BREAKING NEWS: COINBASE, CBOE, KRAKEN AND BITFINEX SENT CEASE AND DESIST LETTERS

[Anonymous No.13779828]

CONTROVERSIAL CRYPTO FIGURE AND SELF PROCLAIMED SATOSHI NAKAMOTO CRAIG WRIGHT HAS SENT CEASE AMD DESIST LETTERS TO MAJOR BITCOIN TRADING EXCHNAGES FOR INFRINGING ON A RECENTLY GRANTED COPYRIGHT DEMANDING THEY RENAME BITCOIN(BTC) AS IT INFRINGES ON HIS COPYRIGHTED WORKS

[Anonymous No.13779845]

>>13779828
kek and i thought linkies were deluded

[Anonymous No.13779849]

>>13779828
SO STIFF

[Anonymous No.13779854]

>>13779828
Source?

[Anonymous No.13779872]

Sauce? If true this guy truly has gotten out of touch with this world lol

[Anonymous No.13779889]

>>13779828
public domain code. sorry.

[Anonymous No.13779899]

OH MY GOD it's nothing.

[Anonymous No.13779902]

This is pure kino. I'm not sure how I will survive all the winning that will come the next few months

[Anonymous No.13779908]

>>13779854
>>13779872
I can’t reveal my sources or I will fix myself wait for the articles to drop soon though you will see in a day or two once all letters have been acknowledged

[Anonymous No.13779930]

>>13779908
Dox myself*

[Anonymous No.13779955]

>>13779828
>proof of social media
>proof of shitposting
>proof of patent filing
>proof of lawsuit threats
>proof of copyright filing
still no proof of signature

[Anonymous No.13779967]

>>13779955
Checked but law is law code is not law

[Anonymous No.13779992]

>>13779899
Literally this, dubs of truth. Bitcoin was covered by an MIT license since inception. Craig Wright, Faketoshi, has no power here.

[Anonymous No.13780008]

>>13779955
Bitcoin:
>proof of patents
>proof of law
>proof of copyright

Core Coin:
>proof of social media
>proof of shitposting

[Anonymous No.13780041]

>>13779828
Copyright doesn't cover names. That's trademarks.

[Anonymous No.13780132]

[Anonymous No.13780159]

>>13779828

[Anonymous No.13780172]

>>13779967
>>13780008
How do you not see the irony that the man who supposedly invented trustless money to take down the banking and legal system, is falling back to an argument of "dude trust me" using the existing banking and legal system?

[Anonymous No.13780207]

>>13780172
>invented trustless money to take down the banking and legal system
You have no idea what you're talking about. Start reading about bitcoin before you pretend to understand it

[Anonymous No.13780226]

>>13780207
>How do you not see the irony that the man who supposedly invented trustless money to take down the banking and legal system, is falling back to an argument of "dude trust me" using the existing banking and legal system?

[Anonymous No.13780286]

>>13779828
The desperation is starting to appear.
Calvin probably needs $4-500 BSV to fund the building of the beach resort he's been planning.

[Anonymous No.13780312]

>>13779902
the villain that bitcoin needed

[Anonymous No.13780355]

>>13779992
Opensource code doesn't cover intellectual property faggot

[Anonymous No.13780470]

>>13780207
Yes, he does. Pick up a book about cryptography you idiot, if you read it you'll find out that you can provide a signature that mathematically and irrevocably proves that you own a certain address (or public key)

[Anonymous No.13780533]

>>13779828
Copyright wasn't granted. He simply registered it. Anyone can do that. It doesn't even count though.

[Anonymous No.13780537]

>>13780470
>mathematically and irrevocably proves that you own a certain address
It proves you control it, not own it. And it certainly does not prove you created Bitcoin. If you think so, you are lost

[Anonymous No.13780538]

>>13779828
imagine LARPing so hard you send cease and desist letters to multibilion dollar companies because they don't roleplay with you

[Anonymous No.13780561]

>>13779828
So that's what he was penning the last couple years? I remember him talking shit on Twitter about it. Jesus what a fucking snake.

