Reminder.

[Anonymous No.14809335]

This is the next Bitcoin level gains within the next 10 years.

iExec is going to be a market-changing technology in the cloud computing, data renting, and AI space, because it is the first ever decentralized cloud computing technology that is actually accomplishing goals and developing something new that the world has never seen. When v4 hits in December, most of the potential of iExec will be unleashed onto the world. GPU capabilities and sidechain/sidechain staking are two of the biggest upgrades. This will allow iExec to finally compete with centralized alternatives.

iExec's "competitors" are so far behind and not capable of half of the stuff iExec currently is that it has become glaringly obvious that iExec will be a major player in the decentralized cloud computing space.
To put it into perspective, the cloud computing market is about ~500b marketcap in 2020. If iExec takes 1% of that, it'll be a 200x from this point on. I have a guess that it'll take more than 1%. Also, iExec affects more than just the cloud computing market. It affects anything that involves data, AI, robotics, oracles, medical, and more. So it could easily 1000x or more from every market it affects.

Consider Bitcoin is the first "digital gold", iExec is the first "digital oil" for technology. RLC will enable access to many new technologies over time to people that otherwise would've never been able to gain access to because of upfront costs/overall costs in general, as well. RLC will most likely be used by enterprises and companies, but there will also be reasons for normal people someday, however that day might be a while away.


The main reason I think that iExec will become a major player (like Bitcoin) in the world is simple.
A decentralized cloud computing open marketplace will be able to price out and provide enough reason to be used over centralized alternatives.

[Anonymous No.14809351]

you sound a little desperate to me bud

[Anonymous No.14809374]

>>14809351
Just posting to inform people of one of the easiest ways to become rich as fuck within the next 10 years. Also so I can come on biz from my yacht and post about how I told all of you yet people like you would rather be idiots than talk about the potential it had at the time.

[Anonymous No.14809392]

>>14809374

Sold the pump shortly before V3 and watching this shit crash hard. I am not gonna say the bottom is on RLC but feels really close.

This cant dump anymore past V4 right since this is the critical release that brings the sidechain. If iExec doesnt gain traction by late 2020/early 2021 I think it will have failed but I am cautiously optimistic about this one.

This is the biggest risk/reward in crypto since ETH was $10 back in 2016 I feel.

[Anonymous No.14809428]

>>14809335
No one want to make it in 10 years they want to make it in 1- 2 tops.

[Anonymous No.14809459]

>>14809428

It wont take 10 yrs he is being conservative. Roadmap ends 2020 if this doesnt take off in the next year it will flop either way you dont have to wait much longer to see if it will pan out.

[Anonymous No.14809464]

>>14809428
>what are keywords
>within
Sure you can gamble on shitcoins, or you can buy sure bets and wait however long it takes for adoption to occur. Personally, I see RLC going very far, even if it takes a few more years.

>>14809392
The bottom for RLC is most likely in. It's been manipulated really hard to stand around ICO price.

[Anonymous No.14809483]

>>14809464

I know they say you shouldn't fall for the 1% of given sector fallacy but what is the upside here?

Assuming crypto hits $10 trillion in next 5 years or so i think $5 billion is realistic for this project but not sure if thats a reach.

[Anonymous No.14809487]

>>14809459
>if this doesnt take off in the next year it will flop
This type of thinking doesn't make sense when you consider the fact that crypto is still very young and Bitcoin itself took ~10 years to actually become worth it to sell if you're a long term holder.

RLC will probably take 1-2 years after v4 or v5 for adoption to start happening. People generally take a decent while to switch to/learn alternative technologies.

[Anonymous No.14809493]

We are gonna make it brah. 50k RLChad in da house

[Anonymous No.14809499]

>>14809487

True but you dont wanna be holding major RLC bags while adoption is taking another few years if bull market will precede it.

Rather hold BTC in meantime then try and buy more later.

[Anonymous No.14809526]

>>14809483
The upside is that we already know many facts and are capable of determining whether or not iExec will rise to meet competitive demands.

