Own (CHX)

[Anonymous No.13241964]

Hi, I'm back. The OG shiller from several months ago. Not the FTM, zero punctuation pleb.

The heart dropping information will be revealed soon. Get ready.

[Anonymous No.13242100]

Hey Sascha, how's it going? You up early.

[Anonymous No.13242106]

oww my balls

[Anonymous No.13242145]

>>13241964
give us more info if you're not larping. what is heart dropping

[Anonymous No.13242214]

>>13242145

[Anonymous No.13242238]

>>13242214
That looks like every white family I ever seen in the northeast wtf is this

[Anonymous No.13242699]

>>13242100
imagine if that actually were Sascha, what a fucking timeline we'd be in

[Anonymous No.13242817]

i'm still here. the OG shiller from several months ago (turned fudder). Yes the FTM, zero puncuation pleb.

the devs chx unlock in april. liquidity on idex dried up so they needed a bitmax listing to dump their chx on you.. devs know 15m is top for the next couple of years... coz it will take a couple of years for chx to build their infulstructure... and 2 years for security tokens to be a thing

im never buying chx again... devs lied about mainnet, having sto's lined up until 2020.. having billions of dollars worth of assets already tokenized...

im going balls deep in ravencoin when its under 300 stats again.. fuck chx scamming jews

[Anonymous No.13242823]

also... the sec have ruled chx is a centralized illegal security... the sec wil shut them down or own will ust walk away after all their tokens have been dumped

ravencoin = decentralized

[Anonymous No.13243523]

>>13242823
kys

[Anonymous No.13243642]

>>13242817

You're going to look just as dumb as you sound in a few weeks.

And this isn't a shill to get anyone to buy.

It's more of a friendly reminder to board the rocketship because it's leaving with or without you.

[Anonymous No.13243648]

>>13241964
when is >>soon

[Anonymous No.13243656]

>>13243648
>when is >>soon
devs are lying pump and dump scammers.. they hype up their coin while they dump on you.. and then we find out the hype was fake

[Anonymous No.13243676]

>>13243656
might be true
of not I'm gonna make it though

[Anonymous No.13243713]

>>13243676
>might be true
it's a fact. you can see on etherscan the devs have been dumping for many months

and there is evidence devs mislead/outright lied about EVERYTHING. tokenized assets, sto's lined up, mainnet, founders last job, etc.

[Anonymous No.13243721]

>>13243713
Says there is evidence
Supplies no evidence

Absolute mongoloid hahaha

[Anonymous No.13243941]

Locked my CHX using BitTreasure so fingers crossed the fud is just fud.

[Anonymous No.13243974]

Scam

[Anonymous No.13243995]

>>13243713

For gods sake, stop trying. You sound childish and desperate.


>>13241964

OP, how soon is soon?

[Anonymous No.13244048]

>>13243721
>Says there is evidence
>Supplies no evidence
>Absolute mongoloid hahaha
not really worth my time to post all evidence.. im a whale.. i'd do it for 1 btc though. here is a ltitle teaser though

[Anonymous No.13244344]

>>13244048
'I'm a whale'

Had 20k worth of shitcoin and bragged about it constantly, fucking kek

[Anonymous No.13244387]

>>13242214
Tineye had zero results. Who is this?

[Anonymous No.13244485]

I think this is what he means. According to Sascha this is real data.

Crap knows what to make of it.

[Anonymous No.13244631]

>>13244485
>I think this is what he means. According to Sascha this is real data.
>Crap knows what to make of it.
it's fake data

[Anonymous No.13244789]

>>13244485
It's fake data, but they didn't bother to correct it for months. They said it's because their time/resources were focused on delivering a finished product. I say because it was a convenient excuse that allowed the rise of the price of CHX.

[Anonymous No.13244959]

>>13244631
>it's fake data
It's actually at least twice that.

[Anonymous No.13245080]

>>13241964
I'll bite anon. I know you're not shilling, but where are you getting this information from? Can you provide any more details? I hope chx gets onto a few more exchanges in the near future.

[Anonymous No.13245373]

It's from

https://dsr.weown.com/own/general-analytics

I thought they removed the fake data but fuck knows.

[Anonymous No.13245730]

I can't fucking wait to see the fudding retards miss out on this one. It will almost be as great as the retirement I achieve from CHX staking

[Anonymous No.13245749]

finally did my taxes and got a phat ass PAWG refund, how many of this shitcoin do i need to make it?

[Anonymous No.13245783]

>>13245730
>I can't fucking wait to see the fudding retards miss out on this one. It will almost be as great as the retirement I achieve from CHX staking
data is proven fake and the devs are dumping

[Anonymous No.13245811]

>>13245080

Can't, but should be revealed soon. Patience will pay off.

[Anonymous No.13245818]

>>13243974
So the ex prime minister of Liechtenstein and partner at one a large Swiss financial institutions is advising a scam and he even has this scam company on his linked in page. Yep that’s really gonna happen. Scam company whose office location in Bristol is common knowledge, yeh ok then cause scamming people out of 15 million $ ain’t gonna involve any repercussions now is it? Ffs

[Anonymous No.13245854]

>>13245818
>So the ex prime minister of Liechtenstein and partner at one a large Swiss financial institutions is advising a scam and he even has this scam company on his linked in page. Yep that’s really gonna happen. Scam company whose office location in Bristol is common knowledge, yeh ok then cause scamming people out of 15 million $ ain’t gonna involve any repercussions now is it? Ffs
i live in the uk and i went to their "office" last month. the lights were off, sounded like no one where there, and there was a storage unit blocking the glass door so no one could see or get in. chink tier scam

[Anonymous No.13245870]

op is sasha. his tokens unlock soon. hes trying to create volume to dump his tokens

[Anonymous No.13245879]

>>13244048
A screenshot without context is useless and evidence of nothing you brainlet

[Anonymous No.13245967]

>>13245879
>A screenshot without context is useless and evidence of nothing you brainlet
give me the ability to short chx and ill spend time getting the evidence and present it

[Anonymous No.13245991]

>>13245783
When will you quit? Goddamn you're a fucking child

[Anonymous No.13246002]

>>13245967
The ability is here with Bitmax. Try it and let us know how it goes.

[Anonymous No.13246008]

>>13245991

He'll be done in a few weeks when the bombshells get announced.

[Anonymous No.13246016]

>>13246002
>The ability is here with Bitmax. Try it and let us know how it goes.
*rubs hands together while doing an evil laugh*

[Anonymous No.13246039]

>>13245870
>his tokens unlock soon
They already started moving massive amounts to an exchange this week. In addition to putting sell pressure on the price, this increases the circulating supply which means the market cap goes up without the underlying value of the token going up. Add to this the fact there hasn’t been word of a single client since launch last week and it paints an ugly picture of where this is headed.

[Anonymous No.13246097]

>>13246039
>>13246016

[Anonymous No.13246350]

>>13246039
Thinks Coinmarketcap doesnt account for that..

