[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 6 KB, 200x250, 1561827062800.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14639461 No.14639461 [Reply] [Original]

We've all made it, now we just wait for the masses to catch up, 2020 will make lots of marines millionaires and the swingers will still scrape for scraps

>> No.14639996

>>14639461
2019 will make us millionaires you ugly kike fuck off.

>> No.14640008

>>14639996
The same way 2018 did?

>> No.14640021

>>14639996
no it won't u birdflu

>> No.14640036

>>14639996
>>14639461
The delusion of LINK holders, it’s like a fuckkng cult

>> No.14640077
File: 574 KB, 634x517, 1518818358668.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14640077

>>14640036
you can call it delusion all you want, you will still be on the sideline while we rake in millions

>> No.14640131

>>14640077
Hecking checking

>> No.14640144

>>14640077
IT HAPPENED AGAIN!!!

>> No.14640161

>>14640144
>>14640077
LOL

checked

>> No.14640180

>>14639461
bag holding doesn't count as making it.

you have to convert to common currency as realized gains.

stop saying you've made it if it's not in cash or at least the bank.

and if you didn't do that at $5, i really don't know what to tell you.

>> No.14640187
File: 860 KB, 1024x1365, 1537716211779.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14640187

>>14639461
Hard to believe that stacks people are paying thousands for was a casual purchase for many of us a few months ago.

>> No.14640212
File: 91 KB, 638x676, 1561828239175.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14640212

>>14640180
Not all bagholding is bad, you probably don't know the difference because you are heavy in the red, I feel bad for you, but its not too late to jump on the link

>> No.14640300

>>14640187
A 10k stack only costed $1,700 is now $35,000. That is a down payment on a house. Let that sink in.

>> No.14640327

>>14640300
More like a down payment on a garage.

>> No.14640330

>>14640036
I know thats what it looks like because for most of them it is. But if you look beneath and actually find out why people have been so bullish on link and why it is the best perfomer through the bear it all becomes clear to you.

This is a one of a kind, not like the gatrillion shitcoins out there. What link is proposing to do is to actually have a reason, non speculative, to be valued at ridiculously high prices to back the contracts they will be handling. So unlike cripple or bitcone or whatever really, link will get value from the contracts they will be handling. Link needs the high marketcap to provide the security for their contracts, otherwise node holders could be insentivised to provide false information to swindle the clients if the contract outvalues all nodes combined by a factor 10000

>> No.14640363

>>14640330
So if LINK never reaches a high market cap, it can’t provide security for the contracts?

Thanks, staying away. 90% of LIT holders literally don’t know what the product is used for and you seem to be one of the only ones who can come up with a coherent argument.

When things reach this level of delusion it’s a clear sell signal. $1000 EOY? That would put them at trillions of dollars in valuation. Microsoft and Oracle aren’t even close to that.

>> No.14640401

>>14640363
You're so dumb. How about you do some research instead of going based off 4chan shitposting.

>> No.14640426

>>14640401
So provide a reasonable argument?

There have only been two companies in the history of the world to reach 1 trillion in valuation. Apple and Amazon.

And you expect people to believe that this will reach 1 trillion?

>> No.14640465

2020 it is

>> No.14640482

>>14640363
>When things reach this level of delusion it’s a clear sell signal. $1000 EOY?
Holy shit you must be new here, lurk more.

>> No.14640505
File: 238 KB, 1200x1200, chainlink is a scam.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14640505

>>14639461
if by "made it" you mean you've been scammed, you're absolutely correct.

>> No.14640518

>>14640482
You do realize that there are a decent portion of link holders who unironically believe this ?

>> No.14640553
File: 137 KB, 250x250, 1561813252089.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14640553

>>14640518
as they should, we will reach $1000 eventually, you need to lurk more
>>14640505
This fud is so old why the fuck would anyone bother refuting it? you keep forgetting most have held since ICO or SIBOS we've been through any fud you can come up with

>> No.14640556

>>14639461
Im still under 1k by 680 LINK!
this sucks

>> No.14640573

>>14640300
I wish I had that Stack.
Do good with your Roches, anon

>> No.14640591

>>14640426
I don't expect shit. 1k is a 4chan meme. You must be new here to take it that serious. How abouty research what they are trying to achieve here and realize the huge potential.

>> No.14640594

>>14640553
Refute it for the new bagholders

>> No.14640596

>>14640553
>This fud is so old why the fuck would anyone bother refuting it? you keep forgetting most have held since ICO or SIBOS we've been through any fud you can come up with
lie. I've been here for 3 years, this fud has never been refuted because anyone with the programming knowledge to refute it would actually agree with it.