IMO crypto will probably reach 10T within the next 5 years as projects, like iExec, begin to fully take shape. In my lifetime I expect crypto to become a 50-100T market or greater.

Consider the fact that the future is digital, and iExec will be capable of pricing out centralized competitors while offering better security as well as the other added benefits from decentralization, I think it's looking really good for iExec. Especially when you consider that these centralized enterprises will be able to use iExec on the backend to compete with competitors if need be.

[Anonymous No.14809540]

>>14809499
Sadly I'm not willing to risk it, since the marketcap is still relatively low. It could 3-5x or more at any time if someone that wanted to invest in the future of cloud computing came along and threw 100M at it. I'd rather just sit, accumulate, and wait. /Making it/ is very much about taking as little risk as it is taking calculated risk.

[Anonymous No.14809580]

>>14809540

Fair enough man I mostly agree with everything you said I am as bullish on RLC as anyone on 4chan. It will be really interesting how the next 5 years play out I guarantee alot of these guys are gonna be posting memes of offing themselves for missing out on this one.

[Anonymous No.14809585]

The Manhattan Project of crypto.

[Anonymous No.14809624]

>>14809580
Yeah, despite "muh dumps after every v#" memes, I am still bullish as fuck on RLC. Especially seeing how good the team is and the stuff they're adding to the technology. It's not emotionally centered either, it's purely based on facts.
Either way it is definitely going to be a funny next 3-5 years as people realize that crypto is the next bastion of insane speculative gains like the internet was back in the day. The gems will prove themselves over time.

[Anonymous No.14809765]

coin not needed

[Anonymous No.14809767]

>>14809585
>>14808288
threads like this make me bullish on sntvt.
Just look at the art. Obviously some drug users in the community.

Alex Grey anon, nice pic.

[Anonymous No.14809768]

>>14809765
Yeah it is. Really dumb fud that has been disproven many times.

[Anonymous No.14809866]

0 users in two years on mainnet tells me a lot more about this project than your fiction novel you wrote here. iExec is trying to do everything but doesn't do anything 'best' or really even good enough to attract users or dapp developers, thats why competitors are getting adoption in their niches where they are foccused on and can present a real benefit. iExec really is a academic experiment. Lots of cool buzzwords and collabs, no relevancy to actual business or user needs.

[Anonymous No.14809920]

>>14809866
>two years on mainnet
Stopped reading there.

[Anonymous No.14809931]

30k chad here

[Anonymous No.14809936]

>>14809920
Stopped reading because you know its true

[Anonymous No.14810009]

>>14809866
>>14809936
kek, 16 year old linkie detected

[Anonymous No.14810027]

fuck kek 10 years...u niggers are insane.

[Anonymous No.14810040]

What's up with those accumulation spikes in the last days? RLC is scooped up at a 10% premium just to drop the same amount minutes later.

[Anonymous No.14810044]

>>14809936
"Mainnet" is such a stupid term in regards to developing projects. v1 through v5 mainnet are all entirely different. Anything before v3 was simply for testing/proof of concept/development purposes, and many developments have been made during that time. I don't consider anything before v3 being a "true" mainnet, whatsoever, due to inability to use public workers.
If you're wondering why usage of iExec is low, it's because of the lack of current reasons/higher cost to use it over centralized alternatives. The sidechain will change all of that, heavily. GPU enabled decentralized computations will also increase the potential. It will take time for it to be adopted. Most people don't even know it exists yet. Not even Vitalik.

You are a retard and nothing you said is true. You have pajeet level grammar as seen here:
>iExec really is a academic
Which means you are either a pajeet or otherwise low IQ individual.
iExec can and will do "everything" it wants to do. It's an open decentralized free-market cloud computing platform. Its value is entirely dependent on adoption and development, and those things take longer than 2-3 years on average for new technologies.

[Anonymous No.14810047]

>>14810040

Sergey is accumulating. Link is being flipped for RLC.

