/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.13192960]

FUCK YOU STUPID SCAMMING COCKSUCKER, YOU TOLD ME EVERYTHING WAS GOING TO 0, AND BSV WOULD BE THE ONLY ONE LEFT

HOW THE FUCK COULD I BE SO STUPID AND FALL FOR THIS SCAM FOR NIGGERS , OH LORD

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13192997]

>>13192960
...

[Anonymous No.13193019]

>>13192960

You bought the bags I sold. Thank you come again (in pajeet voice)

[Anonymous No.13193029]

>>13192960
You have no technical knowledge, that's the only explanation for why you thought Craig Wright was anything more than a con artist.

I'm not being ironic or memeing, you genuinely fell for a scam. You can do whatever you want, I don't give a shit, but learn what the fuck technologies you're investing in

Unfortunately you need at least a Bachelor's in CS to fully understand how Bitcoin works so this minimal requirement is unmet by almost everyone on /biz/ and instead it's a bunch of "investors" and "traders" discussing crypto instead of software engineers

There is only one Bitcoin - the longest Proof of Work chain. It's in the fucking abstract of the whitepaper that you never read:

https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

>Abstract. A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online
payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a
financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main
benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending.
We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network.
The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of
hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing
the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of
events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As
long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to
attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The
network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort
basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest
proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.

[Anonymous No.13193122]

>>13192960
Only actual pajeets believe him

[Anonymous No.13193146]

Why do normies have a hard time identifying cons? One look at the inbred mug and you can tell he’s a pathological liar.

[Anonymous No.13193168]

Look into self love deficit disorder, it makes you fall for these sort of conmen.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13193241]

>>13193029
>Unfortunately you need at least a Bachelor's in CS to fully understand how Bitcoin works
nah, most that do a bsc on cs don't get bitcoin and plenty of people do that have no degree whatsoever. for example creg clearly has no clue what makes bitcoin bitcoin. he is so high on capitalism and patents he just can't comprehend what consensus means.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13193273]

>>13193168
i have a different theory, some people have logical intelligence some have emotional intelligence the later find creg very convincing the former just can't understand how would anyone fall for this madman. different brain wirings are responsible for this. creg makes no sound logical arguments (at least very rarely) but plenty of emotional appeals. people who are empathizing and people who have abandonment issues and don't want satoshi gone think they are some sort of special chosen people who understand creg while the rest of the retarded world just don't get him.

creg is a conman a master manipulator even tone vays who is absolutely fascist about shitcoins like bcash was charmed by him by his own admission when they met.

[Anonymous No.13193330]

>>13193029
> you need a degree in X to understand how Y works
brainlet.jpg

[Anonymous No.13193344]

>>13192960
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIh3SgIAP80

[Anonymous No.13193347]

>>13193330
>Not understanding that by "degree in X" people typically mean "equivalent knowledge of the topics typically taught in degree X"

Neck yerself trader, or give a description of the bitcoin protocol in detail to regain your dignity. I know you won't.

[Anonymous No.13193352]

>>13193273
>some have emotional intelligence
>find creg very convincing
Your theory has some holes

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13193437]

>>13193352
go on! what holes are you referring to?

[Anonymous No.13193453]

>>13193347
I got PhD and fuckload of publications.
Absolutely depressing path if you seek any knowledge. Academia is for incompetent nepotists and paper pushers.

[Anonymous No.13193486]

>>13192960
BITCONNNNNEEEECT!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13193498]

>>13193352
if you look at his works, he is not awfully successful on social media he is a controversial figure but pewdie pie beats the living shit out of him and he is an absolute brainlet. now personally he convinced a great deal of people he met he is satoj and these people usually are women and homosexuals exactly the type of people you expect to have developed emotional intelligence, while most actual geeks and people with technical knowledge (even cashies now) regard him as a fake and a fraud. to me the pattern is clear.

[Anonymous No.13193505]

>>13193437
>>13193498
Perhaps I object more to the term “emotional intelligence” than the theory itself

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13193562]

>>13193505
yeah some people think intelligence is all about iq, but the truth of it there is many aspects to it iq is but a small part mainly well developed pattern recognition and memory. iq for example has absolutely no correlation to creativity which is the other great aspect of intelligence.
it's a well documented thing thing people with developed emotional intelligence are more intuitive they absolutely thrive in social situations the problem is when they apply the emotional decision making process to the work of one like creg who is a pychopath very versed in manipulating the feels people they get rekt. there is no way out of it. especially if he can lay down the ground work.