>> No.14640609

>>14640553
Yeah anon, if it’s so easy to refute then do it

>> No.14640622

>>14640021
keked

>> No.14640638
File: 204 KB, 750x500, sergeymoney.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14640638

>>14640594
>>14640609
Oh no I'm not going to spoonfeed the likes of you, I don't care if you buy or not

>> No.14640642

>>14640638
The absolute state of linktards

>> No.14640657

>>14640518
>implying people who held ETH werent in the exact same position in 2016-2017.
I know you are too new to remember this, but LINK has been a play by play repeat of ETH so far. All of the “delusion” all of the shilling, all of the fud, the price action, the Russian founder, the devs cashing out before liftoff for some strange reason. This has been IDENTICAL to ETH in every way, and will likely reach a similar ATH. The only people who are delusional here are the ones who refuse to see this pattern.

>> No.14640660

>>14640638
This fills me with dread

>> No.14640703

>>14640363
And no company in the history of ever has ever gone after specifically the derivatives market in the way link is. Blockchain wasn't a "thing" in the early 2000s.

Honestly I know it sounds like the regurgitated bullshit half of these brainlets spout but I genuinely recommend you to read the link whitepaper yourself. Unlike the 9000 other pajeets coins there is actually coherent thought put into it and I don't want to spoonfeed the reddit brigades that have been frequenting these shores after link took off(yeah you dutch faggots I know some of you morons unironically bought pi"because its shilled on 4chin" lmfao).

IF they even succeed at getting 0.1% of what they're targeting, and it obviously will always be IF with a fresh company like this, the valuation of link will already be ridiculous. Add speculation to that and its even higher(again, do the math yourself, the numbers will make you say bruh tf?)

As it currently stands link is endorsed by google, oracle, swift and very very likely microsoft(see >>14640464
At this very moment link is lightyears ahead of all the shitcoins out there with their oracle solution, which is why these giant companies are backing it this early. They see the potential it has. There's a reason google doesn't publish blogposts about integrating fucking verge or matic or whatever other shitcoins out there.
Oracle is not just bullish on link, they are so bullish they are footing the bill of integrating literal who companies with link to prove to the other corporations how amazing this new tech is.


Now the vast majority of brainlets on biz has no idea of all of this and the implications behind it and just get memed into buying shit, which is why they will sell early and probably lose the vast majority of this "wealth" within a short time due to getting shilled on some new shitcoin of the month and getting stuck with gigantic bags of some crap like peercoin.

>> No.14640711

>>14640657
This.... Saddens me

>> No.14640713

>>14640657
incorrect.

1. ETH had a full technical white paper for the final decentralized version of Ethereum 4 months after raising funds. Chainlink still has not released the specifications for the decentralized version.
2. Eth had 20+ devs working, spending most of its ICO money and released full working product (decentralized) after 1 year. Chainlink had 2.
3. Eth had hundreds (if not thousands) of developers using its test net, as soon as it came ot. Chainlink had none.
4. Eth foundation owns less than 1% of the supply. Chainlink owns 65%.

>> No.14640727

>>14639996
Based and linkpilled

>> No.14640742

>>14640703
This, I like this

>> No.14640753

I am so tired of all the reddit fags.

>> No.14640780

>>14640660
>>14640642
Yeah it's a terrible project.
Make sure you sell your whole stacks (if you have any.)
Also you can use the filter system on this sub to filter out a whole bunch of stuff. I'd recommend things like "linky" "chainlink" "sergey" etc. It stops you from being overloaded with this shit so that we can focus on the discussion of projects with an actual future like nano and vechain.

>> No.14640787

>>14640426

You can’t compare market cap calculated using a companies market equity value to cryptos such as link. Link tokens are going to be used in the network unlike shares which just sit in your portfolio.

>> No.14640794

>>14640657
ETH went to ATH cuz of ICO craze. They needed to buy ETH to get in. There may be a smartcontract craze, but the end users don't need to buy link token, they can pay for oracle service in fiat. Node Operators need to buy LINK, so unless we get a shit load of node operators onboard, and buying like there's no tomorrow.... price won't sling shot to 1K. I'd be happy if we can get over $100 based on speculating and some basic adaptation from the industry first.

>> No.14640801

>>14640713
Your only point that isnt a straight up lie is #4. Nice try though.

>> No.14640820

>>14640703
This is a complete lie.

Chainlink has captured 0 users. Who cares if they AIM at capturing 0.1% of 1 trillion users?

Their AIM is irrelevant to anything.

The only reason Google Cloud and Oracle Cloud are endorsing Chainlink is to shill their own cloud services. And it worked amazingly. They got tons of coverage. If you actually follow them, you'll see they literally release 5 articles a day, promoting their own services. They are a huge company, these articles talking about random shit like Chainlink is own they market themselves.

