/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.14532605]

> What did he mean by this?

[Anonymous No.14532621]

>>14532605
Chainlink 6¥ EOD

[Anonymous No.14532638]

>>14532605
>The new industry standard

[Anonymous No.14532654]

>>14532605
he means docusign agreements are going to be linked and lit af

[Anonymous No.14532662]

>>14532605
He means its an interesting concept that has yet to deliver and it won't because ETH is a shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.14532680]

>>14532605
Nice photoshop

[Anonymous No.14532681]

>>14532605
How many LINKs does he own?

[Anonymous No.14532691]

>>14532605
CHAINLINK AND DOCUSIGN PARTNERSHIP CONFIRMED

[Anonymous No.14532756]

Reminder he has nothing to do with docusign anymore or he wouldn’t be posting about CL. Docusign has never mentioned CL before

[Anonymous No.14532765]

>normie quits his job
>instead of issuing a bill with due date (for bonus money repayment, wage garnishments, etc) that can be challenged in court, the company can now pull money directly out of his coin wallet or bank account for his resignation due to stipulations in the smart contract that were too technical for normie or the HR roastie that shilled it to him to understand
>cant even challenge it in court because smart contract lawyers aren't a thing yet
THE FUTURE IS NOW

[Anonymous No.14532779]

>>14532756
>Docusign has never mentioned CL before
No but they're inching closer.

[Anonymous No.14532816]

>>14532779
>blockchains cannot differentiate between good and bad data

Neither can Link.

[Anonymous No.14532827]

>>14532816
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

[Anonymous No.14532893]

>>14532779
How is that inching closer? They know about CL but still says the oracle problem exists.

[Anonymous No.14532919]

>>14532827
>resiliency means arbiter of truth

Also wake me when Link is actually working in this capacity.

[Anonymous No.14532987]

>>14532893
>literally describing decentralized oracles
>not inching closer to Chainlink
Wow, sorry about your brain I guess.

>>14532919
>resiliency means arbiter of truth
What?
That pic shows a centralized oracle shitting the bed, turning good data into bad data.
If there had been more than one oracle, the good data would have remained good, and the bad outlier would have been discarded.
Meaning the event would likely not have happened.
As acknowledged by Synthetix themselves.

[Anonymous No.14533101]

>>14532987
>blockchains cannot differentiate between good and bad data
That's the problem. Link still hasn't solved this.

[Anonymous No.14533134]

>>14533101
I gave you an example of good data going bad because of a centralized oracle fuckup.
Decentralized oracles would have resulted in good data in that case.

Computers cannot differentiate between good and bad data either.
This old "computers are actually stupid because they only do what you tell them" nugget is a boomer favorite.
Don't be a boomer.

[Anonymous No.14533143]

>>14533134
>Decentralized oracles would have resulted in good data in that case.
Link isn't decentralized. Great meme though.

[Anonymous No.14533166]

>>14533143
>Link isn't decentralized.

[Anonymous No.14533172]

>>14532987
Decentralization definitely helps, but it doesn't necessarily fix the problem. For instance with sports betting on say football or basketball, you could set up N oracles, but theres only one official stat line coming from the league, often only one legal broadcast being shown, etc. Having N oracles query the same API, or mirrors of the same API (for example if you have some Oracle looking at a pirated stream instead of an official stream for some reason) all leads to the same bottleneck problems experienced with a centralized Oracle. Likewise the same problem applies to centralized events like several Oracles monitoring a faulty roulette table in a casino. LINK whitepaper addresses this briefly, but it can potentially be a much bigger problem (for gambling specifically) than people realize.

[Anonymous No.14533207]

>muh "decentralized" KYC oracles

[Anonymous No.14533210]

>>14533172
>Decentralization definitely helps, but it doesn't necessarily fix the problem.
Today's world runs on the same sources Chainlink would be using.
Banks alone make BILLIONS of API calls every day. Most of them automated.

Don't fud the world of data sources as we know it just to take a stab at Chainlink.
It's just not smart.

[Anonymous No.14533230]

>>14533207
KYC is literally optional.

https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-live-ethereum-mainnet-connected-consensus/
>"We also intend to have an optional identity review available to node operators"

[Anonymous No.14533297]

>>14533166
It's literally not. Ripple calls itself decentralized too. In fact when you compare the two they have a lot in common.

>centralized premine shitcoin (actually link is even worse here because its not even a coin, just a token on an even shitter network)
>in order to run a node you have to go through Chainlink team
>the devs own pretty much the entire supply
>""""""""""partnerships""""""""""""
>extreme hype for xrp it was twitter niggers, for link it was 4chan faggots
>nobody is using it

[Anonymous No.14533319]

>>14533297
>It's literally not.
8 nodes last I checked.
And that's just a month after releasing mainnet, so still pretty much the very first testing phase.

You have brain problems.

[Anonymous No.14533429]

>>14533166
Who is she?

[Anonymous No.14533648]

>>14533210
Banks relying on several unique and uncorrelated sources for market data is different from the NBA, NFL, a horse racing track, etc. only having one official stat line with several mirrors available.

[Anonymous No.14533716]

>>14532605
BUY BUY BUY

[Anonymous No.14533779]

>>14533648
>Banks don't rely on single-source APIs
Now you're not even trying anymore.

[Anonymous No.14533791]

itt oldfags btfo soilinkers

[Anonymous No.14534233]

>>14533779
So you're going to make an argument in my favor, then?