Real talk on LINK price

[Anonymous No.14019661]

Ok so, the market cap is about 380 mill right now , if you take into consideration their total supply it is around 1 bill.

What will the price of link be in the short, medium and long term if microsoft , salesforce, swift , jp morgan etc all come out and confirm they are using link.

X10?
X100?
X300?

I don’t want to buy eth or btc because the max they can do is x30-40, so discuss honestly, how long would it take for link to be 100$ or more and what is needed = 100 b mcap

[Anonymous No.14019673]

1k EOY why this shit again?

[Anonymous No.14019695]

>>14019661
Nobody can accurately predict prices, if they could, they would be billionaires. LINK has a lot of risk, but it also has massive potential rewards. How long will that take? Nobody can say for sure. Buy a ticket and wait, or miss the flight.

[Anonymous No.14019773]

>>14019661
Let's say link is $1 to make it easy. If it does a modest 10x this year thats $10, then bitcoin goes to 20k. Should put link around $40. Then Bitcoin follows all previous trends and does a 20x from previous all time high. That puts link at $800. Now you can see that's modest calculations it won't take much more to get $1000 by eoy

[Anonymous No.14019822]

Link is only pumping because Twitter normies are pushing a bullshit rumor. Lol

[Anonymous No.14019900]

Looking at this picture and comparing it to qnt is making me feel really good about my move today

[Anonymous No.14019904]

>>14019822
arguably that's what happened with btc and look what happened. one source says "it's gonna PUMP" everyone buys and holds and drives up the price. doesn't matter if it was actually going to pump or not. same reason why when one source says it's gonna dump normies cash out and it dumps. link only needs the right conditions (partnership announcements and positive speculation from blogs) and it will moon

[Anonymous No.14019925]

>>14019661
this thread again holy shit he never stops

[Anonymous No.14019971]

>>14019773
Yes, but if btc moons to 20 k while link is 10$, link will probably stay at 10$ , no?
Sats will bleed

>>14019904
What is moon according to you? X10? X100? I need a x100 in 3 years, how plausible do you think that is?

[Anonymous No.14019999]

Link will only sustainably pump when btc/eth pump. It kind of hit a perfect storm the last month when btc was pumping hard and the announce mainnet. that made it go up a dollar.

Link is a HEAVILY manipulated crypto and yes I know most cryptos are, but it's easy to follow the patterns and see people are manipulating it up and down for their own gain

[Anonymous No.14020008]

ChainLink will touch every market and nearly every transaction in the future. That's trillions of dollars. There's only 1 Billion tokens.

It does not matter what the price of other coins is.

[Anonymous No.14020072]

>>14019999
Yes but it seems clear the pattern is having a lower low everytime it gets manipulated up, so obviously this trend will continue.

>>14020008
Yes, but what will link’s price be with this

[Anonymous No.14020074]

>>14019999
digits : checked
milkers : checked

[Anonymous No.14020086]

>>14019661
>>14019695
>>14019773
Link will double in price every six months

[Anonymous No.14020104]

>>14020086
For how long?

[Anonymous No.14020115]

>>14019661
>I don’t want to buy BTC because the max it can do is x30-40

Lmao enjoy buying your worthless meme tokens

[Anonymous No.14020121]

>>14020104
Forever! Now tell me, when are you selling?

[Anonymous No.14020144]

>>14019971
to me i'd probably say mooning is x50 to x100. if you're willing to hold for three years it looks to me like any established token that has a solution to a problem would perform well. back in 2012 if someone said btc would ath at ~$18k most people would probably laugh at you. find a project you believe in, dca in over time, and hopefully that investment pays off. i feel like 3 years down the line 1k link isn't absurd. eoy like people meme seems very unlikely to me but weirder things have happened.
i'm not an expert by any means but my alt holds are link, ftm, and hot. one is pumping hard right now but i'm afraid i missed the entry on that one. ftm and hot are still very cheap and have a shot at hitting $1 in the coming months/year probably which would be a x100 roughly for ftm and x500 for hot

[Anonymous No.14020174]

>>14020072
1,000,000,000,000 ÷ 1,000,000,000 = 1,000 minimum.

