You Pajeets Don't Even Know Big News is Coming This Week With V19.0

[Anonymous No.14377008]

[Anonymous No.14377026]

Check GitHub you fucktards

[Anonymous No.14377146]

help me. iam a nano holder

[Anonymous No.14377780]

>>14377008
Back to plebbit with your hippie coin, boomer. A coin that is only feeless because a handful of friends are doing it for free. Totally broken business model.

[Anonymous No.14377845]

>>14377026
Can you summarize for us

[Anonymous No.14378738]

>>14377780
It's feeless because it only needs a handful cheap nodes to work, with infinite scalability, and a lot of people and companies are willing to protect their investment for a few dollars a month.

It has like 400 nodes without now but could easily run on like 20 good ones.

Senseless fud.

Also, XRB was shilled here before reddit. Back in october 2017

[Anonymous No.14378995]

What's possible for price within a year or two?

[Anonymous No.14379146]

>>14377845
v19 is 98% done and the shit left are very minor things. It could be released any day now.

It's a little complicated to explain, but the most important things it brings are:
- Spam prevention with a new dynamic PoW system. It's brilliant but too complicated to detail here
- Easier exchange integration by switching from UDP to TCP. Exchanges don't like having to open UDP ports just because they have Nano. Everything will be made easier and more similar to integrate than other coins with no security compromise for the exchange.
- Smaller blocks: transactions are going to be faster (consistently under a second). Also, this means a smaller ledger and HDD space required for nodes.
- Sets the ground for v20 which is an even bigger update, and will allow things like ledger pruning of old transactions, completely eliminating bloat from ledger growth, amongst other upgrades

[Anonymous No.14379556]

>>14378738
>with infinite scalability
Just as stupid lies as you did in Dec 2017 when you claimed 7000 TPS, what do you have now? 1 700? Is that infinite for you?
>There is virtually zero traffic on your network, so of course it costs next to nothing to maintain and run it. However, how many tens of millions of dollars must the hippie Nano volunteers fork out if you ever, highly unlikely, become a global network with micro-payments? Of course the incompetent Nano team has never done any calculations and cost analysis, right? Just magically people will do everything for free for all eternity with no downtime ever. Clown world.
>easily run on like 20 good ones
Yeah, super decentralized. If these 20 talk to each other, or only 11, then the whole global currency network will be computerized. This is one currency from hell.

[Anonymous No.14379606]

>>14378738
>with infinite scalability
Just as stupid lies as you did in Dec 2017 when you claimed 7000 TPS, what do you have now? 1 700? Is that infinite for you?
There is virtually zero traffic on your network, so of course it costs next to nothing to maintain and run it. However, how many tens of millions of dollars must the hippie Nano volunteers fork out if you ever, highly unlikely, become a global network with micro-payments? Of course the incompetent Nano team has never done any calculations and cost analysis, right? Just magically people will do everything for free for all eternity with no downtime ever. Clown world.
>easily run on like 20 good ones
Yeah, super decentralized. If these 20 talk to each other, or only 11, then the whole global currency network will be computerized. This is one currency from hell.
>t. plebbitor with plebbit spacing.

[Anonymous No.14379654]

>>14378738
>with infinite scalability
Just as stupid lies as you did in Dec 2017 when you claimed 7000 TPS, what do you have now? 1 700? Is that infinite for you?
There is virtually zero traffic on your network, so of course it costs next to nothing to maintain and run it. However, how many tens of millions of dollars must the hippie Nano volunteers fork out if you ever, highly unlikely, become a global network with micro-payments? Of course the incompetent Nano team has never done any calculations and cost analysis, right? Just magically people will do everything for free for all eternity with no downtime ever. Clown world.
>easily run on like 20 good ones
Yeah, super decentralized. If these 20 talk to each other, or only 11, then the whole global currency network will be compromised. This is one currency from hell.
>t. plebbitor with plebbit spacing.

[Anonymous No.14379668]

NANO is schweeet and extremely underpriced.

[Anonymous No.14379748]

>>14379606
It got tested up to 1700 tps with no issues. It's really expensive to test above this, but it never failed. Nothing says it can't get 7k tps. There's no bottleneck in the protocol. How many coins actually tested successfully up to 1.7k TPS? How can you possibly say it's low? Also, another bigger stress test will come, not sure if they said it was after v19 or v20, probably v19 considering the dynamic pow change will need to be tested
>super decentralized
I just said there are around 400 nodes right now, not sure what your point is. I'm saying there are WAY more nodes than needed so getting people to run nodes clearly isnt an issue.

