

>>14980808
TONIGHT
O
N
I
G
H
T

[Anonymous No.14980893]

>>14980808
Based dan

[Anonymous No.14980913]

>>14980808
Who?

[Anonymous No.14980924]

literally who

[Anonymous No.14980926]

T O N I G H T

https://youtu.be/IUvvGf8T7wM

[Anonymous No.14980941]

Who is Bytom?

[Anonymous No.14980954]

ok but actually unironically this time
literally who the fuck is Bytom

[Anonymous No.14980956]

>>14980808
So many literal who's partnering and promoting chainlink. When're the Microsoft and Libra announcements coming.

[Anonymous No.14980960]

"Dan has a long history of closing deals that help companies reach their next stage of growth globally. He was integral to Alibaba's first US acquisition, various worldwide strategic partnerships worth over $120MM in annual revenue, and corporate exits totaling over $4bn."

[Anonymous No.14980974]

>>14980960
Absolutely based

[Anonymous No.14980998]

>>14980956
>centralized premined shitcoin out the Caymen Islands with no working product
>anything to do with Facebook or Microsoft
>actually falling for oracles needing to be decentralized
>actually memed on with ‘smart contract’ buzzwordery like a 15 year old reading The Verge articles

Imagine being this fucking deluded. Poor linkie has no idea what’s going on his with allowance money.

[Anonymous No.14981013]

>>14980998
>centralised so it sucks
>oracles dont need to be decentralised

[Anonymous No.14981047]

>>14981013
>centralisation of FUNDS do you can get dumped on
>the same as centralisation of a service

Tell me, in your own words and not the Chainlink Debate Manual’s, how lots of decentralized oracles verifying the same singular source of information helps prove the reliability of that information. I don’t expect much from you because you can’t even notice the difference between centralized funds and centralized service.

[Anonymous No.14981048]

>>14980808
Dan need to speak with Thomas about chest exercise routines

[Anonymous No.14981070]

>>14981047
2 years fren

[Anonymous No.14981143]

>>14981047
Why would u have 1 source? In what world wouldnt you have multiple databases being queried? 1 point of failure is a sign that you are brain dead and dont work in IT or have any capacity to comment.

>>reddit/

[Anonymous No.14981190]

>>14981070
>404: Response Not Found
>run Damage_control.exe
>”You has 2 years.”
>”Discord.”
>”Never selling.”
>”My linkies stay stinky.”
>”Sergey cared about me.”

As expected of the linkie post-ATH bagholder. Canned 2-word responses at most.

[Anonymous No.14981245]

>>14980815
Beef and Broccoreee.

[Anonymous No.14981257]

Pump up to 3$ then 5$

[Anonymous No.14981265]

>>14980808
satoshi is saturn
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAhmoyytxcs

[Anonymous No.14981280]

>>14981143
>Why would u have 1 source? In what world wouldnt you have multiple databases being queried?

Gee I dunno, in worlds where there is only one source for information? The source being the actual origin? Flight information comes solely from the airline, crash diagnostics from your SmartCukk electric car come solely from your car. The performance of a company’s stock comes solely from the NYSE. The weather in your native New Dheli comes solely from 1 weather station.

Engage your brain you dumbfuck linkie, all of you are reading off scripts. You’re not even talking about the same thing anymore. Imagine being this confidently stupid. The vast majority of information to be fed into smart contracts if ever is single-source. Fucking mongoloid, you don’t know anything about tech, just like every other bagholder trying to distort reality to believe otherwise. I bet you didn’t even sell a single shitcoin at $4.50.

[Anonymous No.14981402]

>>14981280
Stop... please

I-im not selling ok, you can't make me. Please don't make me sell.

[Anonymous No.14981417]

Literal who and Sergey giving the same talk as last week. Whoopdeefuckingdoo

[Anonymous No.14981434]

>>14981280
Single source data that needs to make it on chain will also use chainlink, because it will be the standard oracle service. Rather than contract devs learning 20 different blockchain platforms, they'll only need to learn one.
>inb4 deluded linkie
It's already happening you dumb fag. Every other day a new blockchain or blockchain service partners with link. Link is already the standard oracle service. All that is left now is for the industry to grow, and it will.

