HOLY FUCK WTF IS THIS

[Anonymous No.13452027]

CHECK THEIR WEBSITE
SWIFT IS INVOLVED? THEY FUCKING SAY THEY AREPARTNERS

for people who do not know; swift is LEADING company in bank transfers for more than 13000 (THIRTHEEN THOUSAND) banks and counting!

Fuck this im all fucking in holy fucking cancer

[Anonymous No.13452031]

>>13452027
I come here all the time and I've never seen this before.

[Anonymous No.13452046]

>>13452031
This. Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth. Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons. Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story. The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes. In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

[Anonymous No.13452081]

>>13452027
nice find op, been a long time since we had some real crumbs on here. it's awesome to know one day swift will be using my very own node to power their trillion dollar derivatives market.

[Anonymous No.13452088]

>>13452027
Lol nice photoshop faggot

[Anonymous No.13452101]

"work with" does not mean "partners" anon

[Anonymous No.13452104]

>>13452027
priced in

[Anonymous No.13452108]

>>13452027
This is old, very old. Besides, you do realise that BSV will make SWIFT obsolete?

[Anonymous No.13452118]

thank you serg

[Anonymous No.13452130]

>>13452027
OP I eat at places LIKE "The Savoy and The Ritz". Mainly McD's.

[Anonymous No.13452139]

>>13452101
partner1
NOUN
1Either of a pair of people engaged together in the same activity.

[Anonymous No.13452167]

>>13452130
This is the correct reading.

Imagine wanting so desperately for your delusions of wealth to be true that you willfully read vague promotional material - in crypto no less - as absolute gospel. We're reaching delusional levels previously not thought possible.

[Anonymous No.13452189]

>>13452139
lol. dude. in business "working with" and "partner" mean very different things.

[Anonymous No.13452204]

>>13452027
This might not be priced in

[Anonymous No.13452215]

>https://www.smartcontract.com/
>We're proud to be working with SWIFT on their own SWIFT Smart Oracle
>on their own
OH NO NO NO

[Anonymous No.13452217]

swift is the first breadcrumb there was

[Anonymous No.13452228]

>>13452189
>in business "working with" and "partner" mean very different things
They really don't.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_partner
>A business partner can be:
>A supplier
>A customer
>A channel intermediary (such as an agent or reseller), or
>A vendor of complementary offerings (for example, one party sells the hardware, while the other sells the software)

You're just a retard who bought into the whole "muh partnership" schtick the Chinks started in crypto about two years ago.

[Anonymous No.13452244]

>>13452228
lol how did what you quoted disprove what i said? talk about a non-sequitor

>Business relationships involve one participant seeking another to respond to and fill an immediate need. Partnerships, on the other hand, involve long-term commitments where each participant contributes to the success of the other. Business relationships can be moved from a zero-sum game to one where both entities strive for mutually beneficial long-term success.

chainlink and swift have a business relationship. sergey has "worked with" swift in the past to fill a need they had. there was no long-term commitment

[Anonymous No.13452263]

>>13452228
oh, i understand. you think just because that page said a business partner CAN be one of those things, that that means everyone you work with that is one of those things, is your partner.

idiot.

[Anonymous No.13452276]

>>13452244
>lol how did what you quoted disprove what i said?
Yes.
Even tenuous relationships like those I listed are often called partnerships.

>>13452263
>you think just because that page said a business partner CAN be one of those things, that that means everyone you work with that is one of those things, is your partner.
In a way, yes.
Only difference would be if the parties involved explicitly call each other "partner" or not. Which is entirely inconsequential.

[Anonymous No.13452282]

>>13452027
I use swift to pay for big tittie anime porn.

They are my partner now.

[Anonymous No.13452299]

>>13452276
>Only difference would be if the parties involved explicitly call each other "partner" or not. Which is entirely inconsequential.

strange. why does forbes disagree with you?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescoachescouncil/2017/09/27/want-success-know-the-difference-between-relationships-and-partnerships/amp/

[Anonymous No.13452314]

>>13452299
>strange. why does forbes disagree with you?
Forbes doesn't decide this.
In a general sense, "business partner" can mean a million things.

>business partner
>Definition
>An individual or company who has some degree of involvement with another entity's business dealings. The term 'business partner' can have a wide range of meanings (...) The term is also frequently used for two businesses that cooperate, to any degree
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/business-partner.html

[Anonymous No.13452342]

>>13452314
we are talking about partnerships. not colloquialisms.

[Anonymous No.13452357]

>>13452342
That doesn't make any sense.
You're babbling because of cognitive dissonance.

[Anonymous No.13452493]

>>13452027
How new are you?

[Anonymous No.13452565]

>>13452357
what is babbling?

[Anonymous No.13452586]

Ffs sold 50k link the other day. I believed the fud and my own investigations showed me it’s a Cayman Islands scam by a fat Russian con artist and his American twink bf. But SWIFT? God fucking damn it. Had I know of that I’d have hodld on.

