/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.13836935]

What would happen if someone kidnapped Sergey and forced him to move his millions of LINK to another wallet? Everyone knows Sergey is sitting on $1 billion worth of LINK. If those tokens are moved, there's no way to reverse the transaction.

How is this not a security risk for Chainlink?

[Anonymous No.13836951]

>>13836935
Eric Holder had Paul Walker assassinated to cover up his illegal gun smuggling operation in Mexico known as Fast and Furious.

[Anonymous No.13836957]

>>13836935
SEC doesnt like chainlink

[Anonymous No.13836962]

>>13836935
anon you bring up a good point. it's known he keeps it in his ledger which is hanging from his waist at all times

[Anonymous No.13836974]

>>13836962
he even once left it on the sink in the nearest mcdonalds,
CIA had to call in helis, there also were fake news about this oracle incident

[Anonymous No.13836975]

>>13836935
lurk more newfag. multisig addresses; rory, tom gonser, and link jesus would all need to sign the transaction as well.

[Anonymous No.13837025]

How do I apply to be fudson cuckson's wife's lover bull?

[Anonymous No.13837041]

It's physically impossible to kidnap Sergey because he cannot fit inside any man-made vehicle. He would literally have to be airlifted with hundreds of aircraft and by that point the entire sun would be blocked out by a plaid silhouette.

[Anonymous No.13837115]

>>13837025

[Anonymous No.13837142]

>>13837041
K E K
E K E
K E K

[Anonymous No.13837146]

>>13837041

[Anonymous No.13838277]

>>13836935

Anon, you being up an excellent point which is the general material insecurity of being the personal steward of your funds. It is the biggest problem about blockchain which i think sits in the back of everyones mind here, whether or not they know it. The only guarantee of ownership you have over your personal key is either the centralized rule of government and law enforcement, or your own ability to defend yourself. Thats why so many people prefer to trust binance or bank boxes to protect their keys. The only good guarantees of the safety of the material access to your blockchain funds are highly centralized and for a good reason--- when it comes to physical enforcement of ownership, centralization is a good thing.

[Anonymous No.13838303]

>>13838277

Tl;dr--- no one actually wants to be personally responsible for physically protecting their claim to owning blockchain funds. Everyone likes, pays, and relies on government, banks, and exchanges to protect their funds because those entities are way better at it.

[Anonymous No.13838326]

>>13836974
my fucking sides

[Anonymous No.13838339]

>>13838277
good post

[Anonymous No.13838360]

>>13838303

This is a good time to remind you why tokens like rvn are actually ridiculous and centralized. The claims to physical property it denotes have to be recognized and backed by government and enforcement agencies to be worth a damn. Imagine owning a house or land using rvn/FLO and trying to defend your claim when anyone just moves in and claims ownership. Or imagine a competing asset tokenization chain emerges and an entirely different group of people on that chain claims ownership of something FLO/RVN says you own. Again, you turn to government to enforce claims to property. Just like if someone steals your computer with your btc wallet.

[Anonymous No.13838420]

>>13836975
>Kidnap them all together
>Put a gun on Sergey's head
>Sign this shit or I'll blow his fucking head off
What do?

[Anonymous No.13838468]

>>13838420
>thinking steve wouldn't charge the gunman to take a bullet for sergey for dragging him along for the ride as he continually pushes nothing to the github

[Anonymous No.13839058]

I'm gay and I hold chainlink?