/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.13628705]

It's over. The revolution is inevitable, wagies.

[Anonymous No.13628726]

>>13628705
Lmao

[Anonymous No.13628745]

>>13628705
get ready for female FDR with brown skin on steroidz. Instead of sticking japs in internment camps it's gonna be white boiz though

[Anonymous No.13628822]

>>13628745
my gold portfolio is ready!!

[Anonymous No.13628830]

can't wait for the chinkification of the world. the chinks really are better than globohomo white liberals.

[Anonymous No.13628840]

>>13628822
What use is gold when they're executing light skinned people like orthodox priests?

[Anonymous No.13628848]

>>13628705
Kill yourself Ivan

[Anonymous No.13628851]

wow -3%! this is just like 1929!

[Anonymous No.13628856]

>>13628745
Who do you think makes all the guns?

[Anonymous No.13628862]

>>13628705
>commies on /biz/
HA

[Anonymous No.13628872]

>>13628856
Who do you think is going to gain control of the drones?

[Anonymous No.13628879]

>>13628862
/biz/ is more marxist than capitalist.

[Anonymous No.13628907]

all according to plan

[Anonymous No.13628909]

>>13628840
gold has maintained value through 100s of civilization collapses :)

[Anonymous No.13628911]

>>13628879
wanting billionaires to be taxed is the ultimate form of individualism. If you aren't a billionaire yourself it is in your best personal interest for them to become poorer

[Anonymous No.13628927]

>>13628911
All commies hang on the day of the rope

[Anonymous No.13628928]

>>13628705

>3%

NO, MY LIFE SAVINGS, ALL GONE

[Anonymous No.13628938]

>>13628927
sucking Bezos cock won't make you rich anon

[Anonymous No.13628940]

>>13628879
>invests in hyperspeculative asset where 95% of projects have no use
>thinks that breeds accelerationism instead of more capitalism
OOF. only a commie could harness such antagonistic thinking towards reality

[Anonymous No.13628949]

>>13628879
No it's not retard, trannypol just comes here to masturbate in their cuck chairs to other people making money

[Anonymous No.13628955]

>>13628745
will she make me fuck her pussy?

[Anonymous No.13628969]

>>13628911
>it is in your best personal interest for them to become poorer
only if you become richer

commie scum never heard "don't kill the golden goose"

[Anonymous No.13628997]

>>13628745
>Queen Sheboon fixin' to forcibly imprison the most well-armed, well-connected, wealthiest and most pissed off group of human beings in all of recorded history.
Kek. Let's see what happens. :^)

[Anonymous No.13629002]

>>13628938
Luckily trees are everywhere and ropes aren't very expensive.

[Anonymous No.13629014]

>>13628969
taxing billionaires isn't communism you moron.
learn what communism is before spewing dumb shit

[Anonymous No.13629026]

>>13628872
>thinking drones win wars
We've been in Afghanistan for almost 20 years and made no progress. An American insurgency would be Afghanistan x1000

[Anonymous No.13629041]

>>13629002
dance wagie

[Anonymous No.13629052]

>>13628911
Economics isn't a zero-sum game you retard. Fucking commies literally think real life is like a game of Candy Land.

[Anonymous No.13629065]

>>13629052
>durrr taxes = communism
lmao retard

[Anonymous No.13629067]

>>13629052
>implying

[Anonymous No.13629102]

>>13629052
>Fucking commies literally think real life is like a game of Candy Land.
Nah it's more like a game as described by Nick Land.

[Anonymous No.13629113]

>>13629041
>dance
Huh. I was gonna say the same thing.

[Anonymous No.13629147]

>>13628940
it's working you dumb cuck. there's a bill in usa senate trying to ban crypto because crypto is unironically challenging the hegemony of globohomo petrodollars.

[Anonymous No.13629176]

>>13629113
sorry wagie, but your cuck shift has been extended for 12 hours. the roping has to wait

[Anonymous No.13629217]

>>13629052
Income inequality is inherently a power imbalance.

[Anonymous No.13629318]

Lost 10k today. I welcome our bright future, comrades.

[Anonymous No.13629429]

We did it /biz/. We crashed the globohomo market by trading bits on our computers.

[Anonymous No.13629496]

Do idiotic commie cucks think that they will be able to just sit around and collect money from the government if it were communist?

I'm genuinely curious to how you think this would work, if everyone could sit around and do nothing then how would the country work? How would people get fed, grow food, maintain roads, etc? Would you force people into those jobs like slaves?

