/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.14695979]

Is Chainlink really as revolutionary as Ethereum? Will it have a similar run?

[Anonymous No.14695990]

>>14695979
yes and no

[Anonymous No.14695995]

>>14695979
No it wont have a run like ETH.


It will have a run bigger.

[Anonymous No.14696011]

>>14695979
No. This is the top, and it may go to $10 in 2021, but a 20x is the best you can do for a top 20 project at this point.

Buy PNK. Stake. This should easily surpass. If you're holding Link now, it's time to sell.

[Anonymous No.14696112]

>>14696011
Pajeet

[Anonymous No.14696127]

Nope chainlink was a pump and dump. Old school biz has all sold the top. Watch it bleed out now.

[Anonymous No.14696144]

>>14695979
No
Even ETH won’t have an ETH run again anon

[Anonymous No.14696158]

>>14696011
I actually took a look at the PNK website. It's a fucking joke.
>randomly select users to settle a dispute
It's neither sybil resistant, so you can spam create a bunch of users to be judges yourself, and the idea of having 3 random plebs settle a dispute for something they aren't experts on is already retarded in the first place.

[Anonymous No.14696159]

YES

every platform requires link to to solve the oracle problem, plus chainlink is BLOCKCHAIN AGNOSTIC, which is why it can also run on the harmony blockchain

EVERYONE will use LINK

[Anonymous No.14696163]

>>14695979
Ethereum brought smart contracts to the world. Chainlink allows those smart contracts to use real world data. Now ask yourself which one is worth more: Pulling the price of ERC20 tokens, or all data on earth.

[Anonymous No.14696193]

>>14696011
How many dicks did you suck for that level of brain damage? "Only" being a multimillionaire? Sounds pretty good to me. Link is the only smart move in this space.

[Anonymous No.14696202]

>>14696159
How do you know? As of today link has no functional decentralization

[Anonymous No.14696214]

>>14696163
This op

[Anonymous No.14696224]

>>14696202
Do you understand what goes into building functional decentralization? It isn't something that happens over a fucking weekend. Would you rather buy LINK now before it is fully decentralized, or after they achieve decentralization when it is already $100?

[Anonymous No.14696260]

>>14695979
ETHplode, anon. Deflation is king.

[Anonymous No.14696268]

It's a better buy than Ethereum for a whole host of reasons

[Anonymous No.14696287]

>>14696224
I don’t know. Do you? Are u a insider or speculator like me?

[Anonymous No.14696302]

ETH's run was due in part by it's own use case, the memes, but primarily due to the crypto hype of 2017. Link is rising all on it's own, and when the network is finally live we will slowly rise and rise past 1K over years of network usage. Link holders are already rich it's just a matter of waiting for the network to actually be used now.

There isn't a single project like Link in crypto right now, it's what will make the other shitcoins actually useful. Unlike BTC it doesn't need your money to survive either. Link is in it's own class entirely, my only regret is not going all in before $1 or looking into it despite seeing the memes a year back

[Anonymous No.14696325]

>>14696287
I'm not an insider, but I'm also not a brain dead sub-100 IQ degenerate either. If you spent an hour a day doing research into Chainlink, then you'd realize how important a decentralized oracle could be to the entire world. A decentralized oracle could have prevented the 2008 economic crisis by itself. Not only could it have done that, but it would also be saving the banks that caused the crisis billions of $$$.

[Anonymous No.14696331]

>>14696302
Haha you shitlinkers are delusional. 1000?? That would be a marketcap bigger than bitcoin.

Chainlink, is for now, a useless & trustless shitcoin hyped too much due their fake partnerships.

[Anonymous No.14696350]

>>14696325
>A decentralized oracle could have prevented the 2008 economic crisis by itself.
Explain. This is not one of those statements you can make with nothing backing it up.

[Anonymous No.14696357]

>>14696325
I agree with anon, decentralized oracle important, got it. Link is currently not decentralized. No one outside of the team know how they will achieve that. So, how do you know it will have a eth like run? I’m a speculator, what about u my fren?

[Anonymous No.14696364]

>>14696331
>That would be a marketcap bigger than bitcoin.
Yes exactly
>Chainlink, is for now, a useless & trustless
I know you're all in too anon, bored?