[Anonymous No.14810051]

>>14810027
>what are keywords
>within
>how do read English
Fucking pajeets kys
>>14810040
Isn't it obvious that RLC is retardedly undervalued at only 3 cents over ICO price considering the massive scope of the project?

Whales are really taking their time on this one.

[Anonymous No.14810057]

>>14810044
>lack of current reasons/higher cost to use it over centralized alternatives
so you suggesting it need to go lower to be more efficient?

[Anonymous No.14810065]

>>14810057
No. If you bothered to actually read what I said you would understand that v4 will bring the main thing that allows it to be used, sidechains and sidechain staking.

[Anonymous No.14810135]

whats the making it stack anons?

[Anonymous No.14810176]

>>14810135

10k minimum

[Anonymous No.14810218]

>>14810135
10k suicide stack
Some anons are thinking RLC could go to 400$ in its lifetime. Seems reasonable if crypto continues upwards in general.

[Anonymous No.14810296]

>>14810135
this year 100k. next year 30k

[Anonymous No.14810474]

>>14810218

$400 implies a 34 billion dollar market cap. Probably not happening desu. Might get as high as $100

[sage and hide No.14810491]

>>14809335
Oh look, it's the same retarded nigger trying to shill his dead chuck-e-cheez token as per usual
> M-MUH V4 WILL BE GOOD THIS TIME I PROMISE
No, faggot. Just no.
It goes in all fields.

[Anonymous No.14810571]

>>14810491
it will make link obsolete. sergey is dumping link to buy rlc

[Anonymous No.14810596]

>>14810491
Well v4 is pretty much the "real" version of iExec because of the sidechain/GPU upgrades. They're pretty integral to the overall usability of the iExec platform.
>>14810474
True, but in a speculative 50-100T total crypto marketcap within 10 years I think it's not far fetched to think that iExec could capture a large portion of it due to its massive amount of use cases.
Also, someone or some people are accumulating this bottom.

[Anonymous No.14810654]

>>14810596

With a speculative 50t market cap might as well all in on BTC as a safe bet.

[Anonymous No.14810669]

>>14810654
Sure, BTC is a "safe" bet, but that isn't saying BTC will outperform RLC over that time.

[Anonymous No.14811477]

Hello????

Does someone knows that you can use eth or any other currency and RLC coin is not needed?
>commodity he said
What?

[Anonymous No.14811504]

>>14811477
it is needed for sidechain and for iexec to be blockhain agnostic in the future. you cant rely in shitcoin like eth completely

[Anonymous No.14811562]

>>14810044
this kills the pajeet

[Anonymous No.14811581]

>>14809335
kindly buy coin sirs very many rupee sirs

[Anonymous No.14811591]

Veeery best coins sirs. Trust me, Vishnu has come down and told the prophecy, it will not dump on V4 this time, it will be holy miracle and the whole of Bangladesh will buy RLC coin.

[Anonymous No.14811600]

>>14811591
>>14811581
Oh no RLC the new BSV

[Anonymous No.14811646]

>>14811504
>it is needed for sidechain
you can stake in eth, why money grab trought ICO?

[Anonymous No.14811654]

>>14811646
They told you already, dumbass

[Anonymous No.14811667]

>>14811504
There's also the possibility they make their own blockchain.

[Anonymous No.14811673]

>>14811646
but you cant be blockchain agnostic if you are running everything on eth

[Anonymous No.14811675]

>>14811581
>>14811591
GOLDEN COW RUN CONFIRMED BY GANESH SIRS,,,, DEARS

[Anonymous No.14811680]

>>14811600
>>14811591
>>14811581
kek
>sub 40 iq fud

[Anonymous No.14812029]

>>14811646
>stake in eth
>sidechain is literally to get away from eth's expensiveness

[Anonymous No.14812094]

>>14809540
100m would do a lot more than 3x-5x it...

[Anonymous No.14812115]

>>14809866
This is an RLC thread, not LINK. RLC has actual users on Mainnet, Link has, well, LINK.

[Anonymous No.14812143]

>>14811477
Try doing big data decentralized computations on the blockchain using ETH and let us know how that works for you.

