Craig Wright here. I DARE any of the core cucks to answer this SIMPLE question.

[Anonymous No.13847986]

First and foremost, see this BTC pump? Guess what pumped right before it? BSV. We are now leading the market and soon BTC won’t even pump after us.

Now on to the real matters. If I was an average joe with low IQ (i.e. a pleb like most of the core cucks), perhaps I would have not been 100% sure that Craig Wright (I.e. me) is Satoshi.

But notice something.....the real Satoshi account (I will not reveal if it is hacked) came out saying that Dorian Nakomoto is not Satoshi.

Why hasn’t the “real Satoshi” if it wasn’t me came out and said the same about me? Why hasn’t the real Satoshi moved some funds or sign ANY transaction with ANY message saying it isn’t me? Oh, that’s right. Because it IS me.

Now wait. I know what the average beta S-O-Y eating white racist core cuck’s response would be: “It’s because Satoshi is dead!”

But wait, that would STILL imply that I am at the worst case a part of the Satoshi group. Why would I risk perjury, jail time, hundreds of millions, and reputations suicide if I atleast didn’t know who Satoshi was? And if I knew who Satoshi is, clearly I am at the very least a part of the Satoshi group, for otherwise the “real Satoshi” who is supposedly dead would never reveal himself to me.

Let’s see your answer you cucks. I know you failed logic classes but let’s see if you can hopefully navigate yourself through this one. Enjoy your life. And enjoy poverty.

[Anonymous No.13848002]

>(You)

[Anonymous No.13848033]

I forgot to add that the “real satoshi” could have easily signed anything without revealing himself so privacy shouldn’t be an issue. Because I know the second most common response is “because he wants to remain private”. That’s bullshit. Any sane man would prevent his project from being hacked especially if he could say something about it privately as he had always done.

[Anonymous No.13848057]

>>13848002
Looks like Greg has been hiring artists to meme on biz now. How much are they paying you?

[Anonymous No.13848063]

>>13847986
Because you are clearly not a rational or sane person. Risking perjury, jail time, hundreds of millions, and reputation suicide for ANYTHING is exactly the kind of thing that a person who's not rational or sane would make.

[Anonymous No.13848099]

>>13848057
they're paying me 1 (You) every time it's posted

[Anonymous No.13848171]

>>13847986
>the real Satoshi account (I will not reveal if it is hacked) came out saying that Dorian Nakomoto is not Satoshi.
>Why hasn’t the “real Satoshi” if it wasn’t me came out and said the same about me?
Corekeks have no response to this.
Imagine thinking that Satoshi would come out of hiding briefly to deny he's 15-minutes-of-fame Dorian but not for CSW and his three-year-long march through clownworld cryptoland.
>>13848063
>Thinking that CSW is "just insane bro."
Hopeless. Enjoy poverty.

[Anonymous No.13848172]

>>13847986

[Anonymous No.13848174]

>>13847986
Only a fool would take a man at his word when he denies to do the one thing that would be irrefutable proof. Fuck you, you're not Jesus, and until you actually sign, you're not Satoshi.

The moment you do I'll believe you, but until then: fuck off con-man.

[Anonymous No.13848193]

>>13848172
Not my address and never claimed it as such. The document submitted by the PLAINTIFF (i.e. not me) was forged as already PROVEN in my blog. Piss off mate.

[Anonymous No.13848196]

>>13848172
Craig never claimed that address, brainlet.
>TFW all the corekeks have left is outright lying
Where have we seen this before?

[Anonymous No.13848236]

>>13848193
It just took you a fucking year to notice it had been filed in the Florida case, yeah?

[Anonymous No.13848255]

>>13848196
Again, even if he is Satoshi, only retards would take someone at their word when they refuse to publically do the one thing that would immediately end all debate. All Craig does is build up situational evidence to (((strongly imply))) he could be Satoshi. He's either a clear con-artist, or an asshole that thinks he's god. You're a cuck for defending him either way.

[Anonymous No.13848257]

>>13847986
LOL thanks for all the entertainment.

Honk honk™

[Anonymous No.13848266]

and then theres these guys. Whose entire reputation is founded on not filing BS

[Anonymous No.13848309]

>>13847986
because you are an attention seeking whore or being paid / blackmailed by a third party

[Anonymous No.13848342]

>>13848171
He asked and I answered.

>Risking perjury, jail time, hundreds of millions, and reputation suicide for ANYTHING
Prove me wrong.

