/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.14294866]

Apologize.

[Anonymous No.14294883]

>>14294866
>i thought bitcoin was an anonymous payment system and projected my political beliefs onto it and when I was shown to be wrong I stuck around and kept projecting for some reason.

[Anonymous No.14294899]

>>14294866
He looks 10 years older than in 2017

[Anonymous No.14294928]

It's literally mooning right now you fucking faggots.

[Anonymous No.14294978]

>>14294928
oh wow I better go run out and buy!

[Anonymous No.14295584]

>>14294928
who cares

[Anonymous No.14295652]

>>14294866
His heart is in the right place. I think he should try to understand the technical perspective of bitcoin more. He’s certainly better than fake satoshi.

[Anonymous No.14295721]

>>14294928
no it isn't you deluded bitch
I've got nothing against' bch, since it's a real project with real development
but don't try to steer from the fact that you've lost value and your fork did not accompany BTC in it's value gain

[Anonymous No.14296158]

>>14295721
Look at the hourly chart you fucking faggot

[Anonymous No.14296359]

It's not that bch is good, it's btc that's a total shit that makes all its forks look great.
t. don't hold any btc anymore

[Anonymous No.14296997]

>>14296158
rofl just ignore the noise cuck

[Anonymous No.14297015]

Two narcissists can never work together for long.

[Anonymous No.14297037]

>>14297015
oh god i really hope they aren't narcissists
if so were are going to get fucked

[Anonymous No.14297041]

>>14294866
with BSV now the real Bitcoin and BTC the current market leader there's so much need for BCH as for a 5th wheel on a car

[Anonymous No.14297055]

>>14297037
You can't see it in their every fucking action?

[Anonymous No.14297065]

One day while Sergey was masturbating, Woody got wood. He could no longer help himself! He watched as Sergey stroked his juicy kawaii cock. He approached Sergey which startled him and make him pee everywhere on the floor and on Woody too. Being drenched in his urine made him harder than ever! Woody: "Sergey Senpai! I'm alive and I want to be INSIDE OF YOU." Sergey: "Oh Woody Chan! I always knew you were alive! I want to stuff you up my kawaii ass!" Woody grabbed a bunch of flavored lube and rubbed it all over his head Woody: "Oh my! It's cherry flavored lube! Cherry is my favorite! Woody then stuffed his head up into Sergey's tight ass! The other toys around the room watched intently as Woody shoved his head back and forth into Sergey's nice ass, continuously making a squishy wet noise. The other toys also became aroused and they all gathered around Woody and Sergey and started to urinate all over them, and then they started to masturbate. Sergey: "Oh my goodness, Woody Chan! You are churning my insides up so well! Your nose is stimulating my prostate! OH YES! All the other toys became so aroused by this, that they could not help themselves anymore! They pushed Woody completely inside, and they all went inside. All of them wanted to be inside Sergey's nice round ass. Sergey: "No wait guys! My ass cannot hold this much! I'm getting so full! All the toys went inside of poor squirming Sergey and pretty much, he was beyond full, and died from having his insides completely damaged. Adylyn came inside and found Sergey, dead with a huge ass hemorrhage on his anus, with a HUGE belly full of toys.

[Anonymous No.14297500]

>>14294866
LMAO all the cope in this thread. No crypto has more adoption in actual payments than BCH. BTC has more but is crippled by fees.
Cashshuffle makes BCH reasonably private without overdoing it. Its fast and cheap to transact and has a cultish following.
BSV has a cultish following as well.

Anons who do their research hold both bad aussie and deluded ancap Bitcoins. BSV and BCH will be the largecaps with the hardest pumps this bullrun. They are the perfect middleground between high risk shitcoins and boring largecaps. Higher gains and higher risk but not suicide shitcoin risk. They aren't going to die anytime soon and have deluded shills and are usable for things.
Its the perfect storm

[Anonymous No.14297575]

What's the point of BCH after it forked off from the Bitcoin protocol?

