>TFW the prophecy about early adopters was literally true

[Anonymous No.14175145]

I wonder why the KYC requirements for nodes was added :OOOOOO

[Anonymous No.14175230]

>>14175145
Plus Director of Engineering is Technical Adviser. Unless this Orwellian-nightmare coin will be a pure centralized shit-coin with no functionality whatsoever they need Oracles and some kind of smart contracts. Just like everyone other platform in the space, they need Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.14175248]

Cuckerzerg can bend the knee to Lord Sergey with the rest of them, still not buying their shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.14175276]

>>14175145
Wow it's almost like being able to run your own node is important

[Anonymous No.14175295]

>>14175145
This isn't related to chainlin it's literally from a Witnet presentation

[Anonymous No.14175312]

>>14175295
Fucking Witnet Kek didn't one of their devs say they were going to beat Chainlink to market? lmao

[Anonymous No.14175365]

>>14175312
Glorious leader will save orcales from the town rapist

[Anonymous No.14175375]

>Because if we don't learn from history channel, we are doomed to repeat history channel

[Anonymous No.14175399]

>>14175295
You’re literally talking bollocks.

[Anonymous No.14175411]

Imagine believing that Facebook is going to use a bunch of stinky neet nodes as critical infrastructure for their enormous new project.

[Anonymous No.14175615]

>>14175312
chainlink has not released any decentralized oracles so far.

[Anonymous No.14175684]

>>14175145
unironically the only reason im hesitant on registering kys as a node operator

it's a little unsettling

[Anonymous No.14175706]

>>14175684
but that's what Linkpool is for, fren

[Anonymous No.14175760]

>>14175411
holy shit

[Anonymous No.14175906]

>>14175312

Both are complete speculation at this point

[Anonymous No.14176193]

>>14175906
>speculation
you mean delusion