Why Chainlink?

[Anonymous No.14168855]

Can someone explain to me why we can't just use ETH as an Oracle before it is sent to another ETH to serve as a smart contract? I have never been able to understand around why we need Chainlink when we can use ETH as the Oracle. If we are afraid of having only one type of smart contract to verify the information functioning both independently as an Oracle and as a smart contract, why can't we use a smart contract platform such as EOS/NEO serving as an oracle to ETH (which will function as a smart contract)?

[Anonymous No.14168884]

>

[Anonymous No.14168891]

>>14168855

Eth already pumped, that’s why.

[Anonymous No.14168895]

>>14168855
thats why Vitalik even acknowledged the existence of an "oracle problem", right?

someone should go tell the creator of ethereum that he was wrong about its capabilities

[Anonymous No.14168896]

>>14168855
Bahahahahaha, brainlet cope. Get good faggot

[Anonymous No.14168902]

>>14168855
reread the whitepapers
breadcrumbs everywhere
disgusting

[Anonymous No.14168903]

>>14168884
i dont want this. i want adoption and links locked up in staking as soon as possible. fuck media and fuck normies.

[Anonymous No.14168928]

>>14168855
fuck off back to r*ddit

[Anonymous No.14168942]

Don't spoonfeed

[Anonymous No.14169122]

>>14168928
Been on /biz since 2016. Been on 4chan since 2011. Can you at least try to answer my question?

[Anonymous No.14169136]

>>14168942
Please care to explain Chainlink and why is it unique

[Anonymous No.14169190]

>>14168855
I will try to answer your question. It’s good that you ask it because the more questions you ask about link the more you will realize that it’s perfect.

Your question is a bit confusing. Using ETH as an Oracle is basically what the chainLink team is building. I’m not aware of any native Oracle functionality of ETH or one that is as well thought out as link.

[Anonymous No.14169293]

>>14168855
>>14169122
Wasted digits. We cannot answer your question because it’s so fucking stupid it gave anyone that read it cancer. We’re now focusing on treatment options and maximizing our little time left on this earth to the best we can due to the cancer you gave us with you dumb shit question. I know I’m responding to b8 here but fuck anon, Jesus

[Anonymous No.14169306]

>>14169136
I dont want to handhold too hard, but just this week 3 "other smartcontract (TM btw) networks" announced they're using the "industry standard" CL. Is there a reason for that?

It's not about fetching data...it's about doing it securely. Secure enough that an industry will trust it's quadrillion+ (that's 1000000000000000 dollars) being handled by chainlink. CL just got audited by 3? different companies for almost a year to verify their shit is SECURE.

Pajeet-atic or some other chink coin is already 2+ years behind on a working product, without all the partnerships and user incentives (free links for companies starting nodes).