[Anonymous No.14020178]

>>14019773
Yes but will it go higher than 1000? I need 3 million minimum to make it.

[Anonymous No.14020292]

Sold everything on this last spike, like everyone here should have aswell

[Anonymous No.14020300]

>>14020292
why

[Anonymous No.14020301]

>>14020178
This is an example of the amount of transactions Visa does per second. Node operators are paid with LINK tokens and go down to 18 decimal places. If you're able to hold long enough, the sky is the limit.

[Anonymous No.14020322]

>>14020178

[Anonymous No.14020337]

Is 8.5k link enough to make it

[Anonymous No.14020345]

If LINK is the nascent industry standard for banking APIs, the theoretical upper bound for the token is in the low six digits, anon. These tokens have to back a bond market measured in the trillions annually, to say nothing of a derivatives market. If the token is displacing 5 bond lawyers, even at 100k a token that's an 80% reduction in cost for the firms involved.

[Anonymous No.14020360]

>>14020337
If you hold and only sell a very small amount to pay off debt and expenses. It's not too late to buy more though.

[Anonymous No.14020363]

>>14020301
>tfw you die at an old age and your kids inherit a single link which is enough to make them wealthy for the rest of their lives
damn...

[Anonymous No.14020372]

>>14020345

[Anonymous No.14020428]

I will hold longer than anyone in this thread

[Anonymous No.14020459]

>>14020300
I'm a swing trader, I look at the risk to reward potential and make my decision from there

[Anonymous No.14020494]

link is over

[Anonymous No.14020636]

>>14020459
the only swinging swinglinkers will do is from a rope

[Anonymous No.14020883]

How many link will be locked up in nodes realistically, how many lockup will each node require

[Anonymous No.14020946]

>>14019999
>boomer probably bought that car after working for the summer as a cashier.

[Anonymous No.14020979]

>>14020883
i think almost everything will be locked up except for the reserve sergey holds to pay out operators. as time goes on the amount paid out will attenuate like bitcoin mining rewards, causing dollar value to increase correspondingly. We will never reach the point where the reservoir of link that sergey pays out for operations is exhausted, because scarcity of that pool will drive up price causing smaller and smaller fractions of link to be paid out. For a while i was worried that this would just enter into the standard spiral of consolidation and monopolization by meganodes, but then remembered that would defeat the purpose of decentralization and thereby dump the price of the links these nodes held. All node operators will have a stake not only in their own node, but in the health and decentralization of the network as a whole. It's fucking crazy but a free link token on an exchange is going to scarce as fuck.

[Anonymous No.14020990]

>>14019773
jesus christ you guys never fail to amaze me with your delusion. you should be medicated.

[Anonymous No.14020991]

imagine dumping 2/3s of the supply into the market, holy kek!

[Anonymous No.14020996]

>>14020979
Doesn't that also mean they will be difficult to sell with incredibly low volume?

[Anonymous No.14021033]

>>14020996
Not to the people who know what they're buying.

[Anonymous No.14021035]

>>14020996
not at all. whether something will sell quickly is determined by the demand for it. if its scarce that just means the price will be that much higher.

[Anonymous No.14021043]

>>14019661
Microsoft has like 10000+ software developers, why would they ever use something 2 guys build in 2 years? Why not just steal the idea and get 20 guys to build it in 2 months? I don't think Linkies understand business.

[Anonymous No.14021048]

>>14020979

What if Sergey gets kidnapped and tortured?

[Anonymous No.14021068]

>>14021048
it's almost certainly going to be held in a trust which, drumroll, will be fully automated trustless and tamper proof via smartcontracts

[Anonymous No.14021077]

>>14019999
the whole package

[Anonymous No.14021085]

>>14021043
Thats not how software development works, you cant just throw 10 times more developers at it and expect to get it done in 1/10 the amount of time

[Anonymous No.14021090]

>>14019661
Anon, consider that the train has left, and all you can do is loudly slam the door in farewell.

[Anonymous No.14021091]

I know that Mememagic is real ..... Link is a meme.
So i will get a couple hundred of this.

