[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 37 KB, 400x386, 1549916460547.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14933153 No.14933153 [Reply] [Original]

Why is wagie/corporate culture so effeminate and gay? It's portrayed as manly when it's the opposite.

>> No.14933162

Do you struggle with it as a boiling vat of raging testosterone and lean muscle?

>> No.14933163

>>14933153
because there are hyper dominant men at the top

>> No.14933204

>>14933153
Because feminized submissive betas make better wage slaves than testosterone filled men that don’t take shit and value their independence and freedom?

>> No.14933218

>>14933153
Because they let wahman join.

>> No.14933223

>>14933162
Go back to 'reality", roastie. You can't stop men from having an outlet.

>> No.14933234

>>14933218
No it's always been effeminate

>> No.14933240

>>14933153

Middle class is inherently a feminine centric social caste. It is entirely about giving women what they want. Wine and cheese O’clock, holidays, shopping, nice and decorated homes, kids and stability. It was never a manly or masculine centric thing to begin with. Its just a feminine class structure.

>> No.14933254

>>14933234
What are you, the bicentennial man?

>> No.14933300

>>14933153
Because if you don't make the environment safe for dykes to passive aggressively menstruate all over your workspace, men with long noses and very nice suits will make your company pay dearly.

>> No.14933574

>>14933153
because doing paper pusher shit is an inherently feminine task. There's no big goal, there's no reward, no struggle. It's not that way for the guys higher up who are making decisions and closing deals.
>t. just graduated and got a paper pusher job and I'm trying to figure out how to break out into the big boy club

>> No.14933590

>>14933240
You just blew my mind

>> No.14933672

>>14933153
partially what >>14933240 says

partially because of women in the workplace
partially because all of the old masculine virtues, which allowed one to simultaneously serve while retaining integrity and honour (duty, respect for one's superiors, and chivalry-based masculinity) have been entirely eviscerated, so that the only remaining masculine virtues are entirely incompatible with a standard work environment, since by gutting the refined masculine virtues (which you may claim are a product of refined repression), the only way for man to assert himself without humiliation is through the masculinity of the uncultured and barbaric.

>> No.14934400

>>14933672

Notice how bachelorhood or anything that doesnt conform to the feminine goals of the middle class is labeled as “childish” or sole variant as stunted or otherwise unapproved.