[Anonymous No.13780605]

>>13780537
If you control Satoshi's address, you are Satoshi, period. And we all know that Satoshi mined the first few blocks, so if you control the genesis coinbase address you are Satoshi and you created Bitcoin. That's how this works

[Anonymous No.13780656]

>>13779967
no, code is stronger than any bullshit law

[Anonymous No.13780677]

>>13780605
Were there actual movements from the real Satoshi? Maybe the dude died a long time ago and nobody knows lol

[Anonymous No.13780709]

>>13780537
well, that'd be more believebale than anything he's done so far

[Anonymous No.13780714]

>>13780008
cope harder

[Anonymous No.13780717]

>>13780041
Bitcorn code is unironically open source and the license protects it from being patented

[Anonymous No.13780763]

How do you think bch and SV were able to fork the code perfectly legally, even though it was hostile? Answer;

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/COPYING

[Anonymous No.13780779]

>>13780717
That's a stupid argument

If cocaco open sourced it's recipe you could make your own Coke or variety BUT YOU COULD JUST TAKE THE LOGO AND NAME AND SAY HURR HURR IM COKE AND PROFIT FROM THAT

[Anonymous No.13780800]

>>13780779
Could not

[Anonymous No.13780821]

>>13779828
binance safu
confirmed

[Anonymous No.13780822]

>>13780779
That doesn't make sense, but open source licences like MIT have long records in winning cases in court for situations like Craig's retarded suits

[Anonymous No.13780842]

>>13780779
trademarks don't protect form opensource development or nonprofit use even assuming he could get one. creg is fucked as always.

[Anonymous No.13780862]

>>13780822
obviously this is a no go. but they managed to hype up their own crowd and dump some sv at double price for a few bucks so i have to say they achieved their objective.

[Anonymous No.13780885]

>>13780470
Why do you faggots always assume people who don't care about cryptographic proof don't care because they don't understand it. Maybe they actually understand something you don't.
>>13780605
Nobody knows if Satoshi was one person or several people and if the latter nobody knows what kind of structure they might have set up. There are tons (an infinity actually) of possible scenarios in which Craig is Satoshi (or the leader of the Satoshi group) and doesn't want to or cannot sign with a known Satoshi key.
You've been reduced to an unthinking idiot because you can't think an inch beyond the "muh cryptographic signature" talking point. Enjoy poverty, mental midget.

[Anonymous No.13780950]

>>13780862
Interesting way to look at it that I didn't see before. Thanks

[Anonymous No.13781563]

>>13780885
>Maybe they understand something you don't
We understand you clearly have no answer.

[Anonymous No.13781580]

Only COINMETRO and FOREHEADMAN are safe now!?

[Anonymous No.13781613]

Coinmetro would seem like the safest bet right now, true

[Anonymous No.13781633]

>>13779828
BREAKING NEWS
BSV BAGHOLDERS ARE FAGGOT
CRAIG IS A SCAM

KYS

[Anonymous No.13781642]

>>13779854
>>13779872
https://www.coindesk.com/us-copyright-office-says-it-does-not-recognize-craig-wright-as-satoshi?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=coindesk&utm_term&utm_content&utm_campaign=Organic%20&amp&__twitter_impression=true

[Anonymous No.13781667]

>>13779828
US COPYRIGHT OFFICE SAYS IT DOES NOT RECOGNIZE CRAIG WRIGHT AS SATOSHI

https://www.coindesk.com/us-copyright-office-says-it-does-not-recognize-craig-wright-as-satosh

[Anonymous No.13781678]

>>13781563
>infinity = 0
Whatever you say, brainlet.
>>13781642
Where is the actual press release/statement? Smells like fake news.

