/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.14216189]

All the twitter and reddit trannies who proudly spoon fed and hyped up the facebook connection to the normie NPCs, are you happy now, did you feel empowered and validated enough, you retarded, short-sighted, attention seeking whores? Down 30 cents already. When will you learn and realize we don't need the normies, that they're utterly worthless and only good for limp pumps and dumps because they don't understand what they're buying and have weak hands? We don't need this artificial shit show.

[Anonymous No.14216204]

>>14216189
who tf cares? only poorfags are worried about what the price is right now

[Anonymous No.14216206]

>>14216189
Agreed. Absolute state of clout chasing faggots, I hope they realise their existence is as pointless as xrp.

[Anonymous No.14216239]

>>14216189
>caring about short term price over some omise go tier rumors right after a legitimate google announcement
You'll be okay.

[Anonymous No.14216257]

>$1000 EOY

[Anonymous No.14216278]

There’s no guarantee facecoin will be a success anyway. They’ve tried currency before and it failed within 2 years.

[Anonymous No.14216287]

>>14216189
What’s really funny is that the white paper basically confirms Chainlink but people are too stupid to understand that. I love watching this shit show as I sit on my very cozy stack.

[Anonymous No.14216294]

>>14216239
This

[Anonymous No.14216297]

>>14216287
Agreed

[Anonymous No.14216298]

>>14216189
I tried to de escalate the facebook shilling but got ignored and ridiculed at every corner, im pretty sure it was whales and discord swingers who was pushing it

[Anonymous No.14216316]

>>14216257
i hope so..i only have 1 k.

[Anonymous No.14216347]

>>14216298
because it was discord swingers and whales after google they weren't happy that link didn't dumped to below 1$ that's why they seething and FUD/Fake SHILL in full force just to decrease price of link. The only way to destroy them is to rebuy their stack and never sell them again. Just buy and never sell and we will win those suckers

[Anonymous No.14216349]

>>14216287
No it didn't what kind of crack are you smoking

[Anonymous No.14216366]

>>14216349
I agree with you, I read the whitepaper no mention of chainlink. no clues. nothing.

[Anonymous No.14216386]

>>14216189
We already have crypto twitter preying on and swinging LINK.
@SatoshiFlipper with 26k followers keeps pumping and dumping us
@LilUziVertcoin took /biz/ breadcrumbs and hyped up the FB rumor to his 33.5k followers
Fucking despise these cunts. We've developed 2 years of potent FUD, why aren't we unleashing it on these "trader" faggots?

[Anonymous No.14216391]

>>14216366
>>14216349
It literally talks about implementing smart contracts

[Anonymous No.14216466]

>>14216349
>>14216366

I'm honestly tired taking the piss out of you guys this morning so I'll give you some advice.

Please stop giving a shit about Ctrl+f, actually read how calibra works, understand that they're in an early phase and intend to peg the value to an array of assets, they've already expressed that they intend to automate this... how do you think their getting those prices on-chain?

Jesus anons if you used your brain and thought for a second, did some research to confirm your thoughts you'll be a multi millionaire in about 3 years.

I can't believe there's so many people that follow blindly without thinking

[Anonymous No.14216524]

>>14216466
You can automate without chainlink. Do you consider this?

[Anonymous No.14216534]

>>14216189
>are you happy now
>mfw

[Anonymous No.14216540]

HOW FAR WILL IT DIP

[Anonymous No.14216563]

>>14216391
Thank fuck for Chainlink creating smart contracts!

[Anonymous No.14216585]

Fucking pisses me off, we even had a fucking salesforce tier announcement yesterday, and instead we're bleeding because of bullshit, fuck you dumb trannies

[Anonymous No.14216588]

>>14216189
>When will you learn and realize
never
these retards don't have the slightest idea of what this tech is, how it works or where its value will come from

they just heard somewhere that "crypto is the future", noticed chainlink's price potential and are completely fucking desperate to see the price increase so they engage in pathetic shilling
that's why rothschild (or whoever the fuck it was) immediately sold when the nigger who cleaned his shoe told him he had bought stocks, you don't want to share your project with impoverished normalfags who are in it without the slightest idea of what thry bought and will sell at the first indication that they won't get rich overnight

[Anonymous No.14216591]

My goal is to purchase as much chainlink as possible for as cheap a price as possible. So yes I'm quite happy with the fact that we're headed under $1. There's literally nothing between now and september to pump this coin. It will bleed hard for the rest of summer.

