ITT we discuss

[Anonymous No.13697115]

How Chainlink is literally just a JSON parson and is not difficult to build, hence why big corp will just build their own.

[Anonymous No.13697122]

>>13697115
You forgot to buy huh?

[Anonymous No.13697128]

>>13697115

Faggot it took 6 years to build, that’s why.

[Anonymous No.13697129]

>>13697115
yeah surgay nazajeet is literally a psychiatrist?
like wtf scam much?
never trust a shrink

[Anonymous No.13697140]

>>13697115
>entry level fud
ahh the good old days
*sip*

[Anonymous No.13697149]

>>13697115
imagine thinking this project with all the layers of both hardware and software security is just a json parser. we're not all gonna make it bros.

[Anonymous No.13697152]

>>13697122
>>13697128
>>13697140
Stay deluded, frens.

[Anonymous No.13697156]

>>13697115
Because its the decentralized part thats valuable. We have oracles already. If a company were to build their own, another entity engaging in a smart contract agreement with said company would have no reason to trust the data being fed to that smart contract because there could be financial incentive to skew the data in their favor. Trustless decentralized oracles are whats valuable here, the best option is and likely always will be LINK.

[Anonymous No.13697158]

>>13697115
Who is Jason Parser?

[Anonymous No.13697159]

>>13697115
Nah, dude. Jason Parser left the team to make the shadow fork.

[Anonymous No.13697170]

>>13697129
Underrated post.

[Anonymous No.13697176]

>>13697128
Yep, and all code is out there. And here is the thing:
>a) Companies can do a link network themselves ignoring the token
>b) Companies can decide to pay for your overvalued ERC-20 token without network effect just because of the memes
I wonder if any of you have ever work on a budget or work at all.

[Anonymous No.13697188]

>>13697152
thank you for doing the needful brother

[Anonymous No.13697197]

>>13697156
There it is! OP completely and utterly BTFO only 4.5 minutes after he made the thread. Im proud of you 4chan, but you can do better. This should have been the first post.

[Anonymous No.13697213]

>>13697176
See
>>13697156

[Anonymous No.13697514]

>>13697115
>>13697140
>>13697152

The technology is a footnote in this project. It's not complicated technology, nor is that the point of the project or where its value lays. That's what FUDders don't understand. The real value of Blockchain--- when people wax poetic about its utopian appeal--- is in the reorganization of social and political life. People in charge of their funds, services, and digital goods; people responsible for securing the networks that guarantee those things; people paying a bare minimum for this level of trustlessness, doing away with historical reliance on centralized aggregations of power and influence.

The failure of most blockchain projects (at large) so far has been in their inability to affect those social changes. To onboard companies, people, marketplaces, merchants, manufacturers, etc etc into their mission and to make their projects have real world use and adoption. Hence they remain technological toys, insular disconnected islands of speculative value and no practical effect. Chainlink is revolutionary and valued as it is because its primary mission is creating the social, political, and infrastructural framework for its project's implementation. They hire Johnny, whose project with Linkpool will make staking and node running easier and more accessible to a decidedly non-technical population of users. CLC group is attempting to organize and make accessible a marketplace of APIs that are otherwise out of reach. Chainlink itself has already allied itself with the biggest of companies and entities that would best make use of their tech. They have purchased town crier. Most of their funds and efforts have gone towards the necessary investments that are required for implementation and real use when mainnet goes live. Indeed, this is where all the hype for LINK has been--- not in the tech itself.

If you can't see this, you deserve to be poor. Go invest in Witnet.