/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.13811741]

Was the most promising project in this market cycle killed by over-enthusiastic telegram pajeets?

[Anonymous No.13811818]

>>13811741
Basically....i told them many times to keep to offical news and not go all fucking sherlock holmes making connections to every fucking bank in the world. Then you got remived doing his constant cope TA and then there is Conbra eho is Cancer to any project. Who the fuck feels confident if the chat is full of these clowns?

Im holding some quant and hope they get some news out eventually.

Bosch..

[Anonymous No.13811826]

Keyword is ‘promising’. Also, the absolute uselessness of a token when ether could be used instead.

[Anonymous No.13811840]

>>13811818
Lmao

[Anonymous No.13811893]

People lost confidence in the team after they dumped their tokens, shown they basically hate the moonboy culture of crypto, and haven’t released any announcements which makes people wonder if they are just exaggerated just like how every crypto project has some sort of partnership with like google or Samsung.

[Anonymous No.13811914]

>>13811893
>they dumped their tokens


This is a serious thread for facts only, please. The team have 5 million tokens and have certainly not been dumping at the bottom of a bear market into one illiquid DEX. Thank you.

Plenty of legit criticism exist for Quant, don't need to make stuff up as well.

[Anonymous No.13811924]

>>13811818
>Bosch

I remember you.

[Anonymous No.13811925]

>>13811741

The vast majority of people don't give a fuck. Anyone who truly bases their buying/selling decisions on the behavior of telegram basket-weavers will end up poor and deserves to be. Who cares?

[Anonymous No.13811987]

>>13811826

I guess you haven't heard about the recent tokenomics updates and plans for QNT to be used for universal cross-chain transfers. Ironically one of the projects most fudded about the token could end up providing the strongest use-case for a token ever to exist in crypto.

Promising, yeah, but that's the point. You buy in before the good stuff arrives, not after it.

[Anonymous No.13812139]

>>13811818
Removed is cancer and Cobra is a larper. The snake was just saying before yesterday’s pump the price was gonna dump to 0.0001 trying to FUD people into selling. What a joke.

[Anonymous No.13812164]

>>13811987
So they are still changing and figuring out what tokens will do exactly?

[Anonymous No.13812213]

>>13811914
Ummm the team have sold quite a few tokens over the last few months. Stop with the cops and DYOR ...transactions are publicly accessible after all.

[Anonymous No.13812417]

>>13812164

They've always known what the token will do. It's an integral part of Overledger as QNT will allow trustless signing, licensing and data validation (i.e. the kind of thing utility tokens are actually useful for). The only uncertainties were the specifics of the tokenomics model.

Now though they're taking it up a notch with an additional way of using QNT for cross-chain value transfer, so I'm not complaining.

[Anonymous No.13812502]

>>13812213
>team have sold quite a few tokens over the last few months

You mean the tokens unlocked from the start which were always earmarked for such use, right, like every single other team ever has done, to raise funds? What's next, are you upset that they sold their ICO ETH?

[Anonymous No.13812517]

>>13812164
>So they are still changing and figuring out what tokens will do exactly?
> expansion in scope and service
> hur dur make up ur mind, gilbert!!!

[Anonymous No.13812602]

>>13812502
doesnt change the fact that they dumped the tokens

> and have certainly not been dumping at the bottom of a bear market into one illiquid DEX

[Anonymous No.13812691]

>>13812602
>they dumped the tokens


Sure, the team has sold some tokens. Why do you consider this a problem, in the slightest?


FUD used to be clever and relevant, I remember. Back in the day. There were whole intricate FUD campaigns with detailed stories. Now it's just a list of perfectly normal and expected things.

[Anonymous No.13812715]

>>13812691
> and have certainly not been dumping at the bottom of a bear market into one illiquid DEX

Read what you wrote, faggot. You said they didnt sell any tokens. Nice denial cope.

[Anonymous No.13812732]

>>13812715
>You said they didnt sell any tokens.

>>13812691
>the team has sold some tokens.

[Anonymous No.13812746]

>>13812732
You only admitted the fact the team sold, after I pointed it out you raging faggot.

Everyone can see when you made your initial comment and now trying to backtrack.

>The team have 5 million tokens and have certainly not been dumping at the bottom of a bear market into one illiquid DEX.

[Anonymous No.13812768]

>>13812732

>The team have 5 million tokens and have certainly not been dumping at the bottom of a bear market into one illiquid DEX.

>Sure, the team has sold some tokens.

Pick one you raging homo.

[Anonymous No.13812780]

>>13812746
>I pointed it out

Yes, you clarified what you meant. This is how discussions go. Your original phrase was "dumped their tokens", which implies a different extent of selling than "sold some tokens", doesn't it.

Tokens sold by the team have come from an always-unlocked wallet that have always been free to use for whatever purposes.

Holy shit the absolute state of QNT fudders these days.


SELL NOW

[Anonymous No.13812799]

>>13812768
There's no point in arguing with quantlets.
It's like kicking a retarded kid.

[Anonymous No.13812809]

>>13812780
Look up the words 'pedantic' and 'cope'

[Anonymous No.13812813]

>>13812768
>Pick one you raging homo.

If you don't understand the situation then you may well be a Downie.

I hereby state very clearly that it's public knowledge and not at all controversial that some QNT tokens have been liquidated/given to exchanges/whatever the fuck they want to do with them.

I encourage you all to sell IMMEDIATELY. Exit scam is in progress.

[Anonymous No.13812880]

>>13812813
Go back to your telespam. You guys dont like Biz, remember?