[Anonymous No.14021105]

>>14021085
I'm actually a software developer myself, and since Link's code is open source, I can guarantee an MS team of 20 can easily rewrite all of Link's code in 2 months. I know exactly how software development works brainlet. Keep coping, no big company will ever use LINK, they will build their own.

[Anonymous No.14021121]

>>14021105
They are building their own. They called it chainlink.

[Anonymous No.14021127]

>>14021048
Imagine being this naive.

[Anonymous No.14021143]

>>14021085
I would bet that every single day at MS, there's more line of codes written than 10x the entire codebase of Link. To even consider for a second that MS will use Link over building its own, is room temperature IQ. Did MS use AWS or build its own? Did MS use Google or built its own? Linkies cope is fucking hilarious.

[Anonymous No.14021297]

>>14021105
>I'm actually a software developer myself

Highly believable, since you're a credulous idiot when it comes to non-tech stuff.

[Anonymous No.14021353]

>>14021297
cope cope cope cope, almost all of tech executives were programmers. Why don't you refute the facts instead of personal attacks? Link going to 0, proven by the stupidity of Linkies like yourself.

[Anonymous No.14021428]

>>14021353
>why doesn't microsoft just steal an idea thats been copyrighted
>you calling other people stupid

[Anonymous No.14021465]

>>14021428
kek you can't copyright software, there's always another way to do it that bypasses the patents/to defend it in court. Again your stupidity and ignorance of software dev and the industry proves Link is going to 0.

[Anonymous No.14021492]

>>14019661
>still trading around 1$
>barely above ico price
>/biz/ talks about x300
never change..

[Anonymous No.14021507]

>>14021492
ico price was literally .11

[Anonymous No.14021526]

>>14021143
there's no talking sense to the LINK holder. They really think some fat fuck Russian philosopher has invented something the lowliest developer on the Microsoft totem pole couldn't replicate within a month.

[Anonymous No.14021537]

>>14021143
Why would Microsoft develop a decentralized oracle network instead of contributing to one? The point is that no one owns it and that it is a decentralized, trustless system. Would you want two different internets? Do you understand the concept behind any of this?

[Anonymous No.14021555]

>>14021353
> tells people to refute his 'facts' when he casually presents a 0 proof unoriginal coder larp along with demented ramblings based on a hypothetical situation

Ad hominem is the only real thing we can go with because the only thing you have truly presented is your incredibly smooth brain. It's all just noise. The barking and pissing of a confused swinglinker. Go drink some drain cleaner and lie down in a landfill somewhere, you mouthbreathing nigger.

[Anonymous No.14021562]

>>14021526
If they could, they would...it is very lucrative

[Anonymous No.14021563]

>>14019822

Top kek, he didnt re enter...

[Anonymous No.14021565]

>>14019773
>if bitcoin reaches 5B link will be 1K
>see how easy that is bros? haha we're all gonna make it amirite
kys retard

[Anonymous No.14021569]

>>14021143
shit tier fud up your game swingie

[Anonymous No.14021585]

>>14021555
You don't need to prove logic, it proves itself
>>14021537
If LINK goes to 1000, Sergey will be a trillionnaire. That's why. MS wants that trillion, it doesn't want Sergey to have it. KEK YOU ARE SO DUMB, everyone of your "argument" makes no sense and gets BTFO. Link 0eoy

[Anonymous No.14021592]

>>14020428

Not so fast, pal.

I can’t even trade my link it’s all in cold storage. I intend to sell 10% of my stack at $100 USD, and neet off that for two years and see where my make it stack ends up.

I intend to only ever fraction split, I will leave LINK to my children as inheritance.

[Anonymous No.14021608]

>>14021569
have sex

[Anonymous No.14021640]

>>14021465
It might go to zero, but that doesn’t matter. Right now cryptocurrency is a lucrative bet because a lot of people believe in them. I’ve thought ChainLink (and smart contracts in general) are retard tier BS, but I’ve made a lot of money off them. No one is gonna out of nowhere say “ok, time to admit it’s all a scam.”

