running a node

[Anonymous No.13514731]

As linklet node operators, what are your plans for obtaining premium and niche data sources?

Was redpilled hard by statueanon and have since been looking into node operation, but so far the idea of some neets negotiating for a special deal with a company like https://flightaware.com/commercial/flightxml/ is fucking laughable, they'd just flat out ignore your emails unless you're a whale with multiple nodes

Can linklet node operators form a group and negotiate with these cunts under the name of group? There's so much talk about 'decentralization' but so far it all feels like superficial bullshit - this isn't friendly to small-time operators AT ALL.

[Anonymous No.13514953]

>>13514731

Stop spazzing out Leroy. Solutions are coming.

[Anonymous No.13515029]

>>13514953
mind dropping a fellow marine some crumbs on where to look for?

I'd hate to just wait while whales are already up and ready to go

[Anonymous No.13515877]

>>13514731
My solution was buying enough LP to stake my whole stack through their nodes at their one year out of mainnet estimation.
Comf.

[Anonymous No.13516434]

Set up a fucking weather monitor in your backyard you dingus

[Anonymous No.13516444]

I can't believe some of these faggots want to run nodes. It pretty much seems like we will be rich as fuck. if I have 40 million dollars why would I want to run a fucking node? The only way I would be tempted to actually run one is dropping a few million to do a brain transplant from an autistic NEET into a hot blonde escort that would live at my place and run the node on my computer as I jerk off and nut on her 5 times a day while she's rubbing it. Otherwise I'd want nothing to do with running some faggot node

[Anonymous No.13516445]

Why run a node when you can just stake and earn comparable income?

[Anonymous No.13516452]

>>13516444
This. Were guaranteed to be multi millionaires who gives a shit about running a small time node. The big players will do all the work for us.

[Anonymous No.13516453]

>>13516445
Or why would you run a node when you can go to Las Vegas pool parties on saturday and offer some whore 1 link to piss on her in your hotel room?

[Anonymous No.13516466]

>>13516444
Trips of truth

[Anonymous No.13516485]

Also Im the anon who wrote the the thread a few days ago where Im scared they will come and kill us. If youhave a nod pumping out link youll probably be more of a target than regular linkies

[Anonymous No.13516533]

>>13514731
So if I operate a node I need to get sources of data that will be called upon all the time? This sounds quite static? Is there like a more dynamic solution where someone needs data and I get it without relying on predefined access to that Data?

[Anonymous No.13516558]

>>13514731
>Small-Time operators
You really think this was built to accomodate some basement nodes, and their neet operators? Talk about deluded.

[Anonymous No.13516573]

>>13514731
Fuck off, Timo.
We're not buying your wares. Shill them elsewhere.
If people want APIs, they'll fucking pay for them.

[Anonymous No.13516580]

>>13516558
Correct.
LINk doesn't give a fuck about brainlets running nodes in their basements.
The end goal is to have people that know what they're doing running the nodes.

Ask yourself, do you know how to make an API call?
If not, you're not the intended audience

[Anonymous No.13516612]

>>13514731
Anybody who has considered this seriously has realized how and why CLC is so important, but the retarded hivemind has decided to call it a scam for retarded reasons and without having thought things through. It's really just low IQ pavlov answers at this point parroting the timo shit, which started as an ironic joke but is now getting unironically regurgitated, with no desire to actually discuss the serious matter at hand and the solution proposed. Let's just be petty and intellectually lazy and destroy our own cause. I don't think even 5% of us have actually even read their recent articles. Nevermind then. I won't try to argue. Let CLC fail, and hope that things will magically work themselves out. I can't believe we were collectively smart enough to understand link but too stupid to understand the critical API issue.

[Anonymous No.13516640]

>>13516612
Calm down Timo. You’re experiencing denial

[Anonymous No.13516649]

>>13516640
You're right, let's talk about how cryplets is totally chainlink white label instead. We already made it after all, right?

[Anonymous No.13516668]

>>13514731
Oh look, timo is awake again

[Anonymous No.13516688]

>>13516533
Listen Timo if you could help a brainlet out I would happily contribute to your scam.

[Anonymous No.13516713]

>>13516444
>he doesn't want free passive income
ask me how I know you're dumb, poor NEET

[Anonymous No.13516815]

>>13516713
If I have 20 million I won't give a fuck about running some faggot node in my basement while eating granola bars to earn some extra income. I will be going to college bars and offering the hottest 19 year olds paying their tuition for a semester if they give me a rimjob

[Anonymous No.13516841]

>>13514731
FUCK TIMO. FUCK CLC. We don't want this v-neck wearing, faggot swing linker in our community.