[Anonymous No.14812161]

>>14812143
Yeah, among the other stuff like fog computing.
People that fud saying you don't need a token for this don't understand how crypto works, or what ETH is for that matter.
>>14812094
True even better. It's possible there are billionaires out there looking to make some insane gains on crypto investments, RLC is a prime target.

[Anonymous No.14812178]

>>14812115
>Dolan plz, think of all the retards

[Anonymous No.14812238]

>>14812178
I kek evrtme

[Anonymous No.14812298]

>>14809335
>iExec is 'digital oil'

[Anonymous No.14812311]

>digital money
>digital silver
>digital gold

[Anonymous No.14812317]

>>14810474
100$ is FUD. If ETH ever is 5000-10000 RLC can definitely be 1000+

[Anonymous No.14812416]

very good coin all my cusins buy it very much 10000 american dollars in the yeat 2019

[Anonymous No.14812444]

thanks just bought 100k

[Anonymous No.14812454]

>>14812444
checked

[Anonymous No.14812641]

>>14812444
Checked. Just bought a mill.

[Anonymous No.14812659]

[Anonymous No.14812748]

>>14809335
Daily reminder this is a real token w real partnerships / collabs... not blogposts

https://www.ibm.com/blogs/cloud-archive/iexec-integrates-ibm-cloud-to-increase-the-security-of-decentralized-computing/

https://networkbuilders.intel.com/social-hub/video/5g-blockchain-powered-smartcities

https://news.ubisoft.com/en-us/article/345175/Ubisoft-Startup-Program-to-Focus-on-Blockchain-and-AI-in-Third-Season

[Anonymous No.14812814]

>>14812029
sidechain will only increase circulating supply trought staking, coin minted and then sold, no good tokenomic, french team

I have 4500 bags bought at 1,80$, I thin you know me. As you can see I haven't stop fudding my own investment until 0.
Now it's a question of autism

Jokes beside... this coin I think it's destined to be in the shadow of ChainLink

I hope tha it can survive another 3-4 years, so when Link will be 500$ or more in the oracle hype I will sell thr 4500 per 1$ each and get my money back before the rlc crash to 0

[Anonymous No.14812837]

>>14812029
I have 4500 bags bought at 1,80$, I thin you know me. As you can see I haven't stop fudding my own investment until 0.
Now it's a question of autism

Jokes beside... this coin I think it's destined to be in the shadow of ChainLink

I hope tha it can survive another 3-4 years, so when Link will be 500$ or more in the oracle hype I will sell thr 4500 rlc per 1$ each and get my money back before the rlc crash to 0
[

[Anonymous No.14812852]

>>14812814
>500$ a link

imagine being this delusional. no, you don't hold any RLC

[Anonymous No.14812898]

>>14812837
Post links of any companies website that showcases their active use of LINK.

Link is a coordinated shill campaign. Nothing more.

[Anonymous No.14812927]

>>14812852
Anon we did the math last year and you know where Link can go.
I don't want to discuss here. It would be too beuty to be true if both projects will do well, but it won't, one will die.

I think is RLC, unironically

[Anonymous No.14813026]

>>14812927
TIL: LINK does decentralized cloud computing, and RLC didn’t make decentralized oracles as a side project because they were bored on a weekend.

[Anonymous No.14813077]

Don't mention coin supply

And

Delete this

[Anonymous No.14813100]

>>14811477
Poco Consensus require rlc.

Anyway, you probably don't know why we need consensus.

[Anonymous No.14813111]

>>14813100
poco is just a smart contract and could easily use eth retard.

[Anonymous No.14813144]

>>14813077
i mean its only take me like couple sec to go to coinmarket cap. Doesnt mean vishnu will be blessing your coin.

[Anonymous No.14813154]

>>14813111
If you think that, it's probably because you don't know about this consensus. Maybe you should start by reading the mediums that are dedicated to this before you open your mouth. Retard.