[Anonymous No.13246361]

>>13246350
>Thinks Coinmarketcap doesnt account for that..
conmarketcap takes months to adjust

[Anonymous No.13246384]

>>13245818
What if I told you the scam is "We tried our hardest to make this platform work and companies are simply not interested yet. We will keep working on making OWN the #1 STO platform but until then we're going to market sell 90,000 CHX for operational costs every week until there's nothing left"

[Anonymous No.13246393]

>>13246350
>Thinks Coinmarketcap doesnt account for that..
you're wrong bro. it takes months for coinmarketcap to update circ supply

[Anonymous No.13246400]

>>13246384
>What if I told you the scam is "We tried our hardest to make this platform work and companies are simply not interested yet. We will keep working on making OWN the #1 STO platform but until then we're going to market sell 90,000 CHX for operational costs every week until there's nothing left"
this. the slow exit scam

[Anonymous No.13246489]

>>13242823
Source?

[Anonymous No.13246778]

sorry brehs, i wouldn't buy

[Anonymous No.13246800]

sorry bros, but i would not buy yet

[Anonymous No.13246943]

>>13245811
You guys have been spamming /biz/ with this coin for months now with promises of "soon." First it was announcement announcements, then some joke partnerships, then Fast, then Mainnet, then exchanges, none of the buildup has led to anything but the devs dumping more and more coins. Now you don't even have specific talking points to hype, just vague promises. It's kind of pathetic at this point.

[Anonymous No.13246961]

>>13246943
Not really? The team has followed through on pretty much everything

[Anonymous No.13247058]

>>13246961
Except major partnership announcements, anonymized business data, and release of public mainnet by Q1.

[Anonymous No.13247328]

>>13246961
The point isn't whether they followed through (they didn't), it's that despite all the hype and countdown spam the price and volume has steadily bled out since the Hamersley pump, meanwhile the rest of the market has been in a bull run.

As far as them actually delivering, that is hilarious. The Fast launch was a mess webpage of broken links that nobody used, mainnet was kind of sort of but not really delayed, the big fast food chain never emerged, the testnet data was all fake, the mystery clients "under NDA" never materialized. Hamersley turned out to be a 3 client stock broker with a $600 a month office kek. Do they even have a block explorer or wallet yet?

[Anonymous No.13247341]

>>13247328
>The point isn't whether they followed through (they didn't), it's that despite all the hype and countdown spam the price and volume has steadily bled out since the Hamersley pump, meanwhile the rest of the market has been in a bull run.
>As far as them actually delivering, that is hilarious. The Fast launch was a mess webpage of broken links that nobody used, mainnet was kind of sort of but not really delayed, the big fast food chain never emerged, the testnet data was all fake, the mystery clients "under NDA" never materialized. Hamersley turned out to be a 3 client stock broker with a $600 a month office kek. Do they even have a block explorer or wallet yet?
this

[Anonymous No.13247365]

>>13246800
>sorry bros, but i would not buy yet
like i said. chx will dump to sub 10m. it will have a similar marketcap as jibrel network.. and stay there for years>>13246943
>You guys have been spamming /biz/ with this coin for months now with promises of "soon." First it was announcement announcements, then some joke partnerships, then Fast, then Mainnet, then exchanges, none of the buildup has led to anything but the devs dumping more and more coins. Now you don't even have specific talking points to hype, just vague promises. It's kind of pathetic at this point.
this guy gets it

[Anonymous No.13247382]

on second thought, jibrel devs aren't dumping their tokens, so chx might dump even lower. chx devs started dumping around 4-5m marketcap. so that will probably be bottom

[Anonymous No.13247404]

The cumulative IQ of each of these arguments add up to less than the price of CHX right now. You’ll need to do better than that, time to accumulate under $1.00 is quickly running out

[Anonymous No.13247463]

>>13247404
>time to accumulate under $1.00 is quickly running out
Under $10 fren. Just imagine what will happen in the next bull market as well.

[Anonymous No.13247482]

>>13247382
Lel 14 posts by this id. Committed and likely funded fudsters.

[Anonymous No.13247615]

>>13247482
Not necessarily funded fud but there are those that bought in last Year, shilled it and then sold perhaps for a small profit. Unfortunately after they dumped it just kept on going up. Some people just hate being wrong I suppose?

[Anonymous No.13247691]

>>13247615

If you look at that dude's ETH address, he sold CHX for FTM, so he's probably trying to keep price low to buy back in.

[Anonymous No.13247732]

>>13247691
No, he’s just smart and likely have doubled his money already, while you held and now either at a loss or broke even in ETH value.

[Anonymous No.13248332]

>>13247732
> Buy's into ftm
> says he's smart
You guys are incurably stupid. Your chance to accumulate under .20 is over, kek

[Anonymous No.13248387]

>>13247691
>If you look at that dude's ETH address, he sold CHX for FTM, so he's probably trying to keep price low to buy back in.
i think i sold after watching the last ama. when sasha said there were only 9 small businesses that were interested in doing sto's.. after saying in a previous ama he had sto's lined up until 2020. this is just one red flag. there are dozens of red flags. and they are market selling their tokens. there is no way i'd invest in these lying scamming pump and dumpers again

[Anonymous No.13248396]

>>13248332
>You guys are incurably stupid. Your chance to accumulate under .20 is over, kek
m8 i am smart. i saw chx would go sideways/down. and i saw fantom would go up. i more than doubled my money, and chx went down. im still holding fantom. it will 2x again soon. not rebuying chx

[Anonymous No.13248603]

>>13248387
>there is no way i'd invest in these lying scamming pump and dumpers again

Then why do you make 30 comments on every CHX thread, kek

[Anonymous No.13248819]

>>13248603
Perhaps for him (and maybe some Others now shilling FTM), his dislike for chx has now become personal?
I say consider this, if his fud is correct, then why waste time fudding what is such an apparently doomed project?

He just wants to feel right that he sold CHX and he wants you to buy his FTM bags.

