CHAINLINK OFFICIALLY BTFO

[Anonymous No.14398332]

BREAKING NEWS: LINK MARINES BLOWN THE FUCK OUT AFTER NEW iEXEC DORACLE POST

https://medium.com/iex-ec/why-your-dapp-needs-a-decentralized-oracle-2f2403f9fd7?

We went to the scene for a comment from LINK holders.

LINK bagholder: "NO NO NO NO NO NO NO FUCK THIS CAN'T BE HAPPENING"

What's clear for now is the only thing being linked in the chainlink network will be LINKers asses to toilet seats, as RLC takes begins to take leadership in the DOracle space.

Back to the studio.

[Anonymous No.14398356]

>>14398332
i am linking this post to high iq posts

[Anonymous No.14398364]

>doracle

[Anonymous No.14398367]

>>14398332
baka

[Anonymous No.14398418]

Sacre blue!!

[Anonymous No.14398437]

>>14398332
dorkl

[Anonymous No.14398444]

>>14398332
BEGONE OP THIS IS NOW A LINK THREAD

[Anonymous No.14398503]

>>14398444
Check out those digits, I think 4.44 eow sounds right

[Anonymous No.14398505]

>>14398444
Checked and kekpilled

[Anonymous No.14398520]

>muh DO'Hracles

[Anonymous No.14398529]

>>14398332
iExec shilling for the industry standard decentralized oracle network

white flag. so french

[Anonymous No.14398534]

>>14398332
dilate

[Anonymous No.14398556]

>>14398444

CHECKED AND KEK’D

FRENCH FUCKS BTFO

[42 No.14398573]

>>14398444
OP...it's not looking good...

[42 No.14398587]

>>14398444

[Anonymous No.14398602]

>>14398444

gtfo

[Anonymous No.14398615]

LINK is kang

But RLC is pretty cool.
It will moon off the success of chainlink once the normies starts looking for the next "LINK" and the new cool buzzword "oracles" is imprinted in their minds.
It also helps that iExec is as legit as a team can get only second to Chainlink, so theres that aswell.

Only the high IQ Linkies holds both.

[Anonymous No.14398625]

>>14398332
>Ranked 173
oi i am laffing

[Anonymous No.14398649]

>>14398615
Normies are still disgesting "crypto" lmao. At least 2 years until they talk about oracles

[Anonymous No.14398687]

>>14398615
LARP aside this is what I see as most likely too, assuming LINK hits top 10. Just like all the other niches of crypto people look for the lesser known alternatives with potential.

sidechain scaling is coming in 6 months, not 100% sure but there may be zero transaction fees at that time.
If so RLC would become cheaper than LINK to use for oracles, which will still have very high transaction fees on ETH. But chainlink would have a bigger network effect.
It might just be consensus fees that sidechain scaling eliminates though I haven't confirmed.

Also iExec has a reputation system by workerpool and nodes stake RLC for collateral with a protocol that looks for outliers and punishes them, just like LINK.

[Anonymous No.14398745]

>>14398332
5/15
never baguette

[Anonymous No.14398774]

Fact is LINK is in prealpha state and RLC is in earlybeta soon to be a fully made product. Stinkies will keep fuding this godcoin but all they feel is fear

[42 No.14398783]

>>14398687
>top 10
top 10 is FUD
it's going to top 3

[42 No.14398798]

>>14398783
>top 10 is FUD

[Anonymous No.14398819]

>>14398687
>If so RLC would become cheaper than LINK to use for oracles
Firstly, based on what pricing moron
Secondly, threshold sigs and pay for how many nodes you want, ie. how decentralized

IExec holders are brainlet tier at best

[Anonymous No.14398823]

Thank god i sold 70% of my Links into RLC week ago.

[Anonymous No.14398842]

>>14398332

HMMMMM, ONE OF THESE HAS A MARKET VALUE OF 200 SATS, AND THE OTHER 20,000 SATS


I WONDER WHICH ONE THE MARKET HAS RECOGNIZED AS MORE VALUABLE...