[Anonymous No.14021654]

did sergey present today? anything interesting?

kicking myself for not loading up more when it hit 0.85 but I'm waiting on a check to clear

[Anonymous No.14021672]

>>14021585
> logic proves itself
> refute my facts because dude trust me
> still provides 0 facts
Why do you keep providing me with evidence of your extra chromosomes instead of addressing what I pointed out about your shit-tier claims? You people are so completely fucked in the head that I don't know whether to feel pity or contempt.

[Anonymous No.14021679]

>>14021640
I agree, I'm allin on real projects, like BTC and ETH. Not scams where 65% of the supply is controlled by 1 man, 0 user adoption, and not even have an actually decentralized mainnet.

[Anonymous No.14021692]

>>14021672
all my facts are logic that prove themselves, but you seem to be too low IQ to realize that. You can't follow a simple conversation so there's really no hope of convincing you, but all the other potential buyers with brains are reading how retarded you and linkies are and selling, which is my goal.

[Anonymous No.14021706]

>>14021585
Who said anything about $1000 per Link? And no one said Sergey owns 650M Link. Just admit you’re a fudding faggot. The 650M could be in a wallet that has very specific instructions of which the company founders are aware. You’re making a lot of stupid assumptions. If they give 300M tokens to Microsoft, then does your mind change? You need to learn to fud better. You sound like such a retarded faggot. Why wouldn’t Microsoft just create their own internet?

[Anonymous No.14021720]

>>14021672
actually you bagholding and proving your retardedness to the public is the perfect outcome for me, I get to insult you AND make you poorer

[Anonymous No.14021725]

>>14021679
BTC and ETH are just as much of nonsense as ChainLink. It’s all useless shit.

[Anonymous No.14021747]

>>14021725
LOL IMAGINE BELIEVING THIS
hey you fucking mongloid, remind me what network Chainlink is "live" on?

[Anonymous No.14021754]

>>14021679
Literally the only useful crypto is Monero and if people ever figure that out it will become illegal and difficult to obtain. I'm just here for the riches anyways.

[Anonymous No.14021757]

>>14021706
See, again, your prove how low IQ you are.

Chainlink has always made Sergey and his associate millions. MS wants these millions. 10, 100, 1000EOY is irrelevent. But you are too stupid to read between the lines.

Wether Sergey owns 65% of the supply, or Sergey and his 10 associates, or a trust controlled by Sergey and his 10 associates, does not make a single difference. It's still 65% of the supply controlled by 1-50 people. But see, you are too stupid to understand that.

I have to spell out every detail that a normal person with normal IQ would just understand as "logic".

[Anonymous No.14021773]

>>14021720
There’s no point in arguing with you. You’re just another stinky linky fudding his own project for whatever mental illness you have and larping as someone who hates link but just researches it in depth to point it’s flaws out in 20 posts per thread. You’re accomplishing nothing.

[Anonymous No.14021781]

>>14021143
Pic relative you massive nigger. KYS

[Anonymous No.14021783]

>>14021757
Right. Thanks for convincing us with your high IQ

[Anonymous No.14021794]

>>14021773
kek every time a dumb linky gets BTFO he says "durr you must be an undercover linky!!!"

Your IQ is so low.

[Anonymous No.14021818]

>>14021781
Chainlink is not decentralized. All they did was create a token out of thin air, sell 35% to randos, keep 65%.

MS can do that in 2 seconds and be just as "decentralized".

Again, another LOW IQ Linky arugment BTFO. Are you guys crying yet? On suicide watch? Bring on more "arguments", which I will also BTFO, I'm waiting.

[Anonymous No.14021835]

>>14021794
>12 posts by this id

I'm sorry to were BTFO swing trading.
You clearly don't work in tech or so any software development, because if you did you'd realise not every company can be specialists in everything and they reach for services who are experts in their field

>Microsoft doesn't use open source, they build their own hurr durr

Brainlet faggot

[Anonymous No.14021859]

>>14021835
I do work as a programmer, I've even done work for a few ICOs.

Oh again the whole "you must be an undercover linky" argument. Have sex

[Anonymous No.14021882]

>>14021818
It will be decentralized. For the rest of your message, read pic related of my previous message. Nigger

[Anonymous No.14021898]

>>14021859

Programmer in what exactly? Spill it and I'll know if you're full of shit. Nobody refers to themselves as a programmer who actually builds software.

