/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.13894378]

banks are in

[Anonymous No.13894384]

>>13894378
IS THIS A LEAK FROM THE BLOGPOST???
DUDE

[Anonymous No.13894396]

But muh Craig Wright muh real bitcoin

[Anonymous No.13894401]

>>13894378

Lmao sure ok

[Anonymous No.13894405]

>>13894401
coping shitskin

[Anonymous No.13894415]

>>13894378
banks think crypto is a joke fyi

[Anonymous No.13894432]

>>13894415
are you a subhuman nigger? because you sound like a subhuman nigger.

[Anonymous No.13894450]

>>13894396
he will always be our cuckboy

[Anonymous No.13894462]

>>13894415
>Banks think the asset that's outperformed literally everything else in the last 5 years consecutively is a joke
If that's true they deserve what's coming to them

[Anonymous No.13894466]

[Anonymous No.13894470]

Why was the file deleted

I saw it

[Anonymous No.13894478]

>>13894470
RIP anon

[Anonymous No.13894479]

>>13894470
What was it

[Anonymous No.13894484]

>>13894479
thank got i saved it

[Anonymous No.13894496]

>>13894432
i work in a large bank as a currency trader

>>13894462
yes we are actually not even allowed to talk about crypto at work, and def not buying it. not that many care but still

[Anonymous No.13894498]

>>13894479

Basically a photo with a bunch of bank logos against different headings like

Blah blah blah providing financial data
*citibank logo* etc

+

Blah blah blah providing fintech
*logos of other banks*

=

Smart Contracts something something

Looked like a slide someone took a pic of but was wonky and half cut off

[Anonymous No.13894537]

>>13894405

72k Chad with 4.5 LP. Fuck off panjeet

[Anonymous No.13894552]

>>13894537
mmm yes thank you sirs, i love your curry very much

[Anonymous No.13894570]

>>13894496

He will get bullyed for this by biz pajets but he is right

I represent some banks and NOONE lliterally no one give shit about crypto or best case its on radar as joke.

Link is cool but if you think mainet is enough for big dogs to jump in fucking lol on you neets

[Anonymous No.13894580]

>>13894496
>currency trader think he knows what his management and executives care about
Good meme dude, as someone who worked for Deutsch for a little over a year right after college they only thing they care about is money and there is a shit ton of money to be made in crypto.

[Anonymous No.13894636]

>>13894580

Number of times institutional money camed in to pump up retail bags during whole human history =0

[Anonymous No.13894648]

>>13894378
>insider here

[Anonymous No.13894662]

>>13894570
>I represent some banks and NOONE lliterally no one give shit about crypto
You sure seem to give a shit.

[Anonymous No.13894675]

>>13894636
it's actually this. it's just that they're so fucking egotistical and stupid that this issue turns them off. I mean, they will eventually be forced to buy but they are empty brained retards that make their decisions like lizards

[Anonymous No.13894719]

Attention all LINK holders

LINK/BTC memelines have converged

I repeate

LINK/BTC memelines have converged

this is not a drill

I repeat

this is not a drill

[Anonymous No.13894759]

>>13894636
>because something hasn't happened yet it's never going to happen
What a shit line of logic, you're saying companies don't care about making more money and that they don't want to increase their bottom line. Completely retarded.

[Anonymous No.13894762]

>>13894662

Do I sound like big board member lurking biz lol

>>13894675

Thats correct, they need to be forced so no mainnet banks in ofc
It will take fucking years to do this shit right if it can be done in this point of time

Thats only truth
Its still good bet

[Anonymous No.13894821]

>>13894759
>this time its diferent!!

Thats line of retail since dawn of time...

They allready print money you think they will share because "cool idea out there" lol?

[Anonymous No.13894842]

>>13894378
if this is real I hope Sergey finds you, fires you, and strips you of any interaction from the 4th industrial revolution

[Anonymous No.13894851]

>>13894762
>says he represents banks
>says no-one in the industry cares about crypto while trying desperately to convince us of something crypto-related
you tried

[Anonymous No.13894968]

>>13894851
Lol yeah I have bank clients I legally represent thats how i know what confuses you?
I like whole sc narative beacause I'm lawyer (you have no idea how many usecases I can picture in my head), and naturally cs rabbit hole led me to LINK...
What I am not is deluded, fantasize about mainnet happening and know its big and long bet with anything but shure outcome.

