Fuck BSV

[Anonymous No.13700717]

Well it is the 17th faggots, what now?
Let me guess you are gonna move the goal post again on your stupid fucking scam team and your shitcoin.
Fuck all of you for shitting up biz with your curry shit relentlessly for months, you are going to lose all your money and we are all going to laugh at you.

[Anonymous No.13700730]

yes sir very cheap buy now and shit in gold plated street

[Anonymous No.13700795]

sir please have patience, creg rait is the smartest man in the whole uttar pradesh

[Anonymous No.13700803]

Go get a job wit yo bum self, BSV apps r poppin

[Anonymous No.13700834]

>>13700803
>Bitcoin Piano
Looks like a boomers phone with random shitty apps installed on it.

[Anonymous No.13700920]

>>13700834
Its onchain u brainlet go look it up https://bico.media/0388a96df8acaaa1da2220abcdd383bb7c4b0ebf42804b957c78bcfddc7188ec

[Anonymous No.13700927]

>>13700717
what do you mean what now? game over, thanks for playing, put in more coins into the slot machine to buy more bsv

[Anonymous No.13700938]

may 20th is the new dedeline. He has to present the keys may 20th

[Anonymous No.13700997]

>>13700803
What a bunch of useless garbage. Do you realize how miserable it looks compared to, say, EOS?

[Anonymous No.13701033]

>>13700997
sir plese no need to bee disrespectful, creg sanjay try very hard

[Anonymous No.13701067]

>>13700920
>it's on chain
and?

[Anonymous No.13701122]

>>13701067
it means it will be there forever. no need to pay for a server to host it. ten thousand years from now, blockchain achaeologists will be able to play it. its a proof of concept of what is to come. pepper your angus.

[Anonymous No.13701138]

>>13700717
june 31th

[Anonymous No.13701144]

>>13700997
for fuck's sake shut up you miserable chum. eos is a centralised POS with dead subsidized apps. This is bitcoin, everything onchain, chain secured with proof of work, POW decentralised. Not by a POS pedo committee. POS don't even scale

[Anonymous No.13701207]

>>13701144
Yes, so what? BSV is even more centralized, it's governed & controlled by nChain and its patents. Besides, BSV has always cherished the idea of several large data centers controlling all the transactions, so EOS and BSV are on an equal footing, except for EOS being technologically superior by several orders of magnitude.

[Anonymous No.13701218]

>>13701067
bitch u more dumb than I thought u was

>onchain means NO SERVERS

wake da fuq up wit ur DUMB ASS QUESTIONS

[Anonymous No.13701270]

>>13701207
r u srs? ur so retarded to whine about

>"uhh only nchain mines bsv"

srs?

>"uhh only satoshi mines bitcoin" -2009

not nchain's fault if yo dumb ass is so slow nigger

[Anonymous No.13701380]

While you stupid faggots argue over literal shitcoins on 4chan (by now definitely controlled by the FBI) we are preparing the next 4chan and all other things worth a shit to be completely "ONCHAIN"

That means uncensorable for all you stupid faggots who still don't understand the significance of BSV and "ONCHAIN"

slop.systems/velouria/index.html

[Anonymous No.13701388]

>>13701270
Unlike BSV with its patents, EOS is under the MIT license. Conceptually, it's absolutely similar to BSV's ideal: only a few large data centers store the blockchain and validate blocks. We don't need the little guy to store the blockchain, right? It already achieved the highest TPS in crypto and is immensely scalable. Its dAPP model is inherently superior to that of BSV, based on a better and more scalable concept. Seriously, you don't need BSV for what it stands to be, the alternatives are simply.. superior.

[Anonymous No.13701402]

based satoshi

[Anonymous No.13701430]

>>13701380
It's already been before. Google Steem.

[Anonymous No.13701479]

>>13701430

Steem is on its own blockchain

(((THEY))) want you to have a thousand blockchains, you are much weaker then

Stupid goyim never learn

[Anonymous No.13701506]

>>13701479
So you just introduce a 1001-th blockchain..