[Anonymous No.14398850]

>>14398332

[Anonymous No.14398869]

>>14398615
Patricians hold Veo instead

[Anonymous No.14398893]

>>14398444

[Anonymous No.14398895]

>>14398687
Exactly how they keep searching for the next Ethereum and pumped shitcoins like Zilliqa, EOS, Tron, Cardano and NEO.

iExec will ride the LINK train eventually. Also they never set out to be a oracle network, its just a tiny part of what they can provide, but not what they set out to accomplish. They will help push smart contracts and oracle adoption in their own right once the ball gets rolling.

[Anonymous No.14398902]

Should we actually be worried about this

[Anonymous No.14398903]

>>14398332
>Goku animation to explain oracles
Ffs op..
Just stop.

[Anonymous No.14398928]

>>14398332
People are already are seeing LINK as a threat
Unironically bullish af just bought 100k more

[Anonymous No.14398956]

>web3
Yes, they are partnered with Chainlink. Need more copium franjeet?

[Anonymous No.14399047]

>>14398819
Based on free market competition with no PAYMENT transaction fees on the RLC network which are big for API calls on ETH (if sidechain scaling does eliminate this). The network effect if chainlink will still mean it leads the way even with this though imo

>>14398895
Yeah, makes sense.

>>14398902
See
>>14398687

[Anonymous No.14399059]

>>14398332
Actually curious about how it works, but don’t dream, they will bend the knee

[Anonymous No.14399148]

>>14399059
> Not curious about shit
> no one is curious about this scamcoin
> gilles keeps feeding his lame threads answering to himself with fake IPs
> what's next is pic related

[linkcoiner No.14399665]

Didn't someone post a picture of the link and iExec teams together at some point?

onI'm keeping an eye on it. Seems natural for their product. I think it uses the same consensus mechanism as their decentralized computing. They're doing pretty interesting things (distributed computing power, TEE computing) and seem to be working with big names in the industry.

[Anonymous No.14399705]

>>14399665
iexec was caught flat-out lying about Chainlink, see >>14398520

[Anonymous No.14399811]

>>14399705
they steal money and suck cocks, obviously they are liars too

[Anonymous No.14399850]

I'm giving iexec exactly 1 month to bend the knee.

[linkcoiner No.14399864]

I saw a linky explain that at the time of posting each point was correct. It is out of date now though because link went main net

[Anonymous No.14399894]

>>14398332
>iExec

literally who

[Anonymous No.14399896]

>>14398798
Stop posting this. What is even the point?

[Anonymous No.14399977]

>>14399864
>I saw a linky explain that at the time of posting each point was correct.
The point about Chainlink not having SGX hasn't been correct since the white paper came out in 2017.
And if they were being autistic about "it's true currently!", then why did they count Chainlink as a "decentralized oracle" before mainnet?

Also, Witnet is still not on mainnet.

That chart was a complete mess, and they removed it almost immediately after posting it after being pressured.

[Anonymous No.14400005]

>>14399665
Chainlink are probably using iExecs PoCo protocol for their oracle results comparing

[Anonymous No.14400009]

>>14399705
>say something 120 years ago that was applicable at the time
>120 years later brainlet says its a lie because its no longer applicable

Being this fucking retarded

[Anonymous No.14400014]

>>14398332
Dapp has dorkle problem

[Anonymous No.14400022]

>>14400009
The point about Chainlink not having SGX hasn't been correct since the white paper came out in 2017.
And if they were being autistic about "it's true currently!", then why did they count Chainlink as a "decentralized oracle" before mainnet?

Also, Witnet is still not on mainnet.

That chart was a complete mess, and they removed it almost immediately after posting it after being pressured.

[Anonymous No.14400026]

>>14398444
Faggot nigger jannies

[Anonymous No.14400034]

>>14398444
kek wills it

[Anonymous No.14400043]

>>14400014

[Anonymous No.14400127]

>>14400022
>sgx
they acquired a fucking town crier for that purpose
the absolute state of franjeet fud

[Anonymous No.14400155]

>>14400127
Plus, the white paper (released in September 2017) mentions SGX about 50 times, and was already rife with TC integration.
Ari Juels himself co-wrote it ffs.

[Anonymous No.14400172]

>>14400127
Once again, the chart was old and literally created prior to any of this. Are all chainlink holders this emotional?

