Hey guys...

[Anonymous No.13474485]

I don't know the difference between bits and bytes but don't worry, I invented bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.13474531]

>>13474485
this

[Anonymous No.13474537]

Where's all the bsv shills to defend this? This is brainlet tier calculations.

[Anonymous No.13474543]

>>13474485
is this real? big if true

[Anonymous No.13474547]

>>13474543
Yes 100%. I'm not letting this thread die until a bsv shill can explain this.

[Anonymous No.13474549]

>>13474543
can confirm its true, saw the tweet with my own eyes. craiglet is a brainlet and his craiglets are brainlets too

[Anonymous No.13474555]

>>13474485
my fucking sides

[Anonymous No.13474565]

>>13474485
hahahaha oh my god please be real

[Anonymous No.13474577]

>>13474485
>>13474531
>>13474537
>>13474543
>>13474547
>>13474549
>Ignoring the point to nitpick a minor clerical error.
This is why crypto must jettison all of you if it is to move forward.

[Anonymous No.13474588]

>>13474485
1.62 hours

[Anonymous No.13474599]

>>13474565
this actually explains a lot of things especially about breaking the speed of light. he can't do math.

[Anonymous No.13474600]

>>13474577
A fucking clerical error? Are you kidding me?

[Anonymous No.13474609]

>>13474485
Literally no human being with an IQ in the triple digits believes this huckster is satoshi

[Anonymous No.13474612]

>>13474577
being false on the basics of compsci should leave you ashamed to ever speak up again... and then there is this guy who always doubles down on stupid statements

[Anonymous No.13474616]

>>13474600
>He has never worked with actual genius tier scientists
>He doesn't understand that they make errors like this all the time
>He doesn't understand that nobody who matters gives a shit
Haha, stay mad pleb

[Anonymous No.13474618]

Wow, what a surprise that the same guy that called Bitcoin "Bit Coin" cannot even make some basic calculations.

I guess he really is Satoshi after all.

[Anonymous No.13474635]

>>13474612
Oh yeah, I'm sure if von Neumann made a math error at a conference everyone would explode and they'd strip him of all his credentials on the spot.
You guys are so deranged and out of your element, its hilarious. I'm finally beginning to understand the kind of mass hysteria that you hear about wrt the Salem Witch trials. The inability to think rationally is very real

[Anonymous No.13474643]

>>13474616
>>13474577
This one is actually correct. It OKAY to make mistakes like that even for legit solid guys. Absent-mindedness is not a sin. However, it still doesn't deny the fact that Craig has been involved in sketchy machinations.

[Anonymous No.13474653]

>>13474485

Fake tweet but nice try

[Anonymous No.13474670]

>>13474653
This is 100% real. I have a lot more dumb shit CSW has said from his BCH days

[Anonymous No.13474681]

>correct someone
>make a dumb mistake in the process
>hurr durr it could happen to everyone
the funny thing is he wanted to look so smart and ended up looking like the biggest idiot, don't know why you losers defend him

[Anonymous No.13474688]

>>13474643
I don't know if you have, but if you have already boarded the CSW-hate train, doesn't it worry you that your fellow passengers are uncritical foaming-at-the-mouth golems like
>>13474485
>>13474537
>>13474543
>>13474547
>>13474549
>>13474555
>>13474565
>>13474599
>>13474600
>>13474609
>>13474612

[Anonymous No.13474695]

>roger roger
Just dumped my $300k stack of BCH

[Anonymous No.13474711]

>>13474616
Genius tier scientist use peer review and actually check their work. I know this because my brother is one.

[Anonymous No.13474714]

Considering he wrote 32 m(MILI)b(BITS) i'd say he's trolling. Everyone jumping on the bandwagon "le hurr durr he's wrong he's not satoshi" are just bait eating fools.

[Anonymous No.13474723]

>>13474635
This is beyond a math error. This is basic CS that Craig fails to grasp. No one involved in bitcoin, let alone the creation of bitcoin, would make this mistake.

