[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 496 KB, 1012x675, clk-launch-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13978680 No.13978680 [Reply] [Original]

Sooooo when are they making the price of BTC available on mainnet?

>> No.13978692
File: 20 KB, 407x447, DiuUxhUYAA_ayO.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13978692

>>13978680
Sanjeets vision is irrelevant

>> No.13978716

>>13978680
RES is the next LINK

>> No.13978739

>>13978680
First they have to release chainlink on bitcoin network. That may take something like five years. You know how long it took to release it on ethereum alone.

>> No.13978757

>>13978680
That chain link pajeet said link is a dead project and bsv is the only one that will survive in the long run.

>> No.13978763
File: 102 KB, 600x338, 1557494667619.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13978763

"Welcome Sir! What's that? You want to see the price of Bitcoin Core? May I see an ID or passport, please? Don't worry, Sir, that's standard procedure."

>> No.13978785

how do I even tell if its working?

>> No.13978792

>>13978739
>First they have to release chainlink on bitcoin network.
I sincerely hope you're trolling.
I'm talking about making the price of BTC available on the Chainlink mainnet, which is currently on ETH.

From the blogpost: "cryptocurrency prices, will be one of the first decentralized oracle networks made available on Ethereum"

>> No.13978797

>>13978680
I don't know I couldn't pass the node operator KYC. They demanded me to send my fingerprints of all 10 fingers but I lost one a few years ago during construction work.

>> No.13978800

>>13978763
>that's optional procedure
ftfy

>> No.13978809

>>13978797
Imagine sperging out this much about an optional feature.

>> No.13978858

just check blockfolio losers
chainlink is shit

>> No.13978870

>>13978858
>just check blockfolio
Checking blockfolio doesn't get anything into the smart contract.

>> No.13978880

>>13978870
like i want to make a smart contract to check btc price when i can press buttons on my phone for free
nice try

>> No.13978894

>>13978680
they literally just released an eth token. something fiverr pajeets do for 5 bucks.

>> No.13978904

>>13978880
>like i want to make a smart contract to check btc price
Then don't.

But if you ever want to have a conditional payment made in BTC, you're going to need an oracle to check the price of BTC.

>> No.13978915

>>13978809
That's like calling a steering wheel optional in a car.
Without this "optional" feature chainlink doesn't work, everyone could spam the network with nodes to provide wrong data

>> No.13978952

>>13978915
>Without this "optional" feature chainlink doesn't work
lmao, of course it does.
Hence why it's optional.

It's a security feature for those who think they want/need it.

>> No.13978953
File: 50 KB, 690x472, 1559201282060.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13978953

>>13978858
The absolute state of crypto "investors".
Sergey will find you and sybil attack your brains out. Pic related

>> No.13978960

>>13978952
if by "does" you mean providing "some" results, not necessarily accurate in any way, then sure.

>> No.13978969

>>13978960
Wow, you really think highly of this KYC thing don't you?

>> No.13978980

>>13978969
>The ability for one person hiding behind anonymity to pretend that they are multiple independent nodes can allow them to take over an oracle network without the need to overcome more complex technical or security hurdles

>> No.13979007

>>13978980
And KYC is the one and only thing that counters this, right?
Damn, you must really like Chainlink now they have KYC, huh?

>> No.13979024

>>13979007
>And KYC is the one and only thing that counters this, right?
in chainlink? yes
>Damn, you must really like Chainlink now they have KYC, huh?
If I needed an oracle I would use oraclize, cheaper gas costs due to payment in eth rather than an erc20 token.

>> No.13979038

>>13979024
>in chainlink? yes
The white paper has been out for over a year and a half.
Maybe you should read it.

>If I needed an oracle I would use oraclize
Oh boy.
Nobody tell him.

>cheaper gas costs due to payment in eth rather than an erc20 token
Maybe you should read the blogpost about the threshold signatures for instance.

>> No.13979062

>>13979038
>Maybe you should read it.
Maybe you should look at mainnet and the blog post and realize whitepaper was a complete lie.
>Nobody tell him.
Another brainlet who thinks oraclize uses chainlink just because they sell overpriced chainlink nodes.
>Maybe you should read the blogpost about the threshold signatures for instance.
Completely irrelevant. Read it again and again until you understand what it's actually about.

