IF CHAINLINK HITS 30K WALLETS MAINNET WILL BE CANCELLED

[Anonymous No.13885267]

Currently at 29965
Do NOT let this number reach 30K
KEEP FUDDING

[Anonymous No.13885390]

>>13885267
Sorry marine the war's over Sergey found the usb and Adelyn is spell checking the blog post right now.

[Anonymous No.13885415]

You had two (2) years

[Anonymous No.13885844]

>>13885390
Kek

Mainnet lets goooo

[Anonymous No.13885864]

>>13885390
>>13885415
>>13885844
yeah you're right fuck it. This is now a 30k countdown thread

[Anonymous No.13885908]

>>13885844
I have 4499 LINK spread out across 2 wallets (don't ask me why)

How, on my white children, will I ever make it with not even half of the minimum requirement to making it?

[Anonymous No.13885922]

>>13885908
by market selling your children

[Anonymous No.13885924]

>>13885864
There is nothing we can do now, we went through it all, the captain is now onboard and ready to take off..
Wait for sergey’s vocal speakers announcement
Bless you marine, we made it

[Anonymous No.13885935]

>>13885390
>adelyn spelling checking
god damnit

[Anonymous No.13885954]

>>13885908
if you can wait 7 years that's 44,990,000

[Anonymous No.13886851]

>>13885390
isnt it just obvious at this point that sergey has just planned the release of the blog post to coincide with the mainnet release?
its just so obvious to me that this is what is happening.

[Anonymous No.13886875]

don't you get it...
it's over.
chainlink won

[Anonymous No.13886912]

>>13885267
Here’s what people reading this need to know about Chainlink, smart contracts, mainnet, and oracles: There are two different kinds of network. The one on blockchain was created by Satoshi, the second chain was created by the people who are going to use those blockchains for the most of things. The reason why they're different on chainchain is that the reason for they're different is because of different rules. One of the problems with block chain is that the system cannot work if everyone is using the same system, and therefore, they cannot be trusted.
Now this problem has been solved and will continue to get more complex with time, but to understand why it happens, the simplest solution involves using a transaction record. The transaction record is just a set of information to include in a block chain that shows who is talking to what to communicate. These records have the following properties: They are public record (not stored on disk). They are readable and can be sent to and from multiple users or different computers, even within a network. -- They do not contain hidden information. They do, however, need to be verified against public records. They also must be valid for the block to be valid and be kept safe by the network. The transaction's txout is always unique within the chain. The other advantage is that a transaction can be verified with a transaction record by sending someone a bitcoin. A bitcoin is not valid if it comes from a wallet that is associated with an organization or an attacker.

[Anonymous No.13886925]

>>13886912
The transaction is broadcast immediately -The transaction contains a transaction ID that can be linked to another transaction (for example, a transaction that includes the timestamp of the previous transaction).

Each transaction includes either a block hash (a hash of the last known block that was created) or a sequence number (which is a list of three consecutive 0's that denote a previous block number). This allows the transaction to be linked to another transaction without having to create or verify a transaction history file with information about past transactions.

With the right tools and knowledge, you can create your own transaction, or create and add transaction outputs to another transaction, or add multiple transactions to a block. You can even use multiple transactions to publish a block, but once they publish the block, it can no longer be altered (an effect of having the same block hash and transaction ID for all).

[Anonymous No.13886943]

>>13886875
WHY DOES HIS ID SHOW "RETRY". OMG MY LINKIES ARE GOING TO ZERO!!!

[Anonymous No.13886944]

>>13885267
Wtf there's almost 30k people on biz? I always assumed this place was like 75 real people and then a bunch of bots and pajeets larping and shitposting under different IDs. mindblown.jpeg

[Anonymous No.13886960]

>>13885267
Is there a way to see top 10,000 wallets?

[Anonymous No.13886977]

>>13886960
https://ethplorer.io/address/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca#tab=tab-holders&pageSize=100

[Anonymous No.13886988]

>>13885908
It has always been 50k to make it. The 10k number only showed up more recently because a ton of poor newfags (like you) showed up that missed the golden bull in 2017 and can't afford 50k so they cope by saying 10k

[Anonymous No.13887002]

>>13885844
this fucking pic always gets me

[Anonymous No.13887010]

>>13886988
200 is enough

[Anonymous No.13887011]

>>13886977
Thanks, I'm in the top 2500...

I tried to make 20k could only get to 13600...

[Anonymous No.13887060]

>>13887011
>https://ethplorer.io/address/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca#tab=tab-holders&pageSize=100
Just like real estate, many addresses are owned by single entities... keep this in mind.

[Anonymous No.13887135]

>>13887060
these are obvious

[Anonymous No.13887147]

>>13887011
consider that some people have two wallets too, or even more, so you might be in the top 2000 for all we know

[Anonymous No.13887166]

>>13885267
What about LINK on binance

[Anonymous No.13887167]

>>13887060
Either way I'm still going to have to ride out the dumps... Even worse so if whales hide their wallets.

[Anonymous No.13887344]

>>13887135
>>13887147
>>13887167

Yes, there may only really be 1000 people worldwide that hold it. Whales most certainly have wallets split for obvious risk reduction reasons. It is a special group indeed.

[Anonymous No.13888021]

29,998

[Anonymous No.13888032]

29,999

[Anonymous No.13888078]

30,000

[Anonymous No.13888130]

29,999
29,998
We dumping boyos

[Anonymous No.13888512]

>>13886988
Bullshit. AssBlaster gave us the 10k to make it 18 months ago.

[Anonymous No.13888743]

>>13885267
Chainlink is a scam and useless

[Anonymous No.13888791]

>>13885267
If Craig has patents, and ChainLink moves to BSV, tokens will be useless since they'll just use fees.

[Anonymous No.13888805]

Will you linkies help a fren out if/when you make it? I don’t want money or anything, but if someone would take me to IHOP for a few pancakes and a nice chat, I would be most appreciative.

:)