[Anonymous No.13248820]

>>13248396
> m8 i am smart
Jesus dude, fix your grammar before making such outlandish claims. I've been in CHX since 8c so I'm doing just fine. If you actually did what you said you wouldn't make it your life's work to baselessly FUD a 'scam' token. Nobody believes you despite all this, its rather sad
>>13248603
Case in point. Literally every thread is filled with this vermin

[Anonymous No.13248857]

>>13248603
>Then why do you make 30 comments on every CHX thread, kek
a few reasons. 1. sasha lied/misled us about everything and is dumping on us and tanking the price. i'm angry and disappointed (even they i got a 4x out of it(would have been 5x if i sold top)) 2. i am solely responsible for getting biz to invest in this.. now i know it's a scam i feel the need to warn everyone

[Anonymous No.13248881]

>>13248820
>I've been in CHX since 8c so I'm doing just fine
i started shilling it at 6 cents (i was the only one). you're welcome

[Anonymous No.13248929]

>>13248857
Oh shut the fuck up, you aren't some white knight desperately trying to 'warn people'. You've further disproved the idea that you have a semblance of logic guiding your fud

[Anonymous No.13248934]

last post in this thread. op is a fraud. he says hes the og shiller from several months ago. hes larping. it was the only person shilling this. he wants people to think it wasnt just me shilling it. also there is no info drop. he just wants to try to stop the dump. ...maybe t's even sasha, trying to get you to place buy orders so he cant market sell

[Anonymous No.13248971]

>>13248929
>Oh shut the fuck up, you aren't some white knight desperately trying to 'warn people
i am. i call out any scams posted on biz. it's most chink stuff i warn people about.

also, all my accusations are backed up with evidence. just look for it for yourself. it's not really worth my time.. it's all in youtube and telegram

[Anonymous No.13248973]

>>13248857
So you started shilling it to biz at 6c. I bought at 7c and made my first post about it here straight after, so you must have beat me to it by at least 2 days..? Maybe it was your post that made my buy it.. lol.

[Anonymous No.13249000]

Or maybe it was this?

[Anonymous No.13249003]

last scam i called out was internet node token. i keep warning the community on reddit over and over. it lost 99% of it's value. they basically lost all their money. i got so much hate from them. i wasnt trying to rebuy that lower either.

[Anonymous No.13249027]

It's not really worth his time to show evidence but it's worth his time to spend entire evenings arguing about it on a Chinese basket weavers forum

[Anonymous No.13249048]

>>13245818
Vechain have scammed a lot more money than 15m

[Anonymous No.13249085]

>>13249027
Yeh, the evidence is all in youtube apparently but you might spend an entire evening looking for it and still not actually find it... but it's in there somewhere...

[Anonymous No.13249100]

>>13249048
yeh, and last time I checked they didn't have an ex prime minister and president of a university working for them.

[Anonymous No.13249125]

>>13249027
>>13248929
>>13248819
You guys are idiots. I also warn anons about OWN because of the simple matter that I wasted upwards of 50 hours researching the team, watching AMAs, and see Sascha wanting to sort out all the little niggles in Telegram. Might as well repurpose the knowledge by shotposting about it on here. None of the “fud” info is made up and you’d see it if you took the blinders off and did your own research.

[Anonymous No.13249213]

>>13249125
Please post your research anon, I'm genuinely interested

[Anonymous No.13249224]

>>13249213
I did in multiple threads already, including taking pic related in this post >>13244048

What do you want to know?

[Anonymous No.13249244]

>>13249085
>Yeh, the evidence is all in youtube apparently but you might spend an entire evening looking for it and still not actually find it... but it's in there somewhere...
i'm going to guess you havent watched all the ama's or telegram chat from the last 5 months, because of you did, you'd see sasha mislead/lied about everything

[Anonymous No.13249254]

>>13249125
But there is no repurposing of any 'knowledge' in what you say, only the same old argument which has been explained.
You say you spent 50 hours researching, after which you invested, then you sold because you learnt that contractors sold some tokens (their salary) and now you hate Own because you wasted so many hours of your life (and you still are...). Can't you see how ridiculous this sounds?

[Anonymous No.13249278]

>>13249224
Basically the project seems to have incredible potential. The team is impressive (ex-CIO of compushare, ex prime minister of lichtenstein), they have been making partnerships (recentlys perkinscoie) and their use case could lead to a massive gain in token value if successful. The last bit is the tricky one, will they manage on execution? From the AMAs I've seen and the products they have released so far, I agree it hasn't been full smooth smailing but that could be said of the vast majority of startup. I agree the pic you provided is pretty bad but it doesn't invalidate all the rest, it could be a genuine mistake, shit happens. If you have some other fud that could convince me to sell please educate me

[Anonymous No.13249286]

>>13249244
Your guess is incorrect.

So specifically, what are these lies? Why not list these lies and then give us evidence to prove they are lies? The time you've spent on here throwing loose and vague allegations you could have documented them in minute detail?

[Anonymous No.13249319]

you all are so so dumb for even acknowledging the fudder in these CHX threads. All he does is deflect from any productive discussion that could be had about this project. Gets his rocks off every time someone replies to him.

[Anonymous No.13249328]

>>13249286
>Your guess is incorrect.
>So specifically, what are these lies? Why not list these lies and then give us evidence to prove they are lies? The time you've spent on here throwing loose and vague allegations you could have documented them in minute detail?
fine. i'll give you evidence for one red flag.. but keep in mind there are dozens and im not going to do this for all of them for you

[Anonymous No.13249351]

>>13249286
>Your guess is incorrect.
>So specifically, what are these lies? Why not list these lies and then give us evidence to prove they are lies? The time you've spent on here throwing loose and vague allegations you could have documented them in minute detail?
ill let the other anon do it

[Anonymous No.13249352]

>>13249254
>only the same old argument which has been explained.
You actually haven't "explained" shit. Literally every explanation you imbeciles come up with requires taking the word of the team. And there's zero reason to do that because they have no credibility left.

[Anonymous No.13249372]

>>13249254
>You say you spent 50 hours researching, after which you invested, then you sold because you learnt that contractors sold some tokens (their salary) and now you hate Own because you wasted so many hours of your life (and you still are...). Can't you see how ridiculous this sounds?
No. OWN market selling 90,000 CHX every week has nothing to do with it. That has been known for months and was the very first legit FUD that led to the price dropping in early February. I also don't hate OWN, because I didn't lose any money. I get satisfaction from calling out scams and schemes whenever I see one. Reading the white paper was a waste of my time. Hammering out 2 to 5 sentences on here is entertainment.

[Anonymous No.13249384]

>>13249319
True..100% right Anon.

[Anonymous No.13249397]

Buy FTM

Forget about own faggot.

[Anonymous No.13249441]

>>13249397
>Buy FTM
>Forget about own faggot.
my man

[Anonymous No.13249452]

>>13249397

[Anonymous No.13249458]

>>13249319
Bro, he's got research

[Anonymous No.13249509]

>>13249286
>Your guess is incorrect.
>So specifically, what are these lies? Why not list these lies and then give us evidence to prove they are lies? The time you've spent on here throwing loose and vague allegations you could have documented them in minute detail?
the biggest lie was sasha saying "they had sto's lined up until 2020". he said this in an ama or on telegram. i forget. it will still be there. you can look for yourself. and in the recently AMA he says there are only 9 small businesses that want to do sto's with them. there is your evidence of fraud. he just wanted to hype his token to increase/price and volume so he can keep dumping chx.

actually, that's not the biggest lie. the biggest lie was saying there had been half a billion dollars worth of assets tokenized in the first few weeks. he said this on telegram. then it turns out it's all fake testnet stuff. one anon tried it and increased it to $2 trillion.

the third major lie was mainnet Q1. mainnet is Q2.

he mislead us all to pump price of his token so he could dump it to fund his business

[Anonymous No.13249526]

I'm done talking. This thread was supposed to be a courtesy reminder. When the catalysts start rolling out, don't be surprised.