[Anonymous No.14216592]

>>14216563

What part of “de facto oracle provider” do you not understand.

If they’re serious about SC implementation, they’re using LINK.

[Anonymous No.14216596]

>>14216366
>>14216287
Evan Cheng is really the only thing I need to know to feel bullish about the connection

[Anonymous No.14216600]

>>14216386
They are retards like that insta thot with 20m followers who couldnt sell 32 shirts.

[Anonymous No.14216620]

>All the twitter and reddit trannies who proudly spoon fed and hyped up the facebook connection
Holy shit just fucking chill.
Don't hype up meaningless breadcrumbs.
Don't fud like a retard.
Just don't be a fucking schizo for once biz.
Just chill.
Is it really that hard?

[Anonymous No.14216621]

>>14216349
>>14216366
Read the technical paper where they discuss specifically not having a solution for their smart contracts to communicate with off chain data. There is literally only one solution for this currently. That combined with >>14216596 make LINK a pretty fucking comfy hold for now.

[Anonymous No.14216629]

>>14216189
How could you not see that this is what they wanted? Their fudding wasnt working anymore, so they flipped the script. They hyped up non-existent announcements to ride a pump up instead of get in on a dump. They got EXACTLY what they wanted.

[Anonymous No.14216643]

>>14216620
>Just don't be a fucking schizo for once biz.

[Anonymous No.14216652]

What about the Kang that called the pump?

[Anonymous No.14216668]

>>14216629
And now we will bleed out for months.

[Anonymous No.14216674]

>>14216524

Absolutely, and you're correct. They'll NEED an oracle of some sort, they may very well create their own centralised oracle, but then they lose all of the benefit of an already existing decentralized oracle network, that has first mover advantage, partnerships with Oracle, DocuSign, Salesforce, had Google writing tutorials explaining how to use the network to put data on-chain.

Chainlink have already done a lot of the up-front work, already solved a bunch of problems related to getting data on-chain. Facebook will be focused on their project succeeding and will leverage solutions other businesses are using for problems to specific problems.

They decrease risk, don't waste resource and keep stakeholders happy by not re-implementing.

I don't think people fully grasp what chainlink is, otherwise you wouldn't need to be asking these questions.

EVERYONE that makes smart contracts will need data or external events support to be useful, at the moment Chainlink solves the problem. There might be another solution in the future, but that's decades away, Chainlink for smart contracts is like Bitcoin for money

[Anonymous No.14216684]

>>14216466
Checked, they clearly need outside data, odds are Link is involved in the future.

[Anonymous No.14216717]

>>14216674
Using a centralized oracle in 2019 is like taking your horse on the highway

[Anonymous No.14216738]

>>14216674
they literally said they have their own centralised oracle thing running with handpicked validators. Told you dumb fucks this too many times already today I cba to even look up the website and link it directly anymore

[Anonymous No.14216807]

>>14216591
>There's literally nothing between now and september to pump this coin.
Did you know about that google cloud post ahead of time?

[Anonymous No.14216813]

>>14216738
>they literally said they have their own centralised oracle
source pls

[Anonymous No.14216837]

>>14216738

Right and RLC will run Durracles too.

NO ONE ELSE has been working on this, link has 24-36 months advantage. Smart Contracts = Chainlink, 100% of the time. When will you shitbrains learn?

[Anonymous No.14216840]

How do Americans buy/sell Chainlink after binance cuts us loose in September?

[Anonymous No.14216855]

>>14216717
Your connections with Salesforce have forgotten that their customers will use Mulesoft, the company buyed last year to connect their ERP with another API, events or another Blockchains.