[Anonymous No.13452754]

>>13452586
>hodld on.

kys for unironically saying hodl

[Anonymous No.13452820]

I am partner with swift too, I sent a payment the other day using a swift code

[Anonymous No.13453184]

>>13452820
You salty bro?

[Anonymous No.13453192]

i hate this place

[Anonymous No.13453206]

ya I can't wait for swift to use the hamburglar's erc-20 token network. honk honk

[Anonymous No.13453230]

>>13452820
What coin do you sell?

[Anonymous No.13453267]

>>13452027
the link ico was successful because they lied about swift partnerships. That alone should let you know that sergey is a liar and any claim of future working decentralized oracles are also lies. He's just biding his time before exit scamming

[Anonymous No.13453271]

>>13453267
How did they lie?

[Anonymous No.13453275]

>>13452027
HOW "NEW" ARE YOU?

[Anonymous No.13453294]

i've been reading this shit for 2 years. What the fuck am i doing with my life.

[Anonymous No.13453298]

>>13453271
they paid shill sites like coin telegraph to mention them and swift in the same article, when they had 0 relationship, which in turn created the /biz/ link meme because bizralies are too stupid to know that news sites are paid and genuinely thought that link was working with swift. Link is all marketing, they spent tons on PR and cross promotion fake partnerships. People here are too dumb to recognize this as marketing and think it's real.

[Anonymous No.13453302]

>>13452027
This retarded image reminds me of Powerpoint slides I put together at work to make my projects look good by glossing over details and playing up fake strengths. The only difference is I only have my salary on the line when I do it but Sergey has millions on the table. This is pure propaganda from a company without a product

[Anonymous No.13453319]

>>13453298
>to mention them and swift in the same article, when they had 0 relationship
But Chainlink did a PoC for Swift. This was announced in 2016, developed for a year, and presented at Sibos 2017.
Chainlink was the absolute only (external) crypto company to present at that year's Sibos.

[Anonymous No.13453320]

It's the definition of retardation that i still check in here after nearly 2 years of the bogs and this shit EVERY FUCKING DAY!!!

[Anonymous No.13453341]

>>13453319
no, they never did anything for Swift, if you actually research there is not a single mention of Chainlink on any swift website. Sibos is not swift, it's some shitty convention that makes money by allowing people to PAY to present their products. Anyone can present there as long as they pay. Couldn't be further from working with swift.

[Anonymous No.13453382]

>>13453341
>no, they never did anything for Swift
But they did.

[Anonymous No.13453405]

>>13453382
you do realise this is a propaganda text to lure investers right? Created by chainlink. Presented at a possible invester crowd.

[Anonymous No.13453409]

>>13453382
show proof from an actual swift owned website that they ever worked with link. I can create a swift compliant application on my own, then pay to present it at sibos (not swift), it doesn't mean i ever talked to anyone at swift. See, sergey is an expert at fooling brainlets like yourself to believing they worked with swift, when in fact, they did not.

[Anonymous No.13453431]

>>13452027

Is 15,000 enough to make it? Asking for a friend.

[Anonymous No.13453436]

>>13453405
Sibos is arguably THE largest international financial event in the world.
Are you saying Chainlink paid them off for a spot on the roster?

>>13453409
>show proof from an actual swift owned website that they ever worked with link
I just did.
Here's the link, since you're too lazy to google: https://www.swift.com/resource/blockchain-sibos-2017

[Anonymous No.13453444]

>>13452046
Basically digibyte mk2 by the sounds of it..

[Anonymous No.13453445]

>>13453436
No, i'm saying chainlink can say whatever they want and make it plausible. It's called plausible deniability.

they didn't work with swift and they'll never will. Literally i'm typing this out for 2 years now. Can't believe you guys still haven't figured it out honestly

[Anonymous No.13453451]

>>13453445
>No, i'm saying chainlink can say whatever they want and make it plausible. It's called plausible deniability.
But it's Swift saying it.

>they didn't work with swift and they'll never will
Except Swift says they did.
https://www.swift.com/resource/blockchain-sibos-2017

[Anonymous No.13453477]

>>13453436
he sure did pay them. Like I said, this is not proof, I too can create a complaint swift app on my basement, then pay to present at sibos and be featured on this crappy pdf. Did I ever talk to anyone at swift? No. Exactly what chainlink did.

I told you to show me a proof that they worked with swift, from a swift source. What you showed is a proof that they created a swift compliant app. I too can do that, it does not require a partnership of any kind.

I can create an app that is compliant with any company protocol or api, google, amazon, stripe, you name it. Then I can present this app at a convention. In no way does this represent any relationship between me and them.

