Bitcoin Cash

[Anonymous No.13679973]

>owns bitcoin.com
>@bitcoin supports it
>backed by bitmain, viabtc, and coinbase
>supported by multiple billionaires
>best devs in the cryptosphere (sorry greg)

You know this s the best buy right now

[Anonymous No.13679992]

>>13679973
~530$ very soon
then short

[Anonymous No.13680040]

>>13679992
nope. parity >$1000
then short

[Anonymous No.13680914]

The government and the banks are scared of BCH because it's the fork which doesn't fear competing with their fiat money while BTC is pretty but a nice string of ascii letters you could hang on a wall but can't use for much else in practice.

[Anonymous No.13680956]

>>13680914
Using BTC is truly the most unjoyful experience and its extremely expensive. Can't use it in a shop cause the block time is too slow. BCH has 0-conf which is nice. Dash has instant send through masternode governance. KMD is showing a loth of development growth. So does BCH and DASH


Thank me later.

[Anonymous No.13681011]

>>13679973
>@bitcoin supports it
Damn dude I'm glad a social media account supports it thanks just sold all my BTC

[Anonymous No.13681016]

>>13680956
>Dash has instant send through masternode governance.
BCH will have it slightly different in Avalanche. Dash has no edge here either.

[Anonymous No.13681044]

>>13681016
DASH and BCH frens forever~

[Anonymous No.13681446]

>>13681044
Why would I invest in Dash instead of something still small like ZIL?

[BSV is kang No.13681578]

>>13679973
>owns bitcoin.com
not even the more logical reverse would be true

>@bitcoin supports it
it's a lot more bitcoin than BTC, that's for sure

>backed by bitmain
what have bitmain done for BCH lately? is jihan dead or alive?

>multiple billionaires
maybe but not USD billionaires

>best devs in the cryptosphere
seems like they've made several sloppy mistakes so far. BTC devs are hardly better tho.

[Anonymous No.13681929]

>>13681011
>doesn't know the history of @bitcoin

[Anonymous No.13681952]

>>13679973
BCH is irrelevant when BSV exists. Both are technically better than BTC by far with 0-conf, no segwit and no handicapped blocksize. Low fees, fast transactions.

But on top of that, BSV also have patents, we have Satoshi, we have so many talented developers building apps on TOP of the protocol rather than fucking with the protocol. It's just no contest, and I while you may be fooled by short term price, technology will win in the end.

Come over to the correct side - unlimited blocksize and metanet soon rather than incompetent devs like ABC who fuck with the protocol causing havoc and uncertainty for everyone.

[Anonymous No.13681993]

>>13681446
> why would I take safe bets

[Anonymous No.13682015]

>>13681952
> patents

stopped reading right there

[Anonymous No.13682031]

>>13681952
Except the constant reorgs that will happen because of orphaned blocks

[Anonymous No.13682091]

>>13679973
we will see survive the next decade of btc dominance first

[Anonymous No.13682116]

>>13680914
Banks and AXA own BCH

[Anonymous No.13682127]

>>13681952
no-one buying your trash, nope

[Anonymous No.13682154]

>>13679973
See >>13681804

[Anonymous No.13682182]

>>13682116
Blockstream shills projecting yet again. The AXA and blockstream relationship is public. Quit spreading lies.

[Anonymous No.13682212]

>>13682182
>Have public relation with Blockstream
>Shill BCH in secret
>Playing 4D chess
Wake up

[Anonymous No.13682230]

>>13682212
AXA invested in blockstream not abc. Go back to bed

[Anonymous No.13682248]

>>13682127
By definition trash does not have function (value).
Bitcoin version without usability is indeed trash.

[Anonymous No.13682356]

>>13682031
Orphans are a natural part of Bitcoin. Read the white paper.

[Anonymous No.13682372]

>>13682015
Patents exist, and are enforceable by law. If you don't have them, you lose.

Have a nice life.

[Anonymous No.13682401]

>>13682372
BSV is going to 0

Have a nice life

[Anonymous No.13682416]

>>13682372
https://craigwrightisafraud.com/

[Anonymous No.13682452]

>>13681952
A reasonable post sir, but consider that unlimited blocks are not yet needed, 32mb blocks put Bitcoin within the range that challenges PayPal (190 per sec) and visa (2000 per sec). Forcing bigger block only increases centralisation as smaller mining operators who can't afford monster servers and fiber pipes are forced out.
BCH will increase the blocksize when it is reasonable needed.
BSV is significantly changed from the original Bitcoin, and isn't locked down yet, still more OP codes that weren't in the original are being added.
Craig is not all of Satoshi, he may have been involved, but more as a hype man shitposting on the original forums to keep the project alive.
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/op-ed-how-many-wrongs-make-wright/

[Anonymous No.13682494]

>>13681044

ZEC and BCH.

Rodger loves both

[Anonymous No.13682652]

>>13682416
http://ohmysatoshi.com/

[Anonymous No.13682687]

>>13682652
Opening quote by Jimmy Nguyen.
Bwahahahahahahahahahs