Everything that was great about BCH went with BSV after the split. Now there's only schizos, bagholders and anarcucks left fighting over what the fuck the coin is even about.

[Anonymous No.14297590]

>>14296158
>z-zoom in

[Anonymous No.14297596]

>>14297575
Redpilled

[Anonymous No.14297597]

>>14294866
Chin.exe

[Anonymous No.14297607]

>>14297041
Based
>>14297575
Redpilled

[Unironically Satoj No.14297620]

>>14294883
>I thought Bitcoin was what's described in the whitepaper instead of listening to propaganda imposed by corporate and three-letter-agency-led censors on the main discussion channels, who only managed to fool 2017 newfags
FTFY
>>14294899
He's 40+ he looks young af
>>14295584
stay poor
>>14295721
>lost value
Eh, a lot of us bought ours at 0.06 BTC shortly after the fork, and given the doubling we got from the BSV airdrop we're still ahead. Missed a lot of opportunities though, I do concede that.
>>14297041
One has the censors the other has the pajeets, so we don't need the third one that actually works? Great logic, retard.
>>14297500
based and semi-redpilled

[Anonymous No.14297786]

>>14297575
For one, BCH has more secure 0conf and actual privacy and merchant adoption and exchanges. If making money is your goal, holding both BSV and BCH is the play. If you arent about gains but about being part of a club and meming Craig then solo-BSV is for you.

[Anonymous No.14297809]

>>14297786
They compete for different markets now. BSV is right now primarily attacking storage and storage of apps with metanet. BCH is still going for payments prumarily.

[Anonymous No.14297948]

>>14297809
BSV is nailing payments as well, some of the best payment services went with BSV at the split, like CentBee who is now blossoming in South Africa and HandCash who also make payment solutions for retailers.

[Anonymous No.14297969]

>>14297809
BSV seems to be expanding and exploding rapidly in applications, transactions and adoptions while BCH is stagnating. Mostly because all the talented devs, the energy and the innovation went with BSV.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5HlzCQHYO8

[Anonymous No.14297992]

>>14296158
>>14294866
COPE
O
P
E

[Anonymous No.14298129]

>>14297948
>>14297969
>BSV is right now primarily attacking storage and storage of apps with metanet.
They are working on it but nailing is very exaggerated. They can get there but for now they are the cool-javascript-app-stored-on-chain-Coin
Try buying a VPN or server or pizza or flight or any other product online with BSV right now. You cant, yet.

[Anonymous No.14298133]

>>14297969
It's not surprising. BCH commie devs decided central planning was actually cool and decided to change the protocol, while limiting scaling. Literally Core all over again.

[Anonymous No.14298165]

>>14298133
Their roadmap also plans to lock the protocol.

[Anonymous No.14298236]

>>14297969
They partnered with Flash who flipped a bit and allowed contactless payments from one specific SV wallet. Can't pay with QR.
This is not robust, and the merchants are not onboard with BSV or know how to use it, or would ever be interested in holding it, or even know it is possible on their machine.
Giulble salesmen and Indians went with BSV (just check nchains team page LMAO)
BCH is the real Bitcoin Cash, with the realistic vision and better tech.

[Anonymous No.14298271]

>>14298165
After changing things. Avalanche, wormhole, pre consensus, checkpoints, changes to transaction ordering, etc. Not Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.14298294]

>>14298271
Its a different approach for sure. BCH goes for protocol improvements for better scaling and faster more secure payments while BSV wants to scale exclusively via implementation code and hardware improvements.

Time will tell which works long term and but for now these are the largecaps with the biggest pump potential.

[Anonymous No.14298303]

>>14298133
Do you know what ABC stands for?
Literally Adjustable Blocksize Cap.
That's the end goal.
BCH is the middle path between cores tiny bottleneck, and BSVs bloated blocks that splinter the network.
32meg is more than enough to enable PayPal level of transactions while keeping smooth block propagation and decentralisation.
Once BCH is doing more volume than PayPal, will increase.
That's it's secret cap:
BCH gets as big as it needs to.