[Anonymous No.13474744]

>>13474714

[Anonymous No.13474750]

>>13474714

[Anonymous No.13474755]

>>13474711
>I know this because my brother is one.
>>13474723

[Anonymous No.13474760]

Still waiting BSV shills. Your attempts at defending this have failed so far.

[Anonymous No.13474763]

>>13474714
He is snarkily referring to the original BCH block size, the size of which it is common knowledge (32MB).

[Anonymous No.13474770]

Craig wrote the most popular tutorial for MASM, i dont think you guys have done enough research

[Anonymous No.13474775]

guys is this one a scam ???

[Anonymous No.13474774]

>>13474755
It is what it is. You can laugh, but it doesn't change facts. My brother has a doctorate in material science and did research for one of the countries top universities in the field.

[Anonymous No.13474787]

>>13474750
Man with multiple degrees in comp sci who teaches at a graduate level who has published papers on network aechitecture and infosec, has worked in the field for 25 years with more certifications than basically any other security expert and a history of being an absolute shit poster couldn't possibly be trolling a bunch of neckbeard faggots and laughing as they all jump around on each others dicks giggling "this proves it, this proves it! " nah no way.

[Anonymous No.13474800]

>>13474787
Yeah, i'm sure this is "trolling". Nice try.

[Anonymous No.13474804]

>>13474485
T O P
K
E
K

[Anonymous No.13474809]

>>13474643
Genius fags might omit some elementary aspects when working on a grand scheme. Being absent minded on the one and only point of your claim is retarded, nothing else.

[Anonymous No.13474835]

>>13474809
Kek

[Anonymous No.13474838]

here he is claiming you can download a 32mb block on a modem. standard talking point for him apparently.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gsuKwAoj6k&feature=youtu.be&t=30m18s

[Anonymous No.13474857]

nevermind /biz/ BTFO

[Anonymous No.13474864]

>>13474787
Kill yourself you shitcoin shilling faggot

[Anonymous No.13474882]

>>13474787
Kek pretty much this.
To the rest of the faggots on this thread: you are not even on the same plain of intellectual existence as this guy, but predictably you sneer at you betters like a bunch of insecure middle schoolers trying to tear down the one kid who did a decent science project.

>You miscalculated the surface area! Haha who's the dummy now!
Well actually you see we are working with non Euclidian space so---
>Fuck you dummy! Hehe, how will the little genius ever recover, right guys?!

Pathetic honestly. 99% of you will never make it, just as we used to discuss on BCT back in the day. You are simply not worthy.

[Anonymous No.13474898]

>>13474882
C O P E
O
P
E

[Anonymous No.13474921]

>>13474787
They will never address the doctor's actual body of (extensive) work and will instead cling to a tweet where they can twist their perception to feed the stupid narrative downloaded into their NPC brains by Gmax and Co.
Honestly I bet CSW was assuming some kind of compression here, but that isn't even the point.
This guy >>13474882 is right. The vast majority are just not very smart and they are not worthy of making it. They must pay for their intellectual dishonestly and laziness.

[Anonymous No.13474960]

>>13474921
cope

[Anonymous No.13474962]

>>13474898
>>13474960

[Anonymous No.13474974]

post yfw when u realized craig is satoshi

[Anonymous No.13474976]

>>13474921
>They must pay for their intellectual dishonestly and laziness.
Fucking Christ. Now the shills are even talking like CSW.

[Anonymous No.13474980]

>>13474962
cope

[Anonymous No.13474981]

>>13474857
nigga there are 8 bits in a byte
1B = 8b

[Anonymous No.13474987]

>>13474962
There were never any valid arguments to begin with. All of the explanations are just full of C O P E.

[Anonymous No.13474995]

>>13474981
practical bandwidth is more like 10 bits per byte tho. this is due to how the physical layer operates and multiple framing of data transmitted.

[Anonymous No.13475001]

>>13474962
No one that lies (demonstrably) about being the creator of Bitcoin can be an intelligent and/or decent human being. He's as literal shit as the pajeets he pays to shill his shitcoin on 4chan

[Anonymous No.13475006]

>>13474987
yes sv fags think emotional appeals and name-calling are arguments. they are fucking not.

