Let's set some things straight.

[Anonymous No.13591156]

Hi /biz/.

Lately I have only seen low-effort FUD threads on Quant though, and I wanted to let you guys know that the one dude who is posting these threads is dead wrong.
He is a long-time fudder of Quant and possibly some sort of sociopath.

Quant (QNT) has been dumping hard lately due to the following reasons:

1. Bounty Hunters getting paid their QNT:
The bounty hunters just got paid approx 99k QNT - I assume they have not done their research and just dumped their tokens for "free and quick money" on IDEX like retards.

2. Panic selling:
This was followed by panic selling by some holders, who also got let down by unfulfilled Q1 promises.

3. BTC Surge:
All alts bleed when BTC performs like it has lately - QNT is no exception to this rule.


Now to the good news.

Quant is not a scam, like some /biz/lets and FUDders are trying to tell you.
It was just featured as a "Cool Vendor" in the latest Gartner report - if you don't know what this means check this out: https://www.gartner.com/en/about

When the big fish (not bizlets) find out what a true gem this is, we will never see quant below double digits again. This is not your average shitcoin pump and dump, and the team is building something massive behind the scenes.

Consensus sponsor with great booth placement right next to AWS/IBM/Digital Coin Group etc, future bank clients, government partnerships, the Gartner report, an upcoming top tier exchange currently under NDA, the list goes on an on.

This project belongs in the top 5 and justice is about to be served.
You have been warned.

[Anonymous No.13591163]

>>13591156
>Quant is not a scam

[Anonymous No.13591174]

>>13591156

QUANT IS A SCAM COIN WITH ZERO PARTNERS

THE LOCKED UP TOKENS UNLOCKED RECENTLY AND THE TEAM HAVE DUMPED THEM

DO NOT BUY THEIR BAGS

[Anonymous No.13591194]

>>13591163
>>13591174

See?
This is what I'm talking about - low effort FUD with no substance.

I'm sure Gartner would promote a scam.
Fucking retards.

[Anonymous No.13591205]

>>13591156
dude lol, qnt is a fucking scam lol

[Anonymous No.13591264]

>>13591205
Except it isn't.

[Anonymous No.13591324]

>>13591194
If you had made real researches you would have sold already.

[Anonymous No.13591338]

>>13591156

SCAM

[Anonymous No.13591361]

>>13591264

It hasnt accomplished anything. At all. Zero partnerships. Lied about q1 bank. Lied about UN using quant to sign. Lied about hyperledger stuff.
Top ten exhanges for forever ago were bs.
No more ama's.
One of the most toxic telegrams I've ever seen.
There's nothing to like about this coin. It's alllllllll hype. It was a good narrative during the bear market but its over. Back to ico price. Will probably go lower yet in the coming weeks.

[Anonymous No.13591393]

>let you guys know that the one dude who is posting these threads is dead wrong.
He is a long-time fudder of Quant and possibly some sort of sociopath.

This is not true. There is more than one playing the game. Im also playing the game. And Ive been playing it long enough and familiar enough with the project to know who you are. Youre a cock. You always have been.

Stop always pinning the blame on Bosch or John Smith and using them as a convenient scapegoat to deflect genuine criticisms about the project.

If 'someone' complains about a lack of exchanges, its not always Bosch. If 'someone' complains about delayed bank announcements. its not always Bosch. And if 'someone' mentions that the team have been selling their tokens in the last month, its not always Bosch, or John Smith. Yes - the team HAVE been selling tokens in the last few months, but funny enough you choose to ignore it in your list of low effort FUD topics. How convenient.

Go back to your telespam bubble and draw your squiggly lines. You need the practice.

[Anonymous No.13591395]

>>13591361

>lied about hyperledger stuff
Proof?

Who cares about the retards in the Telegram?
It's almost like not buying LINK just because 4chan made it a meme.

Look at the underlying tech and the people who shills it, where the team has worked before etc.
If you think this a scam you need to get your brain checked.

I'm not saying this can't go lower, I'm saying you're going to miss out on something fucking massive if you're not buying some time soon.

[Anonymous No.13591400]

>>13591156
Scam project. Even the icon was lifted from something else. I would beat your ass if you tried to sell this to me irl, since I would consider it attempted thievery.