>> No.13979084

>>13979062
>Maybe you should look at mainnet and the blog post and realize whitepaper was a complete lie.
haha what?
Please tell me about a single contradiction.

>Another brainlet who thinks oraclize uses chainlink just because they sell overpriced chainlink nodes.
All I know is Oraclize is using Chainlink.
Cope.

>Completely irrelevant.
Except for the fact that threshold signatures are there specifically to reduce transaction costs, right?

>> No.13979130

>>13979084
>Please tell me about a single contradiction.
kyc as the only security mechanism.
>All I know is Oraclize is using Chainlink.
it isn't.
http://docs.oraclize.it/#pricing
ctrl-f chainlink
0 results
>Except for the fact that threshold signatures are there specifically to reduce transaction costs, right?
to reduce the cost of aggregating answers from multiple nodes, not the cost of a request or paying for it.
No aggregation is needed at all when using oraclize, making the equivalent gas cost ZERO.

>> No.13979165

>>13979130
>kyc as the only security mechanism.
Show me where it says that.

>it isn't.
See pic.
Whoopsie.

>to reduce the cost of aggregating answers from multiple nodes, not the cost of a request or paying for it.
Reducing the cost of aggregation reduces the cost per request you retard.
This is like saying "lowering the cost of gasoline doesn't lower the cost of car trips".

Also, threshold signatures can combine multiple requests, so you're wrong on every single level.

>No aggregation is needed at all when using oraclize
Because "oraclize" isn't decentralized, meaning it's not actually an oracle.
Oracles are about off-chain consensus. And you can't achieve consensus if there's only one player.
Hence why Oraclize is moving to decentralization, and Chainlink.

You're the perfect shillball pitcher.

>> No.13979178
File: 75 KB, 567x552, oraclize using chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13979178

>>13979130
>>13979165
>see pic

>> No.13979246

>>13979165
>Show me where it says that.
here >>13978980
>Reducing the cost of aggregation reduces the cost per request you retard.
pilpuling this hard
>If I needed an oracle I would use oraclize, cheaper gas costs due to payment in eth rather than an erc20 token
threshold signatures are completely irrelevant to this
>Also, threshold signatures can combine multiple requests
only if the nodes are completely identical, but that's again irrelevant to the payment cost
>Because "oraclize" isn't decentralized, meaning it's not actually an oracle.
>trying to redefine common words
are you a kike? That's the second primitive Jewish trick you tried to use.
>>13979178
"interoperate" is not synonymous with "uses" dumb nigger

>> No.13979273

>>13979246
>here >>13978980
Where does it say KYC is the only solution for that?

>pilpuling this hard
It's the simple truth.

>threshold signatures are completely irrelevant to this
Except for
1) the fact that a centralized oracle isn't actually an oracle, since a single oracle can't reach off-chain consensus because it's alone
2) threshold signatures can combine multiple queries, meaning cheaper queries

>only if the nodes are completely identical
Bullshit.
Threshold signatures can combine multiple queries, period.

>"interoperate" is not synonymous with "uses"
Except it literally is.
They will be making use of Chainlink services and tech.

>> No.13979280

>>13979246
>trying to redefine common words
I'm not trying to do anything.

Oracles are about off-chain consensus.
They always were.
And a single oracle can't achieve consensus, simply because it's alone.

>> No.13979374
File: 67 KB, 1220x619, 1558474634911.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13979374

>>13979273
>Where does it say KYC is the only solution for that?
what does that describe?
>can allow them to take over an oracle network without the need to overcome more complex technical or security hurdles
it describes the situation without kyc. There's no security at all. They couldn't be more open about it.
>It's the simple truth.
no, they do nothing about erc20 transfer cost.
>Threshold signatures can combine multiple queries, period.
There's one threshold signature per set of public keys.
If nodes are different for two requests it means two different signatures.
>They will be making use of Chainlink services and tech.
>"interoperate with"
pilpul, again. As you ignored the question it's clear you're really a Jew.
>Oracles are about off-chain consensus.
no, an oracle in the blockchain context is something that provides external data whose truth can't be verified inside the system, whether about facts or a computation result.
That's why chainlink tried to call itself a "decentralized oracle" not just an "oracle".

>> No.13979500

>>13979374
>what does that describe?
>it describes the situation without kyc.
Answer the question: where does it say KYC is the only solution for that?

