Update: CSW paid not $35, but $1600 to get his Bitcoin copyright granted

[Anonymous No.13827687]

The copyright office also clarifies that CSW opens himself up to criminal charges should he have falsely made the Bitcoin claim.

Source: https://www.copyright.gov/press-media-info/press-updates.html

[Anonymous No.13827705]

>>13827687
Literally who?

[Anonymous No.13827715]

>>13827687
Well, it's not like it's possible to legally prove that someone is NOT Satoshi.

[Anonymous No.13827742]

>>13827715
that's where your wrong kiddo. Bitcoin is crytography. the way you prove ownership in a cryptographic system os by signing. wich he cannot do..

[Anonymous No.13827762]

>>13827742
I said 'legally'.

[Anonymous No.13827766]

>>13827742
I hate Craig threads, but god you're dumb.

[Anonymous No.13827790]

>>13827742
>SIgN tHe KeYs
>No Key nO oWneRsHiP

Absolute state

[Anonymous No.13827832]

i heard he held the nazis back alone at the battle of BULGE...

he also has won the nobel prize all of them in fact several times

not many know that he is actually nikola tesla who discovered the secret of eternal life draining energy and vitality from the void

he also holds every patent on earth because he bought all patent offices

he had more lovers of all sexes than zeus himelf

he personally shot jfk for being a filthy socialist

he is also claimed to be the last starfighter at least nobody could ever disprove it.

truly amazing guy

[Anonymous No.13827839]

>>13827762
that is how things work in a court of law. you can't just say you invented shit without proof.

[Anonymous No.13827844]

PS it's the best $1600 ever spent.

[Anonymous No.13827850]

>>13827839
I guess you can

[Anonymous No.13827868]

>>13827790
In my mind it's pretty obvious that the bitcoin creator would have the keys, I don't know about you.

[Anonymous No.13827877]

>>13827715
>https://www.copyright.gov/press-media-info/press-updates.html
Wrong, Satoshi can sign a message with genesis block private key or with his PGP private key anytime (well, atm he cannot since he is locked up in jail).
CSW will never be able to sign one of the two.
That's the entire point of cryptocurrencies.
Private key = ownership

>I said 'legally'.
Asymmetric cryptography has legal value you retard, that's the entire point of something called "digital signatures".

>SIgN tHe KeYs
Sign WITH the keys, fucking retard, you don't even understand basic cryptography

[Anonymous No.13827898]

>>13827877
Yes, you can prove you're Satoshi, but if you're granted a bullshit copyright, there's hardly any way to legally dispute your claim of being an anonymous creator

[Anonymous No.13827935]

>>13827898
It's a bullshit and useless copyright, literally no one cares about this fraud and patent troll.
It doesn't prove anything since claims are not verified.
BTC has a MIT license, so there is literally no point of copyrighting it, except for fraudsters to pump their shitcoins.
Anyone falling for these smoke and mirrors deserve to lose their money.

[Anonymous No.13827954]

>>13827766
no you

[Anonymous No.13827959]

>>13827715
So I am Satoshi and BSV is the new official currency of India, which is going to be a superpower by 2020
>this post will be copyrighted within 5 working days

[Anonymous No.13827965]

>>13827850
>thinks a copyright filing is the same as making the claim in a court

[Anonymous No.13827972]

who?

[Anonymous No.13827986]

[Anonymous No.13828495]

>>13827935
no btc is copyrighted from the get go it was just never registered this registration is bullshit as btc copyright includes all documentation which includes the whitepaper under mit licence. cregs boomer tricks gonna bite him im the ass.