[Anonymous No.14696373]

>>14696350
Blyth Masters single handedly got credited for the housing bubble of 2008.... we could say she did help cause it

[Anonymous No.14696387]

You don't really need chainlink for most applications. There is also always a way to not use chainlink that is cheaper in the long run but a larger upfront cost.

[Anonymous No.14696394]

>>14696163
based and I dare say it, redpilled

[Anonymous No.14696408]

>>14696357
The oracle problem can be solved by just not using oracles. Linkies don't ever want to mention that though.

[Anonymous No.14696443]

>>14696408
https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/07/22/ethereum-and-oracles/

[Anonymous No.14696453]

>>14696408
Serges has always said, you can pay for the amount of decentralization you want to achieve. He had never promised a true decentralized network.

[Anonymous No.14696477]

>>14695979
Chainlink is a fucking JSON parser for fucks sake! Don't fap on muh technulugy invented, this fucking techs are NOTHING. Invest in real products made by the technology, not just a piece of code and whitepaper.

[Anonymous No.14696505]

>>14696477

[Anonymous No.14696558]

>>14696331
1k is fud. Yes chainlink will be bigger than btc

[Anonymous No.14696562]

>>14696350
You know what, instead of telling you to do your own fucking research like I tell everyone else who wants me to spoonfeed them, I'll actually explain it.

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_rating_agencies_and_the_subprime_crisis
>Pic Related

>To sell these "mezzanine" tranches, investment bankers pooled them to form another security—known as a collateralized debt obligation (CDO). Though the raw material of these "obligations" was made up of BBB, A−, etc. tranches, the CRAs rated 70% to 80% of the new CDO tranches triple A.

Alright, this is the most basic way to put this. There were a bunch of mortgage-backed securities (MBS). They are derivatives, as they derive their value from an underlying asset. They were created in the 1930's. Originally, they were awesome. You were essentially betting on good solid working people to pay their mortgage. Pretty safe, right? Fast forward 60 years. All of the "reliable" mortgages are taken. The only ones left are complete fucking garbage, or "sub-prime". These sub-prime MBS's are given low ratings. Low ratings = more risk and less investors. So what did they do? They pooled all of these garbage fucking MBS's together and slapped better ratings on them. Diversification decreases risk right? In this case, fuck no, it decreased nothing. These securities were bought and bought and bought and no one would ever think it would stop. Hell, why would you stop, the securities have extremely high ratings, right? You see where this is going.

Now here comes chainlink with motherfucking smart contract technology. Oh, your security is made up of a bunch of garbage MBS's? Well shit, the smart contract just went off and gave it a pajeet rating. No fucking fraud, no bullshit, and no one has to be trusted to give an accurate rating.

Yes, there were more that went into 2008, but this was a HUGE part of it. Go watch the movie "The Big Short". It's surprisingly accurate.

[Anonymous No.14696570]

Look at the got damn suply. The amout of buyers to even reach Eth level is a far stretch. link Will have its run but not close to Eth range

[Anonymous No.14696590]

>>14695979
yes
no, it needs scam icos on it for a similar run

[Anonymous No.14696604]

>>14696443
>2014
They didn't even have proof of stake back then, of course they need all the help they could get.

[Anonymous No.14696627]

>>14696570
ETH is fucking monopoly money. If Chainlink is successful, it is going to change the way the entire global economy works.

>>14696408
Sure, if you want to trust a single party to give you accurate data, then by all means don't use a decentralized oracle.

>Pay for insurance on a flight, if it's delayed you get money
>Flight is delayed
>Call the insurance people up
>"sorry anon, it shows here that your flight was on time"
Now you're sitting at the fucking airport boarding your plane after being on hold for thirty minutes wishing you wouldn't have trusted some fucking jew squad to pay you what they "promised".

[Anonymous No.14696728]

>>14696562

So if we captured 0.1% of the market are we talking about $100?

