Lol

[AssBlaster No.13971411]

So much chainlink going on at this presentation. This timeline is wild.

NoLINKers how do you plan on killing yourselves?

[Anonymous No.13971477]

>>13971411
kys namefag

[Link Hag No.13971489]

bought below $0.30

[Anonymous No.13971510]

>>13971411
It'll probably be the same presentation as always.

[Anonymous No.13971517]

>>13971411
Your face when ethereum 2.0 fixes the exploit of threshold signatures

[Anonymous No.13971524]

>>13971411
He's going to do the same presentation he's been doing for the past year and you know it. Also checked

[Anonymous No.13971547]

>>13971411
4000 sats or worse by next month. The project is possibly dead in the water after this knowledge.

Sybil attacks are possible since sybil resistance requires KYC or "trustworthy" node operators. Most people won't KYC because it's antithetical to the idea of crypto itself being decentralized and "anonymous". Therefore, since most operators won't want to KYC, LINK will not be sybil resistant.

Now why does RLC make LINK obsolete in this regard? It's simple. The PoCo algorithm is so well designed that iExec's dOracles can rely on it instead of KYC for sybil resistance.

Boom. I sold all of my LINK at 1.40 because I knew after RLC v3 dumped, that even LINK would dump.

I will not be buying back after learning this. I am all in RLC at the price of 0.43$, about 0.7x ICO price.

Sorry gentlemen, I thought LINK was going to save me just like all of us did, but this is the nail in the coffin.

[Anonymous No.13971919]

Where in Toronto is this? Can one just show up or do you need to get some kind of tickets there?

[Anonymous No.13971963]

reminder that most of you have slaved for years wage cucking to buy a 10k-50k stack and sergey printed 350 million tokens for himself in some minutes with a couple of mouse clicks.
you hold around 0.003% to 0.014% of what he holds and he got his stack EFFORTLESS, as if the 32 million dollars werent more than enough.
if this doesnt ring all kinds of alarm on your head, i honestly cant comprehend what does.
even people with 100k stacks hold only 0.03% of what he does. the absolute state

[Anonymous No.13972003]

>>13971411
reminder that chainlink is NOT decentralized. It is a centralized scam

[Anonymous No.13972006]

>>13971963
how is this any different from any other crypto retard? it's how supply works

[Anonymous No.13972079]

>>13972006
no. in bitcoin, and other PoW coins, you MINE your way into a big stack. mining takes TIME and COSTS MONEY. you have to COMPETE with others. you dont just create the entire supply and then sell it to people. what most tokens do is an absolute scam and chainlink is definitely not an exception

[Anonymous No.13972099]

>>13972006
well look at ETH, the ETH foundation has less than 1% of the supply and spent all the ICO money (16mil raised) hiring 100 devs to complete Ethereum within 1 year.

Sergey holds 65% of the supply and hired 3 devs to fuck around while keeping the 32mil for himself.

Chainlink is a proven scam cashgrab compared to any legitimale crypto like ETH.

[Anonymous No.13972143]

>>13972006
this is what linkies actually believe in. hopeless

[Anonymous No.13972296]

>>13971963
>>13972003
>>13972079
>>13972099
another thread of linkies getting blown the fuck out, forcing them to immediately abandon the thread and on to the next echo chamber shill thread in hopes that smart anons dont go there and ruin it again with basic truth.one last bump so everyone can see the truth behind this project

[Anonymous No.13972403]

>>13971510
>>13971524
Sergey and adelyn will be performing sybil attacks live on stage
T. Inside larper

[Anonymous No.13972425]

>>13971411
Assblaster? Is that really you?

[Anonymous No.13972450]

Matic is the real gem there

[Anonymous No.13972474]

>>13972099
Linkies will defend this. The oracle problem is real, but the chainlink mainnet has been a complete disappointment. KYC for nodes? They can't be serious, isn't the whole point decentralization? Now a centralized authority controls the KYC list, great

[Anonymous No.13972521]

>>13972079
And with Chainlink you have to complete oracle computations to get Link.
Picrel.

[Anonymous No.13972537]

>>13971547
gayest pasta. -1 shill points deducted from your account ranjeet

[Anonymous No.13972540]

>>13972450
They partnered with Chainlink a few days ago.

[Anonymous No.13972554]

>>13971411
Can all the swinglinkers and fudfags post price at which they sold?
Capping that to copefuck them later is the only way i can climax

[Anonymous No.13972566]

>>13972521
mining with 65% premined supply owned by a single organization is still a scam, how low IQ are you?

[Anonymous No.13972572]

Sold $1.40 and no regrets. If it moons so be it, but I've already made enough profit at this price that I could give a fcuk.

[Anonymous No.13972580]

>>13972572
Congrats pajeet. May you survive many monsoon seasons with your fat stack of crackers and mosquito repellent.

[Anonymous No.13972585]

>>13972554
that will never happen. The current Link mainnet design is flawed (as is the one described in their white paper) and will never be used by anyone. Once a few months or years passes without any user adoption, Link will dump 95%.

[Anonymous No.13972595]

>>13972003
reminder that KYC has nothing to do with decentralization and that the node KYC is only a temporary solution until reputation and staking take over.

[Anonymous No.13972621]

>>13972079
Wow yeah all those dumb goobers who mined thousands of coins on their fucking netbooks back in 2010 really "earned it". Gtfo

[Anonymous No.13972623]

>>13972595
reminder that KYC is the definition of centralization and that decentralized reputation is an incredibly complex problem that Chainlink does not know how to actually solve. They basically haven't even started solving the only problem that matters, and it's 2 years in kek.

[Anonymous No.13972627]

>>13972566
>he thinks it would've been better if investors/traders/hodlers/exchanges held all or most Link before mainnet
Good thing you're not running any successful project.

[Anonymous No.13972645]

>>13972623
>reminder that KYC is the definition of centralization
Reminder that KYC for chainlink is literally optional, and you're retarded and wrong even if it weren't.

[Anonymous No.13972674]

>>13972645
it's not optional, if you don't KYC you have no reputation and cannot differentiate yourself from the millions of spam nodes.

learn some programming retard.

[Anonymous No.13972676]

>>13972645
>implying you can get any jobs without an approved node

[Anonymous No.13972684]

>>13972645
>literally optional

[Anonymous No.13972692]

Sybil attacks are possible since sybil resistance requires KYC or "trustworthy" node operators. Most people won't KYC because it's antithetical to the idea of crypto itself being decentralized and "anonymous". Therefore, since most operators won't want to KYC, LINK will not be sybil resistant.

Now why does RLC make LINK obsolete in this regard? It's simple. The PoCo algorithm is so well designed that iExec's dOracles can rely on it instead of KYC for sybil resistance.

Boom. I sold all of my LINK at 1.40 because I knew after RLC v3 dumped, that even LINK would dump.

I will not be buying back after learning this. I am all in RLC at the price of 0.43$, about 0.7x ICO price.

Sorry gentlemen, I thought LINK was going to save me just like all of us did, but this is the nail in the coffin.

[Anonymous No.13972707]

>>13972674
>>13972676
>>13972684
"We also intend to have an optional identity review available to node operators"
https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-live-ethereum-mainnet-connected-consensus/

thx for the reverse psychology Chainlink shilling.

[Anonymous No.13972714]

Sybil attacks are possible since sybil resistance requires KYC or "trustworthy" node operators. Most people won't KYC because it's antithetical to the idea of crypto itself being decentralized and "anonymous". Therefore, since most operators won't want to KYC, LINK will not be sybil resistant.

Now why does RLC make LINK obsolete in this regard? It's simple. The PoCo algorithm is so well designed that iExec's dOracles can rely on it instead of KYC for sybil resistance.

Boom. I sold all of my LINK at 1.40 because I knew after RLC v3 dumped, that even LINK would dump

I will not be buying back after learning this. I am all in RLC at the price of 0.43$ about 0.7x ICO price.

Sorry gentlemen, I thought LINK was going to save me just like all of us did, but this is the nail in the coffin.

[Anonymous No.13972749]

>>13971411
Sybil attacks are possible since sybil resistance requires KYC or "trustworthy" node operators. Most people won't KYC because it's antithetical to the idea of crypto itself being decentralized and "anonymous". Therefore, since most operators won't want to KYC, LINK will not be sybil resistant.

Now why does RLC make LINK obsolete in this regard? It's simple. The PoCo algorithm is so well designed that iExec's dOracles can rely on it instead of KYC for sybil resistance.

Boom. I sold all of my LINK at 1.40 because I knew after RLC v3 dumped, that even LINK would dump.

I will not be buying back after learning this. I am all in RLC at the price of 0.43$, about 0.7x ICO price.

Sorry gentlemen, I thought LINK was going to save me just like all of us did, but this is the nail in the coffin.

[Anonymous No.13972752]

>>13972674
It is optional you utter twat.

[Anonymous No.13972764]

>>13972707
if you're too stupid to understand the design flaw now, nothing I can say can convince you, you are too stupid to comprehend it. You will see in 12 months when no one uses it and it dumps 95%

[Anonymous No.13972777]

>>13972764

[Anonymous No.13972780]

>>13972752
It is a flawed design, if you don't KYC there's no way to differentiate yourself from spam nodes.

[Anonymous No.13972799]

>>13972764
> trying this hard to get someone to sell an allegedly useless scamcoin
Nah no ulterior motive here. I just sold 100k for my easy 4x. Thanks for looking out for me.

[Anonymous No.13972861]

>>13972799
my only motive is to create anguish and uncertainty for linkies. I know they are too dumb to sell.

[Anonymous No.13972895]

>>13972749
This. Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth. Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons. Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story. The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes. In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

[Anonymous No.13972906]

>>13971411
guess who's winning that chess tournament tomorrow.
This will be what separates the men from the boys

[Anonymous No.13972932]

>>13972861
Haha oh really now? Oh I'm sure you're not some pleb still salty over buying at $1.20 and instead of 40-50c like the rest. Have you considered having sex instead of being this obsessive and mad?

[Anonymous No.13972972]

>>13972932
why would I buy Link when I've known it's flawed for 2 years? And why would I have sex when I can jerk off using linkies tears as lube?

[Anonymous No.13973821]

>Phill Daian
>Dangers of decentralization in DEXes and Oracle's: Beware The Validators
>Goes right Serg's presentation

Pretty based

[Anonymous No.13973836]

>so much chainlink
literally only one chainlink related presentation
and it will be the same old one from sibos 2017
deluded

[Rate portfolio thread No.13973879]

>>13971963
>>13972296
based. LINKIES ETERNALLY BTFO

[Anonymous No.13973893]

>>13972906
Top kek, memes become reality