Vitalik knew craig was satoshi afterall

[Anonymous No.13426082]

Aaron van Wirdum: The main question I have right now is: If Wright is Satoshi ... why would he publish fake proof? Any idea?

JVP: I have some very good ideas. If I were in Dr. Wright's position, I would do exactly as he has done.

[Anonymous No.13426097]

>>13426082
Yeah so where's the reason behind it? Oh there is none, right.

[Anonymous No.13426100]

>>13426082
AVW: So you're really sharing it with the world then. Which brings us back to "why"...

JVP: I would like for Craig Wright to have his privacy. He has already done more for us than we can repay, but it is not just this. I would like him to be able to do what he wants to do, without interference. We would all be better off when that occurs.

AVW: How does sharing that message help?

JVP: He is following a wrong path, because he must. He is doing it the least-wrong way possible. He is on Meifumando. It is as it has to be.

AVW: What is the wrong path? And what is the right path?

JVP: The world can learn much from what he has done and how. He is showing what cryptography does and does not do. It is a lesson that the world needs to learn before mass adoption can occur.

AVW: Mass adoption of Bitcoin?

JVP: The world was not ready for Bitcoin when it appeared. When the world learns these simple lessons, it will be more ready.

AVW: Why is Bitcoin not ready for mass adoption?

JVP: People do not understand what cryptography does and does not do. People do not understand pseudonymous. Having a key means you have a key. It does not mean you had it previously, or that you will have it in the future.

AVW: Right ... So?

JVP: He is forced on a stage, so he provides a masterful lesson that many who call themselves cryptographers seem to have forgotten.

AVW: In what way is he forced?

JVP: He said it himself, the decision to appear was made by others. Did you not even watch his video on BBC?

AVW: Of course I did.

JVP: Watch it again. You missed a lot.

AVW: But he didn't say in what way he was forced, did he? Or how, or why ...

JVP: I will say this much. If I were in his situation, I would have done as he did, though probably not even as well as he did.

[Anonymous No.13426114]

>>13426082
>bitcoin creater

jesus christ

[Anonymous No.13426131]

>>13426100
thank you for dis

[Anonymous No.13426144]

>>13426100
AVW: You realize all of this is a really weird story, right?

JVP: Yes, and you have seen only the snowdrift on the tip of the iceberg. The level of weird is off the scale.

AVW: Do you know the full story?

JVP: I doubt even Craig knows the full story, but I could fill about 20 books.

AVW: No offense, but: Why should I trust any of this? Why should I trust anything you say?

>JVP: Do your own research. Keep on your quest for knowledge. When you find someone who can teach you, listen carefully. When you find someone that can learn from you, be kind.

AVW: You're skilled at avoiding questions through what sounds like ancient wisdoms.

JVP: You are a reporter, the ancient wisdom is multiple sources, so ... do your own research …

[Anonymous No.13426146]

>>13426131
You should read the satoshi affair to if truly intrested in csw

[Anonymous No.13426154]

>>13426082
Haha that's right core KEKS Craig is BASED. Can't deal with it? All I can say is STIFF and BASEPILLED

[Anonymous No.13426177]

Why is it, that when you ask a bsv shill to explain something, they just send you to a video/article of craig spouting incomprehensible tech jargon? The only reason I can think of for this, is that they can't explain why they like craig/bsv, and can only hope you get the same unexplained disease from craig's words.

[Anonymous No.13426179]

>>13426082
if you only knew how stiff things really are

[Anonymous No.13426183]

>>13426146
Maybe if you're a FAG. True believers only need to hear the words of the true Satoshi to know what he is indeed Craig. Books are trickery.

[Anonymous No.13426208]

>>13426177
>satoshi affair
PROOF OF FUCKING WORK

[Anonymous No.13426274]

>>13426208
I have no idea what you're talking about
or what OP is quoting from
not everyone is familiar with every podcast that shills shitcoins to gullible idiots that waste their time reading/watching/listening to them, basically consuming advertisements
you bsv shills are starting to get on my nerves
you've been shilling this hot garbage for days

[Anonymous No.13426433]

>>13426274
https://www.giac.org/certified-professional/craig-wright/107335

ok bye

[Anonymous No.13426464]

>>13426433
>bunch of diplomas
ok but that doesn't prove anything, I don't care that he wasted a lot of time learning stuff, it doesn't matter
like I said, you fuckers never explain anything

GET
THE
FUCK
OFF
MY
BOARD
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.13426480]

>>13426464
S T I F F
T
I
F
F

[Anonymous No.13426503]

>>13426480
>associating with niggers
well that's all the convincing I need to never ever touch BSV
if I had a single shred of doubt that it's not a complete scam, it's absolutely gone now

[Anonymous No.13426521]

How much do you guys think sv shills get paid per post? Maybe they get paid for how long they can keep a thread up.

[Anonymous No.13426524]

Martti Malmi (an early bitcoin programmer who worked with Satoshi) doesn't acknowledge Craig Wright.