[Anonymous No.14021902]

>>14021859
>I've even done work for a few ICOs.
Oh wow, impressive, Anon
Did you do marketing for bitconnect too?

[Anonymous No.14021910]

>>14019661
establish basic boundary conditions for market cap and pricing and index it against how much risk/exposure you're willing to take

basic breakdown for the lurkers and contributors of this thread:

>btc - 50%
>eth - 35%
>link - 15%

change the order of these 3 to suit the amount of risk you're willing to carry (risk in this context is the exposure to the crypto market, ie. money holding crypto vs. your earnings, assets and potential future earnings)

[Anonymous No.14021918]

>>14021882
It will not be decentralized. ETH is decentralized. They spend their 16mill ICO money hiring 100 devs to finish their mainnet in 1 year, and they own less than 1% of the supply.

Sergey owns 65% of the supply and kept the 32mil to himself instead of hiring enough devs to complete the mainnet in a timely fashion. Note that current mainnet of Chainlink is not finished, it's not currently able to handle decentralization.

[Anonymous No.14021942]

>>14021898
Yes they do, because I do and I program full time. I do mostly backend nodejs work, and I got gigs for the icos because I've worked a lot with IPFS and Web3.

[Anonymous No.14021979]

>>14021918
Ethereum and Bitcoin were premined to oblivion. But that's not what make a network centralized. Nigger and retard

[Anonymous No.14021995]

>>14021942

Tell me the best feature that arrived natively in node 10 LTS? You'll likely get this wrong googling and will only know the correct answer with experience

[Anonymous No.14022001]

>>14021979
Bro, why are you so dumb? Why is it tht I can BTFO every single one of your argument in 2 second?

Eth foundation's ETH reserve were less than 1% of the supply 2 years in.

Do you know anyone who owns 65% of bitcoin? Let me know, I will dump my stack instantly.

[Anonymous No.14022011]

>>14022001
>Missing the point
That's not what make a network centralized. Nigger

[Anonymous No.14022020]

>>14021995
No clue, they haven't added anything I use since node 8 I think. Most of the "new" features are use are classes, destructuring, proxies, arrow function, const, let, for of. They really add so little features every version now that you'd have to be autistic as fuck to know them.

[Anonymous No.14022036]

>>14019661
You kids will never stop shilling shitcoins, huh?

[Anonymous No.14022038]

>>14019661

>microsoft , salesforce, swift , jp morgan etc all come out and confirm they are using link.

Dude, that's delusional. No one will actually ever use LINK for anything. Except maybe the Sergey and couple of biz neets for fun. It's the same for all these crypto projects. After 10 years bitcoin STILL has no one who actually uses it for anything except HODLing and pump&dumps. Screencap this.

[Anonymous No.14022049]

>>14022011
Yes it does, especially since Link plans on using staking for reputation kek. Also if you think running a node mkes it decentralized, I think MS can get poeople to run more nodes than fucking chainlink kek. They have like 75% of desktop marketshare.

HOW DUMB CAN YOU BE. It never seizes to amaze me.

[Anonymous No.14022059]

>>14021043
Jesus Christ, we are back at the beginning... we really did a full FUD circle...

[Anonymous No.14022065]

Listen guys, I don’t care whether or not you think it is a scam or not or whether it is decentralized or not. You can do your own research on that fud each other in another thread, I only want to know what the price potential is on link in each specific scenario and how many link will be locked up in nodes on average.

[Anonymous No.14022069]

>>14019695
>lot of risk

can you elaborate? do you mean in regards to adoption, market timing, team or what?

[Anonymous No.14022081]

>>14022065
price 0 - probability 100%

[Anonymous No.14022102]

>>14021143
>why did no one just make their own internetz anon hm?! Hmm?! Hmmmm?! Ha! I got you there!!!!!! Uuuuuhhhh yess!!!
Kys you subhuman piece of nigger shit

[Anonymous No.14022138]

>>14022102
kek nice argument. I'm sure anyone with money is reading it and rushing to buy Link. Every word you write makes you poorer as you fail to come up with a single good counter argument and smart money is selling.

