What will you do

[Anonymous No.13833687]

When Craig signs and kills BTC for good?

[Anonymous No.13833743]

>>13833687
he wont, but ok ...

let's continue this stupid role playing shitshow, if he signs it and starts selling BTC and BCH to buy BSV it will drop to 3 digits.

[Anonymous No.13833900]

>>13833687
wtf, did craig write that?

[Anonymous No.13833936]

>>13833687
Never, otherwise his drama would end and he couldn’t profit out of retards throwing money to a shitcoin

[Anonymous No.13833944]

who's this Craig guy?

[Anonymous No.13833963]

>>13833687
>alter the protocol
kek, ironically sv blocks are the only ones rejected by all old btc nodes

[Anonymous No.13834058]

>>13833900
Yes.

https://craigwright.net/

He is preparing to fuck all you core cucks and bcash frauds HARD. The stage is being set.

[Anonymous No.13834091]

>>13833687
>Banks been accumulating BTC for years now
Not gonna happen. We love our financial institutions.

[Anonymous No.13834094]

>>13834058
How does it feel knowing there is no way to stop this man? No amount of paid FUD can change what is pre-destined.

Satoshi is back, and he's mad as hell.

[Anonymous No.13834106]

>>13834058
We've have this thread everyday.

[Anonymous No.13834116]

>forging a dead man's signature and making up some imaginary trust

There is a special place in he for Craig

[Anonymous No.13834129]

>>13834094
> Creator of Bitcoin - Satoshi Nakamoto
the worst thing about this picture, this is not the biggest lie
>My opinions are my own

[Anonymous No.13834138]

>>13834058
>>13834094
I don't own any bitcoin, and never will, but why hasen't he signed the original block previously? Why is he waiting until the end of the month? What will you do when he doesn't eventually sign? Will you make more excuses or will you realize he's a fraud?

[Anonymous No.13834185]

>>13834094
Yep. It's about fucking time, too. He should have come back earlier as soon as it started to become clear that the small blocker propaganda was starting to metastasize and the Greg clique was starting to take over the repository.
I suspect this didn't happen because Craig/Satoshi had the keys put into a trust and does not have access to them yet. He knew that the "community" of brainwashed idiots would resist the truth without a public signing, so he probably was hoping the situation would resolve itself. Once it became clear that that was not going to happen, he was forced to come out of retirement prematurely.

[Anonymous No.13834200]

>>13834129
He has copyright on Bitcoin whitepaper, so of course he is Satoshi.

Deal with it or go cry to mommy

[Anonymous No.13834237]

>>13834138
Why do you think he owes you anything? Only complete retards with an IQ so low it doesn't even register in normal tests, doesn't know he is Satoshi already, I guess you are one of them.

Keep screaming for him to sign like a toddler, while he simply outplays you and your little cultist friends six ways to sunday.

[Anonymous No.13834443]

>>13834237
So you're not going to answer any of my questions? The weight of those BSV bags will probably approach infinity here in June.

Answer one of my questions: what happens if he doesn't sign 5/31?

[Anonymous No.13834552]

>>13834200
> copyright
Anon, I ...
>>13834237
he is doing all of this jackshit, spends hours of hours on discussions, sueing people, getting insulted on and you tell me he doesnt owes us anything.
he could settle this all within minutes, but he doesnt, so what does it tell you about him?

[Anonymous No.13834593]

>>13834443
>what happens if he doesn't sign 5/31?
i will open a very big short on bsv, and bagholders are gonna pay for it

BAGGIES BAGGIEEEEEES

[Anonymous No.13834596]

>>13833687
in the astronomically unlikely event that btc is kill i'm gonna start buying eth.

[Anonymous No.13834602]

>>13834094
>pastor

[Anonymous No.13834609]

>>13834237
you're already capitulating that he will not sign... LMAO

[Anonymous No.13834621]

>>13834237
on the contrary only a complete drooling idiot would believe craigs lies after so many failed attempts at fraud.

