/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.14814686]

>is an actual "blockchain technology"
Really boggles your noggin

[Anonymous No.14814694]

This thread is shit.

[Anonymous No.14814732]

>>14814686

Name and branding sucks. Can only assume the tech behind it is just as cringe. Who actually buys this shit? Is your shilling working? Seems not.

[Anonymous No.14814769]

>>14814686
>starts creating decentralized oracle when chainlink starts gaining public traction
why does a cloud computing program need to have decentralized oracles? sounds like you guys are trying to play catch up

[Anonymous No.14814776]

>>14814732
>he doesn't know about the masonic triangle
>he doesn't know the meaning of "I execute"
>he doesn't understand the value
Really noggles your boggin

[Anonymous No.14814802]

>>14814769
shit bait 0/10 kys nigger

[Anonymous No.14814808]

>>14814686
its crazy that people got behind LINK for fundamentals but wont research RLC because the memes are trash.

If you just made better memes this would be LINK 2.0

[Anonymous No.14814826]

>>14814732
I agree

[Anonymous No.14814831]

>>14814808
chances are we are too busy with life to care about making memes to shill it because we know enterprises are going to mainly use it anyways at least in the short term. The ones we have are sort of an inside joke, we know they're shit, and it's hilarious

[Anonymous No.14814844]

>>14814769
hey mongol, chad here to explain it it to you.
iexec created data set renting feature, where you can rent your dataset for ml.training purposes without losing ownership of dataset: https://medium.com/iex-ec/v3-iexec-releases-data-wallet-for-enterprises-to-rent-data-and-ai-models-using-blockchain-e773a6bab69a

give it a read it is really good. dataset renting was in iexec roadmap from the start, what many people do not understand is that dataset renting infrastructure is very similart to decentralised oracle infrastructure, only few additions were needed (hence the joke about weekend side project btfo sergey).
hope you had a nice read while sergey was dumping on you, but if you want to know more do not hestitate to ask!

[Anonymous No.14814851]

>>14814802
one month in and i still cant get a straight answer from the RLC pajeets on why they have decentralized oracles for cloud computing. anyone who falls for this is a complete retard

[Anonymous No.14814870]

>>14814844
>>14814851

[Anonymous No.14814884]

>>14814851
hey mongol, chad here again, give it a read >>14814844

[Anonymous No.14814912]

>>14814844
this has nothing to do with the explanation of why renting computational power needs decentralized oracles. they must be really important if that mustache dude is making fun of chainlink on his twitter, but yet i still cant find why you guys actually need decentralized oracles. still listening if anyone wants to explain to me..

[Anonymous No.14814935]

>>14814912
decentralized oracles can be used for anything, having access to decentralized computing makes them that much more powerful

[Anonymous No.14814937]

>>14814884
>>>
>>14814912
GIVE ME ONE FUCKING SENTENCE THAT EXPLAINS WHY RENTING COMPUTATIONAL POWER REQUIRES DECENTRALIZED ORACLES PLEASE

[Anonymous No.14814952]

>>14814935
of course it can be used for anything, but why do you need it for renting computational power?

[Anonymous No.14814957]

>>14814912
wtf is this retarded question, kek.
>why microsoft need ms office or sharepoint or azure?

they created superior oracles to link and soon you will be able to run everything on iexec instead of using centralised link oracles that had no way to provide compution results onchain.

any more retarded questions my dear mongol?

[Anonymous No.14814972]

>>14814851
>i still cant get a straight answer from the RLC pajeets on why they have decentralized oracles
Because an oracle system is just a subset of cloud computing and is a very small effort that increases their value offering. what other reason do you need? are you a linkie who's just sad that another project is stepping on your toes?

you can run an oracle node on iexec RIGHT NOW.

[Anonymous No.14815008]

>>14814776

Forgot to mention the meme suck ass too. Thanks for the reminder.

