>>14886981
>So? Point to one thing I've said that isn't true.
Most of your statements are your prediction of what will happen (delisting, pump finished, etc.). Those can't be disproved today, but I've capped your comments so we can point and laugh at you when they are proven wrong.
>>14885343
>They will ban US based projects that don't allow US citizens to buy.
Coinbase owns equity in Reserve, and specifically insisted on getting equity rather than tokens. Why did they do this? Because it leaves the door open to listing RSR on Coinbase. The team has former SEC staff advising them. Try and think a few moves ahead anon.
>They don't seem to know what they are doing, pivoting from one thing to another.
The project has not changed direction. They swapped the order of two deliverables on the roadmap, bringing forward the RSR/RSV interaction that actually provides the value for this token.
>Also, I would RUN from any project that does ZERO marketing.
Chainlink has done zero marketing and we would all be happy with LINK-like gains. I bet you think Tron is a great example of marketing.
They have no need to market to investors as they do not need further funding. They will start marketing their app to its intended user base once it is launched.
>Shows a complete disregard for the community
No, it shows that this is a serious business rather than a shitty pump and dump.
The facts that the team changed the roadmap to provide earlier value to token holders, and have locked their tokens in the slow wallet, demonstrate the team have the community's interests front of mind.