I created IndImm to upload files to Ripple Blockchain

[Anonymous No.14930711]

How do I actually get interest in this? Currently I have Twitter (https://twitter.com/ind_imm)) and Gab (https://gab.com/IndImm).). I'm not very social media/marketing savvy.

My twitter announcement: https://twitter.com/ind_imm/status/1153519480548581376?s=20

Cliff Notes:
Upload any size file to the ripple blockchain
It can never be removed or altered
Instructions on how to do it anonymously/securely on the site
Open source and code runs locally only except to hit ripple blockchain

Links to site: http://www.IndImm.link
The above redirects to: https://ndm-inf.github.io/ndm
Source code is here: https://github.com/ndm-inf/ndm

Example of a file uploaded with IndImm:
https://ndm-inf.github.io/ndm/viewFile/CCF56B20582A61DDD304D5C60683A9872FB87DFC6E0B04A1CBC84F7F06B79518-48835694

What do you guys think?

[Anonymous No.14930714]

picture of UI

[Anonymous No.14930742]

>>14930711
Wen airdrop?

[Anonymous No.14930820]

>>14930742
This is not a coin or a token but rather runs on the ripple blockchain. I have considered tokenization for this though but that will be down the line and if this project gains traction.

[Anonymous No.14931122]

please clap

[Anonymous No.14931169]

>>14930714
>inb4 the xrp blockchain permanently stores thousands of terabytes of nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger

[Anonymous No.14931366]

>>14930714
>xrp address
>xrp key
is this a shitty fishing scam OP?

[Anonymous No.14931426]

>>14931366
>is this a shitty fishing scam OP?
No. Unfortunately there isn't something like MetaMask for XRP :(

[Anonymous No.14931556]

>>14931426
so... is "key" the equivalent of private key for XRP?
you expect people to hand you their private key?

I'm not calling you a scammer since I have no proof, but this sure seems irresponsible. Not only you potentially can take the private key yourself, your software is running on github's server, so if your thing gets traction they could take people's money. (We already allegedly had google employees taking funds from users of a wallet that had auto correct in its seed generation text box)

[Anonymous No.14931565]

>>14931556
>your software is running on github's server,
The software is pulled from githubs server and only runs locally on your machine. The only interaction it has with a server is with the blockchain.

The sourcecode is available at https://github.com/ndm-inf/ndm

It is no different than using metamask in chrome when connecting to a DEX, other than you have to manually enter the private key.

[Anonymous No.14931590]

letss upload some child pornography :D

[Anonymous No.14931619]

>>14931565
>*If an upload fails, it is not recoverable and must be restarted. Automatic refunding coming soon. Email us your address if you need a refund.
Wouldn't this imply it's going through a server you personally have control over?

[Anonymous No.14931641]

>>14931619
>Wouldn't this imply it's going through a server you personally have control over?
Negative. All ripples transactions are public. If I have the person's address, I can check to see if they attempted to upload a file and I can check to see if it failed. From there I can calculate how much XRP it cost them. All of this is done from calling the public ripple ledger. I am in the process of automating this.

[Anonymous No.14931662]

>>14931641
And you want me to believe you'll be paying people with failed transactions out of your own pocket?

[Anonymous No.14931680]

>>14931662
It will be returning the transaction that they sent. It will be of no cost to me except for a tiny fraction of the fee incurred. 100's of failures would cost me a few bucks.

[Anonymous No.14931691]

>>14931662
These are important questions though. For visibility, you may want to post them to the IndImm twitter for full and public transparency

[Anonymous No.14931702]

>>14930711
Oh, nnice thinng you got onn there Anon. I will be the CEO / Marketing Adviser and Designer for a 35% cut. Let's create a coin for this.

[Anonymous No.14931719]

>>14931680
the ripple network can refund transactions?

>>14931691
No twitter, I'm asking them out of curiosity, never held XRP and probably never will, you can ask them yourself.
In general I don't like your website, reeks of pajeetery. You seem to be indecisive if it's a proof of concept tool, since it works in a non intuitive and primitive manner, or it's the "final product" because you seemed to have put at least a bit of effort into making it look presentable (which is not btw, the background screams scam). When you mix both of these worlds it looks like ass.

[Anonymous No.14931728]

XRP is normy coin, if you're serious about getting some eyes on this I suggest trying to get some attention from, ugghh, crypto youtubers. Digitalassetinvestor seems to be king normie and will respond to almost anything on Twitter.

[Anonymous No.14931729]

>>14931702
Also, the name sucks. We'll name it Planet Share, CryptoBytes or something like that.

[Anonymous No.14931770]

>>14931719
>the ripple network can refund transactions?
Not directly. I am working on just automating the refunds from validating the transaction chains and eventually will incorporate LINK.

>In general I don't like your website, reeks of pajeetery.
Yeah, the site is ugly. I'm not a graphic designer and have zero taste/aptitude for making things look nice.

>You seem to be indecisive if it's a proof of concept tool, since it works in a non intuitive and primitive manner, or it's the "final product" because you seemed to have put at least a bit of effort into making it look presentable (which is not btw, the background screams scam). When you mix both of these worlds it looks like ass.

It's not a POC or final products, it is in beta. I don't believe in gold plating a product and do believe in a minimum viable product.

I wanted it to be normal/average user friendly so thought the background would appeal. Should I take it out and just use black?

[Anonymous No.14931845]

>>14931770
The background is really bad, literally anything other than scam_ico_background.js

>>14931770
>Yeah, the site is ugly. I'm not a graphic designer and have zero taste/aptitude for making things look nice.
The problem is that it looks like you did try making it look nice, you get it? It's like the uncanny valley but for websites.

[Anonymous No.14931852]

>>14931729
>Also, the name sucks.
I was hopping on the trend of combing two words into a nonsensical word. Guess that isn't in vogue any more.

[Anonymous No.14931873]

>>14931845
>The background is really bad, literally anything other than scam_ico_background.js
I'll get some more feedback before I remove it, but I have a feeling you are right

>The problem is that it looks like you did try making it look nice, you get it? It's like the uncanny valley but for websites.
I get it, I don't disagree at all. Cheapest decent graphic designers in my area charge 5-10kUSD and I really don't want to pay that much money right now unless this gains traction. I'd rather buy more LINK

[Anonymous No.14931896]

>>14931873
>Cheapest decent graphic designers in my area charge 5-10kUSD and I really don't want to pay that much money right now unless this gains traction. I'd rather buy more LINK
What I'm telling you is making it look worse will make it look more credible. Since right now it's in the uncanny valley.

[Anonymous No.14931974]

>>14930711
Stop wasting your time and just market-buy OTO. Whatever you wish from this is not half of what OTO will bring you.

[Anonymous No.14931991]

>>14931873
>designers in my area charge 5-10kUSD
No need to pay any money. It's only 35% and the design is also included.