[Anonymous No.14696774]

>>14696728
We wouldn't be "capturing" anything. LINK is not a derivative. LINK is not a security. LINK is a token that is used to power a decentralized oracle. Every single time someone utilizes the chainlink network, they will have to pay the node operators in LINK. Now imagine if LINK was being paid every single time one of those derivatives in that $542.4 Trillion was traded. That's a lot of fucking LINK that needs to be paid, right? Well, there simply aren't enough LINK to go around for that amount of requests, therefore LINK increases in value as it becomes harder and harder to find and use as payment to node operators.

[Anonymous No.14696785]

>>14696774
and before one of you seething trannies tries to tell me that this isn't how it works, I'd like to kindly remind you all to use your fucking brains and read the whitepaper.

[Anonymous No.14696803]

>>14695979
Eth is a database, nodes validate transactions
Chainlink is a data marketplace, nodes sell data

[Anonymous No.14696806]

>>14696373
Imma gonna need you to sauce that comment broseph

[Anonymous No.14696822]

This thread reeks of cope and hopium.

[Anonymous No.14696847]

>>14696774
When I said captured, that’s what i meant. I’m brain dead early in the mornings, my bad.

Aside from that, Google is working on a BigQuery-backed derivative Exchange and if (99% sure they will) they end up using chainlink nodes to pull data, Link will explode. That’s without examining the rest of Chainlinks use’s.

[Anonymous No.14696943]

Can decentralized oracles save baby killing from Bitcoin Core?

[Anonymous No.14697168]

>>14696331
Yeah yeah fuck off shit cunt

[Anonymous No.14697310]

>>14696453
that sounds utterly gay and useless. sorry.

[Anonymous No.14697331]

>>14696943
>BitCoin Core
I've still never seen any exchange hosting this "Core".

[Anonymous No.14697595]

>>14696224
>Do you understand what goes into building functional decentralization

Idk bro Bitcoin was functionally decentralized within a few months while your shitcoin has been nothing but pure speculation and news that leads to nothing for two years

[Anonymous No.14697619]

>>14697595

Pretty sure the top 1% of bitcoin owns 30+%

[Anonymous No.14697628]

>>14695995
This

[Anonymous No.14697634]

>>14697619
>top 1% owns only 30%
miles better than fiat
bullish

[Anonymous No.14697669]

>>14695979
What makes Ethereum revolutionary is the smart contracts: automated programmable transactions.
They were invented in the 90s, so ETH didn't come up with them.
However, ETH was the first instance of actual smart contracts being implemented, albeit within a very limited scope: its own blockchain.

Chainlink is the key to making ETH's smart contracts applicable to real-world transactions.
So when it comes to real-world transactions (i.e. the real money shot), ETH without Chainlink is as useless as a crypto wallet without its private key.

[Anonymous No.14697677]

>>14697595
The issue with Bitcoin is, all it is, is currently the most secure DLT with the greatest name recognition. First is not set in stone, second can be a rope. Actually pretty bearish on BTC as for now, if the next crypto "hype" will not be again a marketing "bubble" like 2017, but a tech "bubble"

[Anonymous No.14697715]

>>14697669
And as for the question "will it have a similar run"; consider this:
ETH did an incredible run even though all it could really do was smart contracts within its own blockchain.
Now imagine what will happen to the key that allows for smart contracts in the world of mainstream finance.

[Anonymous No.14697720]

>>14695979
No and no. The top is in

[Anonymous No.14697723]

>>14697669
Same issue as with BTC, currently most secure with highest name recognition. The tech is meh, Solicity is ultra meh, and in a world where corporations dictate the way things go, I see a permission smart contract platform taking the lead, HL fabric is very nice and has better backing than ETH, let alone that those that cooperate with ETH are using the tech, but in there own way without ETH (have a look at E&Y github for smart contracts)

[Anonymous No.14697727]

>>14696562
This is absolutely correct
but the difference between what chainlink currently is, what what you want it to be in your fanfic, is so large, I'm gonna have to sign you up to a mental ward.

[Anonymous No.14697730]

>>14696357
>No one outside of the team know how they will achieve that.
Quit playing dumb you fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.14697732]

If it isn't, I will barely have lost a few grand. If it is, it will make me millions.

Don't trip over dollars to make pennies.

[Anonymous No.14697739]

Ethereum gave roughly 100000% return rates when it hit 1k.

That means you could have made 1M USD with just 1k of investment. A lot of people made millions with ETH and left, A LOT.

