[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 2.28 MB, 4160x2336, IMG_20190716_210403.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14938250 No.14938250 [Reply] [Original]

All I'm trying to say is that all Google's success is based on copying potentially good services realized by mediocre people and Chainlink is exactly that

>> No.14938285

>>14938250
Google very rarely builds its own products. It has acquired over 300 companies in the process of building the google line of products. Other than the search engine they have directly built very little. It simply doesn’t make business sense in most cases for a large business to try to build another business vs acquiring or utilizing services. Pretty common knowledge for anyone who has worked more than an entry level job honestly.

>> No.14938305
File: 82 KB, 842x792, 1537507113414.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14938305

>>14938285

>> No.14938325

>>14938285
>Pretty common knowledge for anyone who has worked more than an entry level job honestly.
Are you trying to shame me? I'm a neet and I don't feel emotions since 2012.
Btw my point stands still

>> No.14938445

>>14938250
Bump

>> No.14938947

>>14938325
>My point stands still
Yes, yes it does. Because it was dead the very moment it arrived. Imagine being you and having zero life experience and wasting time posting faery tales on this board instead of going outside and experiencing all the world has to offer. You know you can actually learn about what Google's success is based off of vs. just making up stories in your childhood bedroom and then posting them on your favorite incel message board to get shit on? Try going outside, anon.

>> No.14939010

>>14938947
You sound fundamentally assblasted...are you sweating sweetie?

>> No.14939086
File: 459 KB, 1280x720, 1563837423381.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14939086

>>14938947
you're wrong btw, it develops its own tech and buys competition to kill it. unicorns have one goal: to be bought before the asset bubble pops.

>> No.14939167

>>14939086
I literally work for a company where Google leverages our services. Google is a shit show, the company I work for isn't even that complicated but it would take Google 100,000 of their retarded employees to even come close to building what under 10 people built and manage. If they want to get in our game -- which frankly I don't think they will because there's a billion better businesses out there -- they would HAVE to acquire us. They'd spend way too much time and money trying to figure it out otherwise.

Did they build a Youtube competitor and they're shutting Youtube down?

Did they build a Blogger competitor and they're shutting Blogger down?

Did they build an HTC competitor and shut it down?

No. You can actually look at all of their acquisitions and virtually none of them were "killed". Most were either re-branded or integrated into existing products to make those products more robust. The majority of those products are still in use, only a small handful are "killed".

You just spew shit out your mouth with zero knowledge. Fuck off.

>> No.14939475

>>14938445
Bump for this guy who appreciates bumps. This is what a thread looks like when every low IQ shitposter gets BTFO.

>> No.14939811

>>14939167
>I literally work
Yeah kys

>> No.14940173
File: 51 KB, 599x582, 1563897434839.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14940173

>>14939167
they tried with YouTube, etc. there was a Google video, Google+, etc... but all tech is a shit show really

>> No.14941033
File: 35 KB, 680x339, 0D40A883-098A-4161-965E-3403EC95DE01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14941033

>>14938250
>my other thread was going no where, no one was believing me
>better just make another thread

>> No.14941992

>>14938250
The first part is legitimately correct