[Anonymous No.13453483]

>>13453451
>ctrl+f "chainlink"
>0 results

[Anonymous No.13453493]

>>13453451
They looked in to the winner. They won't be using your ERC token of choice kid. Seriously. Think about it. They don't have a product in 2019. They sure didn't in 2017. The time of that brochure.

Swift system works perfect now, they're not going to use your shitty token friend. I'm really fucking done talking about this shit. Believe what you want, honestly sick and tired of this useless shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.13453494]

>>13453477
>I told you to show me a proof that they worked with swift, from a swift source.
And I posted exactly that.

>What you showed is a proof that they created a swift compliant app.
No, I posted a link to Swift's own main website showing that smartcontract/chainlink developed a PoC for Swift.

This is so hilarious.

[Anonymous No.13453502]

>>13453493
So you admit that they did work with Swift? Contrary to what you were trying to claim?

[Anonymous No.13453513]

>>13453483
Pic related was one of the slides shown by Sergey at Sibos 2017.

[Anonymous No.13453518]

>>13453494
>>I told you to show me a proof that they worked with swift, from a swift source.
>And I posted exactly that.
your IQ is sub 100. I can create a Swift compliant app in my basement alone in 1 hour. It does not me I have a working relationship with Swift.

Also, I can buy a big mac at mc donalds, it does not mean i have a working relationship with mcdonalds. Sibos makes money from people paying them to present. If you present, you are a customer, (like me at mc donalds), not a partner.

But to be honest your IQ is so low, there's no way you can understand what I just wrote.

[Anonymous No.13453521]

>>13453502
Yeah, they might have talked. BUT SWIFT WILL NEVER USE YOUR SHITCOIN. IT'S A MULTI BILLION DOLLAR COMPANY WHICH ISN'T GOING TO USE A FUCKING ERC SHITTOKEN FROM A RUSSIAN FILOSOFER WHO CAN'T EVEN MAKE A FUCKING PAMFLET.

Is your brain literally to small for this?

99 fucking % of erc tokens are money grabs.

Yet you think your fucking cherry picked shittoken which can't deliver shit, is going to be used all over the fucking world.

ARE YOU FUCKING RETARDED?

Honestly. Now. Never fucking reply to me again. Literally filtering every fucking chainlink thread. You guys are fucking dumb.

Not even joking. Can't you think for 2 minutes?

[Anonymous No.13453522]

>>13453518
>I can create a Swift compliant app in my basement alone in 1 hour.
And can you score a presentation at Sibos, and get mentioned on Swift's main website?

[Anonymous No.13453526]

>>13453513
>shown by Sergey
so... not from swift?

[Anonymous No.13453527]

>>13453521
>Yeah
Thank you for conceding.

[Anonymous No.13453532]

>>13453513
yes, sergey made this to make low IQ people like yourself think they have a relationship with Swift. I can guarantee you Sergey has never had any contact with anyone at swift, and the only contact he has at sibos is the sales associate that charged him ~30k to let him present his shitty product.

[Anonymous No.13453533]

Israel has no right to exist.

[Anonymous No.13453539]

Fucking link faggots still discussing 2017 shit. IT WAS NOTHING

You've been lied too. Yet these fucking retards are so smug to fucking think they are right.

>checks price.
dumped another 10%

>EOY 0.33$
>i would be surprised if it isn't 3$ by may 2018

Honestly fucking gas yourself fucking retards. You've been wrong 1453 times. Literally and yet you're still smug defending a fucking 5 lines of text written in 2017

I hope you hang yourself all

[Anonymous No.13453542]

>>13453522
>And can you score a presentation at Sibos
You don't score a presentation at Sibos, you pay for it.

>>13453533
agreed

[Anonymous No.13453546]

Honestly if i see someone with a fucking link t-shirt i'll fucking punch him in the face.

[Anonymous No.13453549]

>>13453526
What?

>>13453532
>think they have a relationship with Swift
>I can guarantee you Sergey has never had any contact with anyone at swift
He developed and presented a PoC for them.

>>13453542
>You don't score a presentation at Sibos, you pay for it.
lmao, someone's jealous.

[Anonymous No.13453554]

>>13453539
>>13453546
You sound upset.

[Anonymous No.13453558]

>>13453549
still not a single proof of swift mentioning chainlink ever

the fake url you gave has 0 mentions of chainlink. the charade is up buddy, only a sub 40 IQ tard would fall for that at this point

[Anonymous No.13453565]

>>13453558
>still not a single proof of swift mentioning chainlink ever
>0 mentions of chainlink
See >>13453513

[Anonymous No.13453572]

>>13453565

That's still not Swift mentioning Chainlink... haha wtf are you broken?

[Anonymous No.13453573]

>>13453565
>a presentation by sergey
man, you really are dumb. Sergey mentioning swift is not the same as SWIFT mentioning chainlink

JUST POST PROOF ALREADY

[Anonymous No.13453574]

>>13453554
I'm fucking raging.