That will never happen again, ever. Sorry.

Crypto broke absolutely all the rules of logic and economics in 2017, if you think this will happen again you don't even understand how the world works because you are just too stupid.

[Anonymous No.14697761]

>>14697723
Even if what you say about "industry users will use their own permissioned blockchains" is true; they'd still need trustless oracles.

But, to be honest, I think permissioned blockchains may disappear in the near future.
For example: https://www.coindesk.com/ibm-blockchain-maersk-shipping-struggling
Turns out that if you know the other people on the blockchain, you end up not trusting them.

Then again, permissioned blockchains may be the future.
Or a combination of permissioned and public.

Either way, doesn't matter for Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.14697771]

>>14697739
You should go back and have a look at the 2016/17 "bubble" again and how it came. It was a combination of CME insider trading, millions thrown at marketing campaigns to fool retail traders and consumers and illegal capital raises by scam token devs, who would without icos never had gotten a dollar. The latter has been closed by financial authorities, the second died with the legal loopholes being closed and the first is probably the dead of bitcoin. If ETH should ever be traded on something like CME, good night sweet prince

[Anonymous No.14697772]

>>14697595
Two years ? Only token was available for two years. Mainnet is live one month and 10 days.

[Anonymous No.14697782]

>>14697761
>they'd still need trustless oracles.
no my child
they'll need permissioned oracles
to correspond with the permissoned blockchains

[Anonymous No.14697787]

>>14697739
>Ethereum gave roughly 100,000% return rates when it hit 1k.
3,000 actually.
ICO price was roughly 0.35 USD; and 1k dividided by 0.35 is roughly 3,000.

The rest of your post is garbage too.
Also nice Reddit spacing.

[Anonymous No.14697788]

>>14697761
>Does it matter for Chainlink?
No, that is why I changed from 75% LINK to 100% when it crossed 1.5 2 years before I expected it

[Anonymous No.14697805]

>>14697782
Ok, "permissioned" oracles.
But they're not going to be making their own for every use case (see Corda using an XRP oracle made by Ripple in 2014), plus you need the same level of oracle security across the various participants in a transaction.

That's where the industry standard in oracles comes in.

[Anonymous No.14697820]

>>14697805
sure, whatever you say, but a permissioned oracle, even using chainlink software, will use permissioned LINK (or be free as it's permissioned and they can settle payment off chain) that they can print out of thin air, on their permissioned blockchain.

[Anonymous No.14697827]

>>14697787
>if something increases from $1 to $2 it yields a return rate of 2/1 = 2%

[Anonymous No.14697846]

>>14697787
You don't even know how to calculate a simple percentage change, but I guess that's a requirement for being a link bagholder.

Wow, this market or actually full of retards lmao

>>14697771
ICO bubble is just happening, so ETH has a long way down and it's dragging EVERY ICO IN EXISTENCE with it.

[Anonymous No.14697862]

>>14695979

ONLY A DEGENERATE WOULD COMPARE A BABBLING OF A FAT SLAV FUCK WITH A RUNNING BUT OBSOLETE FAILED BLOCK-CHAIN OF A THIN SLAV FUCK

[Anonymous No.14697872]

>>14696011
Fuck off Rakesh

[Anonymous No.14697874]

>>14697761
>https://www.coindesk.com/ibm-blockchain-maersk-shipping-struggling
Thanks for the link, and interesting point raised, but I think the article already points out how it will be tackled, advisory boards and equal shares on the IP. Kind of a SWIFT for different DLs - or if looking at what the IMF has in mind, a world wide DLT standard, which will cetrainly not be Bitcoin. It is still so fucking early.

[Anonymous No.14697934]

>>14697787
Just market sold. No way I’m investing in a project that attracts this level of brainlet

[Anonymous No.14697948]

>>14697827
>>14697934
I read the % as multiplication because the numbers were so retarded.
Because if he meant % it's very wrong.
From .35 to 1k is an increase of nearly 300,000%, not 100,000%.

>>14697846
>You don't even know how to calculate a simple percentage change
Says the retard who thinks 0.35 + 100,000% = 1,000.