[Anonymous No.13249555]

>>13249278
The last bit is the tricky one, will they manage on execution? From the AMAs I've seen and the products they have released so far, I agree it hasn't been full smooth smailing but that could be said of the vast majority of startup. I agree the pic you provided is pretty bad but it doesn't invalidate all the rest, it could be a genuine mistake, shit happens.
OWN is in the habit of pretending to not enjoy hype, but time and time again they over-promise and under-deliver. The floodgates will open with the release of the FAST Platform! Did it? Major partnership announcements every week! Where are they? When they dropped Hamersley Partners, it made no difference to the price, I believe it even dropped, and suddenly they changed their minds on making more announcements. Everything is soon and "around the corner" with OWN.

And the DSR numbers weren't a genuine mistake. It couldn't have been because Sascha wrote that comment on the same day or maybe the day after the release. They only corrected themselves when the DSR said 2 TRILLION assets have been tokenized. I suppose that was too outlandish to be believable. Sascha deflected months later by saying the numbers were all "stress test" and he actually got mad at people in Telegram for questioning it. He was offended. How dare we expect them to filter out bad data.

[Anonymous No.13249560]

>>13249555
Fucking missing greentext. Ignore the first line.

[Anonymous No.13249580]

>>13249555
>And the DSR numbers weren't a genuine mistake. It couldn't have been because Sascha wrote that comment on the same day or maybe the day after the release. They only corrected themselves when the DSR said 2 TRILLION assets have been tokenized. I suppose that was too outlandish to be believable. Sascha deflected months later by saying the numbers were all "stress test" and he actually got mad at people in Telegram for questioning it. He was offended. How dare we expect them to filter out bad data.

This is low-level IQ FUD, lmfao. Your poor brain.

[Anonymous No.13249633]

>>13249580
>This is low-level IQ FUD, lmfao. Your poor brain.
some anon posted screenshot on biz, and i also seen it on their website.. it's not fud. it actually happened.... and sasha on telegram was telling us to create hype tell everyone about how many billions in assets they have already tokenized.. dont believe me? look for yourself on telegram

[Anonymous No.13249639]

>>13249580
I suppose if you were deciding on buying CHX back in January and went on OWN's website and saw that hundreds of companies were using their platform from all around the world (~25 in the USA alone) you would think that's fine. Even though the data is fake and no disclaimers were on the page about it. With the numbers rising every week. Discussed in the Telegram. Yet Sascha not commenting on it at all until an anon got in the system and broke it with the two trillion entry. Good one.

[Anonymous No.13249688]

>>13249639
Damn this feels like jibrel network all over again, why can't I just hold a promising project in peace :( I guess the only thing to buy for long term is LINK

[Anonymous No.13249705]

>>13249509
The two big ones for me were that they claimed they were coming out with some kind of legal wrapper so people could raise money in the United States in 10 minutes or something to that effect. That is impossible with current securities law and quite frankly a ridiculous notion. The second lie was that their partnership with a stock broker made their platform legally compliant because that stock broker has an SEC broker license. The two things have nothing to do with each other. It’s like saying you are allowed to build roads because you have a drivers license. It’s straight up nonsense.

[Anonymous No.13249741]

>>13249688
Yeah, I had to get out once the lies got too much to ignore. I even let those fake DSR numbers go at the time because I genuinely wanted to believe they will have major announcements "next week".

Listen to how Sascha talks about those 9 STOs the other anon is talking about in that one AMA. Listen to his tone and watch his body language. Then when he mentioned how companies are interested, but not actually willing to work with OWN until they prove themselves (I'm paraphrasing that one, the companies are "interested, but waiting"). That's when I sold.

[Anonymous No.13249791]

>>13249741
Do you have a link to the AMA you're talking about? There are quite a few so not sure which one to look for

[Anonymous No.13249808]

>>13249639

Alright dumbshit. I don't know why I have to even waste my breath explaining a concept a 2 year old could fucking understand. The clue is in the name...

Decentralized Share Register.

Do you know how Bitcoin or Ethereum work? Anyone can make a transaction and that record is permanent on the blockchain. Block explorers don't pick and choose which transactions to show to make sure little faggot moonboys can sleep at night.

[Anonymous No.13249838]

>>13249791
It will be the last AMA on their channel. I don't have a timestamp, it's over an hour long. But you should find it.

>>13249808
>Block explorers don't pick and choose which transactions to show to make sure little faggot moonboys can sleep at night.
Why do you think OWN bothered to setup and design a dashboard then? And link it in the Telegram? Is it to fool potential customers or to fool potential moonboys?

[Anonymous No.13249844]

>>13249633

So dude, let us get justed then if this is such a scam? Do you really think that most of us believe that you are here to warn us in good faith? That you're here to help?

When was that ever true on /biz/, if ever?

[Anonymous No.13249870]

>>13249838
Alright thanks

[Anonymous No.13249878]

Everybody...quit responding to these fuckin weirdo retards. There seems to be a handfull of people who first shilled this, everyone was first, now everyone wants to try to be some sort of savior and save everyone on biz who put money in this....like, since when did yallz start trying to warn us about scams? It's obvious, you sold and want to buy in lower because you fuckedup. Why the fuck would any retard on here write 20+ comments and monitor these threads daily just to 'warn us' but then say that you'll drop the truth bombs later LOlololollllll. Get the fuck out of here loser. Neck yourself while your at it fuckboy nobody gives a fuck about the stupid shit you keep peddling about CHX. Move along.

[Anonymous No.13249884]

>>13249844
Why would he be spending his time fudding? To accumulate? The price has already been dumping for a while and volume has been steadily decreasing. I really want to believe in the team but some of the facts presented are undeniable, and I HAVE talked with good people on this board (the few people who are the reason why I keep coming here), not surprised if an anon just wants to expose a scam. Of course there are fudders who have ill intent so need to be careful, but fud doesn't necessarily equal bad intent

[Anonymous No.13249907]

>>13249878
Seems like you got an aneurysm as your post went along. I know it would be convenient for you if there weren't any "FUD" (aka facts) and we left these OWN threads permanently so your bags would be worth more and you could invite more people into this Lichtenstein ponzi scheme, now that you foolishly FOMO'd in ATH, but no such luck.

[Anonymous No.13249920]

>>13249458
why don't you go research yourself and form your own opinions? Everyone here has an agenda.

[Anonymous No.13249941]

>>13249907
Anyways faggot, i bought in at 8 cents i'm good, i'm not stressing. And you haven't actually proven shit. Maybe if you actually provided some FACTS then people in here wouldn't be so annoyed by your dumb ass. Hurrr hurrr hurrr they lied, they're dumping, they have no deals in the pipeline, they are scamming durr durr. Fuck out of here idiot.