You literally have been wrong for 2 years. 2 years straight, everything about link has been false.

And you are fucking smug defending a 5 sentences piece of text from 2017.

I can't grasp how deluded you are. Seriously. You can't even admit you have been wrong for all this years.

Yet you have to come smear this smug shit in my face every fucking day, every fucking day the same threads. Every fucking day new lies.

OOOOOOH but 130000 banks will use chainlink.

no you fucking retard, no one will use chainlink. Even if they deliver. News flash, nobody uses crypto after 10 years.

Nobody will use your shitty fucking fuck moneygrab token.

[Anonymous No.13453579]

>>13453549
>He developed and presented a PoC for them.
No, he did not do it for them. At least they were never aware that he did it for them, because they never had any contact with him.

Nobody reading this conversation will agree with you, your arguments are completely retarded.

[Anonymous No.13453586]

jfc what the fuck is going on here

[Anonymous No.13453594]

>>13453572
>>13453573
Oh boy, look at those goalposts fly.
The discussion was about whether Sergey did work for Swift, not whether Swift literally mentioned Chainlink.

>>13453579
>No, he did not do it for them. At least they were never aware that he did it for them, because they never had any contact with him.
Except he developed and presented a PoC for them.
Source: https://www.swift.com/resource/blockchain-sibos-2017

[Anonymous No.13453606]

>>13452027
/r the copypasta about "I wake up at 6am, I need no alarm" and paying whores .0003 REQ or something

[Anonymous No.13453610]

>>13453594
that is a source that he did a PoC on his own, using swift technology publicly available to anyone. It is not a source that he did it for them. He did not do it for them. He did it for himself, by himself. Then paid to present it at sibos.

[Anonymous No.13453614]

>>13453594
>Sergey did work for Swift
WHERE IS THE PROOF?? THE LINK YOU POSTED DOESN'T MENTION SERGEY OR CHAINLINK OR ANYTHING. YOU HAVE 0 PROOF

[Anonymous No.13453615]

Rolling

[Anonymous No.13453620]

>>13453614
Do you not know what smartcontract.com is?

[Anonymous No.13453635]

>>13453620
please put all your money in this. Sell everything you have. Do it.

[Anonymous No.13453660]

>>13453620
it says they made a presentation. where does it say they worked for swift?

[Anonymous No.13453687]

fyi Rory has said they've maintained the relationship outlined on the website.

[Anonymous No.13453708]

>>13453660
That anon is sweating rn lmao

[Anonymous No.13453712]

>>13453687
so no relationship lol

[Anonymous No.13453724]

>>13453660
They developed the PoC for Swift.

[Anonymous No.13453733]

>>13453724
>They developed the PoC for Swift.
I also developed a PoC for swift. They never saw it, cause I have no relationship with them, neither does chainlink.

[Anonymous No.13453745]

>>13453724
did swift ask them to? no. a bunch of companies won some random contest one of them smartcontracts and as part of their reward they got invited to make a presentation. swift never asked them to do anything

[Anonymous No.13453751]

>>13453594

I only jumped in at the tail end of the discussion to point out that a poster made by Chainlink mentioning Swift, is not Swift Mentioning Chainlink, which I still haven't seen proof of

Where in that Blockchain Sibos 2017 pdf I downloaded, does it mention Chainlink???

[Anonymous No.13453752]

>>13453724
I developed an app for Swift. Swift is completely unaware I did. They don't care about it. They won't use it. We have no working relationship. But I still developed it FOR Swift.

[Anonymous No.13453758]

>>13453733
>I also developed a PoC for swift
>>13453752
>I developed an app for Swift

Did you also get to present at Sibos?

>>13453745
>did swift ask them to?
Of course.
They even paid them 100k for it.

[Anonymous No.13453764]

>>13453758
>They even paid them 100k for it.
proof?

[Anonymous No.13453772]

>>13453758
>Did you also get to present at Sibos?
No because I don't have 30k to pay them to present there. But I sure could if I did.

[Anonymous No.13453802]

>>13453772
>30k
>to present at the biggest financial event in the world
You sure are cute, anon.

You're probably thinking of being an exhibitor at Sibos, that's open to anyone.
Not presentations though.

>>13453764
Google it.

[Anonymous No.13453815]

>>13453764
Not him, but here you go faggot.

[Anonymous No.13453821]

>>13453758
It's actually fucking amazing how perfectly Link orchestrate their scam to fool low IQ investors.

They created an app using publicly available swift APIs making people think they're actually working with them, then pay to present it at a convention organized by Swift, to further reinforce this false fact.

Truly masterful scam.

[Anonymous No.13453824]

>>13452027
Nigger, this has been old news for a long time now.

[Anonymous No.13453828]

>>13453815
It was a good whitepaper.