[Anonymous No.14815027]

>>14814937
it does need oracles you fucking pajeet kek.

for example: ML algorithm that relies on external regressors to make predictions. where do you get regressors? form fucking oracle

[Anonymous No.14815028]

>>14815008
>I'm not buying cause your memes suck
imagine basing your crypto purchases on whether the memes are good

[Anonymous No.14815035]

>>14814937
>WHY RENTING COMPUTATIONAL POWER REQUIRES DECENTRALIZED ORACLES PLEASE
it doesn't require oracles, they can both exist without having to interact with one another but can also interact with one another if need be.

Why do you think "renting computational power REQUIRES" any oracle? lol the oracle is just an added feature. iExec is the all in one stop shop

[Anonymous No.14815060]

>>14815008
I mean the Real Life Chad meme is pretty good. The french HONHONHON shit is kinda funny since it's a "french shitcoin"

[Anonymous No.14815081]

i swear Iexec fudders are bottom tier iq mongols

[Anonymous No.14815129]

>>14814937
take another shot faggot lmao

[Anonymous No.14815155]

>>14815081
honestly /biz/ sentiment is changing as people are researching the fundamentals. we are seeing more IDs per thread and fewer instances of the word "tranny". people are getting more and more bullish as they realize this is genuinely a very undervalued great project and it's getting more difficult to FUD it because there are more people that can properly answer good questions and call out retarded ones.

this is the education period. load your bags near ICO while delusional linkies still call it a tranny frogcoin because iexec encroached on links use case.

[Anonymous No.14815171]

>>14815155
bingo.

[Anonymous No.14815231]

>>14814957
>ignores what i said, continues to spew pajeet shit from his asshole
>>14814972
im just weirded out because they all of the sudden starting to care about oracles(not just oracles but decentralized oracles) when chainlink started to get public traction. I literally dont see ANY reason why you need decentralized oracles for renting computational power. and not one fucking person in here can explain it.
>>14815027
why does it need to be decentralized?
>>14815035
added feature for WHAT? again, why does renting computational power need decentralized oracles?
>>14815129
great explanation!

[Anonymous No.14815270]

>>14815231
>im just weirded out
we figured it out boys he's just another baiting fudding retard
> all of the sudden starting
since 2017 troll

[Anonymous No.14815291]

>>14815231
we've explained it but you are literally to dumb to understand kek

[Anonymous No.14815300]

>>14815270
>still doesnt explain to me why RLC needs decentralized oracles
im starting to figure out you guys have no fucking idea what decentralied oracles are. you guys are a complete joke ahahahahahah crazy you gave money to a mustache who goes on twitter when hes mad

[Anonymous No.14815321]

>>14815291
LMK which post, because theres not a single one here explaining why RLC needs decentralized oracles

[Sage No.14815347]

>>14814831
Well then can you stop shitting up the board with your shill posts then. None of us deserve RLC so stop telling us about it. Just leave music linkies to our delusions. Thanks

[Anonymous No.14815365]

>>14815300
jesus your are stupid.

what if you are running powerful trading bot that relies on some ml that need a lot of external data. based on computation outcome trading decision is made. with centralised oracles you could manipulate input to reach desired outcome.

and that is just one example of many

[Anonymous No.14815369]

>>14815300
2 people told you kek you're just too retarded to understand>>14815027
>>14814972

[Anonymous No.14815379]

well good luck guys, dozens of posts but not a single one can explain why decentralized oracles are needed for computational power. you guys might get a good run soon but you will be back to zero in no time! good luck with your doracles, lmffffao

[Anonymous No.14815383]

>>14815365
this anon is high iq

[Anonymous No.14815412]

>>14815369
no they didnt, youre not understand me, i ask why rlc needs DECENTRALIZED oracles.

[Anonymous No.14815423]

iexec doesnt even have verifiable nodes but some convoluted worker/scheduler system so you dont even know who you're getting your information from

[Anonymous No.14815439]

>>14814937
>>14814952
>>14814912
>>14814851

>muh oracles
>muh memes

Who gives a fuck that the IEXeC team decided to make decentralized oracles as a side project.

What you should be asking yourself is why no fortune 50 company has anything regarding LINK actually being used anywhere on their websites, aside from blog posts aimed at marketing to devs on potential use cases for multiple crypto.