[Anonymous No.13591410]

>let you guys know that the one dude who is posting these threads is dead wrong. He is a long-time fudder of Quant and possibly some sort of sociopath.

This is not true. There is more than one playing the game. Im also playing the game. And Ive been playing it long enough and familiar enough with the project to know who you are. Youre a cock. You always have been.

Stop always pinning the blame on Bosch or John Smith and using them as a convenient scapegoat to deflect genuine criticisms about the project.

If 'someone' complains about a lack of exchanges, its not always Bosch. If 'someone' complains about delayed bank announcements. its not always Bosch. And if 'someone' mentions that the team have been selling their tokens in the last month, its not always Bosch, or John Smith. Yes - the team HAVE been selling tokens in the last few months, but funny enough you choose to ignore it in your list of low effort FUD topics. How convenient.

Go back to your telespam bubble and draw your squiggly lines. You need the practice.

[Anonymous No.13591414]

>>13591393
Then I am sorry to say I am not who you think I am.

The community is understandably pissed for the missed Q1 announcements and lack of liquidity, but this project is aiming higher than appealing to 4chan retards and whiners in the Telegram chat. If you can't see this you're a lost cause.

[Anonymous No.13591488]

>>13591395

Okay hyperledger stuff was true i just looked into it. But everything else i said still stands.

Also how can i look at the underlying tech when its three lines of code no one can see?

[Anonymous No.13591589]

>>13591488

Yes, bank announcements are delayed and no-one knows when the exchange will be announced. But it will be, and you will miss the fuck out. It's already rebounding from the dump.

You can start by reading Seqs article series which gives a great overview of the project, how it works and what it aims to do (you can skip the first one and scoll to bottom for links to the ones with interest).

The updated tokenomics that came out today also confirms that they will have gateways to process OverLedger transactions (AKA Nodes) so I assume those with 1k+ Quant can retire soon if that's the amount they go for.

https://medium.com/@CryptoSeq/quant-networks-overledger-part-one-blockchain-fundamentals-db7fdb43058a

[Anonymous No.13591594]

>>13591400

based

[Anonymous No.13591601]

>>13591324
Give me one single reason to sell.
I'll wait.

[Anonymous No.13591643]

>>13591601
you're actually dense if you don't think it was a good idea to sell on the crazy pump to 0.035, you would have been able to double your stack and more if you did, instead of bagholding like a literal retard through ups and downs

[Anonymous No.13591651]

>>13591589
>Yes, bank announcements are delayed a

BECAUSE THEY DONT EXIST YOU DUMB PAJEET


>>13591589
>so I assume those with 1k+ Quant can retire soon if that's the amount they go for.

working at mcdonalds isn't retiring

[Anonymous No.13591689]

>>13591643
Of course it would have been a great idea in hindsight, but they could also have announced the exchange and banks literally any time. Selling was risky as it meant you could be left behind at any time.

That's then. Now's now.
Now could possibly be the greatest buying opportunity ever shilled on this board. Time will tell.

[Anonymous No.13591900]

Seems like the bounce has begun already.
See you in lamboland, fellow QNT and LINK holders.

[Anonymous No.13591905]

pls recover

[Anonymous No.13592013]

Qnt is dead. Nothing happens other than announcements. Gilbert is like Justin sun

[Anonymous No.13592025]

>>13592013
Whatever you say, brainlet.

[Anonymous No.13592141]

>>13591900

Zoom out

[Anonymous No.13592166]

>>13592141
Zoom out even more then, this is not dumping forever. The rebound has begun.

[Anonymous No.13592182]

>>13592025

Where are the screenshots faggot? You promised them at +5

Now you low iq'd brainlet bagtellies are dropping to a dollar.

Taking out loan after loan to keep buying the dip of your delussional fantasy coin

[Anonymous No.13592183]

>>13592166

Zoomed out all the way. It honestly could go either way with that chart.

[Anonymous No.13592192]

The faggots fuding this are the same ones fudding chx. Uber buy signals.

[Anonymous No.13592197]

>>13592182
Screenshots of what?
This is the first thread I am making about QNT on 4chan.
I got tired of seeing bullshit FUD and this is my attempt to combat it. It would hurt me to see redditors see the potential of QNT before biz does.