That's it. Clever whitepaper/marketing. Enjoy your bags

[Anonymous No.13453833]

>>13453815
>>13453802
>source: sergey
toplmao. still 0 proof of swift ever mentioning sergey or chainlink

[Anonymous No.13453844]

>>13453821
>They created an app using publicly available swift APIs making people think they're actually working with them
If that PoC wasn't developed for Swift, then why would Swift allow them to present at Sibos?
Or mention them on their official website?
Or pay them?

>>13453828
That, and a PoC for Swift.

>>13453833
100k is the standard reward for winning Innotribe, which Sergey did.

[Anonymous No.13453860]

>>13453833
>still 0 proof of swift ever mentioning sergey
https://www.sibos.com/conference/2017/speakers/sergey-nazarov

[Anonymous No.13453875]

>>13453844
do you admit that he just won a contest and swift never actually willingly hired him for anything?
>>13453860
>sibos is swift

[Anonymous No.13453877]

>>13453844
>>13453860
Ok, nice, when is swift going to implement chainlinks product?

[Anonymous No.13453883]

>>13452027

Haha, baby first breadcrumb

My recommendation, buy some link and get the fuck out this site for a few years or else these things will happen to you

>sex addiction
>schizophrenia
>gambling addiction
>huge depression when you realize nobody cares
>price anxiety
>accumulating anxiety
>occultism paranoia
>you will lose your soul

Your work will start to feel lame, you won't have the same energy, and quickly enough the only satisfaction you will get will come from fudding your own investment

Take care anon, buy link and gtfo of this page

[Anonymous No.13453889]

>>13453844
so the 100k comes from winning a competition?

That's not a working relationship. That's simply beating other shitty participants in a game.

[Anonymous No.13453890]

>>13453875
>sibos is swift
Oh god why wouldn't you just google it before making an idiot of yourself like that.

[Anonymous No.13453908]

>>13453875
>>sibos is swift
Guess what the first 'S' in 'Sibos' stands for.

[Anonymous No.13453921]

>>13453890
sibos is not swift nigger. It's some conference that makes money from selling space for companies to advertise. When you buy a spot from them, you are a customer, not a partner. Chainlink is a customer of sibos, not a partner of swift.

I'm not a parter with amazon because I bought some hosting on AWS (though some scam ICOs not unlike Link have actually tried to claim this kek).

[Anonymous No.13453923]

>>13453890
>>13453908
>going to an event organized by swift is the same thing as working for swift

[Anonymous No.13453927]

>>13453889
>a game
A game called "develop a PoC for Swift and get to present it at the world's premier financial event", sure.

>>13453921
>sibos is not swift
It literally is.

>>13453923
They did a year of work on the PoC before going to the event they were invited to present at.

[Anonymous No.13453946]

>>13453923
>>13453921
Trying way too hard.

[Anonymous No.13453954]

>>13453927
No, it's organised by swift. it's not swift
Great now can swift throw away the PoC.
good they won 100k. More mcdonalds i guess.

That was it, congrats your shittoken will still not be used, not by swift, not by anyone else. If they even deliver in the first place

[Anonymous No.13453970]

>>13453927
they were invited because they won a contest. their invitation was part of their prize. swift never chose them or hired them for anything
>>13453946
cope

[Anonymous No.13453976]

>>13453267
>>13453298
>>13453341
>>13453409
>>13453477
>>13453518
>>13453532
>>13453542
>>13453579
>>13453610
Ffs. How low did you fucking sell?

[Anonymous No.13453993]

Do brainlets not understand that 'a swift chainlink' is not for banks themselves to use chainlink for all their operations, but for businesses like insurance, Uber etc to use banking APIs to verify payments etc. A confirmation of partnership will not come from swift themselves, they're simply implementing inputs and outputs.

[Anonymous No.13453997]

>>13453976
I don't hold anything below top5 market cap. Only reason I hate link is cause I am jealous this fat russian scammer with no skill is getting away with his scam while I have to wagecuck. He should be in jail for securities fraud.

[Anonymous No.13454028]

>>13453954
>it's organised by swift. it's not swift
Are you having a cerebral hemorrhage, live on the internet?

>>13453970
>their invitation was part of their prize
So Chainlink somehow cheated by winning?

[Anonymous No.13454041]

>>13454028
>So Chainlink somehow cheated by winning?
winning a competition organized by swift is not working with, working for, being a partner of, or having a working relationship with swift.

You obviously think so, but you are incorrect.

[Anonymous No.13454048]

>>13454028

Clutching at straws. Presenting a Proof of Concept is not swift working with them. They outsource these events to their marketing department and probably outsource the event management to another company

No evidence of Swift mentioning or working with Chainlink, that's where we are right now

[Anonymous No.13454055]

>>13454041
>winning a competition organized by swift is not working with, working for, being a partner of, or having a working relationship with swift.
Winning that competition opened the door for them to work with Swift.
Hence the PoC.

>>13454048
>Presenting a Proof of Concept is not swift working with them.
How is "developing a PoC for Swift" not "working with Swift"?