[Anonymous No.13193564]

>>13193498
Wouldn't high emotional intelligence imply people seeing through his shit? I know someone with a CS degree who falls for every pajeet scam incl bsv, and I'd wouldn't describe him as emotionally intelligent. I'm more inclined to believe that people who lack any kind of intelligence or have some kind of disorder are to follow satoj.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13193590]

>>13193564
>Wouldn't high emotional intelligence imply people seeing through his shit?
as far as i can tell eventually they do. but first impressions he always sweeps them off their feet. even if they feel something is amiss their preconceptions about satoshi being some mad genius and definitely a weirdo (total bullshit if you ask me) makes them hesitant to dismiss him.

people with actual technical knowledge know satoshi just put the lego pieces together. meticulously. he had more dogged determination and endurance than flare. he was definitely good at crypto math and a decent enough coder, but he was no genius. everything was laid down for him even the idea was not new. his contribution as far as i can tell was the exact consensus mechanism and incentives system.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13193598]

>>13193564
>I'm more inclined to believe that people who lack any kind of intelligence or have some kind of disorder are to follow satoj.
easy enough theory, but then how do you explain people like gavin andersen?

[Anonymous No.13193636]

>>13193590
Still not buying it. Someone with EQ is supposed to understand satoj and why people call him out on his bullshit, you said it yourself that he gets shit on on Twitter so resistance is plain to see. Whoever falls for this likes the underdog. Only the inexperienced and the idiotic invest in the underdog. There's nothing else to it.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13193660]

>>13193636
like i said he is better at a personal level, his ""charms"" don't really seem to work online. if you mean by that his followers around here then i agree. but still these people are more emotional in their decision making than logical that much stands.

[Anonymous No.13193668]

>>13192960
you actaully believed brenton an aussie criminal?

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13194026]

weather is nice
btc is going up
creg is getting shat on
life is good

[Anonymous No.13194092]

>>13193273
>people who have emotional intelligence find craig very convincing
The very opposite. These are exactly the subjects that the EQ theory describes as people who are badly lacking in their cognitive developmnent and ability to process intrernal emotional states.

[Anonymous No.13194131]

>>13193562
You just idealize the word intelligence into something it isn't. Emotional intelligence isn't intelligence, it is something else than intelligence.
When one refers to intelligence, it is invariably IQ - there is no other. If you wish to define "Intelligence" in clear terms, please do so.
Also, intelligent people don't need to be creative. They can be obedient little slaves who do their work very efficiently.

[Anonymous No.13194137]

>>13194131
Intelligence literally means understanding

[Anonymous No.13194153]

>>13194137
Who cares about the literal meaning of the word? The word "penis" means "tail" in latin last I remember. The current understanding of the word Intelligence is "IQ". All the people who don't accept it, idealize the concept because being intelligent is what constitutes 100% of their identity.

[Anonymous No.13194169]

>>13193029
>Bachelor's in CS
No anon. CE is what people need: bitcoin is defined by its code

[Anonymous No.13194180]

>>13193273
People who are taken in by Craig lack both kinds of intelligence.<div class="like-perk-cnt"><img alt="" width="60" height="60" src="//s.4cdn.org/image/ba.gif"></div>

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13194190]

>>13194092
according to some people being self aware and in control of your emotions is part of emotional intelligence. i can't see how that is relevant. plenty of people with almost zero emotional intelligence are in fine control of their emotions and can dissect them at will.

but what i was talking about is people who are emotional in their decision making. the feels crowd you know... i have looked at a lot of claims creg made and i can't for the life of me see how anyone would see them logical. it seems he is making jumps in logic tied to talking about his "feels" pretty consistently and people who are empathizing will just see this as being truthful if awkward. while the rest of us see a fucking scammer and a bad one at that.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13194197]

>>13194131
>When one refers to intelligence, it is invariably IQ - there is no other.
there are shitloads of studies and articles to the contrary m8 just use google!

[Anonymous No.13194211]

>>13194190
What do you mean by "logic"? Logic is a mathematical subject with absolutely no translation to real life, which is never certain and perfectly predictable.

[Anonymous No.13194216]

>>13194153
>Who cares about the literal meaning of the word
I

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13194228]

>>13194211
>Logic is a mathematical subject with absolutely no translation to real life
wat?