[Anonymous No.13592216]

Even if you dont believe in the project or whatever this is a great opportunity for a quick flip. Its down near 0.01 now, should get back up to 0.015 easily enough

[Anonymous No.13592220]

Here it is zoomed out all the way. Whoch way do you think this is headed?

[Anonymous No.13592258]

>>13592220
Either way right now, but undoubtedly up like a rocket any time in the future.
Once treasury kicks in, gateways goes live, clients and exchange is announced, this thing will go the fuck off.

Short term I don't see it dumping more but if you think it will, by any means wait a bit and try to buy lower.

[Anonymous No.13592293]

>>13592258
That is only of any of it actually gets used. We have no proof that they will be used yet. Id just like ti see more rhan "we canr say yet" before i buy a stack. I got it at 1.25 a long time ago and sold around 3.50. Already did good here. Scary to pish my luck again with only promises.

[Anonymous No.13592325]

>>13591414
>He is a long-time fudder of Quant and possibly some sort of sociopath.

Theres only one person who regularly says the above. Nice try gayboy

[Anonymous No.13592335]

>>13591414
>this project is aiming higher than appealing to 4chan retards

> creates desperate shill thread on 4chan

Pick one gayboy.

[Anonymous No.13592398]

>>13592335
I am not Quants marketing team you fucking mongoloid. Stop trying so hard.

[Anonymous No.13592405]

>>13592398
What do you think of Removed? Do you think he is a raging faggot?

[Anonymous No.13592442]

>>13592405
Yes, with weird political views. He's still more redpilled than you when it comes to Quant though.

[Anonymous No.13592494]

>>13592442
Do you think he makes a good admin?

Do you think he lives in a trailor park and beats his wife when QNT dumps?

How is he more redpilled than me the anon?

[Anonymous No.13592512]

It's a choice of believing Gartner the world's leading IT advisory and research company or not really.

This rating by Gartner confirms clients and working tech. Up to you

[Anonymous No.13592543]

Qntconneeeeeccccctttttt

No banks, no clients, expensive empty offices and booths at conferences. Every announcement is empty and paid for.

I would say get rekt, but you guys already are

[Anonymous No.13592560]

Empty offices? Hahaha what kind of fud is that?

[Anonymous No.13592594]

Low effort FUD? How about Gilbert just sticks to his promises like he said?

[Anonymous No.13592620]

>>13592494
No, he's a shit admin because he gets too emotional, but he still realizes Quant isn't a scam.

>>13592543
Gartner cannot be paid for.
Being awarded "Cool Vendor" means THEY chose YOU because they think your tech is kickass.
The only other cryptos to ever be named "Cool Vendors" are BAT and ChainLink.

Look at their market caps, then look at Quants.

Quant is at 19M mCap, while BAT is at 448M and ChainLink at 235M.

Maybe you're starting to see the bigger picture now? Or are you just going to keep on posting empty FUD you've heard from some other biztard?

[Anonymous No.13592637]

Rekt by Qntconnect

We see you talking, patting each others backs. "Gartner not a scam bro, they simpletons". Well, guess what, hyperledger is fake chair and a paid for partnership. And so is this Gartner paid for report.

[Anonymous No.13592643]

Actually Civic and Orbs were also named Cool Vendors and there Market Cap aint so great...

[Anonymous No.13592654]

OMG Gil said that Gartner isn't paid for. It's almost like he reads the fud and tries to counter it with his one sided announcement lol

[Anonymous No.13592655]

>>13592512
Its not about what one organization thinks that matters. Its what the market thinks. And the price is a reflection of the current market view. The price dump in April is a reflection of disappointment from failing to deliver promised announcements + cockup of EU thing + team selling tokens. Throw in the Hyperledger confusion and this shit is gonna stay down for a while until Gilbert figures out how to play it, assuming he even wants to.

Do you agree with the current top 100 rankings on CMC? Because the market has chosen those rankings regardless of whether you agree or not. So at the end of the day, it doesnt even matter what you think or know about the project. You just need to be on the right side of the market. The market has spoken.