[Anonymous No.14981448]

>>14981280
> Flight information comes solely from the airline
Thank you for making it clear you have no idea what you're talking about.

[Anonymous No.14981477]

>>14981047
It does not prove veracity of data, it exists so we can be sure that the data is not tampered with as it is linked to the blockchain to trigger smart contracts.

It's all so tireaome. Go ahead and flame me now.

[Anonymous No.14981827]

>>14981434
>it will be the standard oracle service.
>it IS the standard service si- I mean guy

Repeating it does not make it so. What fucking ‘standard’? You don’t even have your fabled ‘decentralized oracles’ yet. At this very moment nobody is utilising your shitwork’s platform, so please tell me how it became a ‘standard’. We both know nobody will be ‘learning’ 20 different platforms because they all, starting soon will be following standardised communication protocols for interoperability. You don’t even know that enterprise API aggregation already exists, you don’t even know that Oracalize, Delphi and Augur are already in the game. I don’t give a shit about any oracle in general because they’re buzzword memes and won’t be used until at least another 6 years from now minimum. No, you’re not getting in early.

>>14981448
>pick statement from post
>+ wow you really don’t know

Thanks for letting us know you’re using the older V 15.94.36.256 of the ChainLink Debate Manual.

>>14981477
Adding something in the middle, from source to input location, to make things SAFER? Do you know anything about programming? Even a little? Why introduce a network with inherent vulnerabilities to make sure nothing for some reason happens to your data on the way?

It is indeed tiresome. I enter a thread, make linkies cry, 15 minutes later Damage Control Unit shows up after a quick prep talk in the ChainLink Discord to discuss how to shield the drooling retards on /biz/ from the truth and maintain bagholders to secure the shitwork. Then I remind you that your devs are duping tokens, your CEO is a philosophy grad and isn’t a tech graduate, you’re based out the Caymens where the SEC can’t rape you and you barred Americans from the ICO which raised 32 million dollars while doing nothing in 2 years because your shitty idea is so weak that Chainlink secured 0 (ZERO) venture capital money from anyone with half a brain.

[Anonymous No.14981848]

>>14981827
An intelligent poster on /biz/ wtf is going on

[Anonymous No.14981879]

>>14981827
You're gonna be so mad when these literal retards get filthy rich from LINK

[Anonymous No.14981887]

The co-founder of LinkedIn will be speaking there too.

[Anonymous No.14981945]

>>14980998
Scenario:
I work in a pathology laboratory; Melbourne Pathology. Now the machines are worth millions of dollars, However the data from these machines is stored on hard drives. The hard drives only a few Tb's and every few weeks the machines need to be wiped. Now why can't we store this data on the cloud?, Because patient data is so important that it cannot be trusted on any cloud computing platform. Now lets say a decentralised oracle system can connect our existing systems to Google cloud?, I wonder how much time and money this would save.

[Anonymous No.14982051]

>>14981827
How many times do I have to tell you, I am never selling

[Anonymous No.14982215]

>>14981827
>what standard?
The standard oracle service. Did i stutter? Eventually as blockchain tech begins creeping into the market share of finance, arbitration, insurance, and other industries where contractual enforcement is necessary, link will become the standard for not only oracles, but a standard for data retrieval in general.
>We both know nobody will be ‘learning’ 20 different platforms because they all, starting soon will be following standardised communication protocols for interoperability.
We both do know this, but apparently we disagree on what exactly that standardised protocol will be.

[Anonymous No.14982322]

>>14981945
You need cloud storage. ATM, you don’t need to input patient data into a smart contract.

[Anonymous No.14982340]

It’s happening tonight! Chainlink $1000k EOY, strap on boys!

[CKai No.14982383]

>>14982322

Exactly. You need a SAN or something, wiping this data after the fact, if it's useful beyond just results for a specific patient, should be illegal. In fact, you should be able to provide this data to anyone that asks for it. What do you in fact store, a summary?