[Anonymous No.13194231]

>>13194216
So the thing you have between your legs is a literal tail and not a reproductive organ, according to the literal meaning of the word "penis"? Are you a reptile?

[Anonymous No.13194258]

>>13194231
No because intelligence is an abstract concept whereas “penis” is a metaphor

[Anonymous No.13194281]

>>13194258
>metaphor
What makes the word "intelligence" meant as "understanding" not a metaphor? Because it isn't blatant?

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13194287]

>>13194228
btw by that pic my musical intelligence is 0 or negative score if there is such a thing, interpersonal and linguistic also very low, spatial cognition and body kinesthetics excellent, logical reasoning pretty well developed.

but there are other types of people, who have their logical reasoning ability stunted but well developed interpersonal intelligence i believe those are the natural marks for conmen. the myth about people being able to detect an accomplished liars deceit have been pretty thoroughly dismissed by studies. i bet your ass creg is not an average psychopath given his success. but sure some people would pick up something eventually and alarms would go off in his head but by that time creg made them invested in him so much it's hard to break away. if you read the story of bitcoin belle you know what i'm talking about.

[Anonymous No.13194296]

>>13194228
"Logic" is about binary arithmetic and resoning last I remember. TRUE and FALSE => FALSE, and similar. If you think otherwise, please define it besides using your "gut feeling" for it.

[Anonymous No.13194315]

>>13194287
>musical intelligence
lel. Pure cope territory for brainlets who somehow are skilled at music.
It's musical talent which CAN correlate with intelligence, but doesn't have to.

[Anonymous No.13194319]

>>13194153
No the word "penis" means "penis" in Latin. Same with "vagina"

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13194359]

>>13194315
to me music is just noise irritates me but your definition of intelligence is too narrow>>13194319

[Anonymous No.13194361]

>>13194319
have some Spotted Dick for your troubles.

[Anonymous No.13194366]

>>13192997<div class="like-perk-cnt">&#x2668;&#xFE0F;</div>

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13194371]

>>13194296
binary logic is a subset of algebra what do you think about fuzzy logic?

[Anonymous No.13194379]

>>13194153
>dunning-kruger
>"arguing" semantics
>mfw

[Anonymous No.13194381]

>>13194359
>your definition of intelligence is too narrow
Why? What lies by the nebulous concept YOU understand as "intelligence"? Please make sure not to tangle it with characteristics that you secretly hope you have for extra COPEy flavor.

[Anonymous No.13194397]

>>13194379
>dunning-kruger
people who use the term in discussions are without an exception oblivious projectors. You just confirm the rule.

[Anonymous [O1G] No.13194435]

>>13194381
im actually high iq and telling you that you are wrong and all you need is a cursory search on the subject to see why

[Anonymous No.13194438]

satoj is alright

[Anonymous No.13194690]

>>13192997
>>13193241
>>13193273
>>13193437
>>13193498
>>13193562
>>13193590
>>13193598
>>13193660
>>13194026
>>13194190
>>13194197
>>13194228
>>13194287
>14 posts by this id
jesus christ mate, could you be more cringe if you tried? This is just sad.

P.S. you're on 4chan. Namefags are called namefags for a reason

[BSV will win No.13194887]

>>13192960
Relax brother, it takes time. Can't expect legacy bitcoin to go to zero in such a short time, there's a lot of misinformed people out there.

[Anonymous No.13195076]

Craig Fake-toshi Wright. He claimed to be Satoshi, but couldn't move the coins. Into the trash he goes. Not sure how anons get/got fooled by this faggot. Other than maybe sheer greed and wishful thinking.

[Anonymous No.13195615]

>>13192960
Www.yourube.com/youre-a-mark/getREKT.bmp

[Anonymous No.13195633]

>>13192960
wine he drank was actually shit

[Anonymous No.13196079]

>>13193168
Wew this really made me think

[Anonymous No.13196111]

he's just using "outlier" tactics to appeal to people that want to feel different or special. "hey, no one believes this so imagine how smart you'll feel if you're the only one that believes it"

to those anons I'd say, "hey, most people also don't believe in unicorns, you'd be among the very few ones, the chosen ones, the elite"

[Sergey Nazarov No.13196123]

>>13192960
Look, never trust homosexuals, niggers, chinks or pajeets and you'll have a successful life. Look at me for example.