[Anonymous No.13475016]

>>13474882
Yes, Craig is talented and versed in many subjects. However, people who bothered to spend their time and found outright fraud on his part (not talking about trivial mistakes or ideological clashes) are talented and well-versed too. As you can see, it's a struggle of talents. All you can do is observe and draw your conclusions, because the facts of his fraud are easily verifiable (while the claims of his alleged identity are not). Personally, I'm averse to intellectual dishonesty and I don't like theories that hinge on too many assumptions (like that his fraud is actually an elaborate game to troll people). And there is something very sketchy about the Kleiman affair. I just don't trust him. Oh, I'm also what they call "homophobic" and hate the LGBT & diversity agenda, so I somewhat dislike Craig and his team for personal reasons too.

[Anonymous No.13475020]

>>13474921
>>13474882
you are dumb thinking he is on some other level. you can clearly see he has an alcohol problem and he just talks like a fucking politician. but us people still follow their shit politicians and that is the only reason why CW has minimal support.

[Anonymous No.13475022]

>>13474882
>>13474921
I know, yet i still find myself somehow spending my time wading through all the shit to try and counter the most vocal of the retards so that others may perhaps see the whole picture. I've basically learned a lot of what i know from based anons who can be bothered to do the same despite the attempted shoutdowns by the NPCs. The rest of it i've actually bothered to listen to his talks and read the majority of his medium articles and actually tried to understand what he's saying rather than just go "oh what does a blockstream shill say about this thing i don't understand...oh cool yeah i think the same.... Fraud faketoshi"

[Anonymous No.13475096]

>>13475022
>"oh what does a blockstream shill say about this thing i don't understand"
>Thinks blockstream shills are the only people calling this fraudster out

[Anonymous No.13475097]

>>13475022
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_SoIXUBIhw

this is a shit show, how can you not see?

[Anonymous No.13475149]

>>13475096
Blockstream shills set the narrative, NPCs parrot them. One is paid by bilderberg, axa and inqtel, the others are useful idiots for their psyop. Have you read all his articles or are you basing your claims he's a fake off material from 1meggregs campaign against him?

[Anonymous No.13475171]

>>13475096
He should have said blockstream shills and their useful idiots like you. Is that specific enough for you, pea-brain?
>>13475022
>Wading through the shit
You are doing god's work, anon. Stay curious. The searcher of truth really is beset on all sides by jackals, some of which are evil, but most of whom are just weak and soft in the brain.
It really doesn't take much to unplug somebody from the matrix of lies if they would but spend an hour or two doing some undistracted reading and research. Unfortunately that seems to be too much to ask for in this day and age.
I don't even truly know if CSW really is Satoshi (okay, maybe I'm 95% sure at this point), but even if it turns out the screeching masses were right this time (fat fucking chance, but sometimes even broken clocks are right) people like us will still always make it because we have something the rest of these NPCs don't: the soul of the truly curious.

[Anonymous No.13475178]

>>13475149
>1meggregs campaign against him
For those who don't know

[Anonymous No.13475181]

>>13475097
u fucking retard, thats one of his most revealing interviews yet. god ur so stupid lmao

[Anonymous No.13475191]

>>13475181
Shhh, better to let them spread the truth, even if they do it unintentionally.

[Anonymous No.13475194]

>>13475149
i read enough of his shit to know he wouldnt get hired as a lowly code monkey based on his expertise.

[Anonymous No.13475197]

>>13475149
Make up your mind. The main narrative is that Craig Wright is Satoshi. Who set this narrative? Blockstream shills? The government? The haters? Only Craig Wright himself. If he never claimed to be Satoshi and none of this forged evidence ever popped up, none of this would have ever happened, no one would have gone lengths to expose him. Now you'll sure say that the fraudulent evidence was in fact made on purpose as part of a big scheme of things, but that makes completely no sense because it evokes the negative reaction you're complaining about.

t. a former believer who actually used to create threads about Craig being Satoshi back in 2018 and 2017

[Anonymous No.13475215]

>>13475194
I love how readily the lies just flow from your power saving mode brain. Just admit you haven't read anything and if you did you didn't understand it. It's ok to not have as much knowledge as someone with 25 years in the game, fren. It doesn't have to be the way that it triggers you so hard you have to start shouting fraud at him.

