Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos BTFO

[Anonymous No.14875805]

>Trump looking at Pentagon contract said to be worth $10 billion for Microsoft or Amazon
IBM and Oracle were pushed out of bidding on the contract
>“I never had something where more people are complaining,” Trump said about the The Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure contract
>JEDI was supposed to be awarded in September 2018
wuts the hold up?
Oracle lost a court challenge in which it contended that the JEDI contract was tainted by conflicts of interest
>The cloud computing deal could be announced early as next month, the Pentagon told CNBC.
"we're gonna make it, like, next month" -Sergey Nazarov
>The Pentagon did not respond to CNBC’s request for comment regarding Trump’s statements.
>Microsoft and Amazon declined to comment.
gee, why?
>IBM told CNBC, “IBM has long raised serious concerns about the structure of the JEDI procurement"
why wouldn't they?
>IBM believes the Department of Defense and our soldiers in uniform would be best served by a multi-cloud strategy.”
if only there was a blockchain agnostic middle that could facilitate a mutli-cloud
>Business from the CIA in the US has been a big boon for Amazon
why yes, Bezo's newspaper, The Washington Post, has a $600mm contract thanks to the Bush/Clinton/Bush Jr/Obama era
>"Amazon and Microsoft are the only companies that meet the minimum requirements for the contract", Defense Department spokesperson Elissa Smith told CNBC in April.
lies
Really?

Are elements within the US defense and intelligence at odds with IBM or Oracle obtaining the JEDI contract?
Who aside from AWE and Microsoft would lose money in a mutli-cloud scenario?
More so, who would lose a potential backdoor to US defense infrastructure if Amazon or Microsoft are not solely administering JEDI?
Is this Bullish for our favorite God Protocol regardless of how this plays out for Amazon and Microsoft?
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/18/trump-says-seriously-looking-into-amazons-pentagon-contract.html?__source=sharebar%7Ctwitter&par=sharebar

[Anonymous No.14875820]

[Anonymous No.14875832]

>>14875820
>>14875805
God damn it I love you autists so much, we will all make it together.

[Anonymous No.14875850]

>>14875820
Thats the feels I'm getting too.

Government Transparency and Security is a must.

[Anonymous No.14875874]

>>14875805
Brainlet here...but what does this have to do with chainlink?

[Anonymous No.14875902]

>>14875874
Depends, how much LINK do you own?

[Anonymous No.14875906]

>>14875874
it doesn't have anything to do with chainlink. absolutely nothing.

[Anonymous No.14875947]

>>14875902
85k linkies

[Anonymous No.14875980]

>>14875947
You’re going to be rich anon. I look foward to seeing you at the yatch party.

[Anonymous No.14876013]

>>14875874
>IBM
>Oracle
>muti-cloud strategy more secure than Microsoft's or Amazon's approach
fucking what more writing on the wall do you need?
Either way, the President is gonna look at the situation, consider Microsoft and Amazon's relationship to CHINA, consult his senior cryptography experts and then he is gonna say:
>"Get Sergey Nazarov on the next flight to meet me at Mara Lago"
And all he will hear in response is
Mr President, YES SIR(gay)

[Anonymous No.14876014]

>>14875805
lol you have no idea what you're talking about
t. devops engineer (aws, gcp and azure)

[Anonymous No.14876032]

>>14875874
A lot of hopium and i don't normally say this. It's a project WAY out of scope for link rn.

[Anonymous No.14876033]

>>14876013
I'm honestly lost, what does this have to do with smart contracts? Isn't chainlink's purpose to bring real world data in aggregated format to the blockchain so that smart contracts can have actual utility?

[Anonymous No.14876042]

>>14876033
literally nothing

[Anonymous No.14876089]

>>14876014
Why not OCI?

[Anonymous No.14876167]

>>14876033
No. It’s only one of the many use cases

[Anonymous No.14876207]

>>14876033
government wants to use DLT to process contracts, they'll need an oracle, they will choose the trustless chainlink, also using chainlink will potentially lay bare any conflicts of interest by making relevant deals and transactions that evidence such a claim

[Anonymous No.14876222]

>>14875874
$1000
$10000
$100000?
All FUD, $1,000,000 MINIMUM

[Anonymous No.14876247]

>>14875805
>>>/pol/

[Anonymous No.14876251]

>>14876207
This anon fucking gets it

[Anonymous No.14876266]

>>14875805
Wow can’t wait for it to moon so I can dump these spook bags already. I feel dirty for even holding it this long knowing it’s going to be used for this purpose.