[Anonymous No.14298326]

>>14298165
No it doesn't. They literally attack you for suggesting that locking down the protocol is a good idea and what Satoshi himself said. They are all about having teams of anarchist dev teams sit down and add all kinds of shit to the base protocol instead of building apps on top of it. Schnorr, avalanche, CTOR, etc.

BCH is not Bitcoin, they have different roadmap that involves increasing anonymity and becoming crime coin.

And they have zero ambition of scaling.

[Anonymous No.14298377]

>>14296158
>hourly chart
holy fucking shit never reply to me again you little manlet gypsy

[Anonymous No.14298418]

>>14298303
Big business is not going to onboard their infrastructure or services on the chain unless they can be sure that 1) the protocol is stable (2) the network can actually handle the massive amount of transactions they will generate and (3) that using the protocol is actually compliant with all applicable laws.

BCH does not fulfill any of the criteria, so huge enterprise will never onboard their systems to the BCH chain. SV fulfills all 3 requirements which is why they are actually attracting a ton of interest, and is already killing it in transactions, so your sales pitch seems hollow.

[Anonymous No.14298419]

>>14298326
They want to improve the protocol and eventually end up with a world-scale capable BCH that works as p2p cash.
You can while all you want but vanilla BTCs 0conf are not perfect yet. We can work around that issue in BSV and I have no doubt Bitcoin 0.1 can be scaled but BCH is trying to make the scaling easier via protocol upgrades.

Im here to make money and both WILL pump. Whether you love Craig is irrelevant to me. I will profit off of Craigs next media stunt and I will profit off of BCHs slick product.

[Anonymous No.14298426]

[Anonymous No.14298444]

>>14298426

[Anonymous No.14298453]

>>14298294
Which part of don't fuck with the protocol did the BCH camp not understand?

[Anonymous No.14298467]

>>14298444
Say it with me
Another
Blockstream
Company

[Anonymous No.14298474]

>>14298326
Bitcoin (regardless of the ticker) is not suitable for apps. nChain's chief scientist is an incompetent charlatan: bitcoin is not Turing-complete, it's not suited for dApps and its purpose is entirely different. BCH not striving to be a dapp platform is a pro, not a con.

[Anonymous No.14298496]

>>14298426
>>14298444
Its funny BSV tries to accuse BCH of centralization when Calvins entities own every notable business building on BSV and every miner and the only node implementation. The promise of locked protocol is a promise not more. They could decide to change protocol tomorrow and it would be way easier for them to do than for Amaury or any of the 4 BCH implementation.

But again. I do not care: Im here to make money and both WILL pump. Whether you love Craig is irrelevant to me. I will profit off of Craigs next media stunt (or eventual b2b adoption) and I will profit off of BCHs slick product.

[Anonymous No.14298516]

>>14298474
LMAO say that to projects like Agora who is literally building an entire OS on chain

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=3xHA7LGsjiI

Try it
https://bico.media/624024f810355bebf89a9fa7ddcbb9978237ed3dc508dd154ef510dccc8f0601

[Anonymous No.14298531]

>>14298418
"Stable protocol" and "law-compliant coin" is just nChain's retarded sales pitch that only brainlets fall for. BSV is as far from being stable as possible, and, talking about compliance, if all crypto gets banned, it'll get banned among the first.

[Anonymous No.14298534]

>>14298496
Based and purplepilled

[Anonymous No.14298554]

>>14298516
It's just a dedicated file storage. Who needs a fucking file storage where you have to pay for each upload? Cloud storage does the job.

[Anonymous No.14298574]

>>14298531
>>14298554
Everything you say is false and dumb, please stop posting thanks.

[Anonymous No.14298592]

>>14298303
Absolutely no. ABC's approach keeps them holding the keys to the network. nChain and to a smaller degree Unlimited (I literally have no clue why Unlimited hasn't 100% moved to bsv yet) approach is to keep blocks unbounded and leave the sizes up to the market/miners as intended. Once Feburary hits there won't be anymore tinkering with protocol on bsv and the only tinkering occurring on it now is restoration to 0.1.0.