[Anonymous No.13834637]

>>13834200
what will you say when tomorrow 500 other dudes register copyright on bitcoin all claiming to be satoshi nakamoto?

[Anonymous No.13834639]

>>13833687
It's preposterous to think it would make a difference even if Craig COULD sign, which he can't. But if he could, Bitcoin would still be bitcoin. Nobody would market dump BTC for SV, no miners would switch to BCHSV, nothing would happen. SV would still be a third-tier.
But it's irrelevant because he can't sign anyway

[Anonymous No.13834660]

>>13834138
>>13834443
>>13834552
Imagine being so unimaginative and easily led that you unironically believe that not signing publicly is a 100% guarantee that he is not Satoshi.
This shit is going to be written about and dissected for years when everything starts to finally come out.

[Anonymous No.13834671]

>>13834637
Nobody else has so far. Do it yourself and prove all the "drooling idiots" wrong, faggot.
>>13834639
>The identity of Satoshi Nakamoto doesn't matter
Peak delusion/cope

[Anonymous No.13834682]

>>13834671
>Nobody else has so far
Some hawaiian guy did

[Anonymous No.13834706]

>>13833687

[Anonymous No.13834732]

How come if you search is Craig satoshi the first article is the coindesk one claiming the US copyright office did not recognize him as satoshi

[Anonymous No.13834851]

>>13834671
Why would it matter? The BTC that follows the original whitepaper is BTC, that's why it's BTC. For a decade it has never mattered who wrote the whitepaper or the code. And it is not going to suddenly start to matter if we were to somehow learn who it was.

[Anonymous No.13834874]

>>13834200
That’s not how this works.

[Anonymous No.13834970]

>>13834443
Nothing? Whether he signs or not has no impact on whether the created Bitcoin. Possession of keys is not proof of creation. Take a logic course sometime.

[Anonymous No.13834993]

>>13834602
Craig is a good man. I know kikes hate godly men, but that is even more confirmation why you must be defeated.

[Anonymous No.13835006]

>>13833687
The real question is what will you do when he doesn't & BSV makes its last spin around the toilet (not that you've ever used one)
https://www.stopcraigwright.com

[Anonymous No.13835010]

>>13834637
You are welcome to try. Good luck trying to dispute that in a courtroom.

[Anonymous No.13835048]

>>13834970
satoshi mined the first block, so he must be the owner of the first adresse, ofc he doesnt proof 100% since he could have aquired it somehow which is ver unlikely

[Anonymous No.13835272]

>>13835048
So you admit that simple possession is not proof of anything? You can be in possession of keys that do not belong to you, through theft, lending, etc.

Signing is not proof that he created Bitcoin, I don't understand why you think it means anything.

[Anonymous No.13835306]

>>13833687
One thing I don't understand is, in this free market, given that 99.9% of people in this space agree that the true Bitcoin is BTC, what do we care what Craig thinks? Why would it be any different if he was Satoshi? It just seems more likely that the entire market would just shrug and go on as before. I see no reason why anything would change, especially since it is in the best interest of everyone that status quo is preserved (except BSV cucks, of course)

[Anonymous No.13835346]

>>13835272
so CSW would have stolen the key from Satoshi? i think that's unlikely. that's all. whoever signs genesis is very likely satoshi

[Anonymous No.13835467]

>>13834993
Top bloke! What a lovely man.

[Anonymous No.13835665]

>>13833687
When BSV finally gets the BTC ticker. O what a glorious day it shall be. Kind of bittersweet cause BSV is pure kino. But I know it's destiny is to be the one and only Bitcoin (BTC).

[Anonymous No.13835674]

>>13835665
You know they're coming for that Bitcoin logo and ticker corecucks.

[Anonymous No.13835700]

>>13835346
Read again
>lending
That is to say he could have the keys locked in trust. I wonder what he would call such a thing...