[Anonymous No.13701531]

>>13700717
(((May 34)))

[Anonymous No.13701578]

>>13701388
there are simply no alternatives to BSV. EOS or any centralized bolshevik shitcoin's data centers have nothing to do with decentralized miners all over the globe. Youaresiriuslyretarded

[Anonymous No.13701589]

>>13701144
I agree with you that EOS is a centralized delegated proof of shitcoin. But BSV doesnt go very far in terms of novelty in the PoW department - it's just bitcoin with bigger blocks. Nothing else is new, and there needs to be some significant work done on the bitcoin protocol for it to scale to thousands of tx/sec (and no, lightning network isnt the answer)

[Anonymous No.13701632]

>>13701578
BSV is controlled by patents, dude. How are a dozen of miners (BSV's target goal) different from a dozen of block producers? EOS has already achieved what BSV is striving for.

[Anonymous No.13701700]

>>13701632
God your are such a cuck. Everything is governed by patents you dumbo jumbo, it's called intellectual property.

[Anonymous No.13701709]

>>13701067
MetaNet

It's coming, and there is no way you can stop it. BSV is the future whether you like it or not.

[Anonymous No.13701731]

>>13701589
nChain patents on BSV are free, only non nchain patents negatively affect BSV but they also affect all the other chains btc eth bch. So for God's sake what the heck are you trying to say?

[Anonymous No.13701748]

>>13701700
No, it's called centralized governance. Just call things by their names.

>>13701709
"Storing things on the blockchain" is in no way a novelty, it's been kicked around for years. BSV is not gonna impress anyone with trivial stuff like that without looking bleak compared to senior competitors.

[Anonymous No.13701774]

>>13701709
While the BTC and other shitcoin NPCs have been holding their cocks for years looking at useless price charts like unthinking retard zombies, Craig and his team at nChain have been quietly building the infrastructure and technology that will revolutionize the world and power a new blockchain paradigm through Bitcoin at scale (BSV) and The internet of things all running on Bitcoin (MetaNet).

Now he is literally 50 if not 100 years ahead of his nearest competitors in patents and IP, that literally nothing can stop him from achieving his vision.

Check and mate.

[Anonymous No.13701816]

>>13701748
BSV has no competitors. No other blockchain can scale, nor are they even attempting to.

It's OVER. Craig won long ago, NPCs like you have yet to even realize it.

[Anonymous No.13701818]

>>13701748
Hey libtard, name us ONE coin that is not governed by patents. Thank you!

[Anonymous No.13701897]

>>13701816
BSV is essentially a quasi-centralized coin aiming at decentralized applications, so its competitors are other quasi-centralized dapp coins, namely EOS and Tron. BSV is yet to prove that it's in ANY way better than them. And yes, EOS definitely can scale (it has, you know, big blocks too) and it has the highest TPS rate now.

>>13701818
>libtard
It's hilarious to hear accusations like that considering that nChain is run by LITERAL diversity & LGBT activists. Oh I got it, it was projection. Okay then. What you must look for is BSD or MIT license, not some "OPEN BITCOIN SV LICENSE" bullshit.

[Anonymous No.13701917]

Do you know what decentralized even means?

[Anonymous No.13701964]

>>13701897
can u NOT read fr? nChain patents govern ur shitcoin u officially a complete dumb fuck

>name ur shitcoin

NCHAIN PATENTS GOVERN UR SHITCOIN 2 MA NIGGA

[Anonymous No.13701972]

>>13701917
How many DARTA centres do you have?

[Anonymous No.13701994]

>>13701964
Sorry, I can't comprehend your babbling. nChain governs BSV, you mean? Yes, I agree.

[Anonymous No.13702013]

>>13701816
I dont have 10yrs

[Anonymous No.13702140]

>>13701816
i love it when faketoshi pretends he understands bitcoin

[Anonymous No.13702275]

>>13701816
Hahaahaha like a redpilled fucking religious cult. Sick! Thanks for making people laugh

[Anonymous No.13702614]

>>13701994
You have no idea what you're saying.

I wish you weren't just some paid faggot so when the stiffening happens you could be even more salty. You obviously know you're doomed since you're getting paid to fud sv so hard because your masters are threatened. You better get yourself a suicide stack or you're gonna realise you chose some shekels over actually buying the bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.13702663]

>>13702614
So, what exactly makes BSV superior to, say, EOS?