[Anonymous No.14217362]

>>14216738

Even if what you said was true, the same is true for makerdao right now, and I'll let you in on a secret anon, they're switching to Chainlink

[Anonymous No.14217434]

>>14216189
>t. draymond green

[Anonymous No.14217447]

>>14216840
they don't.

[Anonymous No.14217466]

>>14216189
you're overstating their influence. linkies are treated like the cripplecult.

[Anonymous No.14217487]

>>14217466
cripple or not still i'm not fucking selling

[Anonymous No.14217539]

>>14217487
good, don't. the thot e celeb and others talking about it means nothing.

[Anonymous No.14217567]

>>14216189
Fucking THIS

SLOW CLAP x999999

I hope every faggot who went and shilled this dies a miserable horrific death

[Anonymous No.14217618]

>>14216189
I dumped on normies after spoon feeding them
T. Discord tranny

[Anonymous No.14217620]

>>14217567
I hope you get ran over by a water buffalo while you're pooping on the street.

[Anonymous No.14217681]

>>14216466
>they've already expressed that they intend to automate this... how do you think their getting those prices on-chain?
By making their validator nodes provide them.
The Libra network is much more decentralized than the current chainlink network.

[Anonymous No.14217745]

>>14217681
>tHe LiBrA nEtWoRk iS mUcH mOrE dEcEnTrALiZeD tHaN tHe CuRrEnT cHaInLiNk nETwOrK

[Anonymous No.14217752]

>>14217681
So the validators are going to do the "mining" as well as the oracle computations?

[Anonymous No.14217806]

>>14217681
The validator nodes are validating transactions, not performing api calls and aggregating responses to bring data on chain.

[Anonymous No.14217811]

>>14216652
based

[Anonymous No.14217826]

>>14216840
Just because it doesn't have the green light yet doesn't mean it won't be listed on Binance US. We will also likely see a Coinbase listing in the next few months, LINK is a blue chip now.

[Anonymous No.14217828]

>>14217806
According to whom? Why wouldn't they do that?

[Anonymous No.14217845]

>>14217806
This.
It's the same bullshit people have been spewing about ETH as well; "hurrrr ETH nodes will simply become oracles as well".
Nodes/validators are on-chain, while oracles are off-chain.
Learn the fucking basics.

[Anonymous No.14217875]

>>14216674
imagine still trying to push this narrative at this point

[Anonymous No.14217937]

>>14217845
The reason eth nodes aren't going to have oracles is because ethereum staking is going to be anonymous, and data providing can't be part of the base consensus.
Chainlink relies on kyc, libra relies on kyc, nodes can be oracles too.

[Anonymous No.14217955]

>>14217937
>nodes can be oracles too.
And cops can be pizza chefs.

[Anonymous No.14217995]

>>14217955
What an absurd analogy. You're completely reaching. There's exactly zero chance libra will use anything external.
Chainlink right now is a json parser with kyc and zero users.

[Anonymous No.14218046]

>>14217995
>what is aml/ctf
Im a financial institution
do i demand nodes with kyc, or just be ok with a node ran by ISIS to help fund their efforts in Syria

[Anonymous No.14218059]

>>14217995
Nodes/validators operate under blockchain logic, i.e. deterministic.
Oracles operate off-chain, because they handle non-deterministic data.

Sure you can have one entity do both, but the operations needed are so distinct that it makes as much sense as having a cop make pizzas while patrolling.
Yes people need policing, and yes people need to eat, and yes anyone can do either.
But it makes ZERO sense combining the two.

[Anonymous No.14218064]

>>14217995
I sold the top too.

But Libra will be a centralized piece of shit and I seriously doubt trustflesness is priority or even warranted. Handpicked nodes eliminate the need for a decentralized solution for their purposes. LINK is useful where people can't trust one another, or for idealists, but normies really don't give a shit.

[Anonymous No.14218081]

>>14218046
Even Libra accounts require kyc, nodes are owned by big corporations.
>>14218059
The identity of validators is known. The operation of validating blocks and providing data is separate, they can just create a transaction signed with their public key.

[Anonymous No.14218084]

>>14216189
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA FAGGOT I SOLD AT 2 DOLLARS GOIN G TO REBUY AT 1 DUMB FUCK

[Anonymous No.14218094]

>>14218081
>they can just create a transaction signed with their public key
What?