[Anonymous No.13848394]

Vitalek, cz, the list of names who came out and called you a Fraud is the fucking veritable Whos Who of crypto. Now, there is two possible explanations here - either they are ALL wrong, or, you are (indeed) a liar and a fraud. So, everybody in crypto, or you? Hmm, who to believe..

[Anonymous No.13848419]

>>13847986
Based and utterly stiffpilled

What's your diet like and how often do you work out. I know you do weight lifting, but do you also do cardio?

[Anonymous No.13848447]

>>13848236
I had noticed it much earlier. Just because I posted about it on a blog lately, doesn’t mean that it was when I first noticed it.

However, I’ll cut you some slack. You obviously failed logic classes so you won’t understand this.

[Anonymous No.13848450]

>>13848255
Nobody is taking him at his word, you retard.
Learn to read something that isn't propaganda pushed by desperate neckbeards. There is a shitload of evidence already circulating for years that supports the thesis that he is satoshi
http://financialcryptography.com/mt/archives/001593.html
>thinks he's god
You're the cuck for giving a fuck about such petty things. As the inventor of bitcoin, he's more then entitled to act like a fucking voltron of Zeus, Yaweh and the Bodhisattva for all I care.
>>13848342
You are a circular reasoning brainlet. You conclude he's insane because you already assume he isn't Satoshi. Good job, retard. Much logic.

[Anonymous No.13848465]

>>13847986
Craig, I have confidential information that can help you a lot against your enemies. You are in deep shit and you know it, it's only a matter of time until the whole industry fries you alive.

I know my information can save you, I won't contact you ever again this is a take it or leave it situation.

Send 1000 BSV to this address: 12kmnMZPJWA9StS4m6UFBquP4y4xcsx3ET

You will get all the information privately, take it or leave it, I won't contact you ever again.

[Anonymous No.13848466]

>>13848394
Ian Griggs, John Matonis, Gavin Andersen
Unless you are a complete newfag, you may have heard of them, yes?

[Anonymous No.13848475]

>>13848394
Hahaha ahahahaha

[Anonymous No.13848479]

>>13848450
Who's the author of that website?

[Anonymous No.13848486]

>>13848394
All great movements started from one man against a crowd of sheep.

>>13848419
Both. My diet is low carb high protein.

[Anonymous No.13848509]

>>13848465
>LARPing as a blackmailer on an unincorporated marshland surveying forum

[Anonymous No.13848519]

>>13848450
My friend, they are not experienced in logic. Ignore them. They also do not even understand the meaning of Occam’s Razor. Their opinions are formed by the consensus on forums like Reddit.

[Anonymous No.13848563]

>>13848479
Ian Grigg
One of the most respected cryptographers alive who had very close contact with the the Satoshi team.
Google is your fren

[Anonymous No.13848594]

>>13848563
>the content of each document in the corpus is compared in terms of semantic similarity number using the built-in functions in spaCy and gensim. The results from the two parts suggested which author/authors in the corpus are linguistically and semantically similar to Satoshi Nakamoto
>An unusual result is that Ian Grigg has a similarity score of .99996 to Satoshi’s email exchanges (rounded up to 1.0 in the table).
Something's very fishy here

[Anonymous No.13848672]

>>13848450
>>13848519
This looks totally organic and authentic, and not like paid shilling at all. I'll leave you guys to it.

[Anonymous No.13848712]

>>13848594
Stylometric analysis is notoriously unreliable, especially when you're trying to distinguish between two people who worked closely together.
Also, I don't think Craig was the one writing the Satoshi BCT and mailing list posts or if he was he ran them by someone else before posting them. Writing is not his strong suit.
>>13848672
Stay butthurt, Mr. Logic Circle. Nobody cares at this point given how you've already embarrassed yourself.

[Anonymous No.13848782]

>>13848712
The first bitcoin client was written by one person who was also a C++ programmer. Something very fishy is going on.

[Anonymous No.13848789]

>>13848712
>Writing is not his strong suit
I beg to differ. Take look at his blog. He comes off a fluent writer to me

[Anonymous No.13848836]

>>13847986
Truth is nobody cares anymore, muh Satoshi is old gossip. We're here to make money and to enjoy the memes, but memes die pretty quickly these days. Now fuck off nigger

[Anonymous No.13848892]

>>13848782
How could you possibly know that for sure? And before you ask, yes I code and yes I've looked at the original bitcoin source.
>>13848789
He's gotten better, that's for sure and he's a good writer by any fair general standard. I was trying to emphasize the fact that compared to his genius in other areas his writing is probably one of his weaker points.
>>13848836
>P-p-p-please just go away, orange cheeto! The meme's aren't funny anymore!