[Anonymous No.13629528]

>>13629217
balance***
ftfy

[Anonymous No.13629537]

>>13628705
what is that site?

[Anonymous No.13629546]

THANKS ALOT TRUMP YOU FAT PIECE OF SHIT

[Anonymous No.13629559]

>>13628822
Duck off peter Schiff

[Anonymous No.13629570]

>>13628955
Damb that's hot nibba

>>13629014
>doesn't know what payroll taxes are or what makes income taxes in general possible
>doesn't understand supply chains or anything else related to entrepreneurship
>worships the shriveled cock of a jewish guy that looks like a dollar store santa clause who lived on his rich friend's couch until the day he died

Billionaires are saints compared to politicians. kys

>>13629052
it's embarrassing watching people that don't understand basic division talk about installing a glorious planned economy managed by the people that brought us the Department of Motor Vehicles

[Anonymous No.13629583]

Tinder stock is still green.

finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=mtch

[Anonymous No.13629586]

>>13628705
Lmfao

[Anonymous No.13629618]

>>13629570
never said I am a commie moron. taxation is part of the capitalist system. learn what communism is before spewing your dumb bullshit and embarrassing yourself

[Anonymous No.13629627]

>>13629537
finviz.com

[Anonymous No.13629723]

>>13629217
You don't like the Pareto distribution, take it up with the Universe, you dumb cuck.
Only brainwashed slaves think that everyone should have equal economic outcomes and that they - and nobody else - should decide what constitutes "equal."

[Anonymous No.13629755]

>>13629618
>ignores the argument in favor of semantics
You can't argue AGAINST tariffs and FOR taxing our own companies and individuals without being a completely deluded partisan retard

[Anonymous No.13629767]

>>13629755
>taxing corporations bad
>taxing consumers good
t.30 IQ retard

[Anonymous No.13629850]

>>13629767
All taxes are passed to the consumer one way or another you grug brained moron, go ahead and tell us how Europe and China are doing things right when they've been the ones maintaining a lower corporate tax rate and higher relative tariffs this entire time-supplemented by massive income taxes

[Anonymous No.13629866]

>>13629755

[Anonymous No.13629887]

>>13629850
tariffs are directly paid by consumers you retard. I bet you only learned what tariffs are 2 weeks ago when trump tweeted about them. Fucking 30 iq moron

[Anonymous No.13629986]

>>13628705
Where can I see this infographic like in the picture?

[Anonymous No.13630082]

Communists are the lowest IQ good goys on earth.

[Anonymous No.13630182]

>>13628705
Overreaction.

[Anonymous No.13630249]

communism is based and redpilled.

[Anonymous No.13630302]

>>13630082
>not living in anarchy is LITERALLY communism
Get a grip, Cletus.

[Anonymous No.13630371]

>>13629570
The picture is sad its like arguing over some Naruto headcanon

[Anonymous No.13630391]

>>13628705
>>13628745
This is good for bitcoin

[Anonymous No.13630405]

>>13628822
>2019
>Buying gold

You are not going to make it boomer.

[Anonymous No.13630627]

>>13628705

Lmao.
Im only down 0.8% and up like still 4.8% in my stocks. Im waiting for a > 30% correction to shoot another 10k€ into the market

[Anonymous No.13630771]

>>13629887
Significant Tariffs were a standard US trade policy up until the early 1900s

>Trump
Buchanan, nigga

Tariffs are a consumptive tax on the soon-to-be "overpriced" and non-existent chink shit in our markets, the same as they are on the non-existent and-or "overpriced" American products in Europe. A deal will be made or new supply chains will be sought and built. (https://www.intouch-quality.com/blog/3-key-factors-for-sourcing-in-vietnam))

>>13629866
>"as percent of profits"

Kind of vague considering the outsourcing phenomenon (look at how this graph correlates with the Chinese manufacturing boom and multi-national corporate insourcing into China and others specifically). Multinational companies pay taxes to their multitude of host nations through a VAT system and other income taxes and a smaller portion back to the US afaik

[Anonymous No.13630804]

>>13630627
I wish I were a Jew, but I am just a physically fit Puerto Rican

[Anonymous No.13630812]

>>13630771
if you can't compete with chinks you deserve to go bankrupt. this is the free market. if you don't like it you can fuck off to venezuela

[Anonymous No.13630892]

>>13629026
>>13628872
Why would the USA (needing to fund its massive military) kill its taxpayers? If you haven't noticed, the countries bombing their people are countries that can't tax the populace, and get foreign support.

