Omg

[Anonymous No.13693117]

https://medium.com/iex-ec/v3-iexec-releases-data-wallet-for-enterprises-to-rent-data-and-ai-models-using-blockchain-e773a6bab69a

Even 1000 will be enough to make it in some years. Fuck Doracle. Datawallet is gamebreaker

[Anonymous No.13693157]

iExec has no right to exist

[Anonymous No.13693173]

>>13693157
> if anon from Biz say so

[Anonymous No.13693182]

>>13693117
Kek,
>in some years
We makin it right now. This is now a chainlink thread. Marines you know what needs to be done.

[Anonymous No.13693187]

>>13693182
Lmao as always Linkies are here to read and feel the fear

[Anonymous No.13693211]

>>13693187
Your shitcoin project proved their pajeetery yesterday
Come back in a month, it may have been forgotten by then

[Anonymous No.13693229]

>>13693211
Explain ?

[Anonymous No.13693277]

Interesting. Don't care unless they bend the knee. If they want linkies to support, join us and we could do wonders for them. Until the , don't care.

[Anonymous No.13693292]

>>13693229
> ?
Fucking frog cucks not even trying to hide

[Anonymous No.13693319]

>>13693229
>be unaware of Chainlink's SGX-filled whitepaper (2017) or Chainlink's purchase of TownCrier (2018
>claim Chainlink has no SGX integration on your website anyway in mid-2019
>be forced to withdraw said claim within hours
iexec are incompetent

[Anonymous No.13693330]

>>13693277
Understand there chart was a mistake but they are not totally wrong, or I am missing something ?
+ we don’t need support from Link even if iExec community is shit. Business lead this world, not communities

[Anonymous No.13693337]

>>13693330
>but they are not totally wrong
You're rationalizing.
They admitted they were wrong, and so should you.

[Anonymous No.13693346]

>>13693319
On this point they fucked up. Imo that’s not what they wanted to say + are aware that CL is Oracle leader with TC

[Anonymous No.13693358]

>>13693337
Hadrien from IExec team explained it, that’s all about on chain proof

[Anonymous No.13693365]

>>13693319
Wait, did anyone think they were competent to begin with !?

[Anonymous No.13693371]

But that’s not the point here, in fact I don’t give a shit about this pseudo war. Just wanted to have thoughts about Datawallet

[Anonymous No.13693374]

>>13693346

Even if that chart was semi-correct (which it wasn't), that type of chart is a clear sign of Pajeetery.
And there is no excuse AT ALL for claiming Chainlink has no SGX integration.

iexec were trying to appeal to the absolute lowest-tier of crypto investors, both in their tactics and their absurdly inaccurate content.

[Anonymous No.13693378]

>>13693358
>Hadrien from IExec team explained it, that’s all about on chain proof
Post it.

[Anonymous No.13693385]

>>13693371
No one wants you here frog
Take your shitcoin back to little africa

[Anonymous No.13693386]

>>13693330
Slow your fingers down. My goodness, the curry isn't going anywhere.

[Anonymous No.13693391]

>>13693330
Except it looks bad if they know less about decentralized oracles then a regular /biz/ poster, mainly when it it's their business.

[Anonymous No.13693396]

>>13693117
RLC JUST MADE DATA OBSOLETE, YOU DUMB NIGGER

[Anonymous No.13693400]

>>13693374
That type of chart is truly a fucking mistake, I don’t even know why they did that. They took marketing from the wrong way. Instead of saying iExec is better than (which is not true imo) they should have said iExec can do all this without comparing. But as I said I don’t care that’s not the point here

[Anonymous No.13693406]

If RLC was such a nocoin why do linkfags feel the need to shill every thread. Answer is they're scared RLC was going to hit $1 before LINK.

>"B-but iExec partnerships are weak aha"

Compared to what, McDonald's? Give me a fucking break.

I'm not going to say some dumb brownposting shit like "RLC makes x obsolete" because that reeks of curry and normally isn't true.

Fact of the matter is if we're truly waiting for a bullrun, it doesn't matter what alt we pick, we'll all have to liquidate into BTC/ETH in the long run if we want to make any real big boy dollars. Just pick a coin with whitepages that makes sense and that doesn't have a pajeet team behind it and you'll do all right

tl;dr the linkie strikes you as it cries out in fear

[Anonymous No.13693413]

>>13693319
1. They knew about the TC acquisition by CL.
2. CL still doesn't support SGX, iExec does. (AT PRESENT TIME, BUT LINK WILL HAVE SGX SUPPORT.)
3. The chart was stupid, but ACCURATE AT PRESENT TIME. Good on them for removing it though.
4. The chart was/is actually 100% accurate as of right now. CL mainnet isn't out yet fren. BUT in two weeks the chart becomes invalid as CL mainnet is out.
5. They are not competitors. iExec needs oracles for their platform and actually made their own version/solution (FOR ETH ONLY.)
LINK WILL SUPPORT OTHER CHAINS.
6. They are two entirely different projects solving different issues. Brainlets can't wrap their heads around this for some reason.

t. STINKY LINKY

[Anonymous No.13693421]

>>13693406
Because you fuckers spammed wildly inaccurate bullshite and now you will be reminded of it for as long as rlc dumps and link pumps (read as: eternity).