[Anonymous No.13848944]

>>13848892
Don't you dare compare the degenerate in OP to Trump. Trump is a winner beloved by an entire country, the retard in OP failed to achieve anything besides failed posturing and displays of bruised ego. SHAMEFUL

[Anonymous No.13848948]

>>13848450
>evidence that supports the thesis

There's absolutely 0 need for this because of the way Bitcoin works. Why the fuck are you guys looking at breadcrumbs for evidence when he can just use the network he created to prove it trustlessly, the way he intended it to work?

The fact that he's even asking people to look at multiple pieces of evidence to piece things together is shady as shit.

How do you not understand this?

[Anonymous No.13848978]

>>13848892
Do you believe a whole team interacted with Hal and gave website access to that Finnish student, Martti? Makes zero sense if you're a team. Makes sense if you're a person.

[Anonymous No.13849099]

>>13848944
I don't really give that much of a shit about Trump, though I did vote for him. I just find it amusing how both he and CSW create the same pattern of butthurt among low-information s()yboys living in information bubbles.
>>13848948
>How do you not understand this?
How do you not understand that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence?
I wonder who planted in your peabrain the ridiculous idea that anything short of a privkey signature is inadequate in the face of other evidence? I wonder why you seem incapable of entertaining even for a moment that Satoshi might not have access to or is prevented from signing with his keys for one of many plausible reasons that have been rehashed in every uncensored crypto forum for the last 3 years ad nauseum?
>Makes zero sense if you're a team.
Why? What about being a team prevents the leader from interacting with Hal, etc.?

[Anonymous No.13849110]

>>13848978
Sorry, forgot to reference your post no in the last two lines of the post above.

[Anonymous No.13849173]

>>13847986
>But notice something.....the real Satoshi account (I will not reveal if it is hacked) came out saying that Dorian Nakomoto is not Satoshi.

why won't it say "I am Craig Wright" then?

[Anonymous No.13849200]

>>13849099
If you believe they are in any way similar, your critical thinking faculties are completely off base or wrecked by delusion. Gives insight into the mind of typical BSVschizo and their delusions

[Anonymous No.13849225]

>>13849110
>What about being a team prevents the leader from interacting with Hal, etc.?
Common sense? Why use a "team leader" as a proxy when you can interact with others directly. A team is also supposed to be self-sufficient. Besides, the source code of the first bitcoin client has a quirky, uniform style, as if written by one man.

[Anonymous No.13849247]

>>13847986
fake and gay

literally both

[Anonymous No.13849438]

>>13849200
>Autistic screeching
Disappointing
>>13849225
>Why use a "team leader" as a proxy when you can interact with others directly.
Expediency, anonymity, etc.?
>has a quirky, uniform style, as if written by one man.
90% or more of the code being written by one guy is not inconsistent with Satoshi being a team.
You seem really unwilling to believe that Satoshi was a team effort to some degree, but you fail to convincingly explain why desu.

[Anonymous No.13849453]

>>13848836
Cope

[Anonymous No.13849477]

>>13848944
How much money are you going to lose when the btc pyramid comes down?

[Anonymous No.13849496]

>>13849438
>can't refute, better call the guy an autist
Craig is a failure under every single dimension one can dissect. This is fact.

[Anonymous No.13849508]

>>13849438
>Expediency, anonymity, etc.?
So, anonymity, you say. What do you think his motivation in real life would be? To preserve his anonymity or to destroy it?

[s a g e No.13849513]

Reminder that it's just one hyperautist behind all of the BSV spam on /biz/.

[Anonymous No.13849550]

>>13847986
you're not craig wright! craig wright writes like william shatner talks

yet another faketoshi

[Anonymous No.13849654]

>>13849513
Not true. There's dozens of us.

[Anonymous No.13849672]

>>13848002
kek

[Anonymous No.13849916]

>>13849438
>no argument
>better tell him to gbtr, cringe, call him an autist, or to have sex, that'll show him

Enjoy getting cucked by a con-man. Remember that people tried to help you.

[Anonymous No.13850056]

>>13849654
it's true surprisingly much sv cucks gather here.
if you look at votes they either represent a significant minority of around 30-40% or they are 10% but very busy at the proxies.

[Anonymous No.13850076]

>>13850056
https://www.strawpoll.me/17915936/r
https://www.strawpoll.me/18054955/r

[Anonymous No.13850140]

>>13849496
>This is fact.
>The science is settled.
>>13849508
The fuck are you rambling about?
>>13849916
See >>13849099
There's my argument. Where's yours?
>people tried to help you.
lmao a buttcoiner used the exact same line talking to be in 2013. =DDDD
>>13850056
>if you look at votes
Should I tell him, or not?