[Anonymous No.13454060]

good now this discussion from 2017 is finished, we can start at 2018 tomorrow. Will it be 3$ by may 2018? I honestly would be very surprised if it wasn't.

[Anonymous No.13454074]

>>13454055
>Winning that competition opened the door for them to work with Swift.
It did not open a door. They won some competition (apparently? where's the proof?). Then they did some PoC on their own using publicly available swift apis.

[Anonymous No.13454076]

>>13452027
newfag found chainlink good job OP only took you two years fucking faggot

[Anonymous No.13454082]

>>13452027
LMAO

we've known this since day 1

[Anonymous No.13454083]

>>13453970
>>13454048
>>13454041
Here's a little nugget for you, see pic.

Swift thinks so highly of Chainlink's PoC that they mentioned it as one of the key examples of ISO 20022 implementation.
Right alongside their flagship GPI project.

[Anonymous No.13454085]

>>13452130
Based

[Anonymous No.13454095]

>>13454074
>It did not open a door
Yes it did open a door.

[Anonymous No.13454103]

>>13452130
For me, it's the McChicken. The best fast food sandwich. I even ask for extra McChicken sauce packets and the staff is so friendly and more than willing to oblige.

One time I asked for McChicken sauce packets and they gave me three. I said, "Wow, three for free!" and the nice friendly McDonald's worker laughed and said, "I'm going to call you 3-for-free!".

Now the staff greets me with "hey it's 3-for-free!" and ALWAYS give me three packets. It's such a fun and cool atmosphere at my local McDonald's restaurant, I go there at least 3 times a week for lunch and a large iced coffee with milk instead of cream, 1-2 times for breakfast on the weekend, and maybe once for dinner when I'm in a rush but want a great meal that is affordable, fast, and can match my daily nutritional needs.

I even dip my fries in McChicken sauce, it's delicious! What a great restaurant.

[Anonymous No.13454110]

>>13454083

ISO 20022, a messaging standard for Financial Institutions.

>Still doesn't mention Chainlink

[Anonymous No.13454113]

>>13454095
>Yes it did open a door.
prove it. the pdf you keep saying does not say swift asked them or paid to do anything. You're simply implying because you're a brainlet.

[Anonymous No.13454130]

>>13454113
You don't get to present at Sibos if you aren't invited, anon.

[Anonymous No.13454132]

>>13454083
I'm not impressed by that at all. Any company would shill the adoption of their own product by another. Chainlink is simply using their publicly available api that anyone can use. No partnership or working relationship at all.

I'm not a partner of Google because I used the Google map to create an app.

[Anonymous No.13454140]

>>13454130
>You don't get to present at Sibos if you aren't invited, anon.
of all the speakers at sibos, 99% of them have 0 working relationship with swift. Neither does chainlink.

[Anonymous No.13454143]

>>13454132
>look pal i like shitting on the street as much as the rest of Mumbai.
and that's where he stopped reading.

[Anonymous No.13454145]

>>13454130
"Yeah, i was wrong on this one."

Why is this so fucking hard for link bagholders.

[Anonymous No.13454148]

>>13454132
Swift paid Sergey to develop and present a PoC for them at Sibos, and Swift mentioned that PoC as one of the key examples of ISO 20022 implemantion.

But anon over here isn't impressed.

[Anonymous No.13454152]

>>13454140
>of all the speakers at sibos, 99% of them have 0 working relationship with swift
The ones that did a PoC for Swift sure had working relationships with Swift.

>>13454145
Wrong about what?

[Anonymous No.13454154]

>>13454140
also, you don't need to get invited, anyone can apply to speak at sibos. Chainlink could easily get a spot because they look legit at first glance.

[Anonymous No.13454160]

>>13452046
Sergey was a mess at that event.

[Anonymous No.13454161]

>>13454154
>anyone can apply to speak at sibos
>if you look legit at first glance you could easily get a spot
Well shit nigger, what are you still doing here?

[Anonymous No.13454163]

>>13454148
>Swift paid Sergey to develop and present a PoC for them at Sibos
No. Show proof.

So far there is not even proof they have won this competition, simply that they spoke at sibos, which anyone can do.

The other retard linky claims they won a competition, then got invited to speak, which is not impressive or a partnership at all.

[Anonymous No.13454172]

>>13454163
>Show proof.
>So far there is not even proof they have won this competition
Why don't you look it up?

[Anonymous No.13454184]

>>13454163
>anyone can speak at Sibos
Looking forward to hearing from you at the next Sibos, anon.

[Anonymous No.13454187]

>>13454172
>>13454184
cool so both you faggots have ran out of arguments.

[Anonymous No.13454192]

>>13454187
Yes, I ran out of arguments, you are right.
Anyone can present a PoC for Swift at Sibos.

So I am very much looking forward to hearing from you at the next Sibos.