[Anonymous No.14876289]

The government has unlimited funds (literally, they can just print more money lol), why would they turn to a blockchain startup? Especially when the only function it provides right now is an eth price ticker?

[Anonymous No.14876373]

>>14876289
Fiat losing power and reliability. Virtual currency is the next step to power consolidation. The introduction of blockchain tech will only bring us closer to the fulfillment of this idea.

[Anonymous No.14876398]

>>14876373
Fiat is backed by ((them)), it's not going anywhere.

[Anonymous No.14876526]

>>14876207
>using chainlink will potentially lay bare any conflicts of interest
which is exactly why this will never happen

[Anonymous No.14876563]

Link is gonna make me go insane. Threads like these give me hope and then an another thread a minute later kills me from inside. WHEN IS THIS GONNA PUMP? I'm gonna lose it. I want to be patient but this is horrible. I've invested everything.

[Anonymous No.14876588]

>>14876526
you assume 100% of people in power are scoundrels

[Anonymous No.14876590]

this is not DLT this is not chainlink

[Anonymous No.14876619]

>>14876398
So will crypto when they decide its for the masses to use. Fiat works for now but also has the ability to support independent systems like militias and warbands. When they find or create something centralized, with the illusion of decentralization at its core, with universal adoption and integration ushered in by the looming technological revolution, fiat will no longer be necessary.

[Anonymous No.14876640]

>>14876013
>hey gang, get me this nazarov fellow, yeah the one from russia, to build our defense cloud system

[Anonymous No.14876775]

>>14875805
I've noticed government contracts (and probably all sorts of others) are often written so that the victor is essentially ensured.

[Anonymous No.14876883]

>>14875805
>Are elements within the US defense and intelligence at odds with IBM or Oracle obtaining the JEDI contract?
They're at odds with them because they're shit.

t. IT

[Anonymous No.14877112]

all the Bezos and Bill Gates Maximalists ITT are low IQ poopy faces

[Anonymous No.14877650]

>>14876563
Don't buy into this one. It's absolute nonsense. Government sensitive being dealt with by public nodes from a new crypto start up owned by a russian.

[Anonymous No.14877680]

>>14875805
now this is a very interesting thread and topic
I've been following along closely
it ties very nicely into this documentary:
https://vimeo.com/groups/96331/videos/80799353
someone linked that to me in a previous thread
for all those who want a clearer birds eye view picture of what's going on with blockchain and crypto, you really need to see that documentary

[Anonymous No.14877748]

>>14876563
>I've invested everything.
based
let's see if you're a pussy or if you're a man that can keep a grip lol
>I believe in you

[Anonymous No.14877781]

>>14877748
I AM GONNA FUCKING HOLD SO FUCKING HARD

[Anonymous No.14877789]

>>14876207
>government wants to use DLT to process contracts,
Source on this

[Anonymous No.14877809]

>>14877781
fucking based lol
I knew you could do it bro
they're playing mind games with people to shake out the losers
don't make the cosmically stupid decision to throw your lot in with them
keep your grip and you'll see
>mfw we're going to make it brother

[Anonymous No.14877816]

>>14875805
Noooooo, I need more time!

[Anonymous No.14878205]

>>14875805
This whole post is a bunch of bullshit.

How many of you retards invest your money based on threads like this? Holy shit this fucking board.

[Anonymous No.14878508]

>>14878205
>This whole post is a bunch of bullshit.
>>14878205
>How many of you retards invest your money based on threads like this?
only the ones that can read between the lines
it appears that you are unable to
>hint: it's because of your ego

[Anonymous No.14878536]

TRUMP IT'S CALLED SIACOIN
FOR THE LOVE OF FUCK DO IT

[Anonymous No.14878557]

>>14878536
Trump supports Chainlink

[Anonymous No.14878699]

>>14875805
Just think, Google's Google Cloud could be taken seriously if they didn't act like so silly n shit.

[Anonymous No.14878705]

>>14876207
Plot twist, the government ends up owning and running 2/3rd of the nodes by 2025

[Anonymous No.14878804]

>>14878705
once that's complete we can finally get rid of politicians
we're overcoming the need for actors
it will happen in our lifetimes

[Anonymous No.14878817]

>>14878804
You are a prophet (not being sarcastic)

[Anonymous No.14879032]

>>14878817
it's an exciting time for sure my friend
a lot of us are coming together now and meeting in "not-so-secret" anymore