[Anonymous No.13693424]

>>13693413
Sorry but iExec is blockchain agnostic too. They just focus now on Ethereum

[Anonymous No.13693430]

>>13693400
That explanation in your pic makes zero sense.

He's saying he wants SGX verification to be "on chain", just like SSL verification.
However, SSL verification can only be done on-chain if the certificate is granted on-chain to begin with.
TEEs are "enclaves" for a reason: their verification is supposed to happen in the enclave, i.e. off-chain.
Making enclaves do verifications on-chain would mean they are no longer enclaves.

Again, they have no clue what they're talking about.

[Anonymous No.13693431]

The worst part is that biz/ memed rlc as a black power crypto back in 2017. It was fun, most of us knew that it was a scam, but they didn't attack anyone. Now things have changed and RLC is done for.

I dare a single dumb nigger to explain me why the tokeconomics are good. Burning system has been proven a jew money grab scheme with no actual results to investors, like kyber, 0x and ICONOMI.

FUCK BAGUETTES AND FUCK NIGGERS

[Anonymous No.13693435]

>>13693424
Sirs, sirs, sirs

[Anonymous No.13693459]

>>13693413
>They knew about the TC acquisition by CL.
>CL still doesn't support SGX
Then why did they retract the chart, saying it was "outdated" regarding the SGX thing?

>They are two entirely different projects solving different issues.
lmao, then why the Pajeet-tastic comparison chart?

[Anonymous No.13693475]

>>13693435
Kek.

[Anonymous No.13693488]

>>13693431
They don’t burn token you retard where did you see that ?
Tokenomic is a problem they are trying to solve. Imo the only red flag of this project.

[Anonymous No.13693490]

>>13693421
Spammed what? You mean any time an alt gains steam and brownniggers attach themselves like parasites and try to swing it by posting "BUY x NOW OR STAY POOR" threads every 5 seconds? LINK is just as guilty, just like every other alt in existence.

[Anonymous No.13693502]

>>13693431
RLC has no burning you niggerjew

[Anonymous No.13693513]

>>13693413

RLC have poked the belly of the beast and now you will pay dearly!

[Anonymous No.13693522]

>>13693459
They realized it was a stupid marketing stunt that infuriated hundreds of twitter brainlets?
They realized that the chart will be incorrect within a couple weeks?
I've no idea man, maybe they got too excited and wanted to show off what they had built?

Like i said good that they removed the chart as it will be incorrect within a couple weeks, doesn't change the fact that they managed to build their own version/solution intended to use on their own platform. Reflect about that for a minute fren.

[Anonymous No.13693528]

>>13693490
No, the graphic depicting that rlc's oracle is infinitely better than link. I couldn't give two fucks about pajeets spamming BUYBUYBUY.

[Anonymous No.13693558]

>>13693522
>>13693413
If they really meant "because Chainlink isn't out yet", they would not have claimed Chainlink "qualifies as a decentralized oracle" either in that chart, but they did.

Also, their explanation for not using Chainlink makes zero sense, see >>13693430

iexec's reputation is in the toilet, face it.

[Anonymous No.13693574]

>>13693488
>>13693502

If you doesn't take into account tokeconomics when putting money on a project, you are literally retarded and deserve to lose all of your money, you dumb niggers

[Anonymous No.13693585]

>>13693430
He just says that iExec can do it.
I don’t understand where is the problem so ??

[Anonymous No.13693587]

>>13693528
I'll concede that the chart they posted was retarded, I even laughed out loud when I saw it. But to say that "this is what has permanently destroyed RLC" is completely retarded as well. Especially after LINK maintained steadiness through the 1k btc dump last night, I'm guessing they probably feel embarrassed for posting something so stupid

But what matters is the technology and partnerships, any linkie who's done their research could agree to that.

But at the end of it all I go back to my previous point, of we're really all just waiting for another all out bull run it really doesn't matter which alt we invest in, seeing how our endgame is to be holding the big boy coins like BTC or ETH

[Anonymous No.13693591]

>>13693585
The whole explanation is nonsense.

[Anonymous No.13693593]

>>13693585
You couldn't understand in your thread yesterday either, yet everyone else does....hmmmm

[Anonymous No.13693610]

Pls fucking niggers, explain me why people would like to be payed in this shittoken instead of btc and eth.

Link is needed on the mainnet cause transfer and call properties. What can you say about this you dumb niggers? Enjoy being a deluded bunch of niggers who fell for the black power coin of 2017

[Anonymous No.13693617]

>>13693591
I don’t see where it is a non sense.
He did not say it was better or what, just Saying that iExec has mechanisms to provide on chain proof and Chainlink hasn’t So where is the problem ?

[Anonymous No.13693619]

>>13693587
This was my point all along.

Takes a special kind of brainlet to not understand the fundamental differences between the two and not see potential in both.

[Anonymous No.13693630]

>>13693617
>I don’t see where it is a non sense.
He wants enclave to stop being enclaves so it can be proven that enclaves were used.

How do you not see this is nonsense?