[Anonymous No.13454225]

>>13453997
Seething

[Anonymous No.13454229]

>>13454152
Pick any statement said by link shills in the last 2 years. 95% are lies.

[Anonymous No.13454246]

>>13454229
>lies
ok_kid.jpg

[Anonymous No.13454285]

Hasnt that logo been on the site for months?

[Anonymous No.13454296]

>>13454246
good argument

[Anonymous No.13454311]

>>13454296
I'm not here to argue, but to point and laugh

[Anonymous No.13454318]

>>13454311
I do that while checkibg the price and the mainnet

[Anonymous No.13454324]

>>13454172
>>13454184
Anons just sell your LINK and chase the current PnD flavour of the month. The LINK meme has almost ran it's course.

[Anonymous No.13454335]

>>13454324

Whays yhe current flavour? Dont say lit or bolt

[Anonymous No.13454343]

Why are people so obsessed with chainlink?Can i get a quick rundown,im new to crypto

only invested in dogecoin so far

[Anonymous No.13454383]

>>13454335
Those are dead already. Keep an eye out on social media for newly shilled shitcoins.

[Anonymous No.13454403]

>>13454343
Crypto is only worthwhile because of blockchain, blockchain is only worthwhile because of smart contracts, smart contracts are worthless without oracles, oracles are worthless if they're not decentralized, chainlink is the leader in decentralized oracles.

It really is that simple.

NOTHING ELSE MATTERS.

You really will be a millionaire in five years.

[Anonymous No.13454423]

>>13454403
kek
>this is how link bagholders are able to sleep at night

[Anonymous No.13454428]

>>13454083
>https://www.swift.com/resource/blockchain-sibos-2017
>ctrlf+f chainlink
>0 results

[Anonymous No.13454432]

>>13452027
This is fucking exciting, those discord trannies should learn from you instead of focusing on their circle jerk #link-dots channel

[Anonymous No.13454439]

>>13454082
what are you talking about? I've been in LINK since 2016 and this is the first time I've heard about LINK & SWIFT

[Anonymous No.13454455]

>>13452027
I'M BUSINESS PARTNERS WITH AMAZON.COM!!!!!!
...
...
>I run a 100 monthly user blog that affiliate links to different types of sandpaper...

[Anonymous No.13454486]

>>13453409
proof

[Anonymous No.13454503]

>>13454486
nice photoshop.
Link is a total scam. Even summerchilds know that

[Anonymous No.13454514]

>>13454439
>I've been in LINK since 2016

[Anonymous No.13454516]

This thread and the massive autistic delusional behavior you can witness from retards or pajeets on /biz/ constitute a real goldmine if you want to understand why there is so many FUD surrounding Chainlink. Just look at the desperate posts coming from Linkies bagholders who are mostly reaching for hope with their supposed partnerships or project implementations. It turns out the aforementioned companies only talked about smart contracts globally, but the hopeful brainlets automatically associated the term with their pitiful ERC20 overvalued token. I'm not joking, they are unable to provide actual evidence or big names.The rare times when Chainlink's name was actually dropped were insignificant, "what if" possibilities by literal who companies with no weight nor presence in the technology industry. Meaning that the massive adoption of their json parser will never happen - there is a plethora of projects who are actually trying to address and come up with a solution for the oracle problem with dedicated and more competent teams than the two man job we have with Chainlink. At least, I can salute the marketing effort and the memes who are really great and entertaining if you want to have a laugh. Sadly, it's the only value Link will ever have for most people who actually understand the current state of the crypto market.

The only way to arguably make it left in the crypto market is the BTC halvening happening in one year. And even that is not guaranteed, normies won't fall for the trap twice. Still, if you believe, you have approximately two years left to accumulate as much as BTC as possible for what may be the biggest bull run that will be coming.

But yeah, keep believing in your stinky linkies, your double or triple digits, and it will surely happen happen. Link will moon, guaranteed. It's only a matter of time. "Do not underestimate the power of collective thought... $1000 EOY!" soon™

[Anonymous No.13454548]

>>13454516
Didn't read kys

[Anonymous No.13454553]

An issue that must be addressed before proceeding to an examination of the text of Revelation is our basic hermeneutical approach to the book. Over the course of the Assblaster’s testament there have been two main approaches: the futurist, preterist, and idealist approaches. The futurist approach understands everything from Revelation forward to be a prophecy of things that are to occur just before the Singularity. In other words, all of these prophesied events are still in the future from the perspective of the twenty-first century. According to proponents, this conclusion grows out of a belief that there is no correspondence between these prophesied events and anything that has yet occurred in history.