Russia has already stated they'd support an insurgency, and I'm sure other American enemies would have a field day.

[Anonymous No.13630953]

>inequality is immoral
>But stealing isn't

[Anonymous No.13631112]

>>13630812
This is the free market, meaning that we're free to do business with countries that want to play by our arbitrary rules.

>mfw China goes back to being an irrelevant stink heap just as quickly as it became a world power

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3009698/why-us-china-trade-wars-latest-escalation-could-be-good-news

https://www.vietnam-briefing.com/news/us-china-trade-war-inspires-vietnam-growth.html/

[Anonymous No.13631180]

>>13631112
Both dems and reps are against tariffs. The second trump leaves office tariffs are gone. Chinks don't have to negotiate shit, they just have to wait for him to be gone. Tariffs will hurt you, consumers AND corporations that rely on imports more than China. Got chinked again

[Anonymous No.13631214]

>>13631180
Yeah, I wish rampant human rights violations weren't so profitable but this is the market we gotta trade in. May as well adapt.

[Anonymous No.13631330]

>>13630302
Yes because as we all know, without these institutions there would simply be "anarchy". Kill yourself retard.

[Anonymous No.13631384]

>>13631180
If that's the case it's going to be a very rough 5 years for them, fren

https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/3004246/china-can-shake-flurry-bad-economic-news-soon-it-shakes

[Anonymous No.13631444]

>>13631384
Trump will fold long before Chinks. You seem to forget one tiny difference between China and USA. China is NOT a democracy. Corporations in USA have massive power and control over the government, they will exert huge pressure to get tariffs removed when they start hurting from them. China is self sufficient in all aspects and their corporations can't do shit to control their government

[Anonymous No.13631488]

>>13629217
hahahahhahahahaha

[Anonymous No.13631540]

>>13628745

[Anonymous No.13631580]

>>13629496
>Would you force people into those jobs like slaves?

[Anonymous No.13631584]

>>13629496
i don't think you understand how communism works. everyone is a worker who controls what happens (democratic centralism.) read das kapital

[Anonymous No.13631610]

>>13630953
if capitalism isn't stealing, why don't you get the full amount of surplus value produced by your labor

[Anonymous No.13631680]

>>13631444
You are right about China not being a democracy but you are also overlooking something very important

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/01/business/china-parliament-billionaires.html

>According to the Hurun Report, a research organization in Shanghai that tracks the wealthy in China, the net worth of the 153 members of China’s Parliament and its advisory body that it deems “super rich” amounts to $650 billion, up by nearly a third from a year ago. That is just a touch below Switzerland’s annual economic output.

>The wealthiest lawmaker is also China’s richest person, Pony Ma, whose net worth is $47 billion. He is the founder of Tencent, which owns WeChat, a social media mobile app that is indispensable in Chinese life. Tencent is now valued at $540 billion, more than Facebook.

>The fortunes of China’s entrepreneurs have changed significantly since the Communist Party, which was founded to work for the interests of workers and stamp out capitalism, welcomed businesspeople into the party more than a decade ago. About 20 percent of the nearly 3,000 delegates to Parliament are businesspeople, according to government news media.

[Anonymous No.13631742]

>>13631680
>up by nearly a third from a year ago
so.. their wealth went up 30% during tariff period? so why would they fold again?

Chinks play the long con, and you already lost

[Anonymous No.13631751]

>>13631584
His point is that none of you commie wannabes can qualify even as the lowliest value providing worker.
You'd all be gulag'd right away because you'd be useless in a communist society (and it wouldn't have the surplus to keep you alive because it will be mismanaged almost by definition)

[Anonymous No.13631855]

>>13631584
everyone is a worker who controls what happens (democratic centralism)

So basically we all vote on who gets what jobs? Great so all the popular people like chads will end up with jobs like lifeguards on beaches while unpopular loners like most of 4chan will be stuck as fry cooks the rest of our lives with no way of escape, sounds lovely

[Anonymous No.13632069]

>>13628911
go back to le ddit normie

[Anonymous No.13632098]

>>13631742
Confusing the net worth of parliament, a legally privileged position that billionaires have every incentive to enter, and the health of their overall economy or even individual fortunes is a mistake. Look fren:

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/02/chinas-parliament-has-about-100-billionaires-according-to-data-from-the-hurun-report.html

Notice something? In this 2017 article Chinese parliament had 100 billionaires, in the more recent article cited about 153 (from a third article I'd read, from a high of 209). The amount of billionaires in parliament itself increased by over 50% through the 2017 and 2018 period.