[Anonymous No.14697954]

>>14696847
Not priced in. The crypto community is so dumbly unaware of what is happening here

[Anonymous No.14697957]

>>14697874
>I think the article already points out how it will be tackled, advisory boards and equal shares on the IP
The basic problem persists, no matter how many bandaids they slap on it.

But again: permissioned blockchains may very well be the future, in whatever capacity.
Doesn't matter to Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.14697961]

>>14697954
This link $10,000 EOM

[Anonymous No.14697964]

>>14697846
>ICO bubble is just happening, so ETH has a long way down and it's dragging EVERY ICO IN EXISTENCE with it.
What the fuck are you yapping about.
Tons of ICOs have already gone -99%.

[Anonymous No.14697976]

>>14697820
>a permissioned oracle, even using chainlink software, will use permissioned LINK (or be free
Even if what you say is true (which it isn't, see pic); major players using Link in any capacity will have a massive marketing effect.
Same reason athletes get their shoes for free.

[Anonymous No.14697991]

>>14696847
>>14697954
Damn you guys are fucking delusional

[Anonymous No.14698017]

>>14697991
That's what they called bitcoin holders in 2010

[Anonymous No.14698024]

>>14697948
When did I say 0,35 USD? lmao

I was obviously thinking 1 USD to 1k USD for simplicity you dumb retard, holy shit.
I'm done wasting my time with such mentally disabled fucks like you. No wonder you hold link.

>0.35 + 100000% = 1,000

Ask me how I know you never went to high school.

Thank you for the laughs, clown.

[Anonymous No.14698050]

>>14698024
>When did I say 0,35 USD? lmao
0.35 was the lowest the ETH price ever was, at ICO.

>I was obviously thinking 1 USD to 1k USD for simplicity
Yeah, you just "decided" to multiply the actual base price by 3 "for simplicity".

Cope with your mistake.

[Anonymous No.14698059]

>>14698024
>0.35 + 100000% = 1,000
>Ask me how I know you never went to high school.

That was you.

[Anonymous No.14698061]

>>14697846
>ICO bubble is just happening
Wakey wakey it is 2019, most ICOs are dead, the devs are funding their legal advisers to not end up executed or jailed for 25 years. 99.98% were scams and yes, eth will be dragged down with them and might probably go into history as the scam enabler par excellence
>>14697957
Wouldn't be the first time such an issue would be bandaided, but I see a IMF DLT standard in the next 5 years as the more probable solution and yes, LINK doesn't care, LINK is light years ahead of what we will see in the field in the next decade.

[Anonymous No.14698088]

>>14698059
No you.

Time to HAVE SEX

[Anonymous No.14698101]

>>14698088
already giving up frendo

[Anonymous No.14698178]

>he doesn't believe in meme magic
You're never gonna make it.
>>>/wsg/2943950

[Anonymous No.14698637]

>>14696158
Don't know anon. I've made 5 figures from the ethfinex badge TCR they run. Challenging and as a juror. Shit was $$$

[Anonymous No.14698757]

People who don't understand why Link needs ETH and why ETH needs a bigger markcap than Link to accommodate this don't understand either project.

[Anonymous No.14698764]

>>14698757
>LINK needs ETH

[Anonymous No.14698809]

>>14695979
No and no
The only reason you retards consider Chainlink to be "revolutionary" is because of the stuff Ethereum is able to accomplish. Smart contracts. Connecting banks and payments systems. Google, Microsoft, etc. Tons of other applications, including but not limited to every other crypto project.

Chainlink is only impressive in that it allows these revolutionary platforms such as Ethereum to communicate with external data. A feature that should have been included from the beginning, and will already be implemented in more mature smart contract platforms as time goes on, making Chainlink obsolete.

[Anonymous No.14698820]

>>14698764
Go on then, which platform will replace ETH? Or do you not understand why Link needs to be on a platform with a market cap bigger than it to function securely?

[Anonymous No.14698822]

>>14698809
absolutely awful fud

Ethereum is only impressive in that it allows these revolutionary platforms such as BTC to work with smart contracts. A feature that should have been included from the beginning, and will already be implemented in more mature blockchain platforms as time goes on, making Ethereum obsolete.

[Anonymous No.14698839]

>>14696163
this.is.it.

