Linkes, read this

[Anonymous No.14507990]

https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenehrlich/2019/07/01/after-experimenting-with-bitcoin-and-ethereum-docusign-is-accelerating-its-blockchain-ambitions/amp/

[Anonymous No.14508075]

>>14507990
>ctrl+f
>0 chainlink
Come on. I own links but this is silly.

[Anonymous No.14508089]

>>14508075
Go dilate

[Anonymous No.14508124]

>>14508075
Heh... Tom Gosner. Ever heard of him? Great guy.

[Anonymous No.14508169]

>>14507990
priced in faggot

[Anonymous No.14508179]

Thank you op

[Anonymous No.14508251]

we're all gonna fucking make it

[Anonymous No.14508303]

>>14507990
This basically suggests that they're working with Link, but that Link is currently insufficient to meet their needs

[Anonymous No.14508328]

So I don’t get it, what was the recent FUD w Docusign. Also clause isn’t a fucking oracle provider so who is gonna do the oracles and why can’t they just announce a partnership why are they hesitating so much. Clearly they care more than Just digitizing the contract

[Anonymous No.14508353]

>>14508303
Ya this is a good point. I mean we literally have 5 nodes up and running that’s it. We need to be further along to integrate. That’s why they announced mainnet so abruptly I’m asssuming. We’rr Behind where we need to be.

[SS rk No.14508373]

>>14508303
That is until the hyperledger integration. Coming to you this month!

[Anonymous No.14508376]

>>14508353
Honestly as much as I love Sergey we could really use a genius google guy in there to really launch this thing and take us where we need to get ASAP.

[Anonymous No.14508389]

never really understood why anyone cared about this. Docusign is only an 8 billion dollar company.

[Anonymous No.14508672]

>>14508389
Haha what. It would be massive. It would be their whole platform

[Anonymous No.14509136]

so, Peter Hunn and Dan Selman have repeatedly stated on twitter that they are just not that focused on the oracle problem right now.

This is actually Steven Ehrlich, the writer, noting that one of the challenges for smart contract adoption is getting good data into and out of smart contracts.

But clause is not focused on that problem atm. See, e.g. the point about how their software can run on blockchain or non-blockchain platform.

[Anonymous No.14509166]

>>14509136
go back

[Anonymous No.14509190]

>>14508303
They're saying that Link is not very useful if anything, because there are other more feature complete solutions of this kind.
>>14508373
Microsoft has literally created their Chainlink before Chainlink, it's called Coco and it's getting some use but it's not very popular as enterprise tends to go with proprietary solutions for such simple things. There's -100% chance Microsoft would ever invest in their own sub par competition.

[Anonymous No.14509199]

>>14508303
>This basically suggests that they're working with Link, but that Link is currently insufficient to meet their needs

Honestly I don't think it does. I do not think they are working with link at the moment. I think they are taking a different approach.

See also, the point that link is no longer listed on the accord project website. Accord is a nonprofit started by clause.

I am NOT fudding. I do not think this is a big deal one way or the other for chainlink.

Right now the important question is not clause, but whether chainlink is working with ISDA and Digital Asset. We know chainlink is working with google. And we know that google cloud team is working with Digital Asset and ISDA.

[Anonymous No.14509241]

pic related

[Anonymous No.14509253]

>>14509166
>go back
shut up dumb fuck I am not fudding link. If you don't know what is going on with clause/accord and chainlink and what Peter Hunn has called "enforcement of state" vs "self executing" then you are a dumb shit and need to shut up because the adults are talking.

[Anonymous No.14509292]

>>14508672
>Haha what. It would be massive. It would be their whole platform
no it would not and this shows lack of imagination.

First major use case is derivatives, then insurance. Docusign has basically fuck all to do with either of those at the level that matters.

[Anonymous No.14509421]

>>14509190
>Coco
Are you talking about Common Objects in Context? Cause that doens't sound like a Chainlink type project.

>>14509199
You could very well be right. This is far too little to assume a real connection, it only SOUNDS like there MIGHT be one.

[Anonymous No.14509502]

>>14509421
https://azure.microsoft.com/pl-pl/blog/announcing-microsoft-s-coco-framework-for-enterprise-blockchain-networks/

[SS rk No.14509535]

>>14509190
>what is proof of concept?

[Anonymous No.14509701]

>>14509421
Interesting, thanks.

[Anonymous No.14509726]

>>14509502
Interesting, thanks.

[Anonymous No.14509773]

>>14507990
Thank you anon, Very cool!

[Anonymous No.14510010]

>>14507990
Chainlink literally solves all of their little roadblocks
>which platforms it will run on
Ethereum and literally any other blockchain
>first use cases and initial set of customers
Selling data using 50 start ups handpicked by ORACLE
>scalability issues
End signatures
>accessibility
Literally lightweight, easy to use and again blockchain agnostic
>security problems
It'll be decentralized but until then the node operators will be handpicked by the team through kyc
Are they purposely being retarded? They're larping right? Accord project is still partnered with chainlink and docusign founder is still an adviser. Are they just testing Sergey?

[Anonymous No.14510071]

>>14509253
>>14509292
i hold more link than you by a long shot and have since the ico, on here we real adults dont use reddit spacing. you MUST go back, you dumb fuck

[Anonymous No.14510137]

>>14508389
The hands down leader in digital signatures. They are also moving into document creation. For things like.... contracts.

[Anonymous No.14510704]

>>14509535

[Anonymous No.14510759]

when you google docusign, you get a bunch of reddit/forum posts with people looking for free alternatives to docusign, and there seems to be a lot of them out there that works just as good if not better. why is this docusign connection so valuable to linkers when theres so many free digital signature alternatives? is the future of docusign really so bright?

[Anonymous No.14510884]

>>14510759
docusign is the industry leader pleb. i can tell you've never left the house or signed any bizness deals

[Anonymous No.14510935]

>>14510884
rude

[Anonymous No.14511016]

>>14510935
youre reading jewgle results back at me like they arent monetized and you have 0 idea what the esig industry even is. why are you here? go make a sandwich or tend the bar

[Anonymous No.14511088]

>>14511016
i-im sorry i have offended you sir business man, pls forgive me

[Anonymous No.14511131]

>>14508075
here fag, open your mouth

[Anonymous No.14511142]

>>14511131
here comes the airplane om nom nom nom nom

[Anonymous No.14511451]

>>14511088
Just call him a faggot back or don't reply you castrated redditor

[Anonymous No.14511501]

>>14511451
o-ok so sorry 4channel expert i will keep that in mind in the future

[Anonymous No.14511533]

>>14511142
kek

[Anonymous No.14511642]

>>14511501
Ironic fagposting is still fagposting. Kindly off yourself

[Anonymous No.14511665]

>>14511142
Fucking kek

[Anonymous No.14511951]

>>14511642
s-s-s-s-s-s-s-s-sorry

[Anonymous No.14512220]

>>14508251
I wish.

How many would I have to get?
I only have 36 for now

[Anonymous No.14512446]

>>14512220
I will try to buy more tomorrow, but I am really short on cash

[Anonymous No.14512675]

>>14509190

Coco is centralized

[Anonymous No.14512794]

>>14508389

You have 0 foresight, anon. We’re playing a game of speculation. The whole point of trading crypto is to discover potential future events and profit off of them, it’s very clear and simple.

[Anonymous No.14513008]

>>14508389
>Docusign is only an 8 billion dollar company
>only an 8 billion dollar company
>8 billion dollar company

what's your point anon?