[Anonymous No.13249974]

>>13241964
>Partnerships

[Anonymous No.13249978]

>>13249941
>Anyways faggot, i bought in at 8 cents i'm good, i'm not stressing. And you haven't actually proven shit. Maybe if you actually provided some FACTS then people in here wouldn't be so annoyed by your dumb ass. Hurrr hurrr hurrr they lied, they're dumping, they have no deals in the pipeline, they are scamming durr durr. Fuck out of here idiot.
he did provide verifiable facts

[Anonymous No.13249987]

>>13249941
>And you haven't actually proven shit. Maybe if you actually provided some FACTS then people in here wouldn't be so annoyed by your dumb ass.
I don't care whether you're annoyed or not. Plenty of facts have been posted, learn to read them instead of skimming posts and being an emotional faggot.

[Anonymous No.13249990]

>>13249974
clowned & honkpilled

[Anonymous No.13249999]

>>13249884
>volume is decreasing
Most of these post are made by a couple of bitter pajeets. Good luck with FTM faggots. I won't sell even one ownie.

[Anonymous No.13250022]

>>13249999
>>volume is decreasing
>Most of these post are made by a couple of bitter pajeets. Good luck with FTM faggots. I won't sell even one ownie.
it got a little new exchange listing pump, and then went back to dumping. devs will dump chx back down to 5m marketcap over the next few months

[Anonymous No.13250026]

>>13249999
that volume is bitmax and hotbit fake volume.. they washtrade.. real volume is like $15-30k

[Anonymous No.13250205]

>>13249884

You attributing qualities to this fudder that aren't there...

>but some of the facts presented are undeniable

Such as? Undeniable? If you are going to state they are dumping, they said they would release tokes to pay for things. MANY cryptos do that, why they didn't do it in a fiat is a business choice.

>not surprised if an anon just wants to expose a scam.

Again, based on what? Very few do this on biz. Nothing of his posts scream genuine or helpful in any way. He sounds exactly like the nano fudder who would write pages and pages of text to flush out conversation.

When this retard continues to copy and paste the shit that says the SEC is trying to sniff out CHX and they will be considered an illegal security, I laugh. He sounds like your typical street shitting pajeet.

You also defending this street shitting pajeet is also telling.

I wanted genuine conversation on this coin, but we can't have any because MuH DeVs aRE dUmPInG n cHx Is a ScAmMmM is plastered all over threads. It's annoying and it's contributing to the further decline of biz.


i AM NOT SAYING CHX IS PERFECT...Ethereum, BTC, Tezos etc have all had there share of controversy. Based on research outside of biz, CHX is best poised to catch the peak of the next bullrun.

[Anonymous No.13250319]

>>13250205
It's interesting how you're zeroing in on claims that cannot be verified, such as the SEC claim (that's on the other anon, not me) and the dumping, while ignoring things that can be verified like pic related. Imagine if you were a serious legitimate business and Reyansh told you to look into OWN. You're serious and ready to sign up. That's on the home page. 484 businesses trust OWN, then when you click on it it says in big bold orange letters they've tokenized 9 billion assets worth 126 million dollars. Let's ignore the fact that it used to say slightly 500 million when I bought my first stack of CHX. And that their social media marketing screenshot on Twitter shows 439 million with only 153 companies registered: https://twitter.com/OwnMarket/status/1058407635672842240

3X businesses signed up since November, 10000X more assets tokenized, which are somehow worth three times less in dollars than it did half a year ago.

How is this legal?

[Anonymous No.13250336]

>>13250319
And the dumping can also be verified, of course, by looking at their wallet. But you have to question how they're spending the money. Why they're spending $15,000-$30,000 every week to pay a developer or two and a designer in Bosnia.

[Anonymous No.13250486]

>>13250319
>3X businesses signed up since November, 10000X more assets tokenized, which are somehow worth three times less in dollars than it did half a year ago.
>How is this legal?

You'll get clarity on what those assets are in a few weeks and I will hand you toilet paper to wipe your ass after you shit your pants.

[Anonymous No.13250494]

>>13250486
Ah yes, news soon and just around the corner. You can't refute the facts other than with hopium.

[Anonymous No.13250681]

>>13250319


If Sascha wanted to exit scam, why would he slow exit with 30k a week? Let's say he's dumping straight for the next year, that's approximately 1.5 million, which is not exactly a fuckton a money. And even if he made off with that, there are greater than 1 partnership official partnership he has so he would be destroying his career regardless.


The pic you mention with this misleading numbers, figures, Stats, etc. is endemic to all crypto. This does not make CHX a scam.
it's all a scam then, the wash trading, the fake volume. Inaccurate information is everywhere.

Perfect example is Tezos, rife with false promises , inaccurate information, lies and even class action lawsuits. Now they are in collaboration with CoinBase. It is having a good year.

My point is, if these stats are the reason you think CHX is a scam, then you should not invest anything in crypto at all. Personally, I think CHX has some problems but has the least bullshit to deal with.

[Anonymous No.13250830]

>>13250681
You are quite the moron. Tezos never did anything remotely close to publishing fake numbers and trying to pass them off as real. Or the latest scam of promising 48% annual returns. That is all Bitconnect level stuff.

[Anonymous No.13250878]

>>13250681
>If Sascha wanted to exit scam, why would he slow exit with 30k a week? Let's say he's dumping straight for the next year, that's approximately 1.5 million, which is not exactly a fuckton a money. And even if he made off with that, there are greater than 1 partnership official partnership he has so he would be destroying his career regardless.
Sascha is the #1 boss now. He has his own personal project going, which is financed by people like you. I'm sure they didn't set out to scam from the start, it only happens they can't accomplish what they want. They keep stringing everyone along so they can have more time to figure out how to get this shit off the ground. Did you know they changed the development team back in November? Yet they had half a billion dollars tokenized by then.

>The pic you mention with this misleading numbers, figures, Stats, etc. is endemic to all crypto.
Sascha said they're trying to distance themselves from the crypto community for this very reason. That they are trying to appeal to small to medium sized businesses and don't want to deal with the hype and false promises that come with crypto projects. So, there, we have unraveled another lie that I did not even consider until typing this. Answer this one: Is it okay for a business to lie about the number of clients, figures, and investments they have when their biggest draw is supposedly ensuring everything stays 100% legally compliant?

>My point is, if these stats are the reason you think CHX is a scam, then you should not invest anything in crypto at all.
I wouldn't care about OWN being a scam and involved in embezzlement and ties with the mafia, if the price was reaching the stars.

>Personally, I think CHX has some problems but has the least bullshit to deal with.
Sounds like something a battered wife stuck in a toxic marriage would say. Why hodl instead of taking profits and putting your money to work? Do you honestly believe this project is going to be $100 by 2020?

[Anonymous No.13250887]

>>13250830
>Or the latest scam of promising 48% annual returns. That is all Bitconnect level stuff.
This is also crucial.