[Anonymous No.14698865]

>>14698820
>LINK needs a platform with a higher market cap
Retard. LINK needs a DLT, which one doesn't matter. Can be a permission DLT, most probable case, an open with better specs and less bullshit surrounding it like eth has it, or multiple

[Anonymous No.14698903]

it says im the white paper link should cost no more then a cup of coffe. i can see it peak as a 10 dollar max within the next year/s
i firmly belive bnb might be the next etherium tho.

[Anonymous No.14698923]

I wan my 2018 Fudders back, the new ones are dog shit

[Anonymous No.14698986]

>>14696202
Because its logo is a fucking blue and white hexagon cube...

[Anonymous No.14698993]

>>14698865
If Link is on a platform with a lower market cap than it it will be 51% attacked. There is no reason for it to be on more than one Blockchain. It will be on the highest market cap Blockchain and so far at least all "ETH killers" have been absolute jokes

[Anonymous No.14699012]

>>14698993
>Thinking open platforms have a future
sorry, the industry moved on, the time of muah open source DLT is over. Idealism was replaced by professionalism

[Anonymous No.14699015]

ain't no party like a chainlink party cos a chainlink party don't stop, 1, 2.

[Anonymous No.14699120]

>>14695979
Currency without ballast will never work in the society we live in... So both wont be a thing untill 2025

[Anonymous No.14699143]

>>14699012
That's where we disagree.

[Anonymous No.14699161]

>>14698839
Just bought more Link

[Anonymous No.14699229]

>>14695979
500 LINK
Will I make It?

[Anonymous No.14699262]

>>14699143
I know, I finally know where the current batch of posters have been recruited from. Left pedophiles will always be idealists and always lose

[Anonymous No.14699282]

>>14699262
>Left pediphiles
You used to have a point, now you are Just a shitposter

[Anonymous No.14699322]

>>14699282
At least I don't make threads to keep the impression of traffic up and scrap data of users to sell for cheap to help keeping an unprofitable shithole like 4channel running

[Anonymous No.14699324]

>>14699229
It's less than 1k so at least you won't an hero, but it's halfway there. I expect you'll still be hella depressed you wasted so much on an obvious(in hindsight) scam

[Anonymous No.14699374]

>>14696011
The loo in on the leftside Pankresh

[Anonymous No.14699386]

Just wanted to step by and say that I'm not gonna read anything and I'm not gonna sell now fuck off

[Anonymous No.14699621]

>>14699262
Imagine being so caught up with left\right politics you can't even see the advantages of a public Blockchain over a private one because you have some vague idea about it being a communist plot.

[Anonymous No.14699635]

>>14695979
Buy the top of Chainlink or buy the top of Chromia. Something entirely new and revolutionary

> He didn't read the whitepaper

[Anonymous No.14699792]

>>14696159
>Harmony blockchain
Anon... ahhh... I mean... dont worry :/

[Anonymous No.14699832]

>>14698986
10/10 insight

IT IS THE CHOSEN TOKEN

[Anonymous No.14699884]

>>14695979
>a fucking json parser
>as big as Ethereum

[Anonymous No.14699926]

okay, Sergei is russian, link has 1 billion tokens
so read this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_billion

[Anonymous No.14699990]

>>14697727
All it takes is for the derivatives to choose link as the standard for banking API data. Pretty sure that has happening fren

[Anonymous No.14700007]

>>14699990
so no. all you had to say was no but what you said is hell no

[Anonymous No.14700074]

>>14696011
shhh

it's not time yet you fool. Seriously though imagine not taking profits into the next 1000x LINK contender..The absolute state of biz.

[Anonymous No.14700078]

>>14696562
Thanks for explaining

[Anonymous No.14700091]

>>14696011
Nice try Ranjeet

[Anonymous No.14700181]

>>14696011
Goddam we need flags so bad. Thankfully most of us can smell the street shit from far away, but goddam would it be nice to have an early warning system

[Anonymous No.14700211]

>muh flags

[Anonymous No.14700314]

>>14697739
This post and all the replies are missing the point. "1k EOY is fud/a meme/is a meme" is a meme. We are going to see link over $50 at xrp's market cap from last bull run. If you dont think that will happen you're, dare I say, DELUDED

[Anonymous No.14700405]

>>14695979
No.
Look at how its shilled by pajeets on twitter. Its obviously pump and dump coin

[Anonymous No.14700608]

>>14700314
If it reaches XRP's highest market cap, were looking at 300 per LINK.