[Anonymous No.14400173]

never thought this would be relevant again

[Anonymous No.14400210]

>>14400172
>link whitepaper
2017
>town crier acquisition
2018

[Anonymous No.14400216]

>>14400022
>>14399977
Checked. Goddamn son

[Anonymous No.14400228]

>>14400173
You will see a few RLC threads a day from the 99th percentile of IQ on this board

In 2 months this will turn into around 10 threads a day as the 95th percentile of IQ understands what's happening.

Then it will turn into dozens of threads a day as the remainder of people here catch on. Finally history will repeat with RLC just as it has and will continue to do with LINK.

[Anonymous No.14400238]

>>14400172
So they created the chart before September 2017, and posted it mid-May 2019?
There's no way to put a positive spin on this.
Either iexec are lying or they're incompetent.

[Anonymous No.14400240]

>>14400228
>trusting frogs, ever

[Anonymous No.14400364]

>>14400228
Yeah just like Mobius, Aeternity, Witnet, etc

[Anonymous No.14400469]

>>14400238
They posted an old chart and didnt update it based on what the chainlink devs were planning to implement. Regardless of acquiring TC, the issue hadn’t been addressed prior to mainnet release. This isnt that hard. I know you chainlink kids are primarily just following the meme with your 1.5k linkies, but damn....wake up. Theres money to be made.

[Anonymous No.14400502]

>Doracle
I kinda wish they went with d.oracle instead, never trust the french to come up with a good name

[Anonymous No.14400506]

>>14400469
>Regardless of acquiring TC, the issue hadn’t been addressed prior to mainnet release.
It's all so tiresome.

[Anonymous No.14400510]

>>14400469
>They posted an old chart
According to you, in May 2019 iexec posted a chart that was made before September 2017.
And that chart features Witnet, a project that was born in 2018.

Stop deluding yourself.

[Anonymous No.14400544]

>>14398444
Cheeeeck

[Anonymous No.14400551]

>>14400172
They're holding on to whatever they can anon, it was never about the chart

[Anonymous No.14400582]

Dump it

[Anonymous No.14400652]

>>14398798
>posts image of market maker projections
So an actual "suicide stack" will be 5 to 10 LINK when alls said and done and it finally represents a significant portion (as collateral) of the GDP of planet earth.

gotcha
>comfy

[Anonymous No.14400683]

>>14400510
So ive read up until this point, and let me ask you a question: why should I ( or anyone else) give a fuck about any of this?

[Anonymous No.14400720]

>>14400683
>why should I ( or anyone else) give a fuck about a crypto lying to boost its value
Is this really your question?

[Anonymous No.14400818]

>>14400720
>you think it was a lie
>other guy says it wasnt
>arguing about dates

You both sound like faggots desu. Im talking about from a technical position, not an bickering little faggot position, why should I care about this?

[Anonymous No.14400854]

>>14400818
Why did you switch IDs?

Either it was an outright lie, or iexec really somehow didn't know about Chainlink and SGX.
Either is terrible.
But most likely they lied, considering all the inconsistencies.

[Anonymous No.14400909]

>>14400683
it's not about the chart anon
they will just keep spewing
>but the chart! the CHART!
it's because it's literally all they have to hold on to

[Anonymous No.14400916]

>>14400854
No clue, on a phone

Still doesn’t answer my question. All well, I will continue to dive into the tech and see if its worth diving in. Thanks fren.

[Anonymous No.14400926]

>Buy 30c
>sell 50c
>buy 40c
This coin is gonna have me singing alouette

[Anonymous No.14400960]

>>14400916
linkies would rather have you buy their coin that's up 200%. Iexec does everything link does and is also a cloud computing free market mainframe. do the deep dive into the tech anon, you'll soon be ignoring linkies as much as the rest of the die hard RLC holders too. thanks for making the commitment to reading about the project before you let link shills decide for you.

[Anonymous No.14401024]

>>14400854
1

[Anonymous No.14401025]

>>14400818
It released dorkles on mainnet before chainlink.
Has a qualified team with multiple patents in the cloud industry.
Mentioned alongside chainlink in an Ethereum specification
Innovated a proof of contribution protocol to come to consensus on what nodes did what share of decentralised computing to process tasks

Cons:
Shit at marketing
French

[Anonymous No.14401033]

>>14400916
Your question is "why should I care if my investment is run by scammy/incompetent people?".
It answers itself.