[Anonymous No.13702757]

>>13702663
PoW and the economic competition inherent to its game theoretical design. It can do everything EOS does but it wasn't issued by some scam ICO, doesn't rely on cartel Block Producers, doesn't have some bullshit constitution, isn't founded by literal pedos, is based off graph theory and actual academic literature on network topology and epidemiology and not just the ramblings of a autistic scammer who's the son of a massive arms dealer executive.

[Anonymous No.13702841]

>>13701122
you are fucking retarded, someone is going to have to host the huge fucking blockchain just for some static content that would grow so huge that hosting it would be even more retarded than you are right now
there are zero use cases for this that a p2p net or a central database couldn't do better
holy fuck this is the dumbest shit i've read this year

[Anonymous No.13702877]

>>13702841
Pay to hash. That's what fees are for. Miners could prune content that never gets viewed from their version of the chain they hold. Nothing stopping someone else from keeping that part of the chain though themselves if they wish for the file still to be available.

[Anonymous No.13702894]

>>13702757
But BSV is striving for the same cartel scheme where just a few big miners would be producing all the blocks. No difference with EOS. Besides, BSV has (((patents))) and is run by the LGBT. It's pretty much on an equal footing with EOS conceptually. Not sure about the "can do everything EOS does" part, though. EOS is based on a completely different model (bandwidth-based) which provides way more opportunities. So far BSV hasn't demonstrated how it's able to compete with EOS or Tron, for that matter.

[Anonymous No.13702927]

>>13702894

BSV is forcing everyone to use the same blockchain via patents becuase you autistic faggots are scattered blinded by fighting over scraps of shitcoin gainz to realize that only a single blockchain can defeat the whimsical monetary policy of the central bankers which have enslaved mankind for the last 2,000 years

get on board BSV before it's too late homos

[Anonymous No.13702947]

>>13702877
>Nothing stopping someone else from keeping that part of the chain though themselves if they wish for the file still to be available
Kek

[Anonymous No.13702977]

>>13702927
BSV is not forcing anything YET, so far it's been forced out in response to its bullshit patent trolling. The fact that there are several blockchains is the reality, if you believe that BSV is able to outcompete them all, you'll have to have something better than patent trolling and Satoshi impersonation, all of which has already failed. More like innovation.

[Anonymous No.13703001]

>>13701207
This brainlet doesn't even pretend to understand what he's talking about
>>13701388
Centralized chink garbage

[Anonymous No.13703006]

>>13702894
Bitcoin at scale is bandwidth based too. If you don't have enough bandwidth the propagate your block, either

a, prune some stuff but you won't be able to compete with others who still offer that

b, invest in bandwidth so you don't get orphaned and get to keep the block reward and fees for the block you mined

c, use the double hash to sell the correct solution of the block you just mined to someone who can propagate the block.

The SV blockchain is a perpetual motor for all kinds of backends for any kind of application you need. Wanna do some crazy rendering, task some specialised miners with their TBs of RAM to do it for a fee.

Cartels don't form because bitcoin is competetive, not delegated through "you get my vote" type faggotry.

[Anonymous No.13703011]

>>13702977

It’s not patent trolling if you invented Bitcoin

[Anonymous No.13703099]

>>13703011
As they say, talk is cheap. It all sounds good, but all I've seen so far is sleazy marketing claims, like "we will win by suing the rest" and "we will win by proving to be Satoshi" (none of which is true or possible), not "we will win by having a better technology". Time will tell, I guess. So far I haven't seen any conclusive evidence that BSV is in any way better than its conceptually close competitors like EOS, other than theoretical claims.

>>13703011
Do you still believe that? He feeds his own followers fabricated stuff, I don't know why.

[Anonymous No.13703134]

>>13703001
BSV is also centralized, in concept and de jure. BSV shills always say how it would be good if there were just a couple of extremely huge corporate miners validating gigantic, enormous blocks. Well, EOS already has that, sort of. Now go ahead and prove that your dapp architecture can even compete.

[Anonymous No.13703148]

>>13702877
if they can just prune it then why use blockchain instead of just using the internet

[Anonymous No.13703180]

>>13703099

You still don’t understand.