[Anonymous No.13426566]

>>13426521
I really hope it's not uptime because I'm a being played like a damn fiddle if it is

[Anonymous No.13426661]

>>13426082
i bought bsv only because of how bad I got burned shit trading
thanks for the dump lol this BSV was literally dumber than me. lost 5$ basically. in truth I lost 2000 links

>but I just pretend it didnt happen
>now I am craj fan buy bsv 10K tulip trust buyback market green

[Anonymous No.13426662]

>>13426524
Based

[Anonymous No.13426735]

>>13426433
READ FUCKING THIS: https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Feb/144

AND GTFO OUR BOARD

There is no space for handicapped shills, thanks, we are full.

[Anonymous No.13426761]

Held at gunpoint by cia
questioned
decides to lie to journalists
Goes hiding
btc splits, crypto boom like a big bang
whats special here?
DEVELOPERS and DEVELOPMENT!
Did you see that? Did you see how developers sliced each other necks to be the one to succeed? Did you see corporations getting interested into influencing protocols? Did you see that?
Is it better now to see who's developer and who is sheep there for it's own gain?
Did you see that???
Cheers.

[Anonymous No.13426808]

>>13426761
What are you raving about?
why can't BSV shills speak clearly and explain why bsv is superior
no, no, close that .txt file full of links, no, bad shill, explain in your own words why bsv is better than core

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13426825]

>>13426082

[Anonymous No.13426841]

>>13426177
Their tactic is a cross between “blinding with science” and “snowjobbing”. The full and final truth is that BSV trades at 1/100th what BTC does

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13426858]

>>13426177
>they can't explain why they like craig/bsv
they bought bch before the fork at $500 sold the bch and doubled down on sv at $100 and been bleeding out the ass ever since. they are just poor desperate souls that want out by dumping on you.

[Anonymous No.13426906]

>>13426808
the question is which one follows the whitepaper?

[Anonymous No.13426910]

>>13426825
lmaooooooo

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13426954]

>>13426906
it's starting to feel the whitepaper is like the bible everyone has his interpretation and not afraid to declare holy war and shed blood over it.

[Anonymous No.13427017]

>>13426954
are you pajeet braindead? wouldnt satoshi treat the whitepaper as the BIBLE?!?!

i swear you NPC's are braindead.

[Anonymous No.13427045]

>>13426082
this man is satash, i would die for him

[Anonymous No.13427051]

>>13426954
yeah,
Core = saved by grace (trust)
Cash = saved by grace, but with ordinances (check points)
SV = saved by works (1 TB blocks)

[Anonymous No.13427079]

>>13427017
Ironically bitcoin core follows the original whitepaper more than bcash or bsv
>A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution.

The bigger the blocks the harder it is to be a "peer" in the network, simple as that. And considering there's 8k lightning nodes, I guess it's not that hard being a lightning node "peer" either.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13427085]

>>13427017
no he would treat it as an incomplete rushed work that needs reiterating and perfecting if only he had the time beside doing actual development

[Anonymous No.13427136]

>>13427079
>scaling not on chain
>says it follows the whitepaper

[Anonymous No.13427154]

>>13427136
where does it say that the system must scale on chain? where does it say that 2nd layer solutions are not allowed?

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13427157]

>>13427079
>Ironically bitcoin core follows the original whitepaper more than bcash or bsv
i wouldn't say that as much as i hate cashies each and every fork diverged from it greatly the minority forks willfully broke the nakamoto consensus at which point they relinquished the right to be called bitcoin but bitcoin is pretty far from that tree most retards think it was segwit but it was actually bip16 that irrevocably changed btc forever. ironically that's active on all 3 forks.

[Anonymous No.13427182]

>>13427154
directly above "without relying on trust". off-chain is based on trust, not on PoW (chain)!

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13427209]

>>13427182
>off-chain is based on trust
actually the beautiful thing about ln is it's trustless and it achieves that by wrapping off chain operations into on-chain smart contracts.

[Anonymous No.13427277]

yfw fagtoshi is gathering notoriety so he can sell pajeets a book

[Anonymous No.13427290]

>>13427209
trustless until the flaw where you can lose funds because a payment was below the dust threshold

unironically.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13427379]

>>13427290
if that was the biggest issue with it i would be dancing out of sheer joy

[Anonymous No.13427406]

>>13426100
>he was simply pretending to be retarded

[Anonymous No.13427411]

>>13426480
looks like he likes black cock and is a homo

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13427416]

>>13427411
he likes cock period black white yellow doesn't matter to him cocks and booze and shitposting that's his life

[Anonymous No.13427470]

>>13426082
the correct spelling is critter, not creater please...

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13427703]

>>13427470
no >>13426825

[Anonymous No.13427750]

>>13426464
reeeee harder faggot

[Anonymous No.13427760]

>>13427750
i wish pajeeta was as hot as the image portray

[BSV will win No.13427927]

>>13426464
Lain! Lain you're emotional. I'll call you tomorrow, Lain.

[Anonymous No.13428310]

>>13426082
>>13428255
not satoshi

[Anonymous No.13428785]

0.0099

[Anonymous No.13428792]

AND WE ARE BACK