We are all in this together! (except Timo)

[Anonymous No.13516864]

TIMO IS THE WORST THING IN CRYPTO SINCE SEAN RUTLEDGE

*************

CHANGE MY MIND

[Anonymous No.13516897]

This shit from statueanon makes sense in some way but I interpret it in a different manner: it’s precisely because the API is shut tight that we will see big companies running nodes first. This is how we make it. His shill of clc and calling linkpool’s node a “hobby node” Gave him away. Fucking lol if this retard thinks he’s doing more than linkpool.

[Anonymous No.13516936]

>>13516864

[Anonymous No.13517129]

Honestly, the CLCG exit is inevitable. I just hope they just do it soon. Their shilling is so dispicable and transparent I just don't want to keep seeing their posts.

[Anonymous No.13517139]

>>13516444
if nobody runs a node the network will be centralized as shit. You can wait for the "big players" but at some point a few of us small shits are gonna have to contribute. Classic example of the free rider problem.

[Anonymous No.13517222]

I like how everyone was saying how shit LP is and how it'll centralize the network, and that marines should be running their own nodes

And now anons ITT are saying neet nodes are a meme, we should just be happy to be along the ride

[Anonymous No.13518303]

>>13514731
did you even read the website anon? why do I have to arrange special deals when the pricing is on the page and its price per call?

[Anonymous No.13518852]

>>13516444
>>13516452
only happy with making tens of millions with a once in a lifetime opportunity like this, what a waste.

[Statuesque !yB6Af/mohc No.13519758]

>>13514731
Good to hear people are reaching out, sad to hear you're having trouble. Post your cold e-mail script and we'll edit it a bit. Also, Linkedin is often more effective than the contact form.

>>13515029
There are a couple different directories. Google it, start working through the lists and find useful ones.

>>13516444
This community often depresses me.

>>13516558
Go listen to almost ANY Sergey talk again. NEET nodes reselling data to be written to the blockchain is EXPLICITLY what he envisions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfH1B85YyFU&feature=youtu.be&t=1166
He also hints at people negotiating their own deals at the end of this answer. Straight from the savior's mouth is what I tried to tell you all to do a few weeks ago.

[Anonymous No.13520868]

>>13519758
wouldnt linkedin annoy them?

[Anonymous No.13520892]

>>13519758
I won't be running a node because I'm a brainlet so should I buy more link or buy more linkpool or buy some clc shares?

[Anonymous No.13520965]

Running a node seems like a huge hassle unless you really know how to do it. I'd rather "lend" my linkies to some other guy's node aka pool and let him take like 20% the cut. Of course this has to be somehow secured via smartcontracts and legally so that he can't just run off with all my LINK. Like at least 50% can be withdrawed securely. I can't really explain how it would work since I don't exactly know how it will work.

[Anonymous No.13521020]

>>13519758
Based statue anon

[Statuesque !yB6Af/mohc No.13521848]

>>13520868
It depends on how you approach it. The friendlier and more personal you are, the less likely they are to ignore your cold message. Remember: you're essentially asking to negotiate, so they're looking to say 'no.' Slightly harder to do when they can see your face.

>>13520892
If you really think you can't run one, try and get into Linkpool when they open up to staking again. There's a 350 million pool that might well be devoted to incentivizing the early network, however -- shame to miss out. And, even if that's not what they're using the 'dark' 350 for, there's still money to be made from staking.

As for Linkpool v.s. CLC, DYOR. And not just into the companies themselves, but also into the new valuation research coming out: https://jbba.scholasticahq.com/article/7776-the-application-of-behavioural-heuristics-to-initial-coin-offerings-valuation-and-investment..

I might be getting a LP stake, but I hate missing the early multiple. Hopeful for CLC. Maybe the best move is to wait for mainnet before making any new moves, however.

>>13520965
Linkpool sounds like that exact scenario you're looking for.

>>13521020
Happy to say I've seen most of these in person.

[Anonymous No.13521887]

>>13521848
Have you seen the majesty of the Mannequin Pis? Beheld the grandeur of his visage?

[Statuesque !yB6Af/mohc No.13522945]

>>13521887
lol no. fucking gauls i swear.

[Anonymous No.13522993]

>>13521848

I'll take you around some great statues in the UK sometime dude :)