[Anonymous No.13781686]

You guys don‘t realize that he is now showing evidence of being Satoshi just piece by piece. BTC mob will try to cope harder with every new piece. Soon Craig is goong to release his CC statement and shows the world that he bought the Bitcoin.org domain. The finisher move will be a siganature of the Genesis block.

Screencap this. BSV at $2000 in February 2020.

[Anonymous No.13781696]

>>13779828
US COPYRIGHT OFFICE SAYS IT DOES NOT RECOGNIZE CRAIG WRIGHT AS SATOSHI

https://www.coindesk.com/us-copyright-office-says-it-does-not-recognize-craig-wright-as-satoshi

[Anonymous No.13781697]

>>13780779
did creg create and trademark the logo though? thought not. I'm pretty sure the MIT open source license covers the project name, so that's not even applicable.

[Anonymous No.13781701]

>>13781642
>>13781667
But he owns the copyright. I think its not the copyright offices place to make a stand on this.

[Anonymous No.13781722]

>>13781678
Still no answer. You're deflecting.

[Anonymous No.13781725]

>>13781686
glow in dark vs craig wright. I wonder what is going to happen here...

[Anonymous No.13781747]

>>13781701
>But he owns the copyright.
satoshi nakamoto owns the copyright and he released it under mit license which explicitly allows alter distribute and even re-license by anyone.

[Anonymous No.13781992]

>>13781686
or he could just sign the genesis and not go through all this trouble

[Anonymous No.13782123]

>>13781722
>>13781992
He still can't think of a single plausible reason why Satoshi might not be willing or able to do a public key signing and demands to be spoon fed.
Wew lad enjoy your fake news.

[Anonymous No.13782128]

>>13781992
If he just signed the genesis block on day 1, it would panic the whole market and cause BTC to flash crash to double or single digits. You have to build up trust and slowly wean the truth out to people so that when the final piece of the puzzle is revealed there is less shock and whole business entities disrupted overnight.

[Anonymous No.13782155]

>>13781747
can ANY bsv fuckhead comment on this?

[Anonymous No.13782168]

>>13782123
>or able
yikes
the jig is up

[Anonymous No.13782185]

>>13779828
Join the most transparent and regulated EU based exchange. Margin trading is around the corner, along with eur/altcoin pairs. for lower fees use this link: https://coinmetro.. com/?ref = metro9000

[Anonymous No.13782194]

>>13782155
Copyright (c) 2009 Satoshi Nakamoto

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

[Anonymous No.13782202]

>>13782123
>>13782123
But he is willing to register a copyright claim and spam that he is Satoshi on every public forum, including normie twitter?
>the state of BSV shills

[Anonymous No.13782280]

>>13782202
He's drawing out the reveal so as not to shock the market and forever discredit all the naysayers. It's working. This is a problem only for idiots like you who fell for Core/Contrarian propaganda.
>>13782194
Exactly. Permission granted = permission that can be revoked. The shitshow is just beginning.

[Anonymous No.13782317]

>>13782280
>permission that can be revoked
not how it works nignog

[Anonymous No.13782338]

>>13779828
fuckin clown world lmao

[Anonymous No.13782372]

Link / EUR pair confirmed
COINMETRO EXCHANGE

[Anonymous No.13782425]

The problem with CSW is that he lies to his own supporters and provides them fabricated evidence

t. former supporter

[Anonymous No.13782436]

>>13782155
Yes i can

The software can be used, and altered BUT NO WHERE does it state you can blatenly steal the intelectual property of the name or logo and such. So people can fork it and use it all they like , but they cant profit from the name

It would be like if coke open sourced their recipe but that doesn't mean you can parade around with their logo and name and profit from it. You need your own image

[Anonymous No.13782447]

>>13782317
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17776182574171214893&hl=en&as_sdt=6&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
FOSS licenses are revocable under US law unless the license includes an irrrevocability clause. MIT license does not.

[Anonymous No.13782460]

>>13782372
source?

[Anonymous No.13782492]

>>13782447
only in case of violation of said license sorry you are fucked.