[Anonymous No.13693635]

>>13693630
So how iExec achieved this ?

[Anonymous No.13693663]

>>13693635
They didn't achieves nigger, they are just lying about it with retarded shit. They have been sucking intel cock for years and now they realized intel only wants to fuck sergey and they are jealous at

[Anonymous No.13693665]

>>13693635
Who the fuck knows, some bullshit.
Maybe using their doracles to feed the attestations on-chain from the API.
Just like anyone could.

[Anonymous No.13693701]

>>13693663
That’s really not how they work. Follow them for years now they never cheat on us.

[Anonymous No.13693706]

>>13693701
>they never cheat on us.
They lied to your face.

[Anonymous No.13693733]

>>13693706
Absolutely never. This is pajeet tier fud

[Anonymous No.13693766]

>>13693733
>Chainlink has no SGX integration

[Anonymous No.13693792]

>>13693701
Have you see the charts? Who thinks is dumping it? Obviously the team, to pay for all the worthless marketing activities like being in business fairs with intel. But you know what? All that investement in brand recognition went full poo in the loo after the chart and CM behaviour.

We have a new meme format
Rlc just made [anything] obsolete you dumb nigger

Sell now. Your project is dead af

[Anonymous No.13693801]

>>13693733
Calling the kettle black, I mean brown huh.

[Anonymous No.13693806]

>>13693792
Wow this is even worst congrats retard

[Anonymous No.13693859]

>>13693806
Thanks, but at least I'm not losing money to some French fries fuckers like you anon, check this shit, and if you can refute anything, do it, if not, neck yourself, your brain won't allow you to make it in this game regardless of your efforts

[Anonymous No.13693892]

>>13693859
Pointing out that a news is sold. Wow

[Anonymous No.13693903]

>>13693892
>news is sold.
That only happens with pajeet-type hype.
Like with announcements of announcements, which iexec loves.

By contrast, Chainlink's mainnet news was massively bought.
Because they aren't pajeets hyping up every little thing.

[Anonymous No.13693925]

>>13693157
The Israel of crypto.

[Anonymous No.13693976]

>>13693903
http://sys.4channel.org/derefer?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Fiex-ec%2Fv3-iexec-releases-data-wallet-for-enterprises-to-rent-data-and-ai-models-using-blockchain-e773a6bab69a

> little things. Ok

[Anonymous No.13694065]

>>13693976
If Chainlink did its announcements like that iexec video two days ago, I'd be very uncomfortable.
And judging by the recent price action, many people share my feelings.

[Anonymous No.13694080]

>>13694065
That’s a normal sell off after a +250 % in 2019 and and release
What did you expect ? Smart people sold the news

[Anonymous No.13694087]

>>13693459
Because they were attacked by autist pajeets and jo chart is worth it

[Anonymous No.13694090]

>>13694080
Are you a goldfish?
See >>13693903

[Anonymous No.13694098]

>>13694065
Same, I thought it was going to be live at Consensus. Prerecorded shitty video with a team that can barelly speak english

[Anonymous No.13694124]

>>13694090
You are pathetic
>>13694098
You too

[Anonymous No.13694137]

>>13693406
>Just pick a coin with whitepages that makes sense
We're reaching sell signal levels that shouldn't even be possible.

[Anonymous No.13694147]

>>13694124
Just see the quality of the work. It's cringy at least. The fact that you aren't changing your option after all this facts that you are braindead programmed npc who cant change how it thinks. Sad

[Anonymous No.13694214]

>>13694124
>dat anger
You've run the entire gamut at this point, but not in the right order.

[Anonymous No.13694231]

>>13694147
No one is this dumb
Hes a paid shill

[Anonymous No.13694770]

Link can't do on chain sgx and RLC can generate memes... I know which one Im going with.

[Anonymous No.13694779]

>>13694770
>Link can't do on chain sgx

You're a retard parroting nonsense.
See >>13693430

[Anonymous No.13694799]

>>13694779
District0x (Dnt) just made iexec meme factory obsolete

[Anonymous No.13694810]

>>13694779
and doing shit off-chain is a feature, for price and scalability reasons

[Anonymous No.13694821]

>>13694779
He's saying sgx verification can't be done with link on chain, but RLC can thanks to PoCo

[Anonymous No.13694864]

>>13694821
>PoCo
Adding the attribution on-chain via an oracle is at the exact same level.

You're parroting absolute bullshit.

[Anonymous No.13694993]

>>13694821
Point in case:
>just create a dApp with the logic of the Oracle (querying an API, processing different results into a final one); the iExec platform will automatically replicate it across many different worker; then the PoCo will realize a consensus on the different values
https://docs.iex.ec/doracle.html

So iexec's PoCo process is downstream from querying APIs. Meaning they're going to use SGX attribution APIs for their "on-chain verification" PoCo bullshit.
The exact same fucking thing Chainlink can do.

They are bullshitting you.

[Anonymous No.13695019]

>>13694810
Absolutely, that's what oracles are all about as well: off-chain computation.

[Anonymous No.13695104]

RLC MAKES iEXEC OBSOLETE

[Anonymous No.13695307]

whyyyyyyy