[Anonymous No.13475267]

>>13475197
He didn't say he was satoshi til wired and gizmodo doxed him. Then he said ok i'll prove i am he that created the tech that will usher in the 4th IR, render vanking cartels obsolete, stop money laundering, stop fraud, demonstrate i have millions in BTC and catapult me into the mainstream psyche. "oh wait, actually, i'm an awkward nerd and that intimidates me and ibam a bit scared of that, maybe i'll set it up so that i actually have plausible deniability and drip release it instead". Fraud fraud fake fraud, just prove it you narcisist".

Just because you fantasize for a world where you create something useful and the fame from being known as a smart person for a change, doesn't mean everyone else wants that. Some people like their privacy and don't seek validation from neckbeards and incels on a bhutanese DIY prayer flag forum.

[Anonymous No.13475294]

>>13475215
sorry dude is a bullshitter only brainlets and laymen think he said anything smart ever

[Anonymous No.13475322]

>>13475294
Says dude with nothing of substance to add who can't even punctuate a sentence and can't even criticise anything of craigs on a technical level. You're a lost cause but i'm sure there are some anons out there who can spot the lazy retard and the benevolent intentions of others.

[Anonymous No.13475325]

Why do BSV shills write such long winded diatribes filled with nothing but bullshit. Almost like they are all the same person.

[Anonymous No.13475340]

>>13475181
talking about implementing hyperlinks and FONTS with his system. niceee broo, if you want to support someone who only wants 1 system go on with him

[Anonymous No.13475346]

>>13475267
I don't fall for that narrative of him getting doxxed against his will anymore. Why would he fabricate a 2008 "satoshi" post in his blog in the same year, then? (It's an easily verifiable fact that I have personally checked) It makes completely no sense when you're trying to stay under the radar. Had he simply backed off from proving he's Satoshi, it's one thing. Had he intentionally been trying to delude the public, it's a completely different matter. Little details like that (I know, Craig shills dislike when someone pays attention to little details) give away a bigger and gloomy picture.

[Anonymous No.13475347]

>>13475097
C O N M A N J O H N

[Anonymous No.13475348]

>>13474485

>centralization is just capitalism bro

Always the same argument from this retarded scammer.

[Anonymous No.13475357]

>>13475325
its because its the same people who think its ok to pay taxes because the gov is doing good things with it.

[Anonymous No.13475363]

>>13475348
>hundreds of corporations in extreme competition is centralization

[Anonymous No.13475369]

>>13475325
Because i am not a shill. I am simply speaking truth amongst a bunch of slumbering fools in order that some with eyes to see and ears to hear may notice. Where have i said "buy bsv, will moon"? I'm just combating the falseness of those who simply ad hom, project their ancap fantasies on to satoshi and regurgitate the same tired calls of can't sign, not satoshi!
It appears strange to you because you're a lazy selfish retard who imagines everyone else acts the same as you do.

[Anonymous No.13475388]

>>13475369
I have no problem with Satoshi, though, I admire the guy and his work. This is what makes it so insulting that this document forger claims to be him while offering no proof. This is also what makes it so easy to troll people craigposting, it is truly triggering.

[Anonymous No.13475398]

>>13475369
>buy bsv, will moon
Exactly. I don't want pumps. I want adoption and use.

[Anonymous No.13475413]

>>13475369
>Because i am not a shill.
ahhhahahahahha

[Anonymous No.13475584]

>>13474485
creg has proven time and time again that he isnt nearly as smart as he thinks he is. and the internet has proven him wrong time and time again and also to be the lying scammer that he is. creg is being paid by ayre to pump BSV, its all a fucking scam centered around the BSV scam fork of a fork.

[Anonymous No.13475839]

>>13474774
I will laugh nerd. I work with a hughly decorated boomer genius scientist who has worked with multiple Nobel Laureates and guess what? >>13474616
is completely right. They get excited about something slip over a small detail all the time. You'd know if you worked with them and not just heard glorified versions from your brother. Craig isn't Satoshi though