[Anonymous No.14813168]

>>14813144
doesn't need to my dear friend, Vishnu already inside our great coin RLC token the very beststandart

[Anonymous No.14813322]

>>14813111
Imagine being this retarded

[Anonymous No.14813332]

Real dump hasn't began yet.

[Anonymous No.14813366]

>>14813322
>>14813154
prove to me that I couldn't copy paste the smart contract and replace a ERC-20 token with ETH. Literally everything is open source and can just be used, there is no way they could prevent someone running the same system on ETH with minimal effort.

[Anonymous No.14813382]

>>14813366
>running the same system on ETH
Absolute retard

[Anonymous No.14813412]

imagine if the iexec team dumped $2M of RLC every 3 days like link
lul

[Anonymous No.14813451]

>>14813382
no u are the drivelling, pants-shitting, pee-drinking retard, unironically, if you think a ERC-20 smart contract can't be replaced by a ETH smart contract.

[Anonymous No.14813452]

>>14813412
they couldnt because they hold less 10% of supply

[Anonymous No.14813474]

>>14813111
weak b8 m8

[Anonymous No.14813477]

>>14813026
link is centralised and its computing is worthless as they cant provide proof onchain. rlc oracles are natural extension of data set renting feature

[Anonymous No.14813499]

>>14813452
This.
>>14813451
So then do it, oh wait ETH couldn't even handle cryptokitties.

[Anonymous No.14813509]

Why are Blaise Cavalli and Pierre Colin back on slack?

[Anonymous No.14813544]

>>14813499
are you motherfucking dumb? I'm talking about taking all of iexec code and doing a search and replace of RLC with ETH. Nothing changes except people now can pay with ETH instead of an obscure french coin. I will do it once V4 launches, and it is at least a somewhat useable system (which it is not right now). Porting this on eth will make a lot more people use this.

[Anonymous No.14813565]

>>14813544
Do it then, oh wait you can't and you also wouldn't be able to keep up with a team of french computing gods if you even could do what you think you can.

[Anonymous No.14813589]

>>14813477
This

[Anonymous No.14813611]

>>14813509
Interesting... Didn't that Blaise guy bash ICOs and left iExec butthurt?

[Anonymous No.14813617]

>>14813477
>>14813589
These dudes took the RLC pill.

[Anonymous No.14813628]

>>14813565
> what is github forking a project
oh no, doing a git pull is so hard, I can't keep up lmao

I will. Obviously some larger companies will also do that to use it internally, or with btc/eth if they see that iExec actually works, instead of buying obscure altcoins.

[Anonymous No.14813648]

>>14813628
Do it. You'll only legitimize RLC further.

[Anonymous No.14813684]

>>14813544
Welp, there it is... the dumbest thing I’ve ever read on this website.

[Anonymous No.14813712]

>>14813628
Do it and convince companies to join your computing network with millions of serverson yout github clone. Will be fun to watch

[Anonymous No.14813727]

>>14813628
>fork rlc to use it internally
topkek

[Anonymous No.14813743]

>>14813628
>use it internally
>he thinks he will be able to use the decentralized network internally
>he thinks anyone will buy a shitcoin copy

[Anonymous No.14813799]

The need is huge

The adopters will arrive in mass

That's the brick every blockchain needs right now

But you have to have a brain to understand that

[Anonymous No.14813819]

>>14813743
Yeah he'll create a decentralized network with his desktop pc, an arduino, his mom's laptop and dad's iPad.

[Anonymous No.14813821]

>>14813628
That's crazy how retard you are.

[Anonymous No.14814036]

>>14813819

[Anonymous No.14814111]

>>14814036

[Anonymous No.14814127]

>>14814111
meant for >>14813819

[Anonymous No.14814205]

Thanks just bought 100k.

[Anonymous No.14814229]

NOOOO. WHY DUMPP

[Anonymous No.14814239]

>>14809335
Ever since the shilling started RLC has only been dropping in both sats and USD.
Seems like a desperate effort to create some buyers to dump tokens into, as the order books are thin as hell.
Any "whale" with a couple hundred K token could crash the price 20% if we wanted to get out now. So naturally one would try to persuade some gullible idiots here on biz to buy their shittoken.