[Anonymous No.14298600]

>>14298574

These are the shills I talk about in my post here
>>14298062

These rabid low IQ BCH and BSV shills will make smart anons rich.

[Anonymous No.14298634]

>>14298592
>Once Feburary hits there won't be anymore tinkering with protocol on bsv and the only tinkering occurring on it now is restoration to 0.1.0.
That's another retarded sales pitch aimed at tech-illiterate people

[Anonymous No.14298657]

>>14298453
I honestly don't get it. People here in August 17' got onboard bch for this very reason. I don't understand why any of those same people wouldn't have dropped bch for bsv.

[Anonymous No.14298679]

>>14298474
Vitalik wanted to develop on btc but was blocked and limited because of Core, you're a moron.

[Anonymous No.14298701]

>>14298634
Your opinion is shit.

[Anonymous No.14298710]

>>14298634
BSV
>we wont change protocol. promise

BCH
>We wont be blockstreamed, promise

Ideological useful idiots always get duped, sweeties.

>>14298657
early days of BCH Craig himself was talking about "radical innovation" and stuff like sharding. CTOR was promoted on nchains own website. Locking the protocol has become a big topic in the ruinup to november fork. Before that they were more about scaling on-chain by all means necessary.

[Anonymous No.14298711]

>>14298679
Good for him, he created something entirely different. You can't run Ethereum on bitcoin, prof. Faustus is a fucking incompetent charlatan.
>but muh 0.1.0

[Anonymous No.14298731]

>>14298600
The fact is that BCH offers nothing that BSV doesn't do better, (fees, transaction speed, applications, ecosystem, scale, etc) EXCEPT for one thing: the promise of future anonymity, that is, a promise of safe haven for criminals.

That's it. It's alluring if you want another Silk Road type black market for drugs, sextrade and weapons trade, but it's a fucking terrible proposition if you actually want business adoption of any kind and a new global monetary system run on Bitcoin.

Look at your thought leaders like Roger, who is a total clown. Pic related.

[Anonymous No.14298738]

>>14298711
Pick up a charlatan bag today and rest easy

[Anonymous No.14298791]

>>14298731
>your thought leaders
Imagine becoming part of any "crypto community"

Are you emotionally invested and all in your favorite crypto? BOTH coins will pump. Your opinions are irrelevant.
Both have rabid delusional supporters like you. The price will go up and I will profit.

>imagine thinking you have any control on what coin we will use in the NWO or that it matters which coin you support now


Big time criminals still prefer fiat by the way and they will as long as fiat exists.

[Anonymous No.14298820]

>>14298710
>stuff like sharding. CTOR was promoted on nchains own website
Sauce me boss, because you're talking complete bs. I've only ever heard him say sharding doesnt work.

>>14298711
>Good for him, he created something entirely different
More splits and fractures = less security, more friction and less adoption. Cheering on 1000s of shitcoins is a marker of someone who doesn't understand or care at all about Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.14298884]

>>14297620
Oh bitcoins an anarchist coin as described by the whitepaper? Can you show me that section or the creator having any anarchist views? Would be of great assistance, thanks in advance.

[Anonymous No.14298903]

>>14298820
Altcoins were inevitable and would have emerged one way or another. "If we were in charge, there would be no altcoins" is another sales pitch for low-IQ people. Cope.

[Anonymous No.14298914]

>>14297037
You hope they aren't narcissists?!

Dude, you are so fucked. How did you not notice?

[Anonymous No.14298916]

>>14298791
The point is that only one blockchain will displace the entire financial system, the one that scales first.

You think Bitcoin is just a vehicle to make some fast cash, which is why you are never going to make the correct long term investments, because you do not care about fundamentals like the philosophical, economic, legal and technical aspects. Bitcoin is in fact a fully fledged economic system - it is literally DESIGNED for governments and banks to run all economic affairs on it. In the end, only one Blockchain will consume everything else, we all know this is the future, the tech can not be un-invented. It's here now, and it has sparked an entirely new industry.