[Anonymous No.14022180]

>>14022138
Sure bud. I really hope you mean every word you said, because I can’t wait to see guys like you neck themselves in the future because of their arrogance. But you are just another retard thinking it’s still necessary to fud to keep the price down.

[Anonymous No.14022208]

>>14022180
I've been allin on BTC since 2015, and more recently ETH, no matter what happens to Link I will have made it. Though it will go to 0 with a 100% probability.

[Anonymous No.14022222]

>>14022049
Nigger

[Anonymous No.14022247]

>>14019999
I know where you got that pic

[Anonymous No.14022264]

>>14022222
Link confirmed $1000 eoy

[Anonymous No.14022277]

>>14022264
>>14022222
>>14022222
>>14022222
>>14022222
BASED

MY LINKIES STAY EXTRA STINKY 1000$ EOY

[Anonymous No.14022284]

>>14022222
Best counter argument

[Anonymous No.14022302]

>>14022208
The only probability of 100% is you being a nigger. Now fuck off Tyrone, do some gang stuff, steal cars, sell drugs or whatever you guys do.

[Anonymous No.14022320]

>>14022222
CHECKED.
>thread closed

[Anonymous No.14022364]

>>14022222
What does it mean guys?

[Anonymous No.14022371]

>>14022364
It’s a good sign, fren

[Anonymous No.14022386]

>>14022277
Fuckin chekt

[Anonymous No.14022389]

>>14022364
It seems if you're dumb and poor you will buy Link, if you're smart and rich you will sell it.

[Anonymous No.14022694]

>>14021492
You’re a fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.14022711]

>>14021105
No one will use windows , they will build their own

[Anonymous No.14023426]

>>14020345
>what is fractional reserve
Seriously though, this logic is fucking stupid. “Hey we need to move $100m using these meme tokens, so let’s just say they’re worth $100m!”
The redpill is that the reliability and accuracy of the link network will mean only a small fraction of the value of a job needs to be staked, like 0.01%. We’ll still make it though.

[Anonymous No.14023909]

5 k in 2023 july checkem

[Anonymous No.14023957]

this filthy fud thread. Anyone who DYOR knows the tokenomics of link is insane. 1 billion total tokens? 650 million of which are held in reserve for key partners and staking rewards? And link nodes can only be rewarded with link tokens? What if there were only 1 billion dollars both in circulation and in reserve banks in all the world. How much would a house cost. how much would college cost. and how many smart contracts need to be executed/rewarded daily to replace all digital transactions? How many if only 10% of digital transactions were replaced by smart contracts?

You fucking imbeciles don't deserve money.

[Anonymous No.14023993]

>>14019661
if not LINK then hold what.

[Anonymous No.14024809]

>>14023993
Hold eth, btc and monero, but those have too lil return left

[Anonymous No.14025049]

>>14022222

[Anonymous No.14025249]

>>14021942
>self-proclaimed programmer
>mostly nodejs
>npm install web3
>t. bootcamp graduate
No engineer respects you in the slightest. Pathetic.

[Anonymous No.14025253]

I've tried to calculate this and I've come t around $300 USD considering the market cap and possible growth when trying to be conservative yet optimistic. Beyond that I'm not sure. Things could get crazy for a moment.

[Anonymous No.14025261]

> Kyc to run a node
> reselling private api data is illegal

Good luck with that

[Anonymous No.14025282]

>>14025253
i would be very happy with link at $300

[Anonymous No.14025299]

[Anonymous No.14025629]

>>14022001
Found the guy who is buying Link at $10

[Anonymous No.14025633]

>>14025253
Interesting, I also landed at about $300 for near term though I think depending on how much are locked up in nodes and what the dividends are we could see a price in the multiple thousands. $300 seems like the lowest realistic price we'll see if adoption happens though.

[Anonymous No.14025669]

>>14021043
>>14021105
>>14021465
>>14021585

Hello 2017 Fud.

[Anonymous No.14025917]

>>14025633
>>14025282
>>14025253

How did you calculate this to come at 300$?