[Anonymous No.13835701]

>>13835346
That something is likely or a possibility is not proof. This method even fails to meet your own standard of evidence. You should be asking him to prove it in a court of law, which is legally binding.

[Anonymous No.13835721]

Nobody cares who satoshi is. That was the plan from the beginning.

[Anonymous No.13835738]

>>13834138
>doesn't own bitcoin

Enjoy being poor

[Anonymous No.13835742]

>>13835721
The prevalence and length of CSW threads here over the last month suggests otherwise

[Anonymous No.13835745]

>>13835665
We don't want or need their tainted exchange ticker BTC. It represents failure, fraud, subversion, sabotage and deceit. It's useless.

Going forward it will simply be Bitcoin (BSV)

[Anonymous No.13835760]

>>13835721
New shill narrative being formed now that they can no longer deny he is Satoshi. It's all so predictable.

[Anonymous No.13835772]

>>13834671
>Nobody else has so far.
this is what i don't get i would have expected the frenzy to start already.

[Anonymous No.13835786]

>>13834660
not an argument

[Anonymous No.13835788]

>>13834682
he actually copyrighted bitcoin cash

[Anonymous No.13835797]

>>13835701
it's all about likelihood, do you think people are sentencted for being a murderer only if there is 100% proof they did it?

[Anonymous No.13835816]

>>13835674
shitcoins shouldn't mess with the king

[Anonymous No.13835825]

>>13835760
I'll deny Cuck Suckdick Wright is anything more than a dumpster hobo who stole everything he has from better men. He is not Satoshi, nor would I believe he is even if he signed genesis blocks (which he wont).
He's a cum guzzling con-man

[Anonymous No.13835841]

>>13835816
This is a great gif. I especially like how the bitcoin "B" is not tilted, so you know unequivocally which SHA256 bockchain is the king.

[Anonymous No.13835870]

>>13835841
it's the 2010 pander logo of btc don't get your hopes up shitcoiner

[Anonymous No.13835878]

>>13835825
>>13835870

[Anonymous No.13835890]

>>13834138
>What will you do when he doesn't eventually sign?

Where the fuck is everyone getting the idea hes signing eom?

[Anonymous No.13835920]

>>13834639
Cope

[Anonymous No.13835990]

>>13835825
>nor would I believe he is even if he signed genesis blocks
>reeeee why won't he sign

[Anonymous No.13836033]

>>13835797
There are 1000 other things that establish likelihood that you could look at if that is your standard of evidence. Read his medium articles, read the court documents, listen to knowledgeable people who watched him sign (Gavin, Grigg, Matonis), look into the tulip trust, question how the fuck he became a billionaire in the first place, etc etc.

Don't be an NPC.

[Anonymous No.13836054]

>>13835825
>nor would I believe he is even if he signed genesis blocks (which he wont)
There it is folks.

[Anonymous No.13836088]

>>13836033
Exactly all the anti-CSW propaganda and online tarring and feathering are designed EXACTLY to prevent people from looking up all those primary sources you listed. It's an intellectual firewall erected by figurative kikes.

[Anonymous No.13836102]

>>13836054
lots of bla bla bla for saying NO, i wont sign.

[Anonymous No.13836110]

>>13836033
>>13836054
wtf I want to choke on his cock and swallow his cum now!

[Anonymous No.13836115]

>>13836102
>lots of bla bla bla for saying NO, i wont sign.