[Anonymous No.13782591]

>>13782492
>He thinks making shit up is going to help.
Have a nice life.

[Anonymous No.13782615]

>>13782447
also there are two things to consider
1) for even entertain trying to get a court ruling on revoking the mit license someone would need to actually prove he is the owner. so abck to square one on that.
2) if the mit license ever ruled revokeable it would wreck a huge havoc on the entire industry (no not crypto, the it/software industry) companies like facebook could burn so most likely such a ruling will never be made anyhow.

[Anonymous No.13782632]

>>13782591
did you actually read the foss thing and it's implications? or just throwing around your vomit?

[Anonymous No.13782710]

>>13781747
You can't get a copyright with a pseudonym. It would not be a valid copyright because if he tried to sue someone for copyright violation Satoshi would have to show up in court himself and then would not be anonymous anymore. Now he Satoshi just did it with his real name. Craig S. Wright.

[Anonymous No.13782718]

>>13782615
>prove he is the owner
No shit
>if the mit license ever ruled revokeable it would wreck a huge havoc on the entire industry
Nah

[Anonymous No.13782748]

>>13779828
Good, bull sign for coinbase.
https://www.coinbase.com/join/5b5be3df88879f02fef98767

[Anonymous No.13782765]

>>13782710
>ignorance of an author's identity does not diminish the author's rights under copyright, although it may severely complicate the author's attempts to assert those rights.

[Anonymous No.13782825]

>>13782765
Its not ignorance of the authors identity. Its a made up identity. I think that its unenforceable unless Satoshi decides to reveal himself in a court case and prove that he is Satoshi and prove that he owns the copyright.

[Anonymous No.13782850]

No no no, I found the real Satoshi. Look, there's an official government record.

[Anonymous No.13782892]

>>13780159
god I love cz

[Anonymous No.13782986]

>>13782128
This is the dumbest post out of the entire thread. If he was truly satoshi he wouldn't care about core or “disrupting the market” the money in bitcoin wouldn’t disappear it would get flooded into the scam that is bsv, but because he can’t do this simple thing (because he’s not satoshi) he has to go through all the trouble of doing these little bullshit things that don’t mean anything to fool simple minded people like guys who believe CW a fucking aussie is satoshi. By the way the US copyright office didn’t even recognize him as satoshi so wtf is this thread

[Anonymous No.13782999]

>>13782825
no you don't get it the copyright is the persons that published it under satoshi nakamoto pseud. not anyones that claims to be him. it's not up for grabs. unless you can prove you are satoshi the license is not your property.

and here is how any proof starts
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
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=3FTe
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

[Anonymous No.13783048]

>>13782999
checked

[Anonymous No.13783091]

>>13782999
Ok, I think person trying to claim to be Satoshi would have to have that pgp key to prove that they are satoshi. I think they could prove it in other ways (Evidence in a court of law). You would still have to convince the judge. Nice trips btw.

[Anonymous No.13783117]

You cannot copyright a single word. He would need to register a trademark for that.

This whole story is BS. OP I am drafting a letter right now directing you to cease and desist being a stupid fucking asshole. Please provide the address for your registered agent.

[Anonymous No.13783213]

>>13780538

[Anonymous No.13783221]

>>13782123
More deflection. This just doesn't look good for you.
>>13782128
>Build trust slowly
He's not doing a very good job. "Hey everyone, I'm Satoshi. I'll sign genesis at this date. Should give everyone enough time." Is better than forging documents and peacocking.
>if he signed genesis on day one thered be a crash
If he signed on day 1 there'd be nothing as BTC hadn't pumped yet.

[Anonymous No.13783231]

Are Craig "The Crypto Carlos Mencia" Wright fanboys just LARPers, trolls, paid Indian shills, or just plain retarded? I seriously can't tell.