[Anonymous No.13250905]

>>13250319
>That's on the home page. 484 businesses trust OWN
Where is this on the homepage? Do show us.
>And the dumping can also be verified
shut up idiot, selling tokens to fund development is the norm in this space. And it's not 'dumping', OWN is still up over the past 1-2 months. You cant say something is 'dumping' when it's green faggot lol but keep trying. Your emotional boy pussy crying is pure entertainment to all of us.

[Anonymous No.13250917]

>>13250905
You honestly sound desperate, your only argument is basically that OWN is still up over the past 1-2 months.

[Anonymous No.13250941]

>>13250917
Bro my argument is that you haven't proven anything. You have screenshots of shit that isn't even there. You claim their homepage has the image you posted, SO WHERE IS IT? I'm on the fuckin homepage now and it's not there. You won't find it becuase YOUR FULL OF SHIT. It may have been there a long time ago but for you to say its on the homepage now is just a pure lie and if your gonna lie about some bullshit like that hten you'll lie about all the other bullshit you keep dribbling.

But keep wasting your time. It's entertaining watching a loser cry about a crypto project on the internet and just dribble out lies. Like don't you have something better to do with yourself? I feel sorry for you man.

[Anonymous No.13250946]

>>13250905
>Where is this on the homepage? Do show us.
https://dsr.weown.com/

Thanks for bumping the thread to the top so more anons see the facts.

[Anonymous No.13250973]

This is the most desperate I've seen the CHX fudders so I'm feeling bullish for next week boys

[Anonymous No.13250974]

>>13250941
Also for anyone else reading this thread, note that this pajeet doesn't even understand the concept of IDs and how he's not talking with the same anon. This is who you're investing along with. Perhaps it's a reverse fud? It's for you to decide.

[Anonymous No.13250977]

>>13250941
I'm not the one who posted the screenshot. And as far as I know it was not taken today but when the DSR first launched a while ago. Chill man, again you're sounding really emotional, if own is a sound investment I don't know why you're behaving this way

[Anonymous No.13251012]

>>13250977
>And as far as I know it was not taken today but when the DSR first launched a while ago.
I took those screenshots minutes before posting it tonight. Check the link >>13250946 and see for yourself.

[Anonymous No.13251023]

>>13251012
Yeah sorry just noticed you replied

[Anonymous No.13251195]

This thread is still going on?? Holy fuck one of the most bullish signals I’ve ever seen

[Anonymous No.13251204]

>>13250830

Tezos is CURRENTLY involved in class action lawsuits. so please stfu. It has plenty of skeletons, was shitted on all throughout 2018 and is a top 20 coin. Not gonna continue this part since I don't care. If you didn't get that I actually like Tezos despite this, you missed the entire point.


>>13250878

>They keep stringing everyone along

Evidence of continually stringing people along? Again, every crypto does this. The difference here is, while there was SOME of that here, certain milestones WERE objectively met:

1) FAST platform
2) Mainnet

Some here will debate #2) but here it is: https://wallet.weown.com/validatorInfo

>Answer this one: Is it okay for a business to lie about the number of clients, figures, and investments they have when their biggest draw is supposedly ensuring everything stays 100% legally compliant?

It is not okay, but you can still be legally complaint. You are conflating compliance with inaccurate data. They are absolutely following the regulatory framework needed to be 100 % complaint. Having inaccurate data doesn't mean they are not in compliance. Also, not all of the fud attempts here are accurate either:
1). CHX is not an STO.
2)It is not a security.
3) It has definite, verifiable, actionable partnerships for it's use case.

>I wouldn't care about OWN being a scam and involved in embezzlement and ties with the mafia, if the price was reaching the stars.
Mainnet was a week ago, bitmax was yesterday. So Sell now and buy back when you see the uptrend. No one is stopping you. HODL is a meme.

>Sounds like something a battered wife stuck in a toxic marriage would say. Why hodl instead of taking profits and putting your money to work? Do you honestly believe this project is going to be $100 by 2020?
I don't have stockholm sydrome, I just know what's bullshit and what isn't. This thing is worth every damn satoshi. ETH was fudded on here forever, and still is. And yet, those who bought then, don't care.

[Anonymous No.13251293]

>>13251204
>Tezos is CURRENTLY involved in class action lawsuits.
This is normal for large companies. It doesn't mean shit, and has fuck all to do with CHX other than a pathetic attempt at deflection. Having fake client numbers on your website on the other hand is not normal. Neither is offering 48% annual returns. Last time I heard of something that brazen was Bernie Madoff.

[Anonymous No.13251436]

>>13251293

Tezos was fudded:

1) because of Tezos foundation and the whole way the ICO was set up

2) How the project was run - mainnet taking forever

3) Infighting (Arthur)

There are many more but this is not the point of this discussion.

>Having fake client numbers on your website on the other hand is not normal. Neither is offering 48% annual returns. Last time I heard of something that brazen was Bernie Madoff.
So you are comparing CHX to a global ponzi scheme now?

[Anonymous No.13251440]

>>13251195
>This thread is still going on?? Holy fuck one of the most bullish signals I’ve ever seen
It's more like an autistic signal really.

>>13251204
>Having inaccurate data doesn't mean they are not in compliance.
I disagree with the spin that it's "inaccurate" when it's intentionally misleading. If a business just found out about OWN, had a phone conversation with them when booking a demo and asked about those numbers, do you think they would tell them they are inaccurate? Probably not. If they did: "Yes, the numbers are outdated. they're even higher! Let me tell you about our new partnership..." It's shady.

I already sold all of my CHX. Not at a profit, but got even with ETH rising to $170 (Bought them at $110). Will I rebuy? Highly unlikely, unless they announce some solid heavy-hitter partnerships. I want Dunkin' Donuts or Pizza Hut not Mister Gunter's Bodega & Hotdogs on the corner of their OWN office when they're talking about a fast food chain. I'm not going to hodl along the way to find out what happens, when I know the price will keep dumping, but I will keep following the project.

[Anonymous No.13251467]

>>13251440
>Dunkin' Donuts

Smallest of the 3

[Anonymous No.13251518]

>>13251440

nothing really more to say here. Since you already sold and think it will keep dumping, CHX will bury itself according to you. No need for further fud.
See you on the other side!!

[Anonymous No.13251542]

>>13251518
>Please keep quiet while we and our pajeet shill army spam /biz/ to rip off gullible anons with our ponzi scheme.
No. Fuck you.

[Anonymous No.13251667]

>>13251467
You wish. What's the other two? Nestle and Pepsi?

>>13251518
I'm going to be in every single OWN thread that I see in the hopes that I prevent at least one anon from getting scammed and Sascha gets one step closer to going back to his janitorial duty at Computershare.

[Anonymous No.13251939]

insider here.

i posted this before maybe a month ago. but we have a B tier Japanese automobile manufacturer onboard. they're the biggest we've got.

[Anonymous No.13252038]

>>13251939
Care to elaborate?

