BSV is going straight to $1000 a pop, isn't it ?

[Anonymous No.14011761]

And it won't stop there.

Goddamnit, i could've bought in at $55 .. i was at the fucking brink of getting 20 BSV at that time and i didn't pull the trigger..

Now that i've read into it, this seems to be the only true thing left in this entire market.

Any other anons in my position ?

[Anonymous No.14011771]

no I've been buying under $60 for months, lol. but am still buying at any price every paycheck

[Anonymous No.14011778]

>>14011761
https://youtube.com/watch?v=5DCAC1j2HTY

Remember this?

> “I am about to demonstrate a signing of a message with the public key that is associated with the first transaction ever done on bitcoin”

I don’t understand why is he saying recently “I will sign after proving in court” lol. lol. Wasn't that bbc fake stunt supposed to be real? hahaha

> “I don’t want money! I don’t want fame! I don’t wan adoration”

> “I will never do an interview ever again!”

right.

seems legit right goys?

Here the guy from bbc with his impressions, he was face to face with that clown: https://youtube.com/watch?v=zxMU4C6bGKw

> there will be no split
bch splits

> i will destroy bch
bch not destroyed

> btc will be $0 eoy 2018
btc $4000 eoy 2018

> i am satoshi
can’t sign a simple fucking message

> says I will sign after proving in court
but... wasn't the bbc stunt supposed to be a real signature? LOL

> submits a list of addresses of some fake tulip trust bullshit to court...
one of the addresses he claimed was signed by the real owner with a message saying the address is not belonging to this craig clown

> unlawfully registers a copyright on btc white paper and code in a stunt to cause a dump on btc
btc doesnt flintch

> next day copyright office confirms they didnt confirm this clown is satoshit and reaffirms that anyone can register anything with them
ultra fail

> some brainlets compare this piece of trash with trump, but trump is a winner
this clown is a loser

Guys this fakethosi clown is a fucking scam a pure and simple trash bag for everyone to see.

> He keeps putting a large biz budget for his trash biz shill army in an attempt to change public opinion
he fails miserably, anyone with one inch of brain sees this guy is a fucking trashbag scam

Fuck you and all you brainlets who support this fucking faketoshi loser piece of shit

[Anonymous No.14011785]

>>14011761
>>14011771
Does calvin force all of his tranny shills to buy bsv?

[Anonymous No.14011792]

I don't get it. He is always talking about some exotic shit that no one has ever heard about or understand. Either he is a scammer using techno babble to bamboozle people or he is a genius. I honestly don't know which of them it is anymore

[Anonymous No.14011794]

>>14011778
do a flip

die in poverty low iq subhuman

[Anonymous No.14011808]

>>14011761
Is 20 enough to make it?

[Anonymous No.14011816]

>>14011794
>die in poverty low iq subhuman
Intelligence quotient is uppercase low IQ human

[Anonymous No.14011818]

> the next bit coin
> "organic growth"

[Anonymous No.14011822]

>>14011808
I believe 21 is the correct number.

[Anonymous No.14011823]

>>14011794
kys faggot

proof that craig is satoshi? Bahhhhahahahhaha where is it? Bahahhahahahha

[Anonymous No.14011836]

>>14011816
a phrase has a "." at the end low iq subhuman

[Anonymous No.14011873]

>>14011836
>a phrase has a "." at the end
Somone sounds butthurt "."

[Anonymous No.14011881]

>>14011761
doubtful

[Anonymous No.14011888]

>>14011836
>a phrase has a "." at the end
Someone sounds a little butthurt "."

[Anonymous No.14011898]

>>14011778
It doesn't matter if he's a scammer and a liar, his coin is minting money. Buy it, watch it pump, and dump it. It is only good things for you as an investor. Reality doesn't care about morality, rightness, or a person's honesty, just that their idea is worth something. Don't miss out on this opportunity.

[Anonymous No.14011899]

>>14011794
1 rupee has been deposited to your account

[Anonymous No.14011911]

>>14011898
>It doesn't matter if he's a scammer and a liar

[Anonymous No.14011915]

>>14011816
>>14011823
>>14011899
3 answers, not one can provide any sort of proof

who are the pajeets?

[Anonymous No.14012190]

>>14011761
Has he ever been interviewed by an actual programmer? Someone who would call him out or ask him to go deeper than the buzzword he spouts and see if he actually knows what they mean?

[Anonymous No.14012197]

>>14011792
>a scammer using techno babble to bamboozle people
I think that's it, until proven otherwise of course.

[Anonymous No.14012219]

>>14011778
kys gregfag

[Anonymous No.14012221]

>>14011761
This one talk unironically convinced me for 85% that this man is Satoshi. All these voices yelling "where's the proof", lol, very odd.

[Anonymous No.14012230]

>>14011792
Pretty sure it's the former. He doesn't know what he's talking about technically half the time.

[Anonymous No.14012451]

>>14011792
celluar automata as a model for complexity is quite mainstream. rule 110 has been around for some time. i saw the lecture wolfram gave to faculty on his book.

[Anonymous No.14012475]

>>14012451
is what he is saying is legit?

[Anonymous No.14012521]

>>14011761
No I actually pulled the trigger and was buying for months at 50-60$. Comfy stack of 200 now.

[Anonymous No.14012536]

>>14011761
BSV is the US hedge vs China's BTC

[Anonymous No.14012553]

>>14012536

[Anonymous No.14012569]

>>14012451
Interdasted. Source?

[Anonymous No.14013101]

>>14011778
Easily debunked.

[Anonymous No.14013108]

>>14012475
Yes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_110

[Anonymous No.14013114]

>>14013101
>he signed in private
cringe as fuck

If I was looking to trust third parties I wouldn't be in crypto. Eat a dick.

[Anonymous No.14013128]

>>14011818
>nothing but months and months of Bitcoin barting
>”organic growth”

[Anonymous No.14013651]

>>14011761
ye yes sir, buy satonj vishnu, guaranteed moon

[Anonymous No.14013688]

>>14011761
Alea iacta est

[Anonymous No.14013760]

>>14013114
Stay poor then, nobody cares about your low IQ decisions.

[Anonymous No.14013768]

>>14012451
>celluar automata as a model for complexity is quite mainstream
No, it's absolutely not, and you're trying to use impressive sounding terms to scam people. See >>14012475 >>14012569