/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.14822227]

>Youve sworn these documents are authentic?
>CSW: Are what? Sorry.
>Authentic?
>CSW: They're what were in my possession.
>Dr. Wright, you said they were authentic. Are they authentic?
>CSW: Uh, they are authentically documents in my possession.
>So are they real documents, Dr Wright?
>CSW: They're real documents, but a document means many things.[snip]

>All right. Dr Wright, are these documents forgeries?
>CSW: Um, I don't know.
>Dr Wright, you're testifying directly before this Court. You submitted these documents, you swore to their authenticity, and now you're saying you don't know if they're authentic, if they're not forgeries?
>CSW: Um, all I can say is they are documents that were -- that look similar to ones that I've seen in the past that I haven't had access to that are in company files that have been in my basement for years.

[Anonymous No.14822245]

>>14822227
what's the link to read this documents?

[Anonymous No.14822250]

>Dr. Wright, did you edit the from field of this PDF in 2014?
What I'd like to say is --
>I'd like you to answer the question, Dr. Wright.
What you're trying to do is lead me into something that is clearly false.
>COURT: Dr. Wright --
You are creating --
>COURT: Dr. Wright, excuse me. The question was simple: Did you change the from field or not. That's a yes or no question.
This is not the document.
>COURT: I think his question was: Did you change the from field on exhibit 2; yes or no. It's a simple question.
This is not the e-mail, so, no.
>Did you ever edit the from field of the PDF?
This is a PDF of an e-mail, not the e-mail. No.
>Did you ever have someone else edit the from field of the PDF?
This is a PDF of the e-mail that someone has put in falsely as the e-mail and is trying to mislead the Court. This is proveably misleading by you.
>Dr. Wright, let me make it clear. Did you ever edit the from field of exhibit 2?
You are proveably misleading the Court.
>Dr. Wright, answer the question. Did you edit the from field of exhibit 2?
There is no -- this is a printout of a e-mail made at a later time than the e-mail that you are falsely leading the Court to believe is real evidence that you are misleading them on.
>Yes or no, Dr. Wright. Did you edit the from field of exhibit 2?
There is no from field to edit. This is a printed later document that he is now misleading the Court on.
>Will you answer the question?
I have.
>Is the answer "yes"?
You are committing perjury by falsely putting in a document. That is not real evidence. You have created something. [throws paper]
>COURT: Dr. Wright, you throw another document in my courtroom --
I'm sorry, Your Honor.
>COURT: -- you will be in handcuffs so fast your head will spin. Do you understand me?
Yes, Your Honor. I apologize.

[Anonymous No.14822256]

>>14822227
BASED. LE GOD. BSV 100000 EOY. COREKEKS BTFO

[Anonymous No.14822276]

>>14822245
t (dot) co (slash) d17Org12DF

It's a long read

[Anonymous No.14822280]

>>14822250
lol, it's so sad

[Anonymous No.14822311]

>csw thread
>id starts with SUE
doesn't get any better than this

[Anonymous No.14822363]

>>14822276
thanks

[Anonymous No.14822382]

>>14822280
>doesn't get any better than this
Time traveler here, the day Craig asphyxiates on his own vomit is much better

[Anonymous No.14822575]

>>14822382
thanks for the schlop anon

[Anonymous No.14822618]

based & redpilled trolling the court

[Anonymous No.14822719]

>>14822618
>Craigs lying is so bad he's going to be ordered by the courts to pay millions of dollars he didn't have in the first place
truly satisfying

[Anonymous No.14822775]

>>14822382
Wait, do doggoes actually use the underside of their tongue as a ladle when schloping? That's amazing

[Anonymous No.14822794]

You have to be a degenerate to believe Craig Wright is satoshi.

[Anonymous No.14823217]

>>14822794
No, just not English spoken.
The info they get is filtered down by pro bsv people , it is difficult to pick up the subtle stuff of why he is a total fraud.
Try doing research on prominent Chinese people you are basically walked off after Wikipedia .

[Anonymous No.14823252]

>>14822575
Glad you enjoyed it anon
>>14822775
Yep, doggos are amazing

SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP SCHLOP

[Anonymous No.14823360]

>>14822250
T I C K
O
C
K
back in the dock. soon