FINAL Logical proof that Craig is Satoshi. This is for the doubters.

[Anonymous No.13836326]

Here are the facts:

1.) Gavin Andresen was the lead developer of Bitcoin. In fact, "Satoshi's LITERAL last words online were I've moved on to other things. It's in good hands with Gavin and everyone." Gavin was on the front of his mind.

2.) Gavin witnessed Craig Wright sign using his private key on not just Craig's laptop but ALSO on a brand new laptop that could not possibly have been tampered with.

3.) Gavin understands cryptography. It is next to impossible for Gavin to be fooled by a fraud.

4.) Craig did the same process for Stefan Matthews (Stefan had the early draft of the whitepaper in 2008), to Jon Matonis (head of Bitcoin foundation), Andrew O Hegan (extremely respected journalist), and others.

5.) Craig admitted to providing fake public proof on his blog. He explained his way of lying himself to the journalist. He explained that he hates authority. He hates being told what to do. He especially hates many in the cyperphunk community since he was always hated by them. Julian Assange himself actually mocked Craig way back in the day.

This leaves two possibilities.

1.) Craig is a master fraud that managed to fool some of the leading Bitcoin developers and somehow tampered with a literal brand new computer in front of Gavin.

2.) Craig really is Satoshi but given his stubborn behaviour, he simply did not want to prove it to the public.

Given that someone like Gavin is impossible to be fooled with (it was Gavin's own suggesiton to use a brand new laptop after Craig signed it on his own), and given that many other LEADERS and ORIGINAL developers/figures for Bitcoin have personally witnessed him sign, it is therefore clearly 2.)

He's going to sign it in public soon anyways after it's proven he's satoshi in other ways (could just be right after the court case). He said that on his latest blogspot.

[Anonymous No.13836353]

P.S. I have just realized that the meme in this picture is the same meme the New Zealand shooter used. I do not condone any unintentional depictions of the meme used by a racist and xenophobic frustrated white guy to kill Muslims.

[Anonymous No.13836364]

>>13836326
The day he signs the genesis block is the day I’ll believe he is satoshi. Now jog on bitch. Jog on

[Anonymous No.13836382]

>>13836326
> hearsay evidence and trust me dude
He's easily the worst larper in the crypto space at the moment. BSV would have more credibility if he just deleted all his social media accounts and had Carlos Matos represent BSV instead.

I look forward to him being exposed and then punted into oblivion because it means his 5-6 paid mouthbreathing niggers who spam this site with his garbage will be out of a job. Maybe you can tee up with the faggots who run the Matic / FTM campaigns for more work.

[Anonymous No.13836490]

3.) This is a PR media campaign financed by Calvin Ayre that involves bribery and spreading false rumours

[Anonymous No.13836523]

and finally

4.) This is a massive cover-up to mask the identity of the real Satoshi by using a distractor (useful fool)

[Anonymous No.13836671]

>>13836326
fucking work out what "trustless" means you spastic cunt

[Anonymous No.13836829]

>>13836353
OP is Brenton Tarrant 100%

[Anonymous No.13837323]

>>13836382
>Zero content in post and image is just a reposting Contrarian/Greg's stale list of lies and mistruths
Imagine being this much of an NPC or shill
>>13836490
>>13836523
Fuck off with the conspiracy bullshit that makes no sense.
>>13836671
That's not an argument, dipshit.

[Anonymous No.13837363]

just sign it lol

[Anonymous No.13837422]

>>13837363
I don’t care if he signs shit or not, BTC is broken and only Wright has talked any sense concerning keeping Satoshi’s vision alive.

[Anonymous No.13837545]

>>13836326
He's going to have to sign in court. Despite other evidence that supports him being Satoshi (like Bitcoin.org).

The court will bring in experts on the subject and all of them will recommend that Craig signs to prove hes Satoshi. The court doesn't have to go that way, but it seems the most likely. That said, idk why the fuck he would ever be compelled to prove he is Satoshi in court unless someone challenges his copyright claim. The libel cases could be thrown out desu.

[Anonymous No.13837569]

>>13837545
>Despite other evidence that supports him being Satoshi (like Bitcoin.org).

[Anonymous No.13837575]

>>13836490
Ayre is definitely trying to sell the Satoshi package to the world. That doesn't mean Craig isnt Satoshi. If anything it's much more likely he is. Because if Ayres involvement he too could be held accountable if Craig is a fraud and I find it hard to believe a retired billionaire who already held a mountain of crypto actually needed this fight enough to go to prison.

[Anonymous No.13837589]

>>13837575
>Because if Ayres involvement he too could be held accountable
LMAO. He already is. He's indicted in the US for illegal gambling activities.

[Anonymous No.13837596]

>>13836326
don't think so mate

[Anonymous No.13837606]

>>13837323
> stale list of lies
> no actual rebuttals or proof that any of it has ever been debunked
Craig has never addressed any of the inconsistencies between his larp and who satoshi actually was. You can look it up yourself. Go compare the things which Satoshi said in the past vs the things which Craig has said, it doesn't match at all - although at this point I'd be amazed if someone like you had the reading comprehension abilities to understand any of it.
You're a shit-eating nigger for believing the guy and any calls of 'shill' are pure projection, considering the fact that every time I post that list your handlers fail to give you any talking points to counter it. I'm entirely certain that you absolutely must have an IQ of 80 or below to actually believe him. You people are absolutely pathetic and I look forward to seeing you scrabble for something to cling to when that dumb cunt collapses under the weight of his own lies.

[Anonymous No.13837620]

>>13837589
He didn't even get any felonies from that and doesn't have anything to do with what I was talking about.

[Anonymous No.13837655]

>>13837596
baste

[Anonymous No.13837661]

>>13837620
What you were talking about is nonsense because larping as Satoshi is not a crime per se. But the fact that CSW preaches against "bucketshops" and "scammers" while literally being financed by a gambling mogul is pretty amusing.

[Anonymous No.13837692]

>>13837661
It is illegal when you market patents saying it's coming from the original creator of the technology. Its lying to investors. That goes for just about anything hes pushing with the Satoshi name.

[Anonymous No.13837727]

>>13837692
The problem is, the creator is an internet meme and he's never gonna come out and contest anything. So it's safe to impersonate him.

[Anonymous No.13838070]

>>13837727
That's a baseless assumption. SN never implied he'd stay silent forever and all he would need to do is move coins or sign and it would delegitimize CSW's copyright claim and everything else.

[Anonymous No.13838152]

>>13838070
Copyrights don't mean anything in a distributed system. SN must be not interested in people chasing him, let alone outing himself to the world. As long as someone creates confusion, it might even benefit SN.

[Anonymous No.13838839]

>>13838152
>>13837727
>the creator is an internet meme and he's never gonna come out and contest anything.
>This guy doesn't know that Satoshi came out to repudiate Dorian
Newfag late adopter scum get out

[Anonymous No.13838860]

>>13838839
That's not "coming out"

[Satoshi Nakamoto No.13839152]

I am not Craig Wright.

[Anonymous No.13839165]

>>13836382
https://www.stopcraigwright.com/evidence

[Anonymous No.13839183]

>>13839152
Yes you are.

[Anonymous No.13839219]

>>13839165
>https://www.stopcraigwright.com/evidence

[Anonymous No.13839344]

SIGN
THE
KEYS

[Anonymous No.13839356]

>>13839219
>1 post by this ID

[Anonymous No.13839368]

>>13839356
>2 posts by this ID