[Anonymous No.13836138]

>>13836033
>l-loOK AT THE DOCUMENTS
>S-SIGN THE KEYS? H-H-HAA HA SHUT UP FAGGOT
>LOOK AT HIS BLOG
>oh he retroactively edited the blog? NO HE DIDNT FUCK YOU
pic related, its you

[Anonymous No.13836151]

>>13836115
>I POSTED THE ANGRY S_Y FACE AGAIN MA

[Anonymous No.13836157]

I honestly can't decide if either
>a large portion of /biz/ is larping as bsv shills for luls. I must admit it's tempting to cheer for Craig, knowing all the time he's a fraud
>a large portion of /biz/ are retards who think CSW is anything except a fraud who got into BTC in 2013 and has been trying (successfully) to make bank off the Satoshi name ever since

[Anonymous No.13836164]

>>13836151
>>13836115 (You) #
>I POSTED THE ANGRY S_Y FACE AGAIN MA

[Anonymous No.13836169]

>>13836164
>fuck its not working, lemme post the second one I post in every thread

[Anonymous No.13836193]

>>13836169
>fuck its not working, lemme post the second one I post in every thread

[Anonymous No.13836221]

>>13836193
>>13836169

You guys are children. How are either of you ever expected to get laid?

[Anonymous No.13836245]

>>13836033
We can read the addresses of the tulip trust from court documents, and someone signed a message proving to the world that CSW is a fraud. End of story.

[Anonymous No.13836275]

>>13836054
This is exactly what a charlatan trying to maintain a scam would write. "I won't sign because game theory".
If he was satoshi, he would simply provide detailed and corroborated records of his work developing BTC, and he would sign

[Anonymous No.13836283]

>>13836221
How can the most used-car salesman face in the history of the world be so good at what he does that he gets random people on the internet to defend his reputation for free? Oh right, those random people put their life savings into his spinoff fork shitcoin and so theyre grasping at the straws trying to defend their dwindling dollars.

[Anonymous No.13836314]

>>13836283
* bsv slowly bleed to zero, craig followers organize a mass suicide *

[Anonymous No.13836345]

>>13836314
>craig takes their bags and when he owns majority hashpower, he fake signs with satoshi key on his own fork
>SEE GUYS LOOK I SIGNED, I'M SATOSHI

[Anonymous No.13836415]

>>13833687
Its going to be so satisfying when this backfires and Craig ends up in prison, tanking BSV immediately bitconnect style. Bitcoin isnt going anywhere, no exchanges are pulling it down, BSV however is. Binance did pull it down. Youre going to lose everything and its going to be so satisfying to watch.Like if Bitconnect were a good thing.
Cryptocurrency is disruptive, thats one of its main use cases. Wright is a shill for feds and Jew bankers, just like Garlinghouse and Ripple. Youre fed shills.

[Anonymous No.13836459]

>>13836157
>$0.30 has been deposited into your Blockstream employee wallet for this comment.

[Anonymous No.13836471]

>>13836245
Brainlet.

[Anonymous No.13836479]

>So, over the coming days, I will be posting a series of pieces that will lay the foundations for this extraordinary claim, posting independently-verifiable documents and evidence addressing some of the false allegations that have been levelled, ***and transferring Bitcoin from an early block.***
'The coming days' were over 3 years ago. How many more years can this fantasist spin his bullshit ?
Quote from: https://web.archive.org/web/20160503160003/http://www.drcraigwright.net/extraordinary-claims-require-extraordinary-proof/ - CSW deleted blog, May 03 2016

[Anonymous No.13836503]

>>13836415
>Craig is a fed shill Jew banker
>Craig is going to prison

Bot malfunction LOL. Please consult your nearest blockstream employee for the latest talking points. This is your final warning.

[Anonymous No.13836603]

>>13836221
Get married

[Anonymous No.13836695]

>13836503
>16 posts
Holy the delusion causes desperation. This is pitiful, are all bsv bagholders like this?

[Anonymous No.13836815]

>>13836695
>This is pitiful, are all bsv bagholders like this?
without cope they would lose heir last vestiges of sanity

[Anonymous No.13836984]

>>13834237
he has no problem saying he's satoshi but cant produce a simple signing key to prove it.

[Anonymous No.13837078]

>>13836984
I already explained it, but you are too low IQ to understand simple logic. Signing with a key does not prove you created the system.