[Anonymous No.14700698]

>>14700181
I agree. Then we can see the real numbers of pajeets and mud dwellers who spam LINK threads all the time.

[Anonymous No.14700711]

>>14700608
Eth 2.0 and btc halvening will be occurring in / around the same span of time next year. We will see a total crypto market cap in the trillions, the best thing a link holder could do today is secure their holdings off-exchange and go work on themselves for a few years. Read, get healthy, nurture yourself and loved ones.

[Anonymous No.14700807]

>>14696728
https://www.inc.com/erik-sherman/the-1-percent-fallacy-that-trips-many-entrepreneurs.html

Careful with that sort of thinking.

[Anonymous No.14700880]

>>14697761
While I agree, that's an old article and they're making progress
https://www.coindesk.com/ibm-maersk-finally-sign-up-2-big-carriers-for-shipping-blockchain

[Anonymous No.14700916]

>>14696011
Could you STFU I'm trying to accumulate

[Anonymous No.14700919]

Yea a Json Parser is revolutionary technology KEK

[Anonymous No.14701143]

>>14696331
>1000?? That would be a marketcap bigger than bitcoin.
>>14696364
Not if bitcoin also moved up with Link. Link could be number 3 at 1k price per link if BTC is even higher still. No reason both cant go up at same time.

[Anonymous No.14701183]

>>14696011
>it will never go up
>buy the scam I'm shilling instead
Pajeet my son

[Anonymous No.14701340]

there's so much bullshit ITT, all pajeets and nolinkers can be ignored
but if you're a nulinker, pay attention to this anon
>>14696163
>>14696562
he's dropping knowledge bombs and spoon feeding more than anyone else who wants you to know. This was all discussed and worked out in the last 2 years and we put in substantial effort to research and investigate, most of us are unwilling to spoon feed anymore because why the fuck should we, but that anon right there is giving you a crumb of the pie.
Now buy link, keep buying, fuck off and you'll be rich in 5 years.

[Anonymous No.14701589]

>>14696268
List them

[Anonymous No.14701642]

>>14700919
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ij59eP-4gsA

[Anonymous No.14701716]

>>14701340
We should help anons out for another 6 months or so while the price is under 20 I want to see other anons make it if they aren’t redditor bugmen and complete selfish degenerates that will use their gains for hedonism. Maybe if they can distinguish a positive intent and show they won’t blow the money on tranny hookers and drugs we can keep spoon feeding them.

[Anonymous No.14701954]

>>14696163
Also look at Metcalfe's law and think of all the connections going on in link for just one transaction. Link will have far more users than eth

[Anonymous No.14701998]

>>14695979
>Is Chainlink really as revolutionary as Ethereum?

Absolute state of you newfags.

*If* chainlink succeeds, it will be more revolutionary and more valuable than all of crypto put together (currently). The oracle problem is fundamental for bringing about the fourth industrial revolution.

[Anonymous No.14702940]

Isn't it easily possible that AI could obviate the need for oracle's and chainlink?

[Anonymous No.14703015]

>>14701589
You know them goddamn well as we do.
It's all so tiresome

[Anonymous No.14703134]

>>14695979
There are like 50 public blockchains (that nobody uses) and god knows how many permissioned chains (what companies actually use). They ALL need chainlink to securely execute a smart contract. Nobody needs ETH (public chain) for anything. There are dozens of better alternatives.

[Anonymous No.14703163]

>>14701998
This is too overdramatic. If oracles prove to be in such high demand you can be *sure* that the market will see much more heavier hitters competing for this service.

[Anonymous No.14703203]

>>14695979
Link gets a new partnership everyday and somehow it keeps bleeding. What the fuck is going on? Is it whales trying to accumulate?

[Anonymous No.14703247]

>>14703163
They will be competing within the chainlink network by operating competing oracles. This is already happening. Why on earth would they create an entirely new oracle network from scratch nulinker faggot?