[Anonymous No.14401042]

>>14400854
2

[Anonymous No.14401068]

>>14400854
>>14401024
>>14401042

eat shit retard

[Anonymous No.14401088]

Imagine buying an overvalued Link when Rlc is undervalued and do the exact same things and even more
Gilles I love you let me be your tranny

[Anonymous No.14401089]

>>14398332
>dragon ball gifs
>matrix gifs
please, PLEASE tell me that's not an official blog post
JESUS Christ

[42 !r7LarkyRdI No.14401103]

>>14398444

Peculate

[Anonymous No.14401108]

>>14401025
Oh and the french government directly gave them €2,000,000 as a grant. What does that tell you?

[Anonymous No.14401110]

HOLY SHIT LINK IS BTFO WITH THIS UPDATE IT MAKES RLC ORACLE'S SEEM MUCH MORE FLEXIBLE AND POWERFUL HAHAHAHA GET FUCKED NIGGERS

[Anonymous No.14401131]

>>14401024
>>14401042
>>14401068
>in a perfect world we would have access to Intel's master certificate and we could verify enclave signatures like we verify SSL certificates
lmao, that's grade A bullshit.
SSL cerficates can only be verified on-chain if they were issued on-chain.
Enclave signatures can NEVER be issued on-chain. If it were any other way, they wouldn't be enclaves.

And this is very different from the claim they made in the chart, where they said Chainlink has no support for TEE enclaves AT ALL.

[Anonymous No.14401132]

>>14401089
zee kids, dey like l'dragonballe, HEE HEE HON HON

[linkcoiner No.14401139]

>>14401025
Mentioned? iExec was the main author with Intel. Sergey/LINK also contributed:

[Anonymous No.14401157]

>>14401131
>Dumb nigger doesn't understand the PoCo algorithm
Kek

[Anonymous No.14401164]

>>14401108
>>14401108
>>14401088

What month was it you guys realised iExec isn't actually a source of humor but actually a better option than Chainlink?

[Anonymous No.14401194]

>>14401131
wrong

[Anonymous No.14401195]

>>14401089
>fundamentally
>fundamental
>fundamentally fundamental

Nothing ever could compare to the embarrassment of having sergay as your brand ambassador

[Anonymous No.14401196]

>>14401164
I had a feeling when they announced RLC was capable of oracles that it would somehow be better.

This medium post just sealed the deal.

[Anonymous No.14401247]

>>14401195
Whenever Sergey is referred to he's quoted as the most knowledgeable and respected source on oracles, and he keeps getting invited to the big stages to give presentations. His words go way above the low IQ heads.
There's nothing embarrassing about him.

[Anonymous No.14401248]

>>14401157
PoCo has nothing to do with this.
PoCo involves using the attestation API, it's the exact same principle.

>>14401194
lol k

[Anonymous No.14401274]

The funniest part about all of this is that the linkies here will spam the board to drown out this news because it absolutely terrifies them when they should be buying a suicide stack of RLC and promoting conversation about link and RLC.

[Anonymous No.14401276]

Stop associating this project with LINK.

[Anonymous No.14401290]

>>14401248
PoCo has everything to do with this. You need to read more.

[Anonymous No.14401295]

>>14401276
IExec will be more polyvalent that’s right

[Anonymous No.14401314]

>>14398520
holy shit i forgot about this list of utter lies
i actually had higher expectations of iexec; the claim that chainlink doesn't support TEE enclaves is downright hilarious

[Anonymous No.14401321]

>>14398520
Literally not the case with Link in any way, shape or form.

[Anonymous No.14401329]

>>14401290
No it does not.
PoCo involves using the enclave's attestation API so the basic principle is the exact same.

PoCo is just a slightly tweaked PoS, a consensus mechanism. You can apply it to Chainlink nodes as well if you want, along with any consensus mechanism you like.

[Anonymous No.14401332]

>>14398444
checked!

[Anonymous No.14401343]

Also imagine my sides when
>You could buy a 700m mc coin
Vs
>You could buy a 29m mc coin that does the same thing or better

I'm sorry but it is link that is going to bend the knee this time.