[Anonymous No.13783253]

>>13783231
look at the BSV dev team

[Anonymous No.13783275]

>>13783091
yeah and like i said any ruling in this regard can be used as precedence to break any other permissive license which could cause an industry wide upheaval. so i wouldn't count on it. (even if we forget for a moment that satoshi would never ever in a billion years would try to patent and copyright bitcoin which is just an other piece of evidence that craig is a fraud)

[Anonymous No.13783449]

>>13783275
>precedence
Just stop posting. You are so out of your element its embarrassing.
Anyone else here who unironically thinks that Craig registering and asserting his copyright over bitcoin won't have serious consequences for the idiots who have spent the last year and half doing nothing except trying to discredit CSW and push their retarded Corecoin vision deserves to lose it all in the coming turmoil. Have a nice life.

[Anonymous No.13783484]

>>13783449
you are wrong of course, and apparently out off arguments. good.
>Have a nice life.
just die painfully and alone cashie scum!

[Anonymous No.13783521]

>>13781686
>BSV at $2000 in February 2020
Much more

[Anonymous No.13783897]

>>13783449
You are retarded. That's all lawyers rely on... previous rulings to justify their current case... There's been plenty already for supposed infringements of open source licences, and none of them are favorable to Craig's bullshit

[Anonymous No.13783934]

BSV real Bitcoin and IM gonna hold baby

[Anonymous No.13784132]

>>13781580
>>13781613
>>13781613
based and redpilled https://pastebin.com/AJmNZY2S

[Anonymous No.13784154]

>>13782123
you again, posting that same reddit meme with attempted condescending text, but failing to land it... again. you should try posting it in at least a few none-faketoshi threads so that it isn't so damn obvious

[Anonymous No.13784268]

>>13783484
>die painfully and alone
kek
>>13783897
>none of them are favorable to Craig's bullshit
I enjoy watching nervous nellies like you talk out of their ass. Keep believing there are no implications for you and your scammer friends.
>>13784154
Yum.
Stay salty, idiots.

[Anonymous No.13784354]

>>13784268
>get btfo
>no comeback
pajeet shill confirmed

[Anonymous No.13784619]

>>13784354
>you have no comeback....
>p-p-pajeet shill
lmao guess you need at least 110 IQ for a proper sense of irony on this board. What a shame the intersection of CSW-haters and sub-100 IQ brainlets is so large.

[Anonymous No.13784680]

>>13779828
Can some people from the darknet deal with this joke already?
At the beginning, he was a bit funny, but now he is just annoying and shit is getting out of hand.
Either he stops claiming to be Satoshi or the darknet will make him stop.

[Anonymous No.13784700]

>>13784268
>you and your scammer friends
that's actually hilarious coming from a curry cashie that speculates on an airdrop by a pedo criminal syndicate

[Anonymous No.13784701]

>>13784680
Hahaha. Good luck getting past his NSA guards onions faggot.

[Anonymous No.13784733]

>>13784680
any betting pools on his date of demise? i might throw in a btc.

[Anonymous No.13784759]

>>13784680
>>13784733
So much for winning on the merits. Also Craig is nsa so good luck with that presidential level security. You ‘people’ need to go back.

[Anonymous No.13784766]

this fucking idiot is going to kill the next Golden Bull before it even gets started and find out what Bcashies found out when they killed the last Golden Bull.
Never bite the hand that feeds you.

[Anonymous No.13784787]

don't be so nervous creg! it's just friendly banter. that's all.

[Anonymous No.13784793]

>>13784700
>>13784733
>pedo criminal syndicate
>I JUST WANT THE BAN MAN TO DIE
seething

[Anonymous No.13784805]

>>13784787
You’re on a list now faggot. Enjoy!

[Anonymous No.13784812]

>>13784793
i'm willing to bet on the date that's all, i have the feeling he won't make it to 2020

[Anonymous No.13784893]

>>13784805
i have no idea what you are insinuating here cucknugget but i'm not the pedo criminal in this story.

[Anonymous No.13784915]

>>13779854
OP's butthole