[Anonymous No.13837109]

>>13837078
Its more credible than acting like a child on twitter at the least.

[Anonymous No.13837233]

>>13836245
>He doesn't know where the court docs came from
Shoo, shoo low information brainlet. This space is reserved for people who are at least passingly familiar with the relevant facts, only.

[Anonymous No.13837232]

>>13837109
Yea but the latter produces more salt.

[Anonymous No.13837249]

>>13836275
>>13836283
>>13836314
>>13836345
>>13836415

[Anonymous No.13837288]

>>13836695
Yes

[Anonymous No.13837296]

>>13837249
This is you>>13837288

[Anonymous No.13837343]

>>13837233
Those documents were supplied by The Criminal Investigations Dept. of the Australian Tax Authorities, where CSW is believed to be facing further criminal charges. The documents were supplied to them by CSW himself in connection with (yet another) fraud investigation. The documents were forwarded to Ira Kleiman in connection with his US case against CSW. CSW NOW claims these documents are forged, multiple years after they were initially provided to ATO and more than a year after they were filed in the US case. He claims they are now forged as a message was signed on one of the keys use, stating 'CSW is a fraud'. What is your point, again? Oh. You don't have one

[Anonymous No.13837446]

>>13837343
Point is you're wrong about
>The documents were supplied to them by CSW himself in connection with (yet another) fraud investigation.
And a lot of the other bullshit you posted, but mostly that one line. The documents were produced as part of the discovery process from a pool of data spanning dozens of machines which were owned by one of Craig's early companies and operated by his former employees, some of whom had a grudge against him.
Lurk moar: https://medium.com/@craig_10243/why-code-must-not-be-law-438e2cafe2e4
The scanned doc itself is also obviously altered if you look at it with a discerning eye.

[Anonymous No.13837486]

>>13837446
>doc itself is also obviously altered
but of course. It was also 'employees with a grudge' who signed Dave Kleimans name with ComicSans.ttf on the asset transfer docs, I presume ?

[Anonymous No.13837576]

>>13833687
I'll wager one bsv to one btc in a months time. Put your money where your mouth is.

[Anonymous No.13837577]

>>13837486
>Have you ever conducted any serious business online in the last 10 years, anon? Document management solutions that apply "digital signatures" in the form of text in a slightly different font are a dime a dozen, especially where a lot of paperwork is involved.
Stop falling for dumb propaganda.

[Anonymous No.13837592]

>>13837486
Sounds more likely desu

[Anonymous No.13837614]

>>13837078
actually it kinda does considering bitcoin is a cryptographic system. it proves you invented it or at the very least knew the guy who did and stole his keys. producing the keys would also help the value of his coin as well. literally the only reason im not buying bsv right now is because he refuses to sign.

[Anonymous No.13837629]

>>13833687
> HE-HE'LL DO IT FOR REAL THIS TIME GUYS I SWEAR
The rope is coming for the mindless, shit-eating pajeets who run his bsv shill campaign soon after it comes for him.

[Anonymous No.13837644]

>>13837614
>only reason im not buying bsv right now is because he refuses to sign.
Same. I really want him to be Satoshi, but I'm not /allin/ until he signs.

[Anonymous No.13837680]

>>13837644
Signing is not a proof, but
he is going to sign once he has proven to be Satoshi. this doesnt make sense? you are not alone anon

[Anonymous No.13837726]

>>13837577
>tell it to the Judge
Yes, this signing business has always been a flexible concept with you boys, ain't it? Enjoy prison

[Anonymous No.13837860]

>>13837233

get the fuck outta here

https://blog.wizsec.jp/2019/05/kleiman-v-craig-wright-part-2.html

[Anonymous No.13838067]

>>13837726
>Unironically being this much of a moron
>>13837860
WizSec was part of the effort to extort CSW. You are literally quoting his enemy to defame him. Surely that will lead you to the truth of the matter lmao

[Anonymous No.13838126]

>>13838067
>>Unironically being this much The Accused, in this many continents, with THIS MUCH forged shit as 'evidence'

[Anonymous No.13838485]

>>13838067
Put your money where your mouth is
>>13838138

[Anonymous No.13838504]

>>13833687
Well, isn't it libel now to suggest he is not?