[Anonymous No.14218108]

>>14218094
what's wrong?

[Anonymous No.14218136]

>>14218108
Explain what you meant.

You were implying that the fact that node/validator identities are "known" removes the need for oracles, which is simply not true.

[Anonymous No.14218148]

>>14216189
you know that hating normies makes you a normie nowadays?
anyways thanks for your money fag

[Anonymous No.14218175]

>>14218136
Validators are known and their public keys are known, so they can function as oracles directly.

[Anonymous No.14218177]

>>14218175
That makes ZERO sense.
Are you larping as a retard?

[Anonymous No.14218209]

>>14218136
I think he means that the validators can also be oracle nodes. Since their identity is known and they are vetted by Facebook or whatever, they are trusted third parties.
Thus, no need really for a decentralized oracle network. All the trusted oracles have to do is place their signature on any outgoing data request, and it is good enough.
The question is: Will visa/MasterCard/whatever be using chainlink nodes to run their trusted oracles? Or will they have their own process?

[Anonymous No.14218210]

>>14216278
>There’s no guarantee facecoin will be a success anyway. They’ve tried currency before and it failed within 2 years.

we'll see, full court press this time. its (((them))) completely, i pray it fails and based @jack helps real crypto win.

[Anonymous No.14218215]

>>14218177
Do you know how oracles work? What makes zero sense? That's also literally how chainlink works right now, you pass a review, "optional" kyc and your key gets registered as a provider

[Anonymous No.14218216]

>>14218177
Oh its no larp, lol

[Anonymous No.14218290]

>>14216347

Why can't they just be happy Link is going up? Why can't they just be satisfied with their current stacks? Fucking cancer.

[Anonymous No.14218295]

>>14218209
>I think he means that the validators can also be oracle nodes.
Anyone can.

>Thus, no need really for a decentralized oracle network.
Of course there's still a need for decentralized oracles.
How else do you achieve off-chain consensus?

>>14218215
>What makes zero sense?
That the identity being know removes the need for oracles.

[Anonymous No.14218344]

>>14218295
>Of course there's still a need for decentralized oracles.
>How else do you achieve off-chain consensus?
what the fuck are you even talking about? you're just throwing buzzwords with zero understanding

[Anonymous No.14218366]

>>14218344
That's what oracles are for: off-chain consensus.
That's why centralized oracles are shit, it's the same as having a blockchain with a single node.

[Anonymous No.14218413]

>>14216674
they don’t need an oracle. you don’t need to peg assets on chain. tether doesn’t.

[Anonymous No.14218431]

>>14216239
There was no legitimate google announcement LOL. Some pajeet blogfag posted about it.

[Anonymous No.14218447]

>>14218413
>you don’t need to peg assets on chain
You literally do.

>tether doesn’t.
Because Tether isn't actually backed by anything other than Tether's word.
It's a pretty well-known controversy, you should look into it.

Every stablecoin with actual fundamentals uses oracles, like DAI.

[Anonymous No.14218453]

>>14216588
don't imply you are any fucking different

[Anonymous No.14218493]

>>14218431
>There was no legitimate google announcement
cope

[Anonymous No.14218948]

>>14216840
Changelly

[Anonymous No.14218972]

>>14218447
the absolute state

[Anonymous No.14219128]

>>14216278
I'm not even sure, if Facebook will even still be around in 2 years.

[Anonymous No.14219173]

>>14219128
Facebook owns shit like Instagram and Whatsapp, they'll be fine.

[Anonymous No.14219210]

>>14217826
>We will also likely see a Coinbase listing in the next few months, LINK is a blue chip now.
Stop posting about coinbase pajeet. It's not happening.

[Anonymous No.14219225]

>>14219173
>Whatsapp
Since ICQ is still doing fine, right?

[Anonymous No.14219240]

>>14216840
Coinbase/ learn to use VPN.

[Anonymous No.14219303]

>>14217745
you have to go back faggot

[Anonymous No.14219375]

>thinks some biz fb rumor has anything to do with link's price moving