>>14640801
incorrect, they are all facts. I can see why that would make you salty though, because you're too low IQ to not get BTFO every time you talk

>> No.14640854

>>14640609
>>14640594
For you absolute cock suckers begging to be spoonfed so you can sleep better at night with your $300 investment

Go to GitHub.
Go to smartcontractkit.
Go to audits.
Go to reports.

There lies your answers. I'm not going to summarize these security audits but go ahead and read them yourselves for the answers to your questions.
Last time I ever spoon-feed retards

>> No.14640870

this thread is gay and you're a faggot OP shut the fuck up

>> No.14640927

>>14640426
msft was a trillion marketcap last month. kys you uninformed retard

>> No.14640998

>>14640820

If they are a huge company why would they feel the need to use some obscure “scam” company to promote their products?

>> No.14641049

>>14640927
Ok I missed a company. You’re telling me Sergey = Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, or Jeff Bezos? HAHAHA

In fact he owns MORE of the company than any one of the people listed. If LINK ever got as big as you said, he would become the richest man in the world

>> No.14641132

>>14640854
B-but you didn't spoonfeed me

>> No.14641192

>>14641049
I bet you did as much research into chainlink as you did into answering the question "what companies have been valued over 1 trillion?"

>> No.14641580

>>14641049
Hey boomer they're not shares of a company. They're erc10 tokens

>> No.14641686

>>14640713
ETH only had to build one blockchain. Chainlink had to build a thing that connects all blockchains together.

>> No.14642557

>>14640820
>>14640713
>>14640596
>>14640505

All decentralized oracle solutions will run into the Sybil problem. Whichever one can get past the Sybil vulnerable time frame by having more and more nodes added to the network will be victorious. Chainlink has already made the first step.

>> No.14642575

>>14639461
Too much money on the line anon
My hands are getting super weak

>> No.14642612

>>14642557
This assumes that more nodes increases reliability

>> No.14642639

>>14642557
To add to this, your arguments are valid. The ETH one is a bit retarded considering none of them are relevant. ETH and LINK are two completely different projects, and thus any information about the two should be viewed with a different mindset. However, everything you've said about Sybil attacks thus far is true. So there are a few ways of going about this as an investor:

1. You DON'T believe Chainlink will outlast Sybil vulnerabilities. You don't buy LINK.
2. You DO believe Chainlink will outlast Sybil vulnerabilities. You buy LINK early (now) and reap the gains if your prediction is correct.
3. You don't know if Chainlink will outlast Sybil vulnerabilities. Instead, you wait until Chainlink successfully outlasts the vulnerabilities, and purchase LINK at a higher price that reflects the security of the network.

No risk, no reward. This is one of the reasons LINK is still currently under $100.

>> No.14642684

>>14642612
As long as the nodes are not ran by the same party, then yes, it does increase reliability.

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybil_attack
>In a Sybil attack, the attacker subverts the reputation system of a peer-to-peer network by creating a large number of pseudonymous identities and uses them to gain a disproportionately large influence.

Therefore, the solution to solving any issues regarding a Sybil attack is simply to have more nodes ran by different parties. I personally believe this is what the Chainlink team has been working on, and a reason why 65% of the supply is locked up. There want to get a fuck load of nodes up and running by different players before things start getting serious.

>> No.14642724

>>14642684
This is reassuring, thanks for taking the time anon

>> No.14642842

>>14642557
Chainlink's strategy involves integration with high-trust nodes and providers first, so trust becomes axiomatic before sybil attackers have a chance

>> No.14642969

>>14642724
More information from wikipedia on Sybil attacks.
>A reputation system's vulnerability to a Sybil attack depends on how cheaply identities can be generated, the degree to which the reputation system accepts inputs from entities that do not have a chain of trust linking them to a trusted entity, and whether the reputation system treats all entities identically.

We know that the propsed reputation system will NOT treat all entities identically. This is where LINK comes in, and why it is so important. From what I understand, the more LINK staked and the more successful requests you've completed, the better your reputation on the network. Therefore, it would be very VERYexpensive for a large scale Sybil attack to take place on the Chainlink network. This cost increases as more nodes are created. And again, regarding the 65% locked supply of LINK. If they were to have released 100% or even just 90% of the supply, there would have been nothing stopping a few large buyers from completely controlling the network FOREVER. Yes, the fact that the supply is locked is a good thing. They are not going to allow this to happen. They have taken all of the right steps to ensure that a Sybil attack will be extremely unlikely. The team has their shit together, and they aren't going to give all of that up by releasing a ton of information regarding the locked supply.

>> No.14642989

>>14642842
Exactly. Anyone who actually believes that the team has not put countless days into figuring out how to solve the Sybil problem is too braindead to read between the lines.

>> No.14643061

>>14642842
Don't expect nolinkers to understand delayed gratification or planning. They're too busy going all in and grinding away their stack each time something catches their attention.