[Anonymous No.13252051]

>>13251939
>they're the biggest we've got.
big if true.

[Anonymous No.13252242]

>>13251939
I remember this anon. This was posted once before. Have a hard time believing though.

[Anonymous No.13252399]

>>13252242
Haven't seen it before. Thanks for pointing that out, anon.

[Anonymous No.13252593]

>>13251939
Yes remember seeing this, but lets wait for some verification as rumours that don't come to fruition just feeds these fudders.

[Anonymous No.13253130]

>>13251667
>>13251542

OK gents. Then I will be in every single thread to counter your claims.

>>13251542
When it moons again, I'll post this screencap for your faggot ass.

>I'm going to be in every single OWN thread that I see in the hopes that I prevent at least one anon from getting scammed

I totally believe you. Can you help me with my 401k too?

[Anonymous No.13253471]

>>13251667
>I'm going to be in every single OWN thread that I see in the hopes that I prevent at least one anon from getting scammed and Sascha gets one step closer to going back to his janitorial duty at Computershare.
thanks for exposing chx as a scam. you were the only person to raise all these concerns while the price was going up. i ignored them at first, but when the price was going down i looked into what you said and they are indeed legitimate concerns.

[Anonymous No.13253481]

Fake scam

[Anonymous No.13253484]

i was the main shiller of chx btw. i accounted for 90% of the posts.

[Anonymous No.13253569]

What the fuck am I supposed to believe now after reading this thread? Everyone is throwing their own shit left and right. I'm on the verge of selling my chx.

[Anonymous No.13253580]

>>13253569
Why the fuck are there actual people here exposing scams? Does that actually fucking happen on /biz/?

[Anonymous No.13253634]

>>13253580
>Why the fuck are there actual people here exposing scams? Does that actually fucking happen on /biz/?
human nature. if i see a scam i warn people. if i see something that will make me money i buy it and tell other people to buy it.

[Anonymous No.13253658]

>>13253569
You still don't get how it works here huh? Let me try to enlighten.
A PnD group shilled CHX back in Nov.
They sold and moved on.
The price went up (like a lot) after they sold.They were not happy of course.
They are currently shilling FTM.
Soon they will dump FTM and move on again. Not that there's anything wrong with FTM but because this is how they make money. Meanwhile some of them will throw fud at CHX in the hope that you sell and buy the current bag instead, which is currently in FOMO phase.
If their fud is effective and they can force the price down, they might buy back into CHX and laugh at all of you that sold.
Sell if you want too. It won't make any difference long term.
If CHX deliver in the next 3 months, this fud will be forgotten, if they don't then the price won't need fud.

[Anonymous No.13253659]

>>13253634
Or you want to buy lower. Or you sold and are salty. Or you're a paid fudder.

[Anonymous No.13254480]

>>13253658
Unitonically the truth

[Anonymous No.13254496]

>>13253580
>>13253659
>Why the fuck are there actual people here exposing scams? Does that actually fucking happen on /biz/?
I expose/question scams and liars all the time, including on Reddit. Do you think /biz/ is all that unique just because I'm not getting paid in upvotes?

[Anonymous No.13254504]

>>>13253580
>>Why the fuck are there actual people here exposing scams? Does that actually fucking happen on /biz/?
Yes

[Anonymous No.13254517]

>>13254496
yeah right, larper.. prove it: at what time does the narwhal bacon?

[Anonymous No.13254618]

>>13254517
Do you have stairs in your house?

[Anonymous No.13254813]

>>13254496
Oh please. Get over yourself.

[Anonymous No.13255210]

Muahahaha which ever side is right..... The salt levels will be yuge

[Anonymous No.13255833]

>>13255210
It’s a no brainer which side is right, if you’re gullible enough to believe that the team is “dumping” (aka paying contractors) and that Sascha was a fucking janitor and that the rise of Chx was the result of one single shilling retard who’s now balls deep in ftm after having sold CHX too low. You deserve to miss out on this. Idk how there’s an argument against Chx at this point. The success of this coin will make a lot of people very rich and a lot of others very salty indeed

[Anonymous No.13255955]

>>13253658
>You still don't get how it works here huh? Let me try to enlighten.
>A PnD group shilled CHX back in Nov.
>They sold and moved on.
>The price went up (like a lot) after they sold.They were not happy of course.
>They are currently shilling FTM.
>Soon they will dump FTM and move on again. Not that there's anything wrong with FTM but because this is how they make money. Meanwhile some of them will throw fud at CHX in the hope that you sell and buy the current bag instead, which is currently in FOMO phase.
>If their fud is effective and they can force the price down, they might buy back into CHX and laugh at all of you that sold.
>Sell if you want too. It won't make any difference long term.
>If CHX deliver in the next 3 months, this fud will be forgotten, if they don't then the price won't need fud.
an anon and a pajeet twitter pnd group shilled chx from 1m to 5m in 2 weeks.. they stopped. i bought in and shilled it all by myself on biz and twitter for 4-5 months from 5m to 25m. i sold at 20m. i bought fantom and made a 2+x. i sold 80% of fantom today and leaving the rest to ride. i'm looking for something else to buy. i'm not buying chx. it's dead

[Anonymous No.13256010]

If you buy CHX you get a guaranteed 48% yearly return plus however much the coin goes up. It is the best investment since Bitconnect, maybe even since Madoff Capital. Why are people still fudding this? Sasha says they aren’t dumping and their website says they have hundreds of clients. Case closed.

[Anonymous No.13256054]

>>13255955
>>13256010
The price is moving the opposite direction that you want it to go just fyi, you guys are the little fudders that couldn't. Keep it up and we’ll be at $1 in no time

[Anonymous No.13256080]

>the big fast food chain never emerged
>the testnet data was all fake, the mystery clients "under NDA" never materialized
Looks bleak for CHX. Next try: RTE.

[Anonymous No.13256122]

>>13256054

[Anonymous No.13256140]

>>13256010
>If you buy CHX you get a guaranteed 48% yearly return plus however much the coin goes up. It is the best investment since Bitconnect, maybe even since Madoff Capital. Why are people still fudding this? Sasha says they aren’t dumping and their website says they have hundreds of clients. Case closed.
i sold my ftm on bitmax. when i tried to withdraw my eth it said "pending review" (im fully verified btw). i had to message them on telegram. the exchange is obviously insolvent/ponzi. never using that exchange again

[Anonymous No.13256141]

>>13256122
Try zooming out you absolute mong. I’m in since 8c

[Anonymous No.13256177]

Ghost we know it's you fudding dude. And we know you deny it. Stop being so salty and grow up.

[Anonymous No.13256185]

moving most of my funds to binance and going in tether while i do research

not buying chx for a long long time. it's dead. no hype, no volume, devs credibility dead

[Anonymous No.13256350]

>>13256185
nobody cares dude

[Anonymous No.13256595]

>>13255833
>if you’re gullible enough to believe that the team is “dumping” (aka paying contractors)
Almost a million tokens were moved from the main wallet this week. Nice try though.