[Anonymous No.13592666]

>>13592620
No, he's a shit admin because he gets too emotional, but he still realizes Quant isn't a scam.

OK finally we are in agreement.

[Anonymous No.13592671]

>>13592655
What you fail to realize is that Quant is not dependant on the money in the current cryptosphere to succeed. They will get new money from enterprises, as well as the cryptosphere once people realize that this is the real deal.

[Anonymous No.13592673]

Gilbert didn't keep his promises boohoo.

[Anonymous No.13592688]

>>13592671
This is true. But as speculators I assume you want the backing of the cryptosphere so you can profit.

[Anonymous No.13592707]

>>13592688
Which will come after you retards start realizing which people the team is mingling with and doing deals with. They have a Rockefeller as advisor in the US. Enough said.

[Anonymous No.13592764]

>>13592707
>Enough said.
Its not enough though is it? If it was, you wouldnt even need to create this thread. The market would already have been wowed. But the news didnt do anything.

The problem with Quant...no ,the problem with QNT holders I mean, because Quant the company will do very well, but the token speculators need big household name announcements to drive the price...but this may not happen. Gilbert said so himself that these big companies dont go public with these sorts of things due to competitive reasons. So how will the price rise if thats the case? Are you really expecting HSBC to announce theyre using Overledger? Whats the benefit for them to do so?

[Anonymous No.13592795]

>>13592764
You haven't even read the tokenomics, have you?
Opinion dismissed.

[Anonymous No.13592825]

I THINK QUANT SUCKS

[Anonymous No.13592832]

>>13592795
Please tell us.
What services will be offered in QNT?
What will be their price in QNT?

[Anonymous No.13592857]

>>13592795
>Opinion dismissed.

Sorry, you cant tackle my opinion, but youre gonna have to try harder because it wont be the last time someone says the same objection.

Oh you mean the tokenomics which havent even been fully written?

If youre relying just on future 'usage' to drive price youre gonna be poor for a long time.

[Anonymous No.13592890]

>>13592795
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfHYp4qK4nE&t=107s

Check what Gilbert says in above video at 15:24:

"A lot of the clients we work with dont publically go out and talk about what thyere doing because they dont want their competitors to know."

You're gonna need to defend this statement. Pointing people to tokenomics is not enough im afraid.

Im actually doing you a favor by the way, helping you practice defending against "fud".

[Anonymous No.13592901]

It's a fair point about HSBC who are talking about partnering up with small fintech companies right now. We don't know if they ever will announce it but if they do use overledger as expected its going to be a big deal which will be locking up a lot of QNT tokens for licensing and every day usage costs all paid for in QNT. And there is more than one bank on board already. The lack of announcements did hurt but there is big progress being made at the moment. I'm sure some of it will reach the light of day soon

[Anonymous No.13592904]

>>13592832
>>13592857

https://medium.com/@CryptoSeq/quant-networks-overledger-part-seven-the-qnt-token-d6b945ea15f1

https://medium.com/@CryptoSeq/quant-networks-overledger-part-eight-enabling-enterprise-mass-adoption-f0e0e41363ab

Not feeding more trolls tonight.
Either you DYOR or you don't.
If you choose to believe in random anon biztards FUD instead of Gartners expertise, the tech and the team behind it, I don't know what to tell you.

[Anonymous No.13592924]

>>13592890

It literally doesn't matter if they announce the clients or not as long as they use it.
Quant is bigger than 4chan, crypto fud and scam coin accusations, and I would like biz frens to find that out before reddit and the people who subscribe to Gartner do.

[Anonymous No.13592954]

https://twitter.com/oraclestartup/status/1126026229990207488?s=21

https://twitter.com/hyperledger/status/1121741914674479104?s=21

Some big companies now promoting quant on twitter

[Anonymous No.13592966]

>>13592904
Thats just some sources written by some anon, not from the official team. You couldnt just answer directly without resorting to referencing some medium article?
>Either you DYOR or you don't.
I thought you were here to shill QNT. Sorry you couldnt handle my objection.
>If you choose to believe in random anon biztards FUD
So now youre resorting to accusing what i said as FUD even though I just linked you to Gilbert straight from the horses mouth.