>no, they do nothing about erc20 transfer cost.
Combining node responses and queries offsets transfer costs mightily.

>There's one threshold signature per set of public keys.
>If nodes are different for two requests it means two different signatures.
That in no way implies the nodes have to be "identical".
You're saying if different people have the same key to the same door, that makes them "identical people".

>pilpul, again. As you ignored the question it's clear you're really a Jew.
You're going to have to cope with the fact that Oraclize is moving towards decentralization, and literally towards Chainlink.

>no
Yes.

>an oracle in the blockchain context is something that provides external data whose truth can't be verified inside the system
Here's Vitalik explaining oracles in 2014:
"no single oracle has the ability to unilaterally withdraw the funds"
https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/07/22/ethereum-and-oracles/

A centralized oracle defeats the purpose of using a blockchain, since every single oracle input is a 51% attack.

>> No.13979618

>>13979024
>>13979062
>>13979130
>>13979246
>>13979374

anon:
>"don't use decentralized Chainlink, just use centralized Oraclize"

Oraclize:
>"decentralized oracles and Chainlink are the future of Oraclize"

This isn't going well for you.

>> No.13979689

>>13979500
>Answer the question: where does it say KYC is the only solution for that?
Read the sentence again and again.
>You're saying if different people have the same key to the same door, that makes them "identical people".
what even is that retarded sentence supposed to mean?
Threshold signature is a m-of-n multisig signature aggregation. If signers for two different requests are different the signatures can't be combined. Every node has a different public key.
>You're going to have to cope with the fact that Oraclize is moving towards decentralization
it's not doing anything like that, it's selling nodes that also support chainlink.
>>13979618
>if I post from mobile nobody will notice it's still me
You got completely demolished, get over it.
In the grand scheme of things, a Jew getting scammed by a Russian out of his money is restoring some justice to the world, so all is good I guess.

>> No.13979750

>>13979689
>Read the sentence again and again.
It doesn't say anything about KYC being the only solution.
Provide source, right now.

>Threshold signature is a m-of-n multisig signature aggregation. If signers for two different requests are different the signatures can't be combined.
And a vast multitude of combinations are possible.

>it's not doing anything like [moving towards Chainlink]
>it's selling nodes that also support chainlink
Pick one.

>You got completely demolished
... says the guy who recommended using Oraclize in an attempt to fud Chainlink.

>> No.13979817

>>13978763
That will be 5 dollars sir

>> No.13979826

When do we get stablecoins for stocks via LINK? Shouldn't take too long for someone to make a decentralized exchange with it.

>> No.13979953

>>13979826
Agreed.
This is just one of the amazing use cases that I can't wait to see happen.

>> No.13979967

>>13978792
Of course he's trolling.
Most of the stupid responses and statements about link especially are people just trying to bait retards.

>> No.13979970

>>13978797
That's nothing. I had to send feces sample... Between a McDonald's burger

>> No.13980021

these retards had 2 years to work and all they did was a centralized network to check the price of ethereum. the ABSOLUTE state. ethereum did an ICO half as expensive as links ICO and released their full product 1 year later. this alone proves that link is a SCAM

>> No.13980036

>>13980021
>centralized network
Nope.
3 nodes in a decentralized setup.

>to check the price of ethereum
Nope.
To use the price of ethereum in smart contracts.

>ethereum did an ICO half as expensive as links ICO and released their full product 1 year later
Nope, ETH had its initial release 1.5 years later, and it was simply a slightly more programmable version of Bitcoin.
Even today ETH is lacking numerous key features.

>> No.13980202
File: 43 KB, 696x878, serg1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13980202

>>13978680
Can't believe you idiots are still here spewing anything about this massive Cayman Islands scam.
This is the economic version of the Fyre Festival.
Muh 11000 banks...
Seriously 3 nodes...

>> No.13980243

>>13980202
thanks for the bump

>> No.13980501

>>13980202
Don't forget the new SECZ at the end of the name.

>> No.13981051

>>13979024
>I wouldn’t use Chainlink, I’d use Oraclize
Anon, I...

>> No.13981168
File: 242 KB, 500x500, 1559357706329.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13981168

>>13979024
> He doesn't know

>> No.13981620

>>13978797
I swear man once biz gets new fud it gets fuckin beaten to death within a couple days