[Anonymous No.14401345]

>>14401295
>polyvalent
In what part of the world do you live

[Anonymous No.14401376]

>>14401329
Massive cope.
>Muh attestation API
>Bbut u can apply it to link amirite gaiz

[Anonymous No.14401377]

>>14401345
France. He's an iexec staff member.

[Anonymous No.14401385]

Anybody can build oracles
The challenge is in building the network and on boarding providers and customers

[Anonymous No.14401415]

>>14401376
You cannot produce enclave attestation on-chain.
If you could, they wouldn't be enclaves.

[Anonymous No.14401428]

>>14401415
But you literally can, the devs said so

[Anonymous No.14401441]

>>14401385
Massive link cope

[Anonymous No.14401447]

>>14398444
>these replies
Repeating digits attract the pajeets like it's a blonde girl.

[Anonymous No.14401460]

>>14401415
you can retard. go ask about it on iexec slack inatead of talking shit out of your ass

[Anonymous No.14401464]

>>14401428
No, even they acknowledge that "SGX does't work that way". See >>14401042

[Anonymous No.14401511]

>>14401464
No they don't. They fucking alluded to the fact that it's possible if they have the master certificate and also that iExec is ahead of link in this regard. Fucking retard learn to read

[Anonymous No.14401514]

>>14401460
See >>14401464

They are bullshitting you.

[Anonymous No.14401518]

>>14401385
>The challenge is in building the network
Good thing oracles are already running live on their cloud computing network then huh

[Anonymous No.14401538]

>>14401514
See>>14401511
You are bullshitting yourself

[Anonymous No.14401546]

>>14401511
>>14401538
>They fucking alluded to the fact that it's possible if they have the master certificate
lmao learn to read.
"In an ideal world we would have access to the master certificate (...) but Intel SGX doesn't work that way".

You have no idea what you're talking about AND you have no reading comprehension.

[Anonymous No.14401547]

>>14401343
Look at the momentum rising here.

LINKers have 6 months to bend the knee. 6 months, and only 6 months.

[Anonymous No.14401564]

>>14401518
>Centralized kyc based nodes
Kek

[Anonymous No.14401572]

RENT FREE
BEND THE KNEE

[Anonymous No.14401582]

>>14401546
>There is still a lot of work to do
Alluding to the fact that it's possible and they will find a way to.

[Anonymous No.14401591]

They're talking about how they want to "verify enclave signatures on-chain like you can verify SSL certificates on-chain".
But then right away they acknowledge that it cannot be done because "Intel SGX doesn't work that way".
Which is obvious, since SSL certificates can be issued on-chain, while enclave signatures cannot (hence the term "enclave").

So they bullshit you with some weasel words: "we need a more complexe (sic) infrastructure, which includes Secret Management".
But the reality is that this is basically going to amount to the exact same level of "on-chain verification" as Chainlink due to the simple fact that enclaves cannot generate their certificate/signatures on-chain BY DEFINITION.

[Anonymous No.14401610]

>>14401582
see >>14401591

[Anonymous No.14401612]

Don't argue with gilles, he has aids.
He uses different IPs to answer to himself.
There's no interest in this shitcoin on the board, at all.
The one who bought lose a lot of money.
Anons warned

[Anonymous No.14401628]

>>14401591
>Mental ramblings of a typical link schizo
>Thinks he knows more than literal god tier cloud computing developers

[Anonymous No.14401634]

>>14401628
>god tier cloud computing developers
like Google?

[Anonymous No.14401640]

>>14401628
>>14401634
Savage.

[Anonymous No.14401646]

>>14401628
Ahahah
He knows more than Hadrien
What a joke

[Anonymous No.14401657]

>>14398444

[Anonymous No.14401658]

No, like Gilles fedak and the iExec team.

[Anonymous No.14401674]

>>14401658
Hadrien is the dev for PoCo

[Anonymous No.14401682]

>>14401640
>Savage
>Emotional linklet is scared he has real competition now so he gets all defensive
Kek

[Anonymous No.14401691]

>>14401612
>even an actual pajeet won't buy this shit

you're my kind of pajeet.