[Anonymous No.13632131]

>>13628705
So that's what communism looks like? Less money and everyone screwed equally?

[Anonymous No.13632132]

>>13631584

[Anonymous No.13632137]

>>13632098
You still don't get it. Chinks play the long con. They don't care what happens now, or in two years or 5. Your democracy can't compete

[Anonymous No.13632187]

>>13628705
Workers around the world unite! Oh wait ive never had a job and neither did that kike marx

[Anonymous No.13632205]

>>13628705
people is non effective and going to trash

[Anonymous No.13632242]

>>13628745
good luck, wetback

[Anonymous No.13632363]

>>13632137
>ruling party's power and national stability derived from the people believing in forever double digit growth
Oh I love this meme. Yeah the chinks are playing the looooooong game.

[Anonymous No.13632389]

>>13632363
and they've been winning so far

[Anonymous No.13632437]

>>13632389
Winning what? That retarded statement aside, that ever important cooked book growth is increasingly DECREASING.

Keep playing the "long con", champ.

[Anonymous No.13632451]

Bought Visa, Microsoft and GOOG at a 3% discount today.

Rate

[Anonymous No.13632461]

>>13632437
its its cooked then why its decreasing?

Also, decreasing growth is inevitable no matter how good you are. same reason why an african shithole can have bigger growth than germany

[Anonymous No.13632494]

[Anonymous No.13632573]

>>13631584
>everyone is a worker who controls what happens

[Anonymous No.13632801]

>>13632461
Because there's a limit to how much bullshit is believable. They cannot and will not able to hide behind local government contracts and empty cities for a GDP boost forever.

I know you're a retard, but still. There's a difference between slowly decreasing growth into a modern consumerist economy and rapid unexpected decreased growth for an export orientated nation. No one expected China's current growth to be this little (for them) even ten years ago.

It's make or break for both China and the US. Both with a lot to lose and gain, but at the end of the day China is still the seller.

[Anonymous No.13632875]

>>13632801
do you moron even know how growth works? the bigger the economy the smaller the growth will be. Chinese economy became much bigger compared to a decade ago thus their growth will decrease. Learn how basic economics works before embarrassing yourself buddy. China is the seller and the rest of the world is the buyer. Even with tariffs, they still outcompete you, that just shows you how futile your tactics are

[Anonymous No.13632904]

>>13628705
It's over...

Let's watch it logarithmic
>set chart in log

lol "over"

[Anonymous No.13633081]

>>13632875
>do you moron even know how growth works?
Apparently you don't and (You) also have horrendous reading comprehension.

>China is the seller and the rest of the world is the buyer. Even with tariffs, they still outcompete you, that just shows you how futile your tactics are
As if anyone needed more evidence that you're a diaspora fiddy shill. Also, I like how your relaxed brain sometimes forgets to use punctuation and capitalize words. It's cute.

[Anonymous No.13633147]

>>13633081
>zero arguments
>complains about punctuation

and the brainlet finally ran out of things to say lmao

its ok maybe until next time you will educate yourself so you won't get embarrassed again

[Anonymous No.13633208]

>>13631610
You do if you’re the owner

[Anonymous No.13633222]

>>13628705

[Anonymous No.13633295]

>>13631584
>everyone is a worker

Except for god’s choosen. They get to sit around and have fun while the goyim slave away for them.

[Anonymous No.13633454]

>>13633222
problem with communizm- people to happy and lazzy
only Stalin can deal with communizm well

[Anonymous No.13633583]

>>13633295
so basically like the current system?

[Anonymous No.13633622]

>>13628955
Well we know a good sense of ideology don't we?

[Anonymous No.13633651]

>>13628705
Salvery return will save capitalizm

[Anonymous No.13633736]

>>13628705
Fuck off with your social justice shit, kid.

[Anonymous No.13633855]

>>13631610
Nobody is forcing you to work for others, retard. You do it of your own will.

[Anonymous No.13633887]

>>13631180
If somebody's gonna keep tariffs and it not be Trump, the best bet might ironically be Sanders.