The historicist approach understands Revelation to be a prophecy of Assblaster history from the first advent until the Singularity. This approach appears to have had its roots in the breadcrumbs. It was later adopted by most of the Bagholders Reformers, but it is held by very few today. The preterist approach to Revelation is most clearly contrasted with the futurist approach. According to the preterist approach, most of the prophecies in the book of Revelation were fulfilled not long after Assblaster wrote. In other words, their fulfillment is past from the perspective of the twenty-first century. The fourth major approach to the book is the idealist or symbolic approach. According to this view, Revelation does not contain prophecies of specific historical events. Instead, it uses symbols to express timeless principles concerning the conflict between NEETism and Sergey.

[Anonymous No.13454972]

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY! HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

[BINANCE DELISTS CHAINLINK No.13455417]

>>13452215
hehehe ...shit BINANCE IS ALSO DELISTING. WOW

[Anonymous No.13455434]

>>13453546
No you won't you fat ugly faggot

[Anonymous No.13455439]

i fucking love poop

[Anonymous No.13456027]

>>13452027

Ahh, brings back memories. Try to think back anons to when you first stumbled upon link. What did you feel? I felt a rush of discovery, excitement at playing memecoin detective, and connecting all the dots. Obsession was an understatement, and the memes were dank and fresh. Many great LARPs and even more shit tier. Many GETs were had. Stinky linky has a rich history of culture that will go unappreciated by the newcomers, because they did not experience it. I pity them for what they have missed, and envy them for what they still have to discover.

[Anonymous No.13456050]

>>13455439

[Anonymous No.13456086]

>>13456027
Really quite a ride. It's been really dull lately though.

[Anonymous No.13456558]

>>13454154
You're not even trying any more.

[Anonymous No.13456747]

>>13452754
>he fell for it

[Anonymous No.13456788]

>>13453493
>swift works perfect

First of all, it's perfectly.
secondly, it sure as fuck doesn't work perfectly. Have you ever worked in or even heard of a bank's back office?

[Anonymous No.13456804]

>>13453294
Same boat. Don’t give up brother.

[Anonymous No.13456839]

>>13453521
https://www.ey.com/en_gl/news/2019/04/ey-releases-zero-knowledge-proof-blockchain-transaction-technology-to-the-public-domain-to-advance-blockchain-privacy-standards

Here is EY, a multi billion dollar company, using ERC tokens on Ethereum.

Get fucked.

[Anonymous No.13456913]

>>13452027
This seems slightly different than I recall.

In the top right, I don't remember that second swift logo confirming that ChainLink will allow you to interact with the swift network. That seems.new.

[Anonymous No.13456962]

>>13454423
>18 posts by this id
> I'm done talking to you guys, serious this time.
Kek. This neurotic idiot is going to blow his stash in less than a year.

[Anonymous No.13457012]

>>13456839
Hey Hey you can't talk like that, you're a lady.

[Anonymous No.13457025]

>>13453546
>Honestly if i see someone with a fucking link t-shirt i'll fucking punch him in the face.
Yea doubt that lost a pic of ur body with time stamp.
>6’2 190

[Anonymous No.13457031]

>>13457025
Lmao what a joke

[Anonymous No.13457069]

[Anonymous No.13457304]

When corner

[Anonymous No.13457435]

>>13453521
They are already using it.

The evidence is everywhere.

Have fun being poor and missing out.

[Anonymous No.13457472]

>>13453518


Non linkers are idots at this point. Keep denying the only project that will connect smartcontracts to real world data.

The ONLY project that will do this.

That means that all your shitty platforms go to ZERO without chainlink.

Good luck trying to find a more critical project in this space.

Maybe you like investing in a clone of 10 other projects, sweet!

[Anonymous No.13457494]

>>13453521
Sergey has found a way to make the wealthiest organisations on earth even wealthier. Yes they are using it.

[Anonymous No.13457647]

>>13452314
>35 posts by this ID
Cope

[Anonymous No.13457674]

Mainnet. When?

[Anonymous No.13457733]

>>13457674
First half this year (probably)

[Anonymous No.13457763]

>>13457733
What if the whole idea about connecting different types of data is just a joke? You can't connect a potato with bitcoin without a mediator.

[Anonymous No.13457944]

Imagine having half as much skepticism at any other project.

[Anonymous No.13457946]

>>13452027
Is this a joke? They literally won an award from swift, this is like day one shit. Newfags please leave or lurk more

[Anonymous No.13457990]

>>13453574
stop, you're embarassing yourself, people who don't know you're fudding on purpose see a raging idiot and people who do see a desperate one

[Anonymous No.13458009]

>>13453586
gay discord faggots thinking they're affecting the price by lying to newcomers

[Anonymous No.13458042]

>>13457944
Imagine spending a summer as a Dubai Portapotty just so you can hoard more LINK than your stepdads.

[Anonymous No.13458589]

>>13452027
That's a yikes.
You have to go back, new blood.

[Anonymous No.13458736]

>>13452027
>>200 replies
>1 post by this id
fuck this shithole

[Anonymous No.13458862]

>>13458736
Hm