[Anonymous No.14401697]

>>14401674
PoCo has nothing to do with this. It's a consensus mechanism.

[Anonymous No.14401701]

>>14401674
Yeah I said the iExec team I'm not going to list all of them, and Gilles is a literal genius

[Anonymous No.14401707]

>>14401025
>Cons:
>French
this is exactly why I won't waste my money on this piece of shit
none of y'all learned anything from REQ

[Anonymous No.14401717]

>>14401697
>Doesn't understand the true potential of the PoCo
Kek, do research retard

[Anonymous No.14401723]

iExec team is fucking based.

[Anonymous No.14401741]

>>14401717
PoCo is a consensus mechanism.
God damn you're hilarious.

[Anonymous No.14401798]

>>14401741
PoCo is what's going to be the downfall of link in the oracle war

[Anonymous No.14401803]

>>14401024
>>14401042
you should merge the images, like this

[Anonymous No.14401830]

>>14401741
I will give you a 6.5/10.

Not bad, but needs a little work.

[Anonymous No.14401842]

>>14398444
Checked

[Anonymous No.14401859]

LINK is dead anons, we all made money from it it's time to move on

Next step is RLC

[Anonymous No.14401898]

>>14401377
I figured. "polyvalent" is 100% correct in usage, but certainly nobody uses that in the anglosphere, quite rare to see

[Anonymous No.14401907]

>>14401859
There's much more money to be made on RLC alone based on everything we know plus the tiny market cap plus the fact that only biz talks about it.

You'd be a literal zero IQ dumb nigger to not buy 10k right now

[Anonymous No.14401936]

So just buy link and iexec what the fuck are you retards even arguing about are you that poor you can't put 5k towards both projects who gives a FUCK

Get your stacks then shut the fuck up and literally HAVE SEX

[Anonymous No.14401997]

>>14401936
>tfw the fudding isn't working so the best you can hope for is hope-buys

pajeet fuck off.

[Anonymous No.14402021]

>>14401997
He's half right though. Instead of buying link you should be selling it and buying as much RLC as possible if you want to get rich this year.

[Anonymous No.14402092]

>>14402021
>21 posts by this ID

[Anonymous No.14402108]

>>14398798
i keep seeing this. Wtf does it imply?

[Anonymous No.14402132]

>Shitcoin bagholder trying to fud link and sell his bags
Laffin at you

[Anonymous No.14402136]

>does not buy link for 2 whole years >realizes he missed out
>shills iexec in hopes of recreating the link magic

[Anonymous No.14402182]

>>14398444
They say it was foretold

[Anonymous No.14402210]

>>14402132
>>14402136
>The fearful linkie makes his last cope

[Anonymous No.14402211]

>>14402136
>has link
>has iexec
>likes making money

Leave your emotions at the door my child.

[Anonymous No.14402239]

>>14402136
LINK will remain king almost certainly to be honest, but I'm expecting the magic to flow to RLC eventually

[Anonymous No.14402291]

>>14402239
>realizing rlc w 1/2 of chainlinks current market cap is $15
>realizing rlc is .40 cents

No clue why more cant figure this out.

[Anonymous No.14402307]

>>14402239
It will flow sooner than later.
Get in from the bottom (now) and you'll make more money than you would holding link.

[Anonymous No.14402328]

>>14402239

LINK is the BTC of oracles, RLC is the ETH of this industry. Much more intelligent. It has not only one feature.

[Anonymous No.14402340]

>>14402291
True question is «how Gnt render shitcoin is still ahead of Rlc ?»

[Anonymous No.14402346]

>>14398332
OH NONONONONO
LITERALLY WHO

[Anonymous No.14402353]

Imagine investing in a REQ-tier French piece of shit vaporware with no actual commercial clients.

[Anonymous No.14402363]

>>14398444

[Anonymous No.14402371]

>>14398444
Chainlink $1000 eoy

[Anonymous No.14402373]

>>14401628
>>14401646
He’s absolutely right though.