On a fundamental basis RLC is the typical french project. Just like ARK and REQ it looks good at first glance, but after watching the progress for a while it becomes obvious that this isn't going anywhere.
The latest strategy to also be a decentralized oracle in order to get some of Chainlink's hype is just another desperate move to make a useless token rise in value.

[Anonymous No.14814251]

>>14814239
>but after watching the progress for a while it becomes obvious that this isn't going anywhere.
Yet they're a year ahead of update schedule...kek
Another shit fudder!

[Anonymous No.14814780]

>>14813544
>I'm talking about taking all of iexec code and doing a search and replace of RLC with ETH
checked, dubs of mental disability

[Anonymous No.14814871]

>>14814239
Typical dogshit fud
>a whale could dump the price 20%

A whale could also pump the price 300% easily, with a medium sized bag, dumb point

Also, where are REQ and ARKs fortune 50 partnerships / collabs?

>steal chainlinks hype

Lmaoo all chainlink is is hype
Link any company that actually has info regarding them actively using chainlink in any capacity outside potential use cases

Protip: you cant

https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/iexec-integrates-ibm-cloud-to-increase-the-security-of-decentralized-computing

https://networkbuilders.intel.com/social-hub/video/5g-blockchain-powered-smartcities

https://news.ubisoft.com/en-us/article/345175/Ubisoft-Startup-Program-to-Focus-on-Blockchain-and-AI-in-Third-Season

[Anonymous No.14814878]

>>14814239
>Ever since the shilling started RLC has only been dropping in both sats and USD.
first, they were shilling cause it pumped at v3 and all the moonbois shilled it to biz to drop their bags like usual.

now we have been shilling because it's incredibly undervalued and is a golden ticket to /makeit/, and we keep getting dumped on by bleeding ICO investors desperate to chase the BTC pump, but that absolutely doesn't change the fundamentals. if you don't buy the absolute bottom you have nobody to blame during the alt bull but your fucking self. moonbois will start shilling once we see major pumps but that doesn't make it a good time to buy, the good time to buy is literally now while die hard hodlers are selling you on the fundamentals

t. bought falling knife at 70c, DCAd down at 37c and 27c

[sandeep No.14814879]

>>14809335
>This is the next Bitcoin level gains within the next 10 years.
Hey Pajeet, Sandeep here. I appreciate the effort but you should learn from Prakash: it's foolish to promise super crazy gains to fraud people, try with some more realistic goals.

[Anonymous No.14815011]

>>14814879
suggest them

[Anonymous No.14815077]

>>14814879
>he doesn't think the worlds first decentralized super cloud computer will have bitcoin level gains
hohoho ohaohahaha

[Anonymous No.14815121]

>>14809335
tl; dr.

But, got enough to know you're a buy-my-brand-of-crypto faggot who should be utterly ignored anyway.

Sage advice, in the true 4chan sense of the word sage.

[Anonymous No.14815205]

>>14815121
Retards stay poor

[Anonymous No.14815221]

>>14815077
EOS is doing it too but unlike EOS you don't just "own" the computer in proportion to the percentage of its supply you control, RLC is cloud computing as a service and will have a free market for computation come V4. exciting.

[Anonymous No.14815228]

>>14815077
Boring larp

[Anonymous No.14815320]

>>14815221
EOS is trash though theres a difference. RLC is def exciting.
>>14815228
No larp

[Anonymous No.14815524]

>>14815320
I think EOS is pretty cool desu, don't gotta fud another successful project, but RLC has way way more room to grow. why buy a 5 dollar coin with a billion supply when you can buy a just-as-promising 30 cent coin with 80 million supply? like, in context, RLC is so incredibly undervalued it blows my mind. hence why it's the ticket up.

[Anonymous No.14815585]

>>14815524
EOS just feels really scammy to me.
Everything you said is true, RLC will explode

[Anonymous No.14816248]

>>14815585
Are you the one who made the RLC whale thread