The people who pick correctly and make wise investments will be the new elites. The people who pick wrong will lose everything they put in. It is just an inevitability.

[Anonymous No.14298971]

>>14298916
>Bitcoin is in fact a fully fledged economic system - it is literally DESIGNED for governments and banks to run all economic affairs on it
You spewed out one more sales pitch, thanks.

[Anonymous No.14298987]

>>14298916
Oh I know there wont be shitcoin roulette forever but these things move slowly.
Emotional BSV and BCH-lets who hope for a flippening and think BTC will go to 0 within a week are delusional. If you have your ear to the ground and aren't emotional you will be able to be comfy while slowly moving your buying power into the winner.

>there are BSV bagholders who though BCH was going to be destroyed in the fork by means of HASH WAR and there was.
>You split, we bankrupt you
the same brainlets now think Craig will dump BTC to 0 in 11 months

[Anonymous No.14299001]

>>14294928
>everything is mooning
>pretends bcash mooning along with the rest is noteworthy

[Anonymous No.14299089]

>>14298496
>both will pump
nope. they'll rise with the rising tide but that is it and they'll underperform bitcoin an underperform other projects with good tech

[Anonymous No.14299100]

>>14298987
>You split, we bankrupt you

That's pretty much what happened, just look at Bitmain, what are they now?

https://blockonomi.com/fall-of-bitmain/

https://coingeek.com/jihan-wu-on-his-own-bitmain-reportedly-wants-out-of-failure-bitcoin-cash/

https://cryptoslate.com/largest-bitcoin-mining-pools-gutted-as-bitmain-reels/

https://coingeek.com/bitmains-hashrate-reaches-16-month-low/

Bitmain got totally fucking rekt after the hashwar. And the BCH devs are literally begging their anarchist basement dwellers for pity donations, see >>14298426 and >>14298444 as well as pic related.

Sorry not sorry. Winners and losers are being picked at the moment, woe whoever is on the wrong side.

[Anonymous No.14299191]

>>14299100
>still billionaire chink
>bankrupt

>still billion dollar corporation
>bankrupt

>BCH
>8 billion cap

you split, we bankrupt you was the moved goalpost by the way. His official slogan was THERE WILL BE NO SPLIT
He also dais he had super secret exploit which he would use to destroy BCH in the hash war.
LMAP BCH and BSV cucks truly are low IQ followers.

PUMP
MY
BAGS

>>14299089
they will outperform BTC by multiple X and already did.
BSV 5xed from bottom already.
BCH 5.8xed.
BTC 3.3xed.

[Anonymous No.14299265]

>>14298903
>Altcoins were inevitable
Yeah and LTC existed for a long time. It had literally no relevance until BTC was getting full blocks and other limitations. The only reason shitcoins took off in any meaningful way was because Core, otherwise they would have just remained obscurities.

[Anonymous No.14299288]

>>14299265
this is true. alts would be irrelevant except for a few novelty ones and BTC would be at 100k+ easily if it had just started increasing blocksize

[Anonymous No.14299466]

>>14299191
Lol you are taking his statements too literally as if he has some kind of Godlike power over reality itself. The intent of his statements was that if they split the chain he was going to do everything in his power to make them suffer financially, which is exactly what happened. BCH devs out begging in the streets and Bitmain reeling while nChain and the BSV ecosystem is in a stronger position than EVER and growing with extremely healthy financials and their mining empire only increasing.

You can't pretend the BCH camp came out on top in this battle. They may still go actual bankrupt as the story continues to play itself out.

>>14299265
Yep you can see exactly when this happened on this graph.

[Anonymous No.14299544]

>>14299466
thats a good picture

THERE WILL BE NO SPLIT
I HAVE AN EXPLOIT THAT DESTROYS SEGWIT
I HAVE AN EXPLOIT THAT I WILL USE IN THE HASH WAR
"SATOSHIS SHOTGUN" WILL CONGEST THEIR NETWORK

pump my bags friend :)

[Anonymous No.14299683]