[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

File: 100 KB, 1296x431, CAF4B915-13D2-4F2E-B43B-08952AF0E6FB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 04:06:00 No.14851179 [Reply] [Original]

Now that it is confirmed that Nano is our Bitcoin now, what will be our Ethereum?

>>	Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 04:12:47 No.14851257 ETH 2.0 or FTM assuming its not vaporware

>>	Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 04:44:15 No.14851555 Buy DAG

>>	Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 05:08:03 No.14851784 >>14851257 What about ONE ? Does that stand a chance?

>>	Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 05:11:04 No.14851823 >>14851179 Not sure on secound Ethereum. But Nano is looking really good.

Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 06:16:30 No.14852395
File: 2.51 MB, 600x338, Nano 7 000+infinity tps.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14851179
>>14851823
You Nano idiots are so predictable, comparing yourself to BTC. Bitcoin has earned its reputation due to enormous hashpower and proven track record for a long time resisting all kinds of attack. Nano has nothing of this. No one is buying BTC due to the great and cutting edge tech.

Worse, Nano was pushed by sociopathic devs, lying about 7000 TPS Dec 2017, pic, and Italian scammers at Bitgrail. Due to the incestuous relationship, devs and their friends got 15 million USD out of Bitgrail, as admitted on Nano discord, while normal retail investors were stuck and lost 170 million USD.

VISA is calibrated for 60 000 TPS due to peaks like emergency catastrophe, holidays like Christmas etc. What is Nano's real TPS now? 130 according to last spam test. Or 250 from last summers test? No way in hell can Nano have the tech to be a global micro-payment system. Even if you did, let's say you managed to have the minimum TPS for a global micro-payments system, 100 000 TPS, what would the enormous costs for bandwith, CPU and IO be? Have you crazy Nano fanatics or your scammer devs ever done the cost analysis? Remember that your whole crazy and dysfunctional business model is that all that costs and work must be done by volunteers fro free for all eternity with no downtime ever. Nano is a dead project with sociopathic and borderline criminal devs and a crazy cult-like fanbase. Worst in crypto.

>>	Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 06:18:19 No.14852407 File: 104 KB, 670x708, Nan 75 TPS Aug 2018.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14852395 Real TPS summer 2018, not the 7000 TPS they lied about Dec 2017

Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 06:19:53 No.14852426
File: 137 KB, 1712x484, p49zMEo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14852395
While retail investors were stuck with frozen accounts and maintenance, devs and their friends had no problem to move assets out of Bitgrail before the exchange collapsed. Pic.

>>	Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 06:21:07 No.14852446 File: 38 KB, 876x424, KYC Nano BitGrail1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14852395 While retail investors were stuck for months to get verification before Bitgrail collapsed, friends of the devs had no such problem.

>>	Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 06:22:34 No.14852469 File: 75 KB, 622x441, Zack.Shapiro.BitGrail not a scam 4Feb.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14852395 Dev Zack Shapiro, just days before the collapse of Bitgrail.

>>	Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 06:23:35 No.14852482 File: 15 KB, 300x289, Zack Shapiro2545636.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14852395 (((Zack Shapiro)))

>>	Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 06:24:42 No.14852497 File: 716 KB, 960x2117, 024388.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14852395 Tragic incompetence.

>>	Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 06:25:46 No.14852512 File: 255 KB, 1418x746, Bitconnect moved to Nano.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>14852395 Much of the post-Bitgrail Nano community came from Bitconnect.

>>	Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 06:32:38 No.14852569 >>14852482 >>14852497 Is it a cohencidence if Zack Shapiro left the Raiblocks/Nano team after he said funds are safe and millions of Nano got stolen? I think not.

>>	Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 06:37:43 No.14852612 >>14852569 >I think not. Me too. Plus community manager Troy wanted to explore new business opportunities too. No explanation from Nano what was going on. Community too stupid and ignorant to care.

>>	Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 06:38:37 No.14852622 >>14852395 >>14852407 >>14852426 >>14852446 >>14852469 >>14852482 >>14852497 >>14852512 looks like DAG boy didnt neck himself after all. good to see you back.

>>	Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 06:41:21 No.14852641 Kek, see reddit is trying to fit in here. Well, listen up kid, you've got a lot too learn...

Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 06:42:09 No.14852645

scamcoin that can't actually scale
bitcoin also had uncapped blocks and feeless transactions back in the day
the fact this shit can't even have a fees or o hardcap of tx/s means it won't work, get yourselves a brain fucking redditors and figure it out

>>	Anonymous Thu, Jul 18, 2019 06:48:12 No.14852712 >>14852395 Lmao Nano gay threads always get BTFO by the first few posts

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]