[Anonymous No.13838635]

If Craig Wright is truly Satoshi, why does he file suits against those who state he is not Satoshi? Those who are defensive and not confident in themselves act in such a manner.

Not even considering he has provided ZERO proof for his bullshit claims.

[Anonymous No.13838689]

>>13833687
I honestly hope this happens so thousands of Chinese millionaires sign a death contract for his head and I get the pleasure of reading the news headline "Craig Wright found brutally murdered in his home late last night"

[Anonymous No.13838843]

>>13837614
>literally the only reason im not buying bsv right now is because he refuses to sign.

Am I supposed to care? It's like saying

>Literally the only reason i choose to stay poor is because I'm a retard

That's fine with me LOL I don't need to convince you of anything. In fact, it's better that you never buy BSV it's not going anywhere anyway. Just stay out of it.

[Anonymous No.13838882]

>>13838635
You have it backwards retard.

If he wasn't Satoshi, why the hell would he ever get near a courtroom where he can be punished with jail time for lying? If you are actually a fraud the last place you want to be is in front of a judge lmao

Fuck I hate kikes and your lies, literally always state the opposite of reality.

[Anonymous No.13838952]

>>13838635
filing suit and actually going to court are two different things anon. he does plenty of the former to threaten the non-believers - its a bit more expensive than filing $25 copyright claims, but equally meaningless. BUT ACTUALLY GOING BEFORE A COURT? no, creg doesn't do that. They start demanding 'evidence' and 'proof' and stuff. make creg nervos, that does

[Anonymous No.13838967]

>>13838882
because he is backed into a corner by all his lies and the people that have been funding him now force him to take a stand

[Anonymous No.13839025]

>what if..
>wait until..
>when...

CSW is a man of claims and slogans, so are his followers. Less talk, more action. I do not get convinced by people regurgitating slogans and sales pitch.

[Anonymous No.13839037]

>>13838967
lmao then why are all the people he is suing ducking the court? Ver, Mccormack, Vitalik. Shouldn't they be excited to prove to a judge Craig is a fraud so he can go to jail? Yet they don't.

Fucking criminals and frauds. All you do is project.

[Anonymous No.13839049]

>>13839025
Less talk, more action
Don't wait up now: >>13836479

[Anonymous No.13839071]

>>13839037
>Mccormack
you mean, why is Peter ignoring cregs lawyers BS letters and inviting him to go to court instead? WHERE HE HAS CLEARLY STATED, HE WILL DEFEND THE ACTION ? so, why isn't it then before a court? eh?
>Fucking criminals and frauds. All you do is project
yes, they do, DON'T THEY

[Anonymous No.13839078]

>>13839037
>Shouldn't they be excited to prove to a judge Craig is a fraud so he can go to jail?
about as excited as anyone would be about proving a negative ever. craig is a fraud if he is not satoshi but not even the real satoshi could irrevocably prove that just make it pretty damn likely.

[Anonymous No.13839254]

>>13835674
The only way they can take it is in a hash wat. They’re losing that already though

[Anonymous No.13839365]

>>13834185
I'm glad easily deluded people like you are so plentiful...

[Anonymous No.13839393]

>>13838882
he can prove to the court by signing the keys.

[Anonymous No.13839465]

My theory is they Craig worked with Kleiman on Bitcoin and knows Satoshi is dead or was Finney. Now he's embroiled in a legal battle for a billion and desperately needs to prove he is Satoshi, a claim he's willing to make because he knows who Satoshi is and that he's dead.