/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.13387352]

Will he help crypto investors?

[Anonymous No.13387376]

>>13387352
Probably the opposite. The more democrats touch stuff, the worse things get.

[Anonymous No.13387378]

“Clear guidelines” sounds good in theory, but in practice it translates to “more regulation.” Once bureaucrats like the SEC get their hands on crypto in the coming decade, things will change drastically I’m sure

[Anonymous No.13387379]

he'll be completely irrelevant in a year. why would that help crypto kids?

[Anonymous No.13387383]

>>13387352
The only thing he'll help is himself and his political buddies to your gains

[Anonymous No.13387385]

>>13387352
>Will he help crypto investors?
simply by talking about it and bringing it to a larger audience, yes. pretty much everything about yang is good for crypto.

[Anonymous No.13387857]

>>13387352
No because he won't get elected
Even if he did, you won't get UBI
Even if you do, it won't be sustainable because he is pro immigration

[Anonymous No.13387871]

>>13387857
>he's pro immigration too

Holy frickin' heck just how stupid is this goof

[Anonymous No.13387948]

>not choosing the superior candidate who's currently co-sponsoring a legislation that would be a godsend to crypto (token taxonomy act) whether she gets the nomination or not

[Anonymous No.13387980]

>>13387352
I'm just going to vote for Rand or Trump