“We will win with better technology” has already been done.

The technology is “blockchain”. It really is that simple. No need to get fancy with dumb shit like thousands of shitcoins are wanting to add a special spin to it. The Proof of Work blockchain. That’s fucking it.

Nothing else that EOS or any other scam is doing is important because BSV can do it all.

The blockchain is the technology.

And Bitcoin is the first, the simplest, the longest proof of work, the most scalable, and owns all the patents because that’s the only way to round up degenerate gambler debt slave commoners currently owned by (((them)) into supporting a single chain that they haven’t realized they should support yet.

[Anonymous No.13703241]

>>13703180
"There will be one and only one blockchain" is just empty marketing talk. It's not an argument. Sorry. There are several blockchains, that's a fact. So far you have not explained one simple thing: how is BSV supposed to replicated EOS's core feature, the user's ability to use a smart contract without paying anything, just by staking alone? It's too early to be smug and condescending when you're in fact the inferior one.

[Anonymous No.13703244]

>>13701731
What the fuck does anything I said have to do with patents? Fuck parents, this is open source software

[Anonymous No.13703261]

>>13703244
Yeah fuck parents if you want fuck

[Anonymous No.13703268]

>>13703180
a proof of work blockchain with micro-minority hash is so insecure that it's worthless.

[Anonymous No.13703290]

>>13703268
truth

[Anonymous No.13703307]

>>13703268
This guy fucks, you are literally months from being 51% attacked into completely worthless bags.
Not to mention this mongoloid thought it was a good idea to fight with Chinise miners with enough hash to do this at their fingertips. They might do it just for the LULZ.

[Anonymous No.13703446]

>>13703307
Do chinks eben lulz?

[Anonymous No.13703715]

>>13701122
nobody cares, you can take a shit and lok the manure inside a vault, it will be there forever. who gives a fuck
>>13701218
>NO SERVERS
the servers are the nodes you dumbfuck
worst fucking server service of all time lmao
you're the type of boomer who wants to put everything on the blockchain because it's the new thing
kys
>>13701709
buzzword
nobody cares, try again

[Anonymous No.13703727]

>>13700717
This chart is unironically bullish for BSV.

[Anonymous No.13703740]

>>13700997
>EOS
Link some of the apps on this centralized PoS token.

[Anonymous No.13703761]

>>13701207
>BSV has always cherished the idea of several large data centers
That Satoshi Nakamoto guy did as well. What does that mean?!

[Anonymous No.13703774]

>>13701388
>Its dAPP model is inherently superior to that of BSV
How? Bitcoin has a security and incentives scheme that keeps the machine running and the Turning Completeness allows for w/e you want to create.

[Anonymous No.13703792]

>>13701402
It's amazing how people think BTC is at all what Satoshi intended. Literally just read his writings.

[Anonymous No.13703808]

>>13701506
Its Bitcoin though. BTC and BCH aren't following Satoshi's implementation. So its existed since 09' and will consume the entire market.

Something like Steem is pointless when the same thing can be done on Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.13703814]

>>13700717
Test

[Anonymous No.13703818]

>>13703148
Because it's still on the chain if someone hosts it. Just bitcoin doesn't force everyone to keep all copies. If you think it will net you value not pruning it you keep it.

[Anonymous No.13703823]

>>13703715

[Anonymous No.13703841]

>>13702663
PoW, scaling and re enabling OP codes.

If Core never fucked with the protocol and instead scaled (miners are at fault as well) then no other shitcoins would have any marketshare at all and most of them wouldn't exist today.

Money Skelly wanted to develop on Bitcoin but couldn't because of fucking Core.

[Anonymous No.13703856]

>>13702894
>big miners
The intent of mining was always commercial.

[Anonymous No.13703879]

>>13702977
>patent trolling
Fren...

https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/result.jsf

[Anonymous No.13703899]

>>13703134
Lol I don't understand why you people don't understand mining to this day. Farms are already in the hundreds of millions to run and operate. This is no small venture. Commercial application was always the intent.

[Anonymous No.13703909]

>>13703180
blockchain with no hashrate is worthless
you're going to get fucked
you can't mine on a loss forever

[Anonymous No.13705147]

>>13700717
bumpu