[Anonymous No.14402380]

>>14402328
This
>>14402340
No one knows. This market is full of retards that buy based on names and logos.
>>14402346
>>14402353
Fear coping is obvious

[Anonymous No.14402438]

>>14398332
They are literally shilling CL without knowing it

There is no oracle network out there that is as robust and secure end to end as CL. There is a reason oraclize did what they did. they were the leaders in this space and where are they now? Sergey has been quietly working on this for YEARS before oracles were even called oracles

[Anonymous No.14402457]

>>14402438
False.
iExec is better and more flexible in every way. Plus iExec is not solely an oracle coin. It's the ETH of oracles.

[Anonymous No.14402483]

>>14402438
>most robust end to end
source: trust me dude

[Sage No.14402485]

>>14398332
>begins to take leadership
>begins to start

In other words: s..soon, y..you'll see

[Anonymous No.14402533]

>>14402328
>RLC is the ETH of this industry. It has not only one feature.
Read this, specifically number 4. You don't know what you're talking about.
https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/Design-Rationale#user-content-principles

[Anonymous No.14402552]

>>14402457
>Plus iExec is not solely an oracle coin. It's the ETH of oracles.
Again, read >>14402533

[Anonymous No.14402575]

>>14402533
>RLC has near infinite use cases
>So does ETH
That's what he's saying

[Anonymous No.14402588]

>>14402552
>>14402533
he made incorrect comparison, what a retard teeheeeheeeheee

[Anonymous No.14402602]

>>14402552
>Thinks any of that means anything
You don't know what your talking about.

[Anonymous No.14402608]

>>14402533
The comparison is about the number of features. Are you this dumb anon ?

A rotten banana would be smarter than you

[Anonymous No.14402625]

>>14398444
Oooooooo that boi got em

[Anonymous No.14402644]

>>14402533

You can do anything with smart contracts. You can only pay with BTC

That's the point you dumb fuck

[Anonymous No.14402652]

>>14402608
He's a literal strawmanning retard like most link holders

[Anonymous No.14402676]

>>14402533

I can't get how someone this retard can get access to the internet. Did your momma helped you to connect ? How did you survive this far ?

[Anonymous No.14402765]

The point is that the oracle problem warrants a token entirely dedicated to just that. Anything more ambitious will fail.
Tell me, how is RLC addressing the possibility of Sybil attacks?

[Anonymous No.14402824]

>>14402765
Same approach as chainlink, reputation and staking

[Anonymous No.14402850]

>>14402824
Reputation might be for the whole pool though so might not be as effective. Not 100% sure

[Anonymous No.14402892]

>>14402765
>Muh specialized oracle
Fucking retard. RLC does the exact same fucking thing but is a more flexible technology. Wait until it gets fucking GPU support and then you'll feel retarded for not buying a suicide stack

[Anonymous No.14402902]

>>14402765
strawman again.
>>14402850
each worker and each pool will have reputation. pool consisting of reputable workers will have high reputation

[Anonymous No.14402908]

>>14402824
>>14402850
exactly, RLC works with the PoCo system which was not designed specifically for oracles. Chainlink allows different kinds of oracles for different kinds of industries. RLC just has PoCo.

[Anonymous No.14402942]

> Gilles Fedak answering to himself forever about a shitcoin no one cares about
What a pathetic freakshow

[Anonymous No.14403049]

>>14402908
Don't you think it's a bad thing that something as simple as a Poco algorithm can come along and completely disregard any and all development made by the link team in the blink of an eye?

Imagine investing in a coin that only does 1 thing, and it doesn't even do it the best.

[Anonymous No.14403478]

>>14398444
I knew this was a link thread, that's why I opened it! rlc cucks literally in the image

[Anonymous No.14403675]

>>14403478
oh wow he got trips. 1/100 chance of getting it wow, crazy huh, considering link retards make 100k post per day, how did that happen

[Anonymous No.14403695]

>>14403049
Except it doesn't do the same.
I'll give just one (1) example: PoCo has the "Iexec hub and marketplace" smartcontract reaching consensus on the validity of any oracle pool. That's it. That's all they say in their whitepaper.
Link on the other hand relies on (medium and short-term) aggregation, and many other long-term solutions to security. Go read it, seriously.
Guess which one is going to be more secure.

[Anonymous No.14403792]

>>14402902
how the fuck is that strawmanning I was literally just asking how RLC addresses Sybil attacks. I'm not assuming anything.
Well, I'm assuming you won't have an answer, yes, but I'm giving you the opportunity to reply. Go ahead.