Meanwhile, RLC is a literal roadmap to mainstream adoption.

Link is a meme

RLC is real world application

https://networkbuilders.intel.com/social-hub/video/5g-blockchain-powered-smartcities

https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/iexec-integrates-ibm-cloud-to-increase-the-security-of-decentralized-computing

https://news.ubisoft.com/en-us/article/345175/Ubisoft-Startup-Program-to-Focus-on-Blockchain-and-AI-in-Third-Season

[Anonymous No.14815452]

>>14815365
thanks bro you actually answered my question. holy shit that was really hard to get out of you guys. very very small use case, ill still go with chainlink. ill buy into RLC if the mustache faggot stops acting like a child on twiter

[Anonymous No.14815454]

>>14815412
>why does anything need to be decentralized

[Sage No.14815457]

>>14815365
Manipulation is only a problem when two parties dont trust eachother. So a trading bot would be just fine with using centralised APIs.

[Anonymous No.14815474]

iExec will try and fail to create an entire bundle of products that should be separate things. Project is too fat and tightly integrated to work.

As separate projects and without RLC token, one or more of the components would probably be widely adopted.

[Anonymous No.14815486]

>>14815454
Because of trust issues between two parties

[Anonymous No.14815488]

all of you smell like pajeets who dont even understand their own project lmfao

[Anonymous No.14815501]

>>14815412
see this mongol>>14815365
now take another retarded shot your low iq pajeet mind loop
>>14815423
for super sensitive data you can use ibm,alibaba,azure, tfcloud pool mix.
even random workerpool is bettet than chainlink node because chainlink cant verify results onchain, if someone messed things up in tee you would not know it. so fuck centraliswd piece of shit link

[Anonymous No.14815529]

>>14815423
Who uses links network currently? Inb4 : no one outside of the devs

[Anonymous No.14815532]

iExec bagholders mostly don't understand their own tech and are not programmers, so they don't really have a clue what they talk about. Every argument is countered with
> but muuuuuuh POCO
> hurrdurr you are all lowww IQ pajeets
> 5G smart-city fog-computed doracles 100$ EOY

[Anonymous No.14815545]

>>14815474
it's real easy to use the iexec network.
>>14815488
we do we just dont want to spoonfeed retards like you since we spent a long time researching

[Anonymous No.14815550]

>>14815501
>if someone messed things up in tee you would not know it.

implying the chainlink software would be so poorly coded it would return bad results
ever hear of towncrier? they were working on sgx before iexec was even an idea

[Anonymous No.14815569]

>>14815532
Putting meme arrows in front of legit arguments doesn't invalidate them

[Anonymous No.14815604]

>>14815550
link with towncrier at the moment assumes that no one tempered with data in tee. they might or might improve, but now it is fuckin shit. there is a lot of incentive to mess with sgx if you can change the outcome of expensive smart contracts

[Anonymous No.14815608]

>>14815532
>Imagine dismissing actual fortune 50 companies shilling RLC as FUD
>imagine being this fucking retarded

Based asian said RLC is the future. His head is bigger than your country. Stay poor faggot.

[Anonymous No.14815613]

>>14815550
>muh towncrier
the cope

[Anonymous No.14815632]

>>14815545
>it's real easy to use the iexec network
That's the idea of tightly integrated. Unix philosophy unironically wins long term in this space.

Uniswap got instant adoption because it's minimal, useful, has no associated shitcoin, and can be replaced really easily if something better comes along. iExec is an entire suite of things which should have been separate.

[Anonymous No.14815633]

>>14815604
sounds like cope to me
if an outcome is tampered with then the node loses part of their stake
face it chainlink nodes are superior because theres actually accountability

[Anonymous No.14815659]

>>14815632
nope

[Anonymous No.14815686]

>>14815633
>doesn't know you have to stake rlc

[Anonymous No.14815732]

>>14815633
since link is centralised that does not mean shit.
iexec workers lose stake too, research before fudding.