[Anonymous No.14703301]

>>14696562
>Chainlink is something that just tells you any information you need

You are beyond retarded

[Anonymous No.14703345]

>>14703163
The only way to launch a decentralized oracle is with real world trust in mind. An oracle must first have the buy in (and implicit pledge to perform) of those with the most real world trust (ie google, oracle, swift, etc).

A good network that's secure takes TIME to build, regardless of how much money you can throw at it. Chainlink is miles ahead of the (non-existent) competition.

[Anonymous No.14703358]

>>14701954
Are you suggesting it’s currently undervalued? If the law is correct in predicting the value of a network, isn’t the token essentially correctly valued?

[Anonymous No.14703362]

No. It's just a scam

[Anonymous No.14703367]

>>14703247
For a great number of reasons, but mostly to avoid being in the pocket of an upstart CEO.

[Anonymous No.14703499]

>>14703367
>implying Sergey is not their hand-selected guy.
Sergey is an insider with the clients

[Anonymous No.14703605]

>>14703367
>For a great number of reasons, but mostly to avoid being in the pocket of an upstart CEO.
your iq < 20

[Anonymous No.14704246]

>>14703367
>I will try to argue about this thing I know nothing about with people who have been doing autistic research for two years!

[Anonymous No.14704431]

Why are the nolinkers in this thread so aggressive? Nigga just close the thread if it bothers you like just walk away lmaooo

[Anonymous No.14704499]

>>14695979
Could've been but was killed by the fact that it's premined. The rewards that were supposed to go to the nodes got hoarded by you mindless horde which somewhat killed the plausibility of the underlying service.

[Anonymous No.14704630]

>>14704499
The FUD has gotten so fucking lazy.

[Anonymous No.14705009]

>>14696806
go read about credit default swaps, a derivative that blythe masters invented

[Anonymous No.14705010]

>>14697727
>the difference between what chainlink currently is, what what you want it to be in your fanfic, is so large
Yup, I can't argue with that. But isn't that what investing is? Aren't you supposed to hold assets that you believe will grow? If it was already as large as I propose it could be, then we wouldn't be sitting at fucking $2.88 right now. But if it Chainlink does become that large, and it absolutely has the potential, then we're looking at something larger than all of crypto combined.

[Anonymous No.14705189]

>>14704499
>What is the 650,000,000 LINK currently not in circulation

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybil_attack
>A reputation system's vulnerability to a Sybil attack depends on how cheaply identities can be generated, the degree to which the reputation system accepts inputs from entities that do not have a chain of trust linking them to a trusted entity, and whether the reputation system treats all entities identically.
>whether the reputation system treats all entities identically.

All nodes will NOT be treated identically. It's almost as if the 650,000,000 LINK was held to prevent a few big players from accumulating 90% of the supply and BTFO the Chainlink network forever.

>>14703358
> isn’t the token essentially correctly valued?
Sure, for the time being. But this is exactly why people believe LINK will explode. With all of the breadcrumbs and partnerships, and being shilled by fucking google, we can expect the network to grow extremely large. Thus, LINK will in-turn grow to be extremely valuable.

[Anonymous No.14705190]

>>14696570
>Look at the got damn suply. The amout of buyers to even reach Eth level is a far stretch.
eth: unlimited supply

[Anonymous No.14705261]

>>14704431
kek

[Anonymous No.14705540]

>>14705189
This. When link is above $50 and assuming the average node will hold 10k link thats 500k for every node if you want to compromise the network you will need millions. Even so you would still need to build your reputation from the ground and your node doesnt know what contracts they are serving. Once the network is running at full power it would be impossibly expensive to attack it.
Link tokenomics is genius

[Anonymous No.14705670]

>>14696011
Took a look at the coin. It’s a Jew coin (team all jews) so it will either be chosen to get huge or just a quick scam to depart sheckles from goyim.

It’s also a smart contract coin so it has big potential if we get a smart contract bull run. Not bad price also. Lots of fud right away as soon as you posted your comment also. This could be the Jews are trying to surpress a hidden gem for themselves (jews lurk here in high numbers and have fun deceiving Nazi gentiles).

Good find op, this could be the next big gainer.