[Anonymous No.14403798]

>>14403695
>rlc relies on an entire hub and marketplace plus staking and reputation to reach consensus
>link relies on a bunch of vague "aggregation" and "many other long term solutions"

>Guess which one is going to be more secure.
RLC.

[Anonymous No.14403805]

>>14398332
If you are big player and want to use smart contracts you are choosing biggest/most secure and checked by Google/Oracle middleware oracle network.

What we are even talk about here ?

[Anonymous No.14403818]

>>14403792
>I was literally just asking how RLC addresses Sybil attacks
wow googling is so fucking hard in 2019

https://medium.com/iex-ec/poco-series-2-on-the-use-of-staking-to-prevent-attacks-2a5c700558bd

[Anonymous No.14403851]

>>14403805
>What we are even talk about here ?
We are talking about the only other oracle competition and a way to make millions of dollars off of a few thousand dollars investment.

That investment is RLC.

[Anonymous No.14403865]

>>14403792
>anything more ambitious will fail
sure, anything ambitious always fail.
Sure happy that i bought TATA stock instead of Tesla. TATA is less ambitious

[Anonymous No.14403943]

>>14400022
Shit?? What is Witnet??

[Anonymous No.14404051]

>>14398615
Their team is white so I bought a hundred bucks worth

[Anonymous No.14404074]

>>14402108
81k eo26

[Anonymous No.14404090]

>>14404074
>RUshy1
what did kek mean by this?

[Anonymous No.14404092]

>>14403798
If you consider that all these validators (entire hub) would need access to expensive API's and SGX in many cases (which they won't have), that does make this type of consensus system very unreliable.
It was designed for computations, that's why it will fail for oracles.
>>14403818
Except the word oracle is not even mentioned ONCE here, they are talking about computations. You know why? Because PoCo was designed for COMPUTATIONS. Sybil oracles can not be addressed in the same way.

[Anonymous No.14404121]

>>14398444
I believe in magic

[Anonymous No.14404134]

>>14400000

[Anonymous No.14404159]

>>14404092
>If you consider that all these validators (entire hub) would need access to expensive API's and SGX in many cases (which they won't have), that does make this type of consensus system very unreliable.

Fud. Sidechain is coming.

>Except the word oracle is not even mentioned ONCE here
Because this is before they announced oracles, retard.
> You know why? Because PoCo was designed for COMPUTATIONS
What if I told you, PoCo can be used for more than just "computations"?
Imagine being so dumb that you think something that is already fully working -doesn't work- because the algorithm was designed for something else.

Fucking low IQ pajeet.

[Anonymous No.14404171]

>>14398444
obviously checked, kek

[Anonymous No.14404183]

Guys

You're not seeing the meme magic.
iExec founder is french.... so are the Bogdanov brothers.

Ultimately the meme magic will get much more stronger towards the Bogs. The LINK memes are running in circle to be honest.

Thats why I trust iExec will be bigger

[Anonymous No.14404190]

>>14402021
>34 posts by this id
uhm what? imagine being this much of a busybody

[Anonymous No.14404213]

>>14404183
zey know
>pamp et before zey buy

It's not that iExec will be bigger, even if it isn't, there's more gains potential.

[Anonymous No.14404293]

>>14404213
>link to $5 2x
>rlc to $5 12.5x

This x100, literally.

[Anonymous No.14404301]

>>14404213
meme magic is starting. as planned. perfect.

[Anonymous No.14404405]

>>14398364
sounds like someone desperately trying to say oracle as they're taking a shit

[Anonymous No.14404429]

>>14404405
yeah, taking a shit on link with a sideproject they whipped up on a lazy weekend
oracles are literal brainlet tier shit

[Anonymous No.14404771]

>>14404429
it's too late

[Anonymous No.14404846]

>>14404771
it's too early, actually

[Anonymous No.14404924]

iExec is super sharp

https://market.iex.ec/

Also, their blog posts are much clearer than LINK's one

[Anonymous No.14405470]

>>14398444
boom it's all true

[Anonymous No.14405659]

>225 replies
Why /biz/? Why?