[Anonymous No.14815753]

>>14815686
1/3 of the computing cost. Ohh nooooo I have to stake 3 cents to verify this potentially multi-million dollar worth API call, how could I ever think of cheating when the stakes are this high LMFAO

[Anonymous No.14815761]

>>14815632
provides superior tech package.
>should have been seperate
nice argument

[Anonymous No.14815765]

>>14814769
Decentralized Oracles are just a subset of data renting which iExec targeted from the start, it's on their whitepaper. So iExec does what Chainlink AND a lot more stuff. Get scammed by LINK devs with their 66% supply dump

[Anonymous No.14815796]

>>14815753
you wouldnt verify it on a public pool.

your argument also can be applied to link as losing 10 or even 50k would not matter in a 10kk smart contract

[Anonymous No.14815808]

>>14815732
i dont think you know what centralized means
link is on ethereum mainnet check out https://explorer.chain.link/job-runs?search=0x79fEbF6B9F76853EDBcBc913e6aAE8232cFB9De9

>>14815686
link has a higher marketcap so nodes have more to lose

[Anonymous No.14815831]

>>14815808
kyc and lack of nodes makes your shitcoin centralised

[Anonymous No.14815834]

>>14815761
>>14815765
>>14815796
this.

[Anonymous No.14815886]

>>14815831
you have no counterarguments so youre just spamming the same shit over and over again not making sense
I'm leaving bye

[Anonymous No.14815895]

>>14815886
your shitcoin is shit get rekt

[Anonymous No.14815936]

>>14815886
bye

[Anonymous No.14815961]

>>14815633
Then why is nobody using it?
>inb4 hurr durr google blog

[Anonymous No.14815973]

>>14815532
>Every argument is countered with
Which arguments?
>RLC is shit
>trannies
>baguetted
>pajeet
is not an argument

[Anonymous No.14816159]

>>14814686
Guys.. what do you think about this pic? to me, it basically is an instruction on how to DOMINATE a room... if only l*nkies would take notes....

[Anonymous No.14816193]

>>14816159
my favorite meme

[Anonymous No.14816269]

>>14816193
Thanks... just look at it.
>forcing audience to look at your gigantic groin
> make sure to have a camera to film you so they see you from two angles at all times
>phallic blue beams shooting up over the audience
>cocking your hip with one arm, violently gesturing with the other
>get a guy with literally SEX in his name to take pics of you all day

[Anonymous No.14816312]

>>14816269
lmao
photoshop his crotch to be fuckin huge

[Anonymous No.14816361]

G-guys... Why does the rest of the team humiliate Haiwu He this way?

[Anonymous No.14816373]

>>14816269
>fundamentally
>fundamental
>fundamentally fundamental
>ughh
>ughh
>ughhhhhhhhhhhhh
>ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Imagine investing your money in a walking talking meme

[Anonymous No.14816533]

>>14816312
Best i could do

[Anonymous No.14816573]

>>14816533
kek

[Anonymous No.14816806]

>>14816533
checked and kekked

[Anonymous No.14816813]

>>14816533
Hahaha BIGGER

[Anonymous No.14816921]

>>14816533
Make it like this fren

[Anonymous No.14816952]

>>14816533
Now do one with the "I recognize" bulge

[Anonymous No.14816985]

>>14816921
>>14816813
nice inspo. I have to go to wageslave job, but promise to make a real good one in about 12 hrs.

[Anonymous No.14817088]

>>14814831
>Too busy with life to care about memes
>Makes 20 shill threads every day

[Anonymous No.14817258]

>>14817088
>implying that guy makes all RLC threads

[Anonymous No.14817299]

>>14816952
>>14816921
>>14816813
>>14816806
>>14816573
Heres a quick preview, i have to go now . but if you leave any suggestions ill add them tomorrow

[Anonymous No.14817302]

10 USD in a month. Mark my word.

[Anonymous No.14817430]

>>14817299
Replace all the peoples heads in the audience with crying sirgays

[Anonymous No.14817529]

>>14817430
this

[Anonymous No.14817564]

>>14817299
Kek

[Anonymous No.14817692]

>>14817430
Ok. Leaving now. Just added some pearly whites and increased his left shoulder some