ETH vs LINK first 500mil pump

[Anonymous No.14145418]

Pic related is the first ETH and LINK pump at around 500mil. volume.

Can someone tell my why there was so low price action on LINK even with THIS insane volume ? LINK should be at least at 10 $ right now (comparing the fundamentals + volume + marketcap)

I know its different time and a second year of a bear market but why the fuck link did only 50% (40 cents) pump with 500mil volume at 500mil. marketcap.

TELL ME WHO THE FUCK IS SUPRESSING THE PRICE AND WITH HOW MUCH LINK THAT HE CAN SUPRESS A FUCKING 500 MIL VOLUME WITH ONLY 500MIL MARKETCAP.

[Anonymous No.14145436]

>>14145418
Sergey himself.

[Anonymous No.14145435]

>what is total supply

[Anonymous No.14145447]

Are you mad?

[Anonymous No.14145453]

>>14145418
There are some yuuge whales in link

[Anonymous No.14145462]

>>14145418
Whales like to swing

[Anonymous No.14145475]

You could only get in the ICO if you had 30eth. LINK is one of the most whale accumulated shitcoins there are, enjoy getting mindfucked by them.

[Anonymous No.14145511]

>>14145418
Because bots prevented it

[Anonymous No.14145512]

>>14145435
Wtf, you are an actual brainlet, total supply doesnt matter you moron, what matter is the volume and marketcap here.

Even XRP was at 15bil marketcap during its first 500mil. pump, WITH PIC RELATED TOTAL AND CIRCULATING SUPPLY

[Anonymous No.14145550]

>>14145512
jesus newfag calm down, we have been in this for 2 years... just wait and have some patience, this is not a normies coin

[Anonymous No.14145549]

>>14145436
his big wallets are untouched, try next
>>14145447
no, but this happening is very interesting
>>14145453
>>14145462
>>14145475
>>14145511
Whales/bots, yeah sure, whales and bots are able to supress 500mil. pump on 500mil marketcap coin.

[Anonymous No.14145568]

>>14145418
Its called Market Making. And anybody who swing trades forex for a living is fucking loving LINK's the entire history of price action.
>healthy markets dont move forever vertically
>always bring scuba gear

Thanks, whales!

[Anonymous No.14145570]

>>14145418
you really cant figure out whos suppressing price? Lmfao how new are you

[Anonymous No.14145582]

>>14145418
Really gets the jogging nogging. Could be that people are more interested in accumulating BTC for the upcoming bull run. Ether had USD pairs and also bitcoin looked bad at the time (winklevoss ETF rejection), plus ICO-fag buying pressure. So it looked as if ethereum would over take bitcoin itself. That was the sentiment at the time (see flippening). Now when it comes to Chainlink, it’s got way more negative sentiment, lack of exposure, no real USD pairs, isn’t blockchain (this it’s esoteric), and then there is (like you said) the fact we JUST had a bear market right after the scammy ICO bullshit we saw.

I don’t find it that surprising considering the market is much more noisy and people are still skeptical of new ICOs.

[Anonymous No.14145661]

>>14145475
Funny, I got in with 5

[Anonymous No.14145682]

>>14145582
in other words: stealth phase

[Anonymous No.14145709]

>>14145549
They totally are. Do you think (((their))) bots would allow a significant price increase?

[Anonymous No.14145746]

>>14145550
not an oldfag but okay
inb4 "partners with the whole world" - still at 1$" Cofee standard fud is getting real day by day.
>>14145568
Nice market making coin you have there, 10$ seems like a pure dream (we literally need Bitcoins daily volume to get to 10$)
>>14145570
He thinks cofee standard is a fud
>>14145582
good reply in a sea of brainlets, fuck i miss old biz. These newfags are calling everyone "newfag" meanwhile they are the real newfags, kek. Yeah, the flippening was real when btc went from 85% dominance to 45% in couple of days but there was noone selling ETH at that time, but who the fuck is selling so much LINK to such a huge pump that its worth for him to supress it ?

[Anonymous No.14145762]

>>14145582
>market is skeptical of new ICO's
anybody looking at its price action and fundamentals through that lens, is low IQ or poorly informed.
>LINK's ICO was two years ago
>its the only project that outperformed every crypto including King Shitcone during the 2018 bear market
>only project to hit, retrace and (yesterday) surpass its ATH while all other crypto projects have barely regained 50% of their 2017 highs, including BTC
>IMPORTANTLY: only asset to fully retrace from the April/May rally while BTC and the rest of shit crypto have yet to make a full retracement from the highs they all made of the April/May rally
>only premier asset for both trading and sound investing (chart is bullish as all fuck)

Why arent reddit cucks already all in? Because muh racist basket weeving associations?
>oh no, anon, its because LINK is a "new" ICO
"woke" logic makes normies stay poor

[Anonymous No.14145774]

>>14145709
No, but i think (((their))) bots will push it to 5-10$ and unload everything right after SWIFT announcement leaving you 1K moonfags swinging.

[Anonymous No.14145785]

>>14145475
Bullshit, ICO was 7 ETH max per address, presale was 100 ETH max per invite and the invites to the presale allowed multiple addresses and were shared heavily on biz.

[Anonymous No.14145786]

>>14145418
Chinkos are suppressing the price cuz it's literally going to be worth $1000 eoy

[Anonymous No.14145866]

>>14145746
I wasnt implying LINK is making the crypto market. Quite the opposite:
>shitcoins/99.9% of crypto market are at the whim of BTC price action
Meanwhile
see >>14145762

LINK's Decoupling from rest of crypto market/BTC is eminent.

[Anonymous No.14146042]

>>14145418
Well, now the crypto market has become more experienced, and prepared.

Due to the huge number of bots and washes, trading volumes began to distort the picture.

Fetch a month trading with x4 times the volume of cap.

[Anonymous No.14146095]

we would be here, right?