[Anonymous No.13256733]

>>13256595

They were moved to BitMax's wallet you absolute imbecile. Keep trying though.

[Anonymous No.13256799]

>>13256733
That's exactly how you dump coins you fucking idiot.

[Anonymous No.13256844]

>>13256799

Yeah they are going to dump a million tokens? all of it? Based on what objective evidence??

ARE YOU FUCKING BRAINDEAD

SHUT

THE

FUCK

UP

[Anonymous No.13256872]

>>13256799

Hey guys I'm gonna make a project, but you know what ?

Before it gets going and one week into mainnet I'm gonna
dump a million tokens because of reasons.

I ScAm sO wELLLLL

[Anonymous No.13256890]

>>13256844
How do you think BitMax is able to give away 1,500,000 CHX just for holding with them for three months? And an additional 100,000 CHX to the top 2000 owners.

[Anonymous No.13256942]

>>13256890

Ghost,

How is that the same thing as dumping??

[Anonymous No.13256973]

>>13256942
How do you think BitMax is able to give away 1,500,000 CHX just for holding with them for three months? Explain it.

[Anonymous No.13257036]

>>13256973

That is not the definition of dumping at all. That's the explanation, simply as that. They are transferring the tokens for a trading promo.

You don't even know what you are arguing now.

[Anonymous No.13257057]

>>13257036

Exactly, thanks anon.

[Anonymous No.13257195]

>>13257036
You still haven't answered the question. Do you think OWN gave BitMax $200,000 worth of CHX only for funsies?

[Anonymous No.13257247]

>>13257195

Explain it. You and the other Anon made the claim they were dumping. The burden of proof is on you.

[Anonymous No.13257262]

>>13257247
>Explain it. You and the other Anon made the claim they were dumping. The burden of proof is on you.
look at the smart contract. own have been selling chx every few days for the last 5 months

[Anonymous No.13257366]

>>13257262

This has been discussed many times.

[Anonymous No.13257409]

>>13257247
I never once claimed they were "by definition" dumping with the BitMax transfer. I did however say they were constantly dumping at least 90,000 CHX on IDEX by market selling every week for months, which you can clearly confirm by checking their wallet.

>>13257366
You're right. OWN is an honest, transparent company that would admit to dumping when called out on it.

[Anonymous No.13257413]

>>13257247
>The burden of proof is on you.
Get the fuck out of here with this shit you moron. Tokens controlled by the team have been moving to exchanges for months now. This week alone the circulating supply went up by about 1%. Whether you call that dumping or paying their salary or "promotion" or whatever retarded cope you come up with makes no difference to the price.

[Anonymous No.13257436]

>>13257366
Yeah I'm going to just take the word of a bunch of lying dipshits who haven't mastered the arcane art of there vs. their.

[Anonymous No.13257515]

>>13255955
well...truth is. you didn't shill it all by yourself.. i was shilling this on biz from 7-8c but you believe what you want, I don't care as its not important

[Anonymous No.13257550]

>>13257515
>well...truth is. you didn't shill it all by yourself.. i was shilling this on biz from 7-8c but you believe what you want, I don't care as its not important
80% of chx posts were made by me.. same as fantom

[Anonymous No.13257715]

>>13257550
So why did you sell FTM?

[Anonymous No.13257865]

>>13256177
Idk what idiot admin you are, but I'm not the one fudding. I never sold any of my Chx. Why are u faggots so obsessed with me? Lmao

[Anonymous No.13257952]

>>13257715
Might have something to do with this... this is the change in value of the top FTM whale accounts.

[Anonymous No.13257976]

Now compare above to CHX.

[Anonymous No.13258349]

>>13257195
> when people actually think OWN would put on an elaborate scam for like 1m total when in reality the project (upon success) would be worth billions
Holy shit you guys are actually retarded

[Anonymous No.13258410]

>>13258349
Yea it really doesn't make sense when you look at it that way. They have about 20 team members. That is literally no $ compared to costing them their careers.

[Anonymous No.13258436]

>>13257976
That's interesting and good to see. How did you create the data?

[Anonymous No.13258668]

>>13257976
>Now compare above to CHX.
rule 1. if the founders are dumping their shares in their company don't invest

[Anonymous No.13258741]

>>13254496
>R*edit
You have to go back.

[Anonymous No.13258926]

How much to make it? 10k?

[Anonymous No.13259217]

>>13258349
The retardation is the mindset of poor people who have no idea how to make money. The same people use see at Occupy Wallstreet bitching about the 1% instead of learning how to be like them...

[Anonymous No.13259274]

>>13258349
Scam implies it’s intentionally malicious. OWN is merely incompetent and over-promises without delivering, while along the way constantly embellishing or down right lying about their current success. They want to be the Amazon or Spotify of STOs. Just like how hundreds of websites and apps that pop up every single year want to be the next Facebook, Tinder, or Angry Birds. Hopium.

[Anonymous No.13259555]

reminder: chx was sub 1 million marketcap only a few months ago. it was pumped and dumped (by me and with the help of the misleading devs). the devs are dumping it back down to where it was. they need the money.

[Anonymous No.13259824]

>>13259555
>reminder: chx was sub 1 million marketcap only a few months ago. it was pumped and dumped (by me and with the help of the misleading devs).
no that was me.. i made 90% of the original shill posts sub 1 mil mc and then fudded it hard and bought in lower.

[Anonymous No.13259902]

>>13251293
>This is normal for large companies. It doesn't mean shit
Hahahah! This is very very bad.
T. involved in a class action lawsuit against a major company that will result in a payout of upwards of a $billion. It has already forked out billions in other countries.
CHX is excellent and is worth watching for the next few weeks. Don't sell to these idiot spammers.

[Anonymous No.13260397]

>>13259902
>>This is normal for large companies. It doesn't mean shit
>Hahahah! This is very very bad.
>T. involved in a class action lawsuit against a major company that will result in a payout of upwards of a $billion. It has already forked out billions in other countries.
>CHX is excellent and is worth watching for the next few weeks. Don't sell to these idiot spammers.

everything is pumping except chx... because devs are dumping

[Anonymous No.13260584]

>>13259274
lmfao, your argument is pathetic at this point, just give it up. I have no idea how someone can type so much and have it make so little sense. Biz really has the worst scum of the earth occupying it

[Anonymous No.13260652]

>>13260584
If that didn’t make any sense to you, you might be retarded. But I’m here to help out the unfortunate, fortunately for you. CHX = poo poo

[Anonymous No.13261482]

>>13257865
Ghost what’s good bro I’m a young buck like your self. Ignore these fags we gonna make it

[Anonymous No.13261621]

>>13261482
Thx bro, I'm really hoping we get some actual STOs soon and not just hype.

[Anonymous No.13262213]

>>13261621
Same man. The next 2 months should be interesting