[Anonymous No.13592972]

>>13592924
>Quant is bigger than 4chan,
OK get back to your telespam then, Removed, and stop posting here cos youre not doing a good job in answering concerns.

[Anonymous No.13592997]

>>13592924
>It literally doesn't matter if they announce the clients or not as long as they use it.

So you think crypto prices is driven by usage alone? You think people actually use ADA and thats why it ranked top 10? No of course you dont. you know its down to speculation, so just shut the fuck up and stop digging a bigger hole.

[Anonymous No.13592998]

>>13592966

So point out exactly what is wrong with the articles then.
The articles are literally promoted by the team on their Twitter - do you think they would do this if they contained false information?

You don't even have an objection, since you have not done the research needed to have an opinion. You are literally just repeating biz FUD.

Again - some clients may announce, some might not, but they will use the tech which is the only thing that matters.

[Anonymous No.13593021]

"We have spoken to many banks who want the same outcome. We can't comment on specific clients yet but we do have banks as registered organisations in our developer portal and have had for a while."

[Anonymous No.13593040]

>>13592998

No i didnt bother reading why should I? Shill me or dont. If you had read and understood it yourself, you would have been able to summarize and deliver it to me on a plate.

Not the first time the team has put out false information is it so why should i trust them?

>You don't even have an objection,

No client announcements = no price rise from speculators. Fact.

> they will use the tech which is the only thing that matters

stay poor faggot

[Anonymous No.13593044]

>>13593021

= Dont expect announcements from big banks. Ever.

[Anonymous No.13593048]

"We're working on this and will be releasing what we can with our clients and partners as previously mentioned. Working in Corporates these things take time." Re announcements. It doesn't sound like he's saying these will never happen does it...

[Anonymous No.13593052]

Honestly i dont care what qnt does or how honest anyone is or anything at all. Its at a good buy price. Id bet it goes up enough to flip it for some profit from here.

[Anonymous No.13593080]

>>13593048
>releasing what we can with our clients and partners as previously mentioned.
Its diplomatic speak, anon. Gilbert is good at that.

We all know about Q4 2018 and Q1 2019.
expectations....why Gilbert make those deadlines on himself if knew corporate world takes time? What happened?

[Anonymous No.13593092]

Yeah exactly. That's why I'm buying again. It's had a huge correction and there's a good chance that these clients will eventually get released. And when they do we all know what will happen.

[Anonymous No.13593094]

im going now gaylords. nice chatting to you faggots.

[Anonymous No.13593117]

Yep good chatting with someone who doesn't just scream scam. See ya

[Anonymous No.13593153]

>>13593117
No its not a scam. But you know something anon, sometimes its the scammy projects that pump the hardest and the legit ones that dont. Sad but true. Good luck.

[Anonymous No.13593236]

>>13592512
I worked for that company, they're shit and fucking weird

[Anonymous No.13593243]

>>13591194
Everything in this space is a scam until it proves otherwise you mongoloid.
The point is to make money not ride bags because of
>Muh tech
>Muh partnerships

Unironically never going to make it

[Anonymous No.13593280]

>>13593243
We'll just have to wait and see, won't we?
I placed my bets.

[Anonymous No.13593290]

>>13593243
>But im only here for the tech.
For real tho i just bought a small bag of qnt again. I got in at 1.25 and sold at around 3.50 before. I bet it goes up from here.

[Anonymous No.13593298]

>>13593236
Yeah of course you did LMFAO

[Anonymous No.13593322]

>>13593298

His dad works at nintendo too.

[Anonymous No.13593466]

>>13593322
checked

[Anonymous No.13593500]

>>13593466
checked

[Anonymous No.13593533]

>>13593322
>>13593466
>>13593500

Praise kek
Quant and ChainLink holders will make it together

[Anonymous No.13593894]

I hold eth qnt and link. I hope i make it.

[Anonymous No.13594254]

QUANT AND CHAINLINK HAVE AN ACCORD FORGED IN YHE FIRES OF THE BEAR MARKET.

THEY ARE BROTHERS; ROMULUS AND REMUS.

[Anonymous No.13594418]

>>13593894
Same. Got a chx bag too. Ready to retire and start my hobby farm.