[Anonymous No.13850172]

>>13850076
Oh, I see what you're getting at now. The second one is meaningless as I think CSW is Satoshi but BTC is my largest holding. Bet that confuses the fuck out of people like you.

[Anonymous No.13850187]

>>13850172
>second one
Meant to say first one

[Anonymous No.13850206]

>>13847986
Have sex

[Anonymous No.13850210]

>>13850140
I asked a question.

[Anonymous No.13850237]

>>13850210
You asked
>What do you think his motivation in real life would be
What does "in real life" even mean? Also, are you talking about his motivation now or his motivations in 2009? Your question is unclear and if you have a point you should just get to it because otherwise you're wasting everyone's time.

[Anonymous No.13850245]

>>13850172
not really, i only expect cognitive dissonance of significant proportions from bot sv cucks and craig fanboyz.

[Anonymous No.13850312]

>>13850237
Wouldn't it make sense for SN to dilute and distort his identity IRL for the sake of the aforementioned anonymity? Making by passing it to other people.

[Anonymous No.13850370]

>>13850312
especially a wiling clown it's possible it was decided by satoshis inner circle by people who knew him well and respected his will to remain anonymous.

but it's all just speculation until someone signs.

DE4E FCA3 E1AB 9E41 CE96 CECB 18C0 9E86 5EC9 48A1

[Anonymous No.13850371]

>>13850312
*Maybe

[Anonymous No.13850378]

>>13850312
His identity is already distorted despite coming out. Look at all the easily manipulated brainlets who still don't believe him. Whether or not you conclude he's Satoshi is an IQ/reasoning test.

[Anonymous No.13850406]

>>13850378
So, suppose there's a person who's a C++ programmer and previously attempted to create something like bitcoin, but it got shut down by the government. His writing style suspiciously (but of course, purely coincidentally) matches SN very closely. What do you think, purely hypothetically, are the odds of him being SN?

[Anonymous No.13850421]

>>13850378
>Look at all the easily manipulated brainlets who still don't believe him.
funny but why the fuck you would believe him exactly? seriously? both sides saying the other side is just idiots that can't see, but there is no fucking evidence pro or contra. none except for his failed attempts at proving himself. those are very well documented.

[Anonymous No.13850526]

>>13850406
if you come from the technical skills angle sv cucks will just keep moving the goalpost saying shit like creg was like steve jobs not writing his own code but a visionary and shit like that.

it's fucking shameful really. we have a world where only one thing matter and that is cryptographic evidence. and people still manage to make it a fucking absurd bollywood drama.

[Anonymous No.13850571]

>>13848099
Based and redpilled

[Anonymous No.13850573]

>>13850421
>none except for his failed attempts at proving himself. those are very well documented.
Maybe if you live in an information bubble.
>>13850526
>we have a world where only one thing matter and that is cryptographic evidence
Kek, imagine typing this shit out seriously. You are too far gone.

[Anonymous No.13850606]

>>13850573
>Maybe if you live in an information bubble.
show don't tell! oh you can't... tough shit.

if you don't think that so you need to get out of crypto and start investing in boomer securities.

[Anonymous No.13850616]

>>13847986
>white racist core cuck
shit larp

[Anonymous No.13850620]

>>13847986
I hope you choke on the biggest, blackest dick imaginable.

[Anonymous No.13850639]

>>13850573
I asked a question.

[Anonymous No.13850658]

>>13847986
or you just move 1 coin and say its me...wow, such larp, much wow

[Anonymous No.13850745]

>>13847986
Completely based

Never doubted you Craig

[Anonymous No.13850746]

>>13850639
State you case plainly and stop wasting time. This is your last chance or I will not respond to you further.
>>13850606
I don't have to show anything when your posts speak for themselves:
>there is no fucking evidence pro or contra. none except for his failed attempts at proving himself.
If you believe such tripe, there's really nothing more for us to do here other than call you out for being an idiot. Everyone else reading the thread can easily start looking at the evidence themselves, starting with
http://financialcryptography.com/mt/archives/001593.html
Have a nice life.

[Anonymous No.13850763]

>>13847986

(You)

oh and Bait/10.

[Anonymous No.13850832]

>>13850746
I'm not going to go in circles too. Do you realize that your "evidence" points at a very different thing? Think again. I asked a question.

[Anonymous No.13850855]

>>13850746
>I don't have to show anything
true disciple of craig
>can easily start looking at the evidence themselves
you can't just call half assed and sometimes backdated blog posts evidence