[Anonymous No.14380055]

>>14379748
>It got tested up to 1700 tps with no issues
Really? Sustained over a period of time and not just a burst? Documentation
>There's no bottleneck in the protocol
OK, so what is the CPU, IO and bandwidth for 100 000 TPS, the very minimum for a global micro-payment currency?
>1.7k TPS? How can you possibly say it's low?
Competitors like ETH are working on 1 million TPS. They will have it within 1-2 years. When that happens Nano is gone forever and pretty much worthless. Bitconnect.
>so getting people to run nodes clearly isnt an issue
With zero traffic yes. You ignored my questions regarding costs if you ever will reach your goals.

[Anonymous No.14380181]

>>14379748
Here is the 7000 TPS lie that was pushed by Nano and the Italian scammers in Dec 2017, causing the parabolic rise. Pic, so you admit that at best Nano only has 1700 TPS and not the claimed 7000?

[Anonymous No.14380330]

>>14380055
1 million TPS is a second layer solution for Ethereum.
NANO is limited only by node hardware (which uses minimal computational power per ts, especially compared to Bitcoin, Ethereum, etc), and needs no second layer solution

[Anonymous No.14380439]

>>14380055
Oh the DAG shill is here again with his 100k TPS meme

[Anonymous No.14380510]

>>14380330
>needs no second layer solution
You are struggling with 1700 TPS, claim to be a global micro-payment service, run for free by volunteers and you need no second layer? You have no idea about the costs involved. To claim that TPS is only limited by hardware is absurd, as Nano has a broken model. It's like claiming you can drive to the moon with your car soon, and the speed is infinite, only limited by hardware. How does that make any sense?

[Anonymous No.14380581]

>>14380439
>100k TPS meme
Maybe you are able to answer very basic questions regarding the flawed and broken Nano model?

[Anonymous No.14380627]

>>14380439
>DAG shill
Not advocating DAG for the time being, as I decided to accumulate more.

[Anonymous No.14380757]

just wait until btc is $30+ a transaction and takes 12+ hours to send

[Anonymous No.14380794]

>>14380757
And costs $18

[Anonymous No.14381031]

>>14380757
>>14380794
Stellar is on Coinbase. Nano?

[Anonymous No.14381692]

>>14381031
You have way too much free time on your hands with your senseless fud all day every day on nano threads.

It's not "struggling" at 1700 tps. It was pushed to 1700 tps as a stress test with no issues. It also was pushed by a community member (Ty) for hours in the high hundreds. It's not that it can't do higher. It's just that there's no point renting all that computing power to spam the network more than that, it's not going to crash. It's futile and expensive. You go ahead and do it if you want to push it pass 1700, just test it.

[Anonymous No.14381794]

>>14380181
Look who it fucking is the paid nano fudder. I don't know a more persistent motherfucker, but I truly admire you. Because without you I probably wouldn't be scooping up all this discount nano. So I am sending my graditude to you and your friends that have nothing better to do other than spread easily dismisable fud. In b4 dead project, libra killed nano, and eat a dick faggot. Do your own research come to your own conclusions

[Anonymous No.14382007]

>>14381692
>>14381794
> It was pushed to 1700 tps as a stress test with no issues
Burst or prolonged period of time?
>senseless fud
When questions regarding a basic cost analysis for your crazy model based on people working for free and taking all the costs, is "senseless fud", then you know you are talking to an idiot community and incompetent team.
>Look who it fucking is the paid nano fudder
I am not paid and warned against Bitconnect as well. Got around the same stupid response as from the Nano team as well. Many of you will know me, as you came from the Bitconnect community. Pic. Your modus operandi is pretty consistent
>So I am sending my graditude to you
With that crazy psuedo-logic, you should buy up a ton of Bitconnect crypto as well, and then thank me for the bargain price.

[Anonymous No.14382351]

>>14382007
No one knows you faggot. You are a nobody in real life and on this Mongolian basket weaving forum. The only legacy you will leave when you die is that the few unfortunate sons of bitches that actually did ever happen to meet you ALL hated you. The end.

[Anonymous No.14382614]

Why is everything going up but nano?

[Anonymous No.14383251]

>>14382351
>No one knows you faggot. You are a nobody in real life and on this Mongolian basket weaving forum. The only legacy you will leave when you die is that the few unfortunate sons of bitches that actually did ever happen to meet you ALL hated you. The end.
Thanks. So you nuts in the Nano community have clearly nothing and can only get nasty and hysterical like you did when Bitconnect crashed. Nice to now. Your comment and pic related.