Literally any industry "adoption" of crypto is pure pnd on higher level (like btc custodian services), with exception of EY nightfall and LINK.

[Anonymous No.13894973]

>>13894496
>i work in a large bank as a currency trader

Wow thats practically the same as being a CTO of a big four! You definately would be in the know about cutting edge fintech thats hidden behind NDA's for sure!

[Anonymous No.13895059]

>>13894719
We're in the end game now.

[Anonymous No.13895063]

>>13894570
Interestingly enough I got the chance to talk to Alexander Mertz, COO of Blackrock Germany, Austria and Eastern Europe a few months back. I asked him about his/his company’s views on cryptocurrencies. His response was that they don’t believe Cryptocurrencies will one day be a widely used payment method (surprise), but the underlying technology, blockchain, is highly interesting and they will have an eye on the developments in this field.

[Anonymous No.13895069]

>>13894396
bitcoin and all of its scam forks are fucking dog shit technology.
all the smart money is in on ETH and other high tech projects at this point.

[Anonymous No.13895071]

>>13894968
I just don't see why anyone with actual access to such information would even see the need to forcefully broadcast it.

Also, you're wrong.
Banks are among the first to adopt any type of computer automation, especially if it's coming from 3rd parties so they don't have to do anything (see saas).

[Anonymous No.13895079]

>>13894484
HOLY SHIT MOON

[Anonymous No.13895081]

>>13895059
what does it mean

[Anonymous No.13895090]

>>13894484
Delete this RIGHT NOW

[Anonymous No.13895097]

>>13894484
its all true all of it what

[Anonymous No.13895114]

>>13895079
>>13895090
>>13895097
You like vague, sourceless pics that much huh?

[Anonymous No.13895118]

>>13895097
lmao at my id KEK

[Anonymous No.13895151]

>>13895114
You're new here huh?

[Anonymous No.13895167]

DELETE THIS

[Anonymous No.13895169]

>>13895097
>gay in ID
lol, you're gay

[Anonymous No.13895173]

Funny thing is that this fake image will be underwhelming compared to the real blogpost

[Anonymous No.13895195]

>>13895059
Fuckyou I was like good for 6 months

[Anonymous No.13895221]

>>13895063
this is in line with my experiences
>>13895071
>Banks are among the first to adopt any type of computer automation, especially if it's coming from 3rd parties

Only if it is related to:
>makeing money
>cutting costs

SC are not mainstream yet (far away form it acually) for anyone to care about link and yes im aware link will make sc economy flourish and paradox of it.

[Anonymous No.13895237]

>>13895221
>Only if it is related to:
>>makeing money
>>cutting costs
That's generally the idea behind automation, yes.

[Anonymous No.13895269]

>>13895081
fuck if I know. I just shitpost here.

[Anonymous No.13895304]

>>13894821
t. dunning kruger retard who doesn't understand human greed and thinks things stay the same for all of history

[Anonymous No.13895410]

>>13895173
Welcome back toilet-anon

[Anonymous No.13895666]

hmm

[BSV will win No.13895718]

>>13894484
no need to thank got, here's a protip: copies of deleted images can be found on various archive sites, such as the url below

>>/biz/thread/13894378

[Anonymous No.13895946]

>>13894968
An attorney would not have such a poor understanding of English grammar. Kys shitskin.

[Anonymous No.13896061]

I've contacted the team about this leak and they said that they are delaying mainnet and the blog post indefinitely pending further investigation of said leaks.

[Anonymous No.13896120]

>>13895118
Are you the faggot Nostradamus of Bitcoin?

[Anonymous No.13896169]

>>13894484
fugg this could be real, all of those payment processors and banks are on the smartcontract website or in the whitepaper/infographics.
The price would pump 10x in one day if those were confirmed in the blogpost

[Anonymous No.13897076]

>>13894484
delet rn

[Anonymous No.13897261]

This looks fake because the format used in that image doesn't seem to be the type of format to be used in a blogpost by Sergey.

[Anonymous No.